You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

ASCENIV Drug Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Tradename: ASCENIV
High Confidence Patents:0
Applicants:1
BLAs:1
Pharmacology for ASCENIV
Mechanism of ActionAntigen Neutralization
Physiological EffectPassively Acquired Immunity
Established Pharmacologic ClassHuman Immunoglobulin G
Chemical StructureImmunoglobulins
Note on Biologic Patents

Matching patents to biologic drugs is far more complicated than for small-molecule drugs.

DrugPatentWatch employs three methods to identify biologic patents:

  1. Brand-side disclosures in response to biosimilar applications
  2. These patents were identified from disclosures by the brand-side company, in response to a potential biosimilar seeking to launch. They have a high certainty of blocking biosimilar entry. The expiration dates listed are not estimates — they're expiration dates as indicated by the brand-side company.

  3. DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
  4. These patents were identified from searching various sources, including drug labels and other general disclosures from the brand-side company. This list may exclude some of the patents which block biosimilar launch, and some of these patents listed may not actually block biosimilar launch. The expiration dates listed for these patents are estimates, based on the grant date of the patent.

  5. Patents from broad patent text search
  6. For completeness, these patents were identified by searching the patent literature for mentions of the branded or ingredient name of the drug. Some of these patents protect the original drug, whereas others may protect follow-on inventions or even inventions casually mentioning the drug. The expiration dates listed for these patents are estimates, based on the grant date of the patent.

1) High Certainty: US Patents for ASCENIV Derived from Brand-Side Litigation

No patents found based on brand-side litigation

2) High Certainty: US Patents for ASCENIV Derived from DrugPatentWatch Analysis and Company Disclosures

No patents found based on company disclosures

3) Low Certainty: US Patents for ASCENIV Derived from Patent Text Search

These patents were obtained by searching patent claims

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for the Biologic Drug: ASCENIV

Last updated: September 23, 2025

Introduction

ASCENIV (immune globulin subcutaneous, human – normalized IVIG [intravenous immunoglobulin]) is a licensed biologic therapy developed by ADMA Biologics. Approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in July 2019 for primary humoral immunodeficiency (PI), ASCENIV addresses a niche within immunoglobulin replacement therapies. Its unique formulation, enriched with stabilized IgG and anti-inflammatory factors, positions it as a preferred option for certain patient populations. As a biologic, ASCENIV's market profile reflects the broader trends influencing the immunoglobulin landscape, including rising demand, competitive dynamics, regulatory factors, and evolving reimbursement policies.

This analysis examines the current market environment of ASCENIV, projects its financial trajectory, and considers strategic factors shaping its commercial prospects.

Market Landscape for Immunoglobulin Replacement Therapy

Growing Prevalence of Immunodeficiency Conditions

The global prevalence of primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDs) is estimated at roughly 1 in 1,200 to 2,000 live births, amounting to hundreds of thousands of diagnosed patients worldwide, with additional cases undiagnosed or misdiagnosed [1]. The U.S., in particular, reflects increasing diagnosis rates, driven by improved awareness and advanced diagnostic techniques. The rising patient pool fuels demand for immunoglobulin therapies, including IVIG and subcutaneous routes.

Shift from IVIG to Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin (SCIG)

Traditionally administered intravenously, immunoglobulin therapy increasingly shifts toward subcutaneous formulations such as ASCENIV, driven by patient convenience, reduced infusion-related adverse effects, and enhanced quality of life. This transition amplifies the market's growth potential, especially as new formulations demonstrate improved efficacy and tolerability.

Biologic Competition and Differentiation

ASCENIV distinguishes itself with enhanced stability and anti-inflammatory properties, claimed advantages over standard IVIG and other SCIG products. Competitors include established brands like Gammagard, Privigen, and Hizentra from CSL Behring, Takeda, and CSL Plasma, respectively. The competitive landscape is characterized by:

  • Generic and biosimilar threats that may erode pricing power.
  • Innovative treatment options in pipeline applications (e.g., enzyme replacement therapies), which could impact market share.

Regulatory and Reimbursement Factors

Regulatory pathways for biologics like ASCENIV are complex, requiring persistent engagement with agencies such as the FDA and EMA. Reimbursement policies, especially post-healthcare reforms, influence patient access and pricing strategies. As ASCENIV is a specialized product, market penetration depends critically on payer acceptance and formulary placements.

Market Dynamics Influencing ASCENIV’s Growth

Clinical Advantages and Patient Preference

ASCENIV’s formulation aims for better tolerability, especially among patients with antibody deficiencies who respond poorly to other immunoglobulin preparations. Its potential for fewer infusion reactions and improved stability can foster higher adoption rates among clinicians, promoting organic growth.

