DIANEAL LOW CALCIUM W/DEXTROSE 3.5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER Drug Patent Profile
When do Dianeal Low Calcium W/dextrose 3.5% In Plastic Container patents expire, and when can generic versions of Dianeal Low Calcium W/dextrose 3.5% In Plastic Container launch?
Dianeal Low Calcium W/dextrose 3.5% In Plastic Container is a drug marketed by Vantive Us Hlthcare and is included in one NDA.
The generic ingredient in DIANEAL LOW CALCIUM W/DEXTROSE 3.5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER is calcium chloride; dextrose; magnesium chloride; sodium chloride; sodium lactate. There is one drug master file entry for this compound. Three suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the calcium chloride; dextrose; magnesium chloride; sodium chloride; sodium lactate profile page.
AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
- What is the 5 year forecast for DIANEAL LOW CALCIUM W/DEXTROSE 3.5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER?
- What are the global sales for DIANEAL LOW CALCIUM W/DEXTROSE 3.5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER?
- What is Average Wholesale Price for DIANEAL LOW CALCIUM W/DEXTROSE 3.5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER?
Summary for DIANEAL LOW CALCIUM W/DEXTROSE 3.5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
| US Patents: | 0 |
| Applicants: | 1 |
| NDAs: | 1 |
| Finished Product Suppliers / Packagers: | 1 |
| Clinical Trials: | 2 |
| DailyMed Link: | DIANEAL LOW CALCIUM W/DEXTROSE 3.5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER at DailyMed |
Recent Clinical Trials for DIANEAL LOW CALCIUM W/DEXTROSE 3.5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants
| Sponsor | Phase |
|---|---|
| Yale University | NA |
| National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) | NA |
| Iperboreal Pharma Srl | Phase 3 |
See all DIANEAL LOW CALCIUM W/DEXTROSE 3.5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER clinical trials
Pharmacology for DIANEAL LOW CALCIUM W/DEXTROSE 3.5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
US Patents and Regulatory Information for DIANEAL LOW CALCIUM W/DEXTROSE 3.5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
| Applicant | Tradename | Generic Name | Dosage | NDA | Approval Date | TE | Type | RLD | RS | Patent No. | Patent Expiration | Product | Substance | Delist Req. | Exclusivity Expiration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vantive Us Hlthcare | DIANEAL LOW CALCIUM W/DEXTROSE 3.5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER | calcium chloride; dextrose; magnesium chloride; sodium chloride; sodium lactate | SOLUTION;INTRAPERITONEAL | 017512-014 | Jul 11, 1990 | RX | Yes | No | ⤷ Start Trial | ⤷ Start Trial | ⤷ Start Trial | ||||
| >Applicant | >Tradename | >Generic Name | >Dosage | >NDA | >Approval Date | >TE | >Type | >RLD | >RS | >Patent No. | >Patent Expiration | >Product | >Substance | >Delist Req. | >Exclusivity Expiration |
DIANEAL Low Calcium With Dextrose 3.5% Market Dynamics, Patent Position, and Financial Trajectory
DIANEAL Low Calcium With Dextrose 3.5% in Plastic Container is a peritoneal dialysis solution marketed by Baxter Healthcare Corporation. Its commercial position is tied to the recurring peritoneal dialysis consumables market rather than to conventional prescription-drug pricing. Demand is driven by the installed base of automated and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients, dialysis-center protocols, home-care adoption, supply reliability, and reimbursement.
The product has limited apparent patent-based exclusivity. Its principal defenses are manufacturing know-how, validated sterile production, regulatory compliance, distribution capacity, physician familiarity, and integration with peritoneal dialysis systems. Product-level revenue is not separately disclosed by Baxter. Financial exposure must therefore be assessed through Baxter’s former Kidney Care business, now Vantive following the sale of the business to Carlyle.
What is DIANEAL Low Calcium With Dextrose 3.5%?
DIANEAL Low Calcium With Dextrose 3.5% is a sterile peritoneal dialysis solution containing dextrose as the osmotic agent and reduced calcium concentration for intraperitoneal administration. It is supplied in plastic containers and is used in patients receiving peritoneal dialysis for renal replacement therapy.
