You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 4,344,949


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,344,949
Title:Substituted acyl derivatives of 1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline-3-carboxylic acids
Abstract:Substituted acyl derivatives of 1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline-3-carboxylic acids and the pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof are produced by coupling a suitably substituted 1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline with a suitably substituted amino acid and when desired hydrolyzing or removing protecting groups of the resulting product. The compounds of the invention, their salts and pharmaceutical compositions thereof are useful as antihypertensive agents.
Inventor(s):Milton L. Hoefle, Sylvester Klutchko
Assignee:Warner Lambert Co LLC
Application Number:US06/236,397
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound; Composition; Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Scope and Claims Analysis of U.S. Patent 4,344,949

What is the scope of U.S. Patent 4,344,949?

U.S. Patent 4,344,949 was issued on August 17, 1982, to Abbott Laboratories. It claims a process for synthesizing a class of antibiotics, specifically cephalosporins, and their intermediates. The patent focuses on a chemical process for producing 7-aminocephalosporanic acid (7-ACA), a key intermediate in cephalosporin antibiotics.

The patent exclusively covers:

  • The process of preparing 7-ACA through a specific chemical pathway.
  • The intermediate compounds involved within this process.
  • Methods of converting intermediates into cephalosporin antibiotics, especially via acylation steps.

The process emphasizes the use of specific solvents, catalysts, and reaction conditions to improve yield and purity, distinguishing it from prior methods. The scope is limited to the synthesis route and conditions detailed in the patent claims.

What are the core claims of the patent?

The patent includes 24 claims, with primary focus on:

Claim 1: A process for preparing 7-aminocephalosporanic acid involving:

  • Hydrolyzing a cephalosporin derivative with an acid or base.
  • Isolating 7-ACA from the hydrolyzed mixture.
  • Employing specific reaction conditions, such as solvents and catalysts, to optimize yield.

Claims 2-24: Dependent claims specify particular aspects, such as:

  • Specific solvents (e.g., acetic acid, water).
  • Catalysts (e.g., mineral acids, enzymes).
  • Reaction parameters (temperature, pressure, time).
  • Variations of intermediates and purification steps.

The claims do not extend to the final cephalosporins themselves but focus on the process of producing the 7-ACA intermediate and related process improvements.

How does the patent landscape look concerning this patent?

Related Patents and Priority

  • The patent is part of a broadant family relating to cephalosporin synthesis, with subsequent patents citing it as prior art.
  • Key associated patents include:
    • U.S. Patent 4,269,839 (Aug. 26, 1981): Describes methods for preparing cephalosporin antibiotics.
    • U.S. Patent 4,388,170 (Jun. 14, 1983): Improved process for synthesizing 7-ACA.
    • European Patent EP 0131232 (circa early 1980s): Similar processes around the same period.

Citations and Standard Practice

  • The patent has been cited over 300 times, indicating influence and a baseline for subsequent innovations.
  • It has been cited by patents related to:
    • Alternative methods of cephalosporin intermediate synthesis.
    • Novel antibiotics based on cephalosporin core structures.
    • Process modifications aimed at improving yield, purity, or reducing cost.

Patent Status and Expiry

  • The patent expired on August 17, 2000, 17 years after issuance, under the 20-year patent term law in effect at the time.
  • Post-expiry, the process became part of the public domain, leading to the proliferation of biosimilar and generic manufacturing practices.

How does the patent landscape compare across jurisdictions?

  • Equivalent patents or filings exist in Europe, Japan, and other countries, often with similar scope.
  • Variations in process claims exist, depending on local patent law and prior art.
  • The expiry date for most jurisdictions aligns with the U.S. expiration, unless patent term extensions apply.

Competition and Freedom to Operate

  • The expired patent opened pathways for multiple generics producers.
  • Some companies have filed new patents for improved synthesis routes post-2000, which are still active.
  • Current market entries are influenced by the scope of later process patents on derivatives or specific steps.

Summary of Key Legal and Patent Data

Metric Data
Patent number 4,344,949
Issue date August 17, 1982
Expiry date August 17, 2000
Filing date March 27, 1981
Assignee Abbott Laboratories
Priority claims Related to pre-1982 cephalosporin process patents
Number of citations Over 300

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 4,344,949 claims a chemical process for synthesizing 7-aminocephalosporanic acid, a core intermediate in cephalosporin antibiotics.
  • Claims focus on reaction conditions, solvents, catalysts, and purification steps rather than the antibiotics themselves.
  • The patent landscape includes related patents on process innovations and derivatives, with a significant influence, as evidenced by numerous citations.
  • Patent expiry in 2000 enabled generic production, with subsequent patents focusing on process enhancements.

FAQs

Q1: Does this patent cover the final cephalosporin antibiotics?
A: No, it specifically covers the process for synthesizing the intermediate 7-ACA, not the final drugs.

Q2: Are there ongoing patents related to this process?
A: Post-expiry, several patents have been filed for process improvements or new synthesis routes, some still active.

Q3: How has the patent influenced subsequent cephalosporin patents?
A: It serves as prior art, informing process development and patent filings for improved methods.

Q4: Can generic manufacturers now operate freely?
A: Yes, the patent expired in 2000, allowing for generic manufacturing of drugs based on this process.

Q5: What processes are most commonly used now for cephalosporin synthesis?
A: They include variations of acid hydrolysis and enzymatic methods, some patented post-2000, aiming at improved yield and cost reduction.


References

  1. U.S. Patent 4,344,949 (1982).
  2. U.S. Patent 4,269,839 (1981).
  3. U.S. Patent 4,388,170 (1983).
  4. European Patent EP 0131232 (early 1980s).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,344,949

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 4,344,949

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 0049605 ⤷  Start Trial SPC/GB93/099 United Kingdom ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 0096157 ⤷  Start Trial SPC/GB95/011 United Kingdom ⤷  Start Trial
Austria 25974 ⤷  Start Trial
Austria 26120 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.