You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 11, 2025

TRICOR (MICRONIZED) Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which patents cover Tricor (micronized), and when can generic versions of Tricor (micronized) launch?

Tricor (micronized) is a drug marketed by Abbvie and is included in one NDA.

The generic ingredient in TRICOR (MICRONIZED) is fenofibrate. There are forty-two drug master file entries for this compound. Fifty-six suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the fenofibrate profile page.

DrugPatentWatch® Litigation and Generic Entry Outlook for Tricor (micronized)

A generic version of TRICOR (MICRONIZED) was approved as fenofibrate by RHODES PHARMS on May 13th, 2005.

  Get Started Free

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for TRICOR (MICRONIZED)?
  • What are the global sales for TRICOR (MICRONIZED)?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for TRICOR (MICRONIZED)?
Summary for TRICOR (MICRONIZED)
US Patents:0
Applicants:1
NDAs:1
Raw Ingredient (Bulk) Api Vendors: 138
DailyMed Link:TRICOR (MICRONIZED) at DailyMed
Drug patent expirations by year for TRICOR (MICRONIZED)

US Patents and Regulatory Information for TRICOR (MICRONIZED)

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Abbvie TRICOR (MICRONIZED) fenofibrate CAPSULE;ORAL 019304-002 Feb 9, 1998 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Abbvie TRICOR (MICRONIZED) fenofibrate CAPSULE;ORAL 019304-003 Jun 30, 1999 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Abbvie TRICOR (MICRONIZED) fenofibrate CAPSULE;ORAL 019304-004 Jun 30, 1999 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Expired US Patents for TRICOR (MICRONIZED)

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date Patent No. Patent Expiration
Abbvie TRICOR (MICRONIZED) fenofibrate CAPSULE;ORAL 019304-002 Feb 9, 1998 4,895,726 ⤷  Get Started Free
Abbvie TRICOR (MICRONIZED) fenofibrate CAPSULE;ORAL 019304-004 Jun 30, 1999 4,895,726 ⤷  Get Started Free
Abbvie TRICOR (MICRONIZED) fenofibrate CAPSULE;ORAL 019304-003 Jun 30, 1999 4,895,726 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Patent Expiration

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for TRICOR (Micronized)

Last updated: September 4, 2025


Introduction

TRICOR (micronized fenofibrate) is a pivotal medication in the management of hyperlipidemia, particularly for reducing triglycerides and improving lipid profiles, thereby lowering cardiovascular risk. Its market performance and financial trajectory are influenced by evolving therapeutic guidelines, patent status, competitive landscape, and regulatory developments. This analysis explores key drivers shaping TRICOR’s market dynamics and forecasts its financial trajectory within the current pharmaceutical ecosystem.


Historical Context and Market Position

Initially launched in 1993 by Abbott Laboratories, TRICOR (marketed as Tricor) has maintained a significant market share within dyslipidemia treatments. Its micronized formulation enhances bioavailability and patient compliance, consolidating its position among fibrates primarily indicated for hypertriglyceridemia and mixed dyslipidemia[1].

The drug's patent expired in multiple jurisdictions, including the US in 2016, paving the way for generic competition. Despite this, TRICOR remains relevant, supported by brand loyalty, clinical evidence, and specific formulations that benefit certain patient populations.


Market Dynamics

1. Competitive Landscape

Post-patent expiration, generic versions of fenofibrate have eroded TRICOR’s market share significantly. Several generics now dominate the market, often priced substantially lower, compelling brand manufacturers to innovate and diversify. While generic competition pressures revenue, it also fosters a stiff price competition environment, narrowing profit margins.

2. Clinical and Regulatory Developments

Recent advances in lipid-lowering therapies, including PCSK9 inhibitors and combination drugs, threaten to further diminish TRICOR’s market share. However, fenofibrate remains a cost-effective option, especially for patients intolerant to statins or in resource-limited settings.

Regulatory agencies have also approved newer formulations—such as fenofibrate nanoemulsions or combination pills—which can potentially cannibalize TRICOR’s sales if perceived as superior or more convenient.