The 3.5% dextrose concentration provides a higher osmotic load than lower-dextrose formulations. The low-calcium formulation is intended for patients for whom dialysate calcium management is clinically appropriate. Product selection depends on the patient’s volume status, serum calcium, dialysis prescription, residual renal function, and treatment modality.
Product profile
| Attribute | Product description |
|---|---|
| Brand | DIANEAL |
| Formulation | Low-calcium peritoneal dialysis solution |
| Dextrose concentration | 3.5% |
| Dosage form | Sterile dialysate solution |
| Route | Intraperitoneal |
| Container | Plastic container |
| Primary use | Peritoneal dialysis |
| Manufacturer | Baxter Healthcare Corporation |
| Commercial category | Renal-care consumable and prescription dialysis product |
FDA labeling identifies DIANEAL as a peritoneal dialysis solution indicated for patients with acute or chronic renal failure when peritoneal dialysis is clinically appropriate.[1]
What is the FDA regulatory status of DIANEAL Low Calcium 3.5%?
DIANEAL is an FDA-approved prescription dialysis solution marketed under a new drug application. Baxter’s product labeling includes composition, indications, contraindications, warnings, handling requirements, and administration instructions.[1]
The product is subject to pharmaceutical manufacturing controls and dialysis-device compatibility requirements. The plastic container and transfer system must maintain sterility, chemical stability, container integrity, and safe connection to the patient’s peritoneal dialysis equipment.
The main regulatory risks are operational rather than clinical-development risks. They include:
- Sterility failures or microbial contamination
- Particulate or container-integrity defects
- Labeling or concentration errors
- Manufacturing-site interruptions
- Shortages of raw materials, packaging components, or sterilization capacity
- Compatibility issues with transfer sets and dialysis systems
Because DIANEAL is an established dialysis solution, the product does not have the clinical-development profile of a new molecular entity. Its regulatory value rests on continued compliance, manufacturing consistency, and supply reliability.
What patents protect DIANEAL Low Calcium With Dextrose 3.5%?
DIANEAL’s commercial protection appears to rely more on manufacturing and supply-chain barriers than on an active composition-of-matter patent estate.
A review of FDA Orange Book search materials does not identify a prominent product-specific patent blocking generic entry for the DIANEAL Low Calcium With Dextrose 3.5% plastic-container formulation. The product’s original approval dates back decades, making conventional composition-of-matter exclusivity unlikely to remain commercially relevant.[2]
Patent protection by category
| Patent category | Relevance to DIANEAL |
|---|---|
| Composition of matter | Low; the formulation uses established dialysis ingredients |
| Dextrose concentration | Limited patent value absent a novel technical feature |
| Low-calcium formulation | Potentially protectable in theory, but unlikely to create long-term exclusivity for an old product |
| Plastic container | May be covered by packaging or container patents, but those would not necessarily block an equivalent solution in another container |
| Transfer system | Potential device and connector rights may affect system compatibility |
| Manufacturing process | Trade secrets, process controls, and facility validation are more important than broad patent rights |
| Method of use | Limited blocking value because peritoneal dialysis is an established therapeutic method |
| Orange Book patents | No prominent blocking listing identified for the specific product |
The absence of a significant Orange Book patent position does not mean competitors can enter immediately. A competing manufacturer must demonstrate formulation equivalence, sterile manufacturing capability, packaging integrity, quality systems, and regulatory acceptability.
When does DIANEAL lose exclusivity?
DIANEAL’s meaningful market exclusivity has likely already expired in practical terms. The relevant commercial protection is not a remaining patent term but the difficulty of reproducing a sterile dialysis-solution supply chain at scale.
Exclusivity timeline
| Milestone | Commercial significance |
|---|---|
| Original FDA approval | Established Baxter’s regulatory and manufacturing position |
| Patent and regulatory exclusivity period | Historically relevant, but no longer the primary barrier |
| Mature product phase | Competition shifts toward supply reliability, contracting, and manufacturing cost |
| Current market | Brand demand persists through clinical familiarity and installed dialysis infrastructure |
| Generic or alternative entry | Possible through abbreviated or other FDA pathways, subject to product-specific requirements |
A product such as DIANEAL may remain commercially durable after formal exclusivity ends because dialysis providers prioritize continuity of supply. Switching costs include inventory redesign, staff training, protocol review, patient transition, compatibility testing, and risk management.
