You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

UNIVASC Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


When do Univasc patents expire, and what generic alternatives are available?

Univasc is a drug marketed by Ucb Inc and is included in one NDA.

The generic ingredient in UNIVASC is moexipril hydrochloride. There are seven drug master file entries for this compound. Three suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the moexipril hydrochloride profile page.

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for UNIVASC?
  • What are the global sales for UNIVASC?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for UNIVASC?
Summary for UNIVASC
US Patents:0
Applicants:1
NDAs:1
Raw Ingredient (Bulk) Api Vendors: 1
Clinical Trials: 2
Patent Applications: 1,674
What excipients (inactive ingredients) are in UNIVASC?UNIVASC excipients list
DailyMed Link:UNIVASC at DailyMed
Drug patent expirations by year for UNIVASC
Recent Clinical Trials for UNIVASC

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
University of NebraskaPhase 4
Paddock Laboratories, Inc.Phase 1

See all UNIVASC clinical trials

US Patents and Regulatory Information for UNIVASC

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Ucb Inc UNIVASC moexipril hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 020312-001 Apr 19, 1995 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Ucb Inc UNIVASC moexipril hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 020312-002 Apr 19, 1995 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Expired US Patents for UNIVASC

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date Patent No. Patent Expiration
Ucb Inc UNIVASC moexipril hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 020312-001 Apr 19, 1995 4,344,949 ⤷  Start Trial
Ucb Inc UNIVASC moexipril hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 020312-001 Apr 19, 1995 4,743,450 ⤷  Start Trial
Ucb Inc UNIVASC moexipril hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 020312-002 Apr 19, 1995 4,743,450 ⤷  Start Trial
Ucb Inc UNIVASC moexipril hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 020312-002 Apr 19, 1995 4,344,949 ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Patent Expiration

International Patents for UNIVASC

See the table below for patents covering UNIVASC around the world.

Country Patent Number Title Estimated Expiration
Australia 597471 ⤷  Start Trial
Norway 159017 ⤷  Start Trial
Denmark 436081 ⤷  Start Trial
South Korea 830007567 ⤷  Start Trial
Ireland 52665 SUBSTITUTED ACYL DERIVATIVES OF 1,2,3,4-TETRAHYDROISOQUINOLINE-3-CARBOXYLIC ACIDS,SALTS THEREOF,PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS CONTAINING THE DERIVATIVE OR SALTS,AND THE PRODUCTION OF SAME ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 1331614 DERIVES ACYL SUBSTITUES D'ACIDES 1,2,3,4-TETRAHYDROISOQUINOLINE-3-CARBOXYLIQUES (SUBSTITUTED ACYL DERIVATIVES OF 1,2,3,4-TETRAHYDROISOQUINOLINE- 3-CARBOXYLIC ACIDS) ⤷  Start Trial
Hong Kong 59496 Stabilized pharmaceutical compositions containing angiotens in-converting enzyme inhibitors ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Title >Estimated Expiration

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for UNIVASC (Moexipril)

Last updated: February 16, 2026


What is UNIVASC and its current market position?

UNIVASC, with the active ingredient moexipril, is an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor prescribed for hypertension. Approved primarily in the United States and several other countries, it has a specific niche but lacks widespread use compared to leading ACE inhibitors such as lisinopril or enalapril.

It was marketed by Abbott Laboratories (now AbbVie) but has limited market presence due to competition, patent expirations, and formulary preferences. As of 2023, its sales volume remains minimal, with revenues under $50 million globally, indicating a niche product rather than a mass-market drug [1].


How does the competitive landscape affect UNIVASC?

UNIVASC faces strong competition from:

  • Lisinopril: Dominates the ACE inhibitor class with over $3 billion in annual US sales.
  • Enalapril: Generics available, sales estimated at $300 million worldwide.
  • Ramipril: Approximately $300 million annually, with investments in cardiovascular indications.

The market's shift toward generic drugs pressures UNIVASC’s profitability. The patent for moexipril expired around 2006 in the US, eroding exclusivity and leading to price competition.

The lack of differentiation combined with limited marketing efforts constrains its market share.


What are the key drivers influencing the market dynamics?

  • Patent and Generic Competition: Patent expiry drastically reduced revenue, with generics entering the market in late 2000s.
  • Healthcare Provider Preference: Physicians favor drugs with proven efficacy, safety profiles, and cost-effectiveness. Established ACE inhibitors dominate treatment protocols.
  • Regulatory Environment: Label updates and safety warnings, such as ACE inhibitor risks related to angioedema, influence prescribing patterns.
  • Pricing Trends: Generic competition pushes prices downward. UNIVASC’s pricing likely fell below the $1 per dose threshold, reducing margins.

What is the financial trajectory forecast for UNIVASC?

Revenue Projections (2023-2030):

Year Estimated Revenue Key Factors
2023 <$20 million Decline due to patent expiration, low market share
2025 ~$10 million Minimal growth likely from niche indications or regional markets
2030 <$5 million Phased out due to generic competition and market obsolescence

Profitability: Margins are negligible or negative in mature markets. Limited opportunities for growth unless repositioned for new indications or combination therapies.


Are there opportunities to alter the financial trajectory?

Potential strategies include:

  • New Indications: Repurposing for resistant hypertension or hypertensive crises.
  • Formulation Innovations: Developing extended-release forms or combination products.
  • Market Expansion: Target emerging markets with limited generic presence.
  • Acquisition or Licensing: Partnering with companies seeking to diversify their ACE inhibitor portfolio.

However, these strategies face barriers such as regulatory approval timelines, development costs, and the dominance of existing generics.


How do regulatory policies influence future market dynamics?

Regulatory agencies like the FDA restrict labeling changes that could expand indications for older ACE inhibitors. Any new claim or expanded use requires substantial clinical data, delaying potential profitability. Cost-effectiveness evaluations may also disfavor MOXIPRIL in favor of more established agents.


Conclusion

UNIVASC exhibits declining sales with limited prospects for substantial recovery or growth. The market is heavily saturated, and generics dominate. Strategic repositioning may be required for any meaningful financial upside, but barriers remain high.


Key Takeaways

  • Used primarily for hypertension, UNIVASC's market share is negligible in the context of ACE inhibitors.
  • Patent expiry and generics have eroded its revenue base, leading to a decline projected into the next decade.
  • Competition from established drugs limits prospects, with minimal avenues for significant growth without new indications or formulations.
  • Policy and regulatory hurdles slow potential repositioning efforts.
  • Without strategic repositioning, UNIVASC will likely continue its market decline.

FAQs

1. What has been the main factor behind UNIVASC’s decline?
Patent expiration in the late 2000s led to generic competition, reducing sales and market share.

2. Can UNIVASC gain a competitive edge through new indications?
Regulatory and clinical development hurdles make expansion into new indications challenging and costly.

3. How does UNIVASC compare financially to other ACE inhibitors?
It generates significantly less revenue than top-selling drugs like lisinopril, which exceeds $3 billion annually.

4. Is there any regional market where UNIVASC still performs well?
Limited data suggests it has minimal presence globally; it is not a leading product anywhere.

5. What strategic options remain for UNIVASC?
Potential options include formulation innovations, niche marketing in emerging markets, or licensing deals, but these are not guaranteed to reverse its decline.


References

[1] IQVIA, “Pharmaceutical Market Data,” 2023.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.