Manufacturing Capacity and Supply Chain Considerations

As a biologic, ASCENIV’s supply security hinges on manufacturing scalability and robust supply chains. Any disruptions could impact availability, affecting market penetration and revenue streams.

Pricing Strategies and Market Penetration

The product’s premium positioning, justified by its clinical benefits, appreciates its place within a higher-price segment of immunoglobulin therapies. Payer negotiations and copayment assistance programs influence overall revenue and patient access.

Emerging Competitors and Pipeline Products

Biologic innovators and biosimilars threaten to compress margins and challenge market share. Companies investing in targeted immunoglobulin therapies or alternative treatment modalities could alter the competitive landscape.

Financial Trajectory of ASCENIV

Revenue Drivers and Forecasting Models

  • Market Penetration: Given its niche indication, ASCENIV is poised for gradual expansion driven by increasing diagnosis rates and clinician awareness.
  • Pricing and Reimbursement: Premium pricing, aligned with clinical benefits, supports revenue but may face payer pushback.
  • Patient Adoption Rates: Optimized dosing regimens, caregiver education, and patient advocacy are critical for accelerating adoption.

Projected Revenue Outlook (2023–2030)

Based on current market conditions, industry surveys, and ADMA's internal guidance:

  • Short-term (2023–2025): Revenues are expected to remain modest initially, estimated at $100–$150 million annually, primarily driven by existing patient base and slow uptick.
  • Mid-term (2026–2028): With increased physician familiarity and expanded indication approvals or labels, revenues could rise to approximately $250–$400 million.
  • Long-term (2029–2030): Market maturation, new patient enrollments, and potential international expansion could propel revenues to $500 million or beyond, contingent on competitive pressures and pipeline developments.

Key Revenue Challenges

  • Pricing pressures, especially from biosimilars.
  • Limited patient pool relative to broader immunoglobulin market.
  • Regulatory delays or unfavorable reimbursement policies.

Cost Structure and Margins

  • Manufacturing costs for biologics like ASCENIV tend to be high due to complex production processes.
  • Margins will depend on economies of scale achieved with increased sales volume and manufacturing efficiencies.

Profitability Outlook

Given its niche status, profitability will hinge on balancing investment in R&D, manufacturing scale-up, and commercialization efforts. If ADMA achieves significant market adoption, gross margins could stabilize around 50–60%, with net margins improving accordingly.

Strategic Considerations for Stakeholders

  • Investors: Long-term upside depends on sustained demand growth and competitive differentiation.
  • Healthcare Providers: Adoption driven by clear clinical benefits.
  • Manufacturers: Focus on supply chain resilience and cost efficiencies.
  • Regulatory Bodies: Supportive of expansion through favorable pathways is vital.

Key Takeaways

  • ASCENIV operates within a growing and evolving market for immunoglobulin therapies, characterized by increased demand due to rising immunodeficiency prevalence.
  • Its differentiation factors—including improved tolerability—positively influence market adoption, although competition and biosimilar threats present challenges.
  • The product's financial trajectory is poised for steady growth, with potential acceleration through expanded indications, international expansion, and payer acceptance.
  • Strategic focus on manufacturing scalability, clinical positioning, and reimbursement negotiations will determine revenue and margin prospects over the next decade.
  • Overall, ASCENIV exemplifies a biologic targeting a specialized niche with promising growth potential, provided it navigates competitive and regulatory hurdles effectively.

FAQs

  1. What differentiates ASCENIV from other immunoglobulin therapies?
    ASCENIV is formulated with stabilized IgG and enriched with anti-inflammatory factors, offering improved tolerability and stability, particularly beneficial for patients with antibody deficiencies who experience adverse reactions to conventional IVIG.

  2. How significant is the market for ASCENIV globally?
    The global primary immunodeficiency market is estimated at over a billion dollars, with a growing sub-segment dedicated to subcutaneous formulations like ASCENIV. Its market share depends on clinical preference, reimbursement, and regulatory acceptance in multiple regions.

  3. What are the primary hurdles for ASCENIV’s growth?
    Key obstacles include pricing pressures, competition from biosimilars and other biologics, limited patient pool, and regulatory or reimbursement delays that could hinder access and adoption.

  4. Will ASCENIV expand beyond its initial indication?
    Potential exists for expanded indications, such as secondary immunodeficiencies or autoimmune disorders. However, such approvals require additional clinical trials and regulatory review, influencing future revenue streams.

  5. How does ADMA Biologics plan to sustain ASCENIV’s growth in a competitive environment?
    Strategic initiatives include optimizing manufacturing, expanding clinical evidence for broader indications, enhancing payer engagement, and exploring international markets, thereby strengthening its market position over time.


References

[1] Imperial, M., et al. "Global Prevalence of Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases: a Systematic Review." Expert Review of Clinical Immunology, vol. 13, no. 8, 2017, pp. 759–768.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.