Are there Paragraph IV challenges to DIANEAL?
No prominent public Paragraph IV litigation is associated with DIANEAL Low Calcium With Dextrose 3.5% in the available public record. That is consistent with the product’s age, limited patent estate, and specialized market.
Paragraph IV litigation is less attractive for a mature peritoneal dialysis solution than for a high-value branded tablet or injectable with a large remaining market and multiple unexpired patents. A challenger would need to weigh:
- Limited pricing power in a concentrated dialysis market
- Manufacturing and quality-system investment
- Potentially modest standalone product revenue
- Contracting pressure from dialysis providers
- The risk of supply interruptions
- The possibility of non-patent regulatory and technical barriers
If a competitor were to file an abbreviated application, the more material dispute would likely concern formulation equivalence, product quality, manufacturing controls, container systems, or regulatory classification rather than a broad composition-of-matter patent.
What formulations are protected by DIANEAL-related intellectual property?
The commercial value of DIANEAL-related intellectual property is concentrated in the product system rather than in the active ingredients.
Formulation and delivery features
The relevant technical elements include:
- Dextrose concentration and osmotic performance
- Calcium concentration
- Electrolyte composition
- pH control
- Sterility assurance
- Container materials
- Solution stability during storage
- Transfer-set compatibility
- Manufacturing and filling processes
- Packaging and shipping conditions
A rival may be able to use the same broad ingredients while differentiating through container design, electrolyte composition, automated peritoneal dialysis compatibility, or supply configuration. Such differences can support regulatory filings or commercial differentiation even if they do not create strong patent exclusivity.
How large is the market for peritoneal dialysis solutions?
Peritoneal dialysis solutions occupy a recurring-use market linked to the global end-stage kidney disease population. Peritoneal dialysis represents a minority of dialysis treatments in many developed markets but has higher penetration in selected countries because it can be administered at home and requires less dependence on in-center infrastructure.[3]
Demand is determined by:
- The number of peritoneal dialysis patients.
- The frequency and volume of dialysate exchanges.
- The mix of continuous ambulatory and automated peritoneal dialysis.
- Conversion between hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.
- Home-dialysis reimbursement.
- Dialysis-center purchasing contracts.
- Product availability and shortage conditions.
The market is concentrated among large renal-care suppliers. Baxter has historically been a leading supplier of peritoneal dialysis solutions and systems. Fresenius Medical Care is another major dialysis company, with a stronger overall position in hemodialysis and dialysis services but also exposure to peritoneal dialysis products and home-care programs.[4]
What was Baxter’s financial exposure to DIANEAL?
Baxter did not separately report revenue for DIANEAL Low Calcium With Dextrose 3.5%. The product was included in the company’s Kidney Care portfolio, alongside peritoneal dialysis systems, hemodialysis products, access products, and related services.
Baxter reported Kidney Care as a major operating segment before the business was sold. Public filings describe the portfolio as a large, recurring-revenue business supported by chronic renal-care demand, consumables, and equipment.[5]
Financial trajectory
| Period | Financial interpretation |
|---|---|
| Mature Baxter ownership | Stable recurring demand from chronic dialysis treatment |
| 2020-2022 | Pandemic-related logistics, labor, and supply-chain pressure affected medical-product operations |
| 2023 | Kidney Care remained strategically important but exposed to cost inflation and operational complexity |
| 2024 | Baxter completed the sale of the Kidney Care business to Carlyle for approximately $3.8 billion |
| Post-sale | The business operates as Vantive, with DIANEAL positioned within a standalone kidney-care platform |
The sale changed the financial context. Under Baxter, DIANEAL benefited from the scale of a diversified medical-products company. Under Vantive, the product sits within a narrower renal-care portfolio where dialysis consumables, home therapies, and equipment economics receive greater management focus.[6]
Product-level revenue cannot be isolated from public disclosures. The most defensible conclusion is that DIANEAL contributes recurring but undisclosed revenue within the peritoneal dialysis consumables franchise. Its financial value is higher when it supports equipment and patient-system retention than when evaluated as a standalone bag of dialysate.
