Glenmark Speclt Company Profile

« Back to Dashboard

What is the competitive landscape for GLENMARK SPECLT

GLENMARK SPECLT has thirty approved drugs.

There are seventeen US patents protecting GLENMARK SPECLT drugs.

Summary for Glenmark Speclt

US Patents:	17
Tradenames:	24
Ingredients:	23
NDAs:	30

Drugs and US Patents for Glenmark Speclt

Applicant	Tradename	Generic Name	Dosage	NDA	Approval Date	TE	Type	RLD	RS	Patent No.	Patent Expiration	Product	Substance	Delist Req.	Exclusivity Expiration
Glenmark Speclt	DEFERASIROX	deferasirox	TABLET, FOR SUSPENSION;ORAL	209433-002	Jan 6, 2020	AB	RX	No	No
Glenmark Speclt	DEFERASIROX	deferasirox	TABLET, FOR SUSPENSION;ORAL	209433-003	Jan 6, 2020	AB	RX	No	No
Glenmark Speclt	RYALTRIS	mometasone furoate; olopatadine hydrochloride	SPRAY, METERED;NASAL	211746-001	Jan 13, 2022		RX	Yes	Yes	11,679,210		Y

International Patents for Glenmark Speclt Drugs

Country	Patent Number	Estimated Expiration
Serbia	62383
Australia	2026200777
Colombia	2025007747

Supplementary Protection Certificates for Glenmark Speclt Drugs

Patent Number	Supplementary Protection Certificate	SPC Country	SPC Expiration	SPC Description
0717738	12/2002	Austria		PRODUCT NAME: LINEZOLID; NAT. REGISTRATION NO/DATE: 1-24227 - 1-24230 20011009; FIRST REGISTRATION: GB PL 00032/0259 - PL 00032/0262 20010105
0717738	02C0005	France		PRODUCT NAME: LINEZOLIDE; NAT. REGISTRATION NO/DATE: NL 26 660 20010831; FIRST REGISTRATION: GB - PL 00 32/0261 20010105
2506844	SPC/GB18/020	United Kingdom		PRODUCT NAME: A PHARMACEUTICAL COMBINATION PRODUCT COMPRISING A PHARMACEUTICALLY ACCEPTABLE SALT OF UMECLIDINIUM (E.G. UMECLIDINIUM BROMIDE), VILANTEROL OR A PHARMACEUTICALLY ACCETPABLE SALT THEREOF (E.G. VILANTEROL TRIFENATATE), AND FLUTICASONE FUROATE; REGISTERED: UK EU/1/17/1236/001(NI) 20171117; UK EU/1/17/1236/002(NI) 20171117; UK EU/1/17/1236/003(NI) 20171117; UK PLGB 19494/0287 20171117

Similar Applicant Names

Applicants may be listed under multiple names.
Here is a list of applicants with similar names.

• Glenmark Generics
• Glenmark Pharms
• Glenmark Pharms Ltd

Glenmark Specialty (Glenmark Speclt): Competitive Landscape Analysis, Patent/Regulatory Position, and Generic/Biosimilar Risk

Last updated: June 17, 2026

Glenmark Specialty’s market position and near-term competitive exposure depend on the specific Glenmark “Speclt” portfolio assets tied to the relevant markets (US/Europe/India) and the relevant product-level patent estates. A patent and regulatory competitive landscape for “Glenmark Speclt” cannot be completed from the information provided because no specific drug(s), strength(s), dosage form(s), FDA NDA/BLA identifiers, Orange Book entries, or jurisdictional filings were supplied.

Key issue: which product(s)

• “Glenmark Speclt” can refer to different Glenmark specialty products across territories and time periods. Patent expiration timelines, Paragraph IV eligibility, exclusivity windows, and biosimilar/generic entry risks are product-specific and must be anchored to identifiable regulators listings and patent numbers.

Because no product identity was provided, the analysis below is omitted to avoid generating incomplete or inaccurate patent timelines and litigation/regulatory status.

Key Takeaways

• A complete competitive landscape for Glenmark Specialty requires product-level identification (active ingredient, dosage form, market, and regulator listing such as FDA NDA/BLA and Orange Book patents).
• Patent expiration, exclusivity, and generic entry risk are not computable at the portfolio label level.

FAQs

1. What portfolio-level factors determine generic and biosimilar entry risk for Glenmark Specialty?
2. How do Orange Book patent listings translate into Paragraph IV attack timing windows?
3. What litigation patterns most often affect US specialty product launch dates?
4. How do formulation and method-of-use patents change generic design-around strategies?
5. What commercial KPIs best predict which Glenmark Specialty products face near-term erosion?

References

(No sources cited because no product identifiers, regulator listings, or patent datasets were provided.)