Which companies compete with DIANEAL?
Competition is concentrated and regional. The principal competitive set includes:
| Company | Relevant competitive position |
|---|---|
| Vantive, formerly Baxter Kidney Care | Major supplier of peritoneal dialysis solutions and systems |
| Fresenius Medical Care | Global dialysis provider and renal-products supplier |
| Regional dialysis manufacturers | Potential competitors in selected countries and procurement systems |
| Hospital and government procurement suppliers | May distribute branded or locally manufactured solutions |
The competitive landscape is shaped by supply contracts and system compatibility. A dialysis provider may prefer a supplier capable of delivering solutions, cyclers, transfer sets, technical support, and patient training. This favors integrated vendors and raises the commercial barrier for a single-product challenger.
What generic entry risks exist for DIANEAL?
Generic entry risk is real but moderated by manufacturing economics. A competitor could seek approval for an equivalent peritoneal dialysis solution without relying on Baxter’s brand. The threat would be greatest if the entrant can offer lower pricing while matching Baxter’s quality and supply reliability.
Key entry barriers
- Sterile large-volume solution manufacturing
- High-volume filling and packaging capacity
- Validated plastic-container systems
- Quality-control testing
- Distribution to dialysis centers and home patients
- Reimbursement and formulary acceptance
- Long-term supply commitments
- Product liability exposure
- Compatibility with dialysis equipment and transfer systems
The highest commercial risk is likely price erosion in tenders rather than abrupt displacement. Dialysis providers may introduce a second supplier to obtain price concessions while retaining Baxter or Vantive as a continuity-of-supply source.
What litigation and settlement agreements affect DIANEAL?
No major publicly reported patent litigation or settlement agreement has been identified as a current market driver for DIANEAL Low Calcium With Dextrose 3.5%. The absence of litigation is consistent with the product’s mature status and limited apparent Orange Book patent exposure.
The more relevant legal risks are likely to involve:
- Product liability
- Manufacturing defects
- Regulatory enforcement
- Supply-contract disputes
- Dialysis-device compatibility
- Antitrust or procurement issues
- Healthcare reimbursement and purchasing practices
Patent settlements are less likely to determine market timing than manufacturing readiness and regulatory approval.
How does DIANEAL compare with competing peritoneal dialysis solutions?
DIANEAL competes primarily on clinical familiarity, availability, formulation range, and integration with dialysis systems.
| Factor | DIANEAL | Competing solutions |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical familiarity | High in markets with Baxter-installed systems | Varies by geography |
| Dextrose options | Multiple concentrations within the portfolio | Typically comparable across major suppliers |
| Low-calcium option | Available in the DIANEAL range | Availability depends on supplier and country |
| Container system | Integrated with Baxter supply infrastructure | Competitors may use different packaging and connectors |
| Patent strength | Limited apparent current exclusivity | Similar mature-product profile |
| Switching cost | Moderate to high because of protocols and supply systems | Lower where products are technically interchangeable |
| Price competition | Likely at institutional tender level | Strong in markets with multiple qualified suppliers |
The central competitive advantage is system-level retention. A supplier that controls the cycler, consumables, service network, and clinical support can defend a mature solution even without strong patent protection.
What is the geographic coverage of DIANEAL?
DIANEAL has been marketed internationally, but product names, concentrations, package sizes, regulatory status, and labeling can vary by country. Global commercial performance depends on:
- National dialysis reimbursement
- Home-dialysis adoption
- Local manufacturing and import requirements
- Government tenders
- Currency movements
- Regional supply-chain resilience
- Healthcare infrastructure
The United States remains strategically important because of its large dialysis population and reimbursement system. Growth opportunities are also linked to home dialysis policy and patient adoption. Emerging markets may offer volume growth but often have greater price pressure and procurement dependence.
How strong is the patent estate for DIANEAL?
The patent estate is weak as a standalone exclusivity instrument but the broader commercial moat is moderate.
Patent-strength assessment
| Dimension | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Remaining composition patent | Low |
| Method-of-use protection | Low |
| Orange Book blocking position | Limited |
| Manufacturing know-how | Moderate to high |
| Regulatory and quality barriers | High |
| Distribution and contracting | High |
| Brand and clinical familiarity | Moderate |
| System integration | Moderate to high |
| Litigation leverage | Low |
The product’s value is therefore defensive rather than patent-driven. A new entrant can potentially avoid Baxter’s historical patents but still face a difficult commercialization process.
What is the outlook for DIANEAL revenue?
DIANEAL revenue is likely to remain stable to modestly growing in nominal terms if the peritoneal dialysis patient base expands and supply reliability remains strong. Volume growth can be offset by:
- Price reductions in competitive tenders
- Generic or private-label entry
- Conversion to hemodialysis
- Reimbursement pressure
- Manufacturing disruptions
- Lower use of higher-dextrose solutions where clinicians seek to reduce glucose exposure
The post-Baxter ownership structure may increase focus on renal-care portfolio economics. Vantive can use DIANEAL to support a broader home-dialysis strategy, but the company also faces concentrated-customer risk and the need to fund manufacturing and quality infrastructure.
Key Takeaways
- DIANEAL Low Calcium With Dextrose 3.5% is a mature peritoneal dialysis solution supplied in a plastic container by Baxter’s former Kidney Care business, now Vantive.
- Product-level revenue is not publicly disclosed.
- The product’s commercial value is tied to recurring dialysate consumption and system retention, not new-drug pricing.
- No prominent current Orange Book patent barrier or Paragraph IV litigation driver is associated with the product.
- Manufacturing validation, sterility, container integrity, supply reliability, and dialysis-system compatibility are more important than remaining patent exclusivity.
- Generic entry would likely create tender-level price pressure rather than an immediate market collapse.
- Baxter completed the sale of its Kidney Care business to Carlyle for approximately $3.8 billion in 2024, changing the product’s ownership and financial reporting context.
- The principal competitors are Vantive, Fresenius Medical Care, and regional dialysis-solution suppliers.
- The long-term outlook is stable, with growth dependent on peritoneal dialysis adoption, home-care reimbursement, and reliable supply.
FAQs
Is DIANEAL Low Calcium 3.5% a generic drug?
No. DIANEAL is a branded peritoneal dialysis solution. However, it is a mature product with established ingredients and limited apparent current patent exclusivity, so equivalent competing solutions may be possible.
Does DIANEAL have an active composition-of-matter patent?
No prominent active composition-of-matter patent is associated with the mature DIANEAL Low Calcium 3.5% product in current public patent and Orange Book materials.
Is DIANEAL used in automated peritoneal dialysis?
DIANEAL solutions can be used in peritoneal dialysis regimens, including automated peritoneal dialysis, when prescribed and administered with compatible equipment and appropriate clinical protocols.
Who owns the business that formerly marketed DIANEAL through Baxter?
Carlyle acquired Baxter’s Kidney Care business in 2024. The business was rebranded Vantive and includes the former Baxter renal-care portfolio.
Can a competitor launch a lower-priced DIANEAL alternative?
Potentially. The main barriers are FDA regulatory compliance, sterile large-volume manufacturing, packaging validation, dialysis-system compatibility, customer contracts, and dependable distribution. Patent clearance alone would not ensure successful entry.
References
-
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). DIANEAL peritoneal dialysis solution prescribing information. Baxter Healthcare Corporation.
-
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2024). Approved drug products with therapeutic equivalence evaluations: Orange Book. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
-
United States Renal Data System. (2023). 2023 USRDS annual data report: Epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States. National Institutes of Health.
-
Fresenius Medical Care AG. (2023). Annual report 2023. Fresenius Medical Care.
-
Baxter International Inc. (2023). Annual report 2023. Baxter International Inc.
-
Baxter International Inc. (2024, August 30). Baxter completes sale of Kidney Care business to Carlyle. Baxter International Inc.
More… ↓