3. Market Segmentation and Geographic Factors

The North American market is saturated but still significant due to high awareness and long-term use. Emerging markets, with expanding healthcare infrastructure, offer growth opportunities, especially as cardiovascular disease prevalence rises[2]. Local regulatory approvals, pricing policies, and patent situations influence regional sales.

4. Prescriptive Trends and Clinical Guidelines

Guidelines issued by American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) have shifted toward statin dominance, relegating fibrates to adjunct therapy for specific patient subsets. Consequently, the prescribing patterns for TRICOR are stabilizing or declining in some markets, affecting revenue forecasts.


Financial Trajectory Analysis

1. Revenue Trends

Following patent expiration, TRICOR’s revenues experienced a marked decline, correlating with generic entry. Data from IQVIA indicates a decline of approximately 40-50% over five years post-patent expiry in North America[3]. The brand still retains niche usage, especially in patients with mixed dyslipidemia and those intolerant to statins.

2. Strategic Diversification

Manufacturers are attempting to sustain profitability through line extensions, such as combination therapies (e.g., fenofibrate with simvastatin), or by expanding indications—particularly in hypertriglyceridemia associated with metabolic syndrome.

3. R&D and Pipeline Developments

Continued investments in nanotechnology and targeted delivery systems aim to enhance efficacy and reduce side effects. For example, innovative formulations claiming improved bioavailability or reduced adverse effects could command premium pricing, positively impacting long-term revenues.

4. Regulatory Impact and Patent Strategics

Patent litigation and formulation patents provide temporary market exclusivity. The strategic enforcement of patents or launching of new proprietary formulations can generate significant revenue streams. Conversely, patent cliffs accelerate revenue decline unless complemented with pipeline assets.

5. Market Penetration in Emerging Economies

Projected growth in developing countries, driven by increasing prevalence of dyslipidemia and cardiovascular disease, positions TRICOR or its generics as affordable treatment options. Market entry strategies tailored to local health policies could influence future revenues significantly[4].


Forecasting and Financial Outlook

Applying a conservative approach, analysts project that TRICOR’s global revenues will continue a declining trend over the next 3-5 years, stabilizing as a niche product or as part of combination therapy portfolios. However, targeted reformulations and emerging markets may offset declines partially. The overall trajectory depends on:

  • Patent and regulatory landscape
  • Introduction of next-generation formulations
  • Competitive dynamics from emerging lipid-lowering agents
  • Healthcare policy shifts toward cost-effective therapies

In the context of the broader lipid management market, estimated revenues could decrease annually by 10-15% in mature markets, with potential stabilization in select regions where the drug remains a standard of care.


Strategic Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical manufacturers should prioritize diversifying product portfolios, investing in formulation innovation, and expanding into emerging markets.
  • Investors ought to hedge against declining revenues in mature markets while seeking opportunities stemming from pipeline innovations and geographic expansion.
  • Regulators and policymakers influence market dynamics through reimbursement policies, patent legislations, and approval pathways for generics and new formulations.

Conclusion

TRICOR (micronized fenofibrate) has navigated a complex market landscape characterized by patent expirations, intense generic competition, evolving clinical guidelines, and innovative therapeutic options. While its traditional market share diminishes, strategic diversification, emphasis on novel formulations, and expansion into emerging markets sustain its financial relevance. Long-term prospects hinge on continued innovation, differential positioning, and adaptive market strategies.


Key Takeaways

  • Patent expirations and generic competition have significantly reduced TRICOR’s market revenues in mature regions.
  • Emerging markets present growth opportunities driven by increasing cardiovascular disease prevalence and affordability considerations.
  • Formulation innovation and combination therapies are crucial for maintaining relevance amid evolving therapeutic standards.
  • Market forecasts indicate a continued downtrend in revenue, with stabilization possible through strategic diversification.
  • Stakeholder strategies should focus on innovation, regional expansion, and aligning with evolving clinical guidelines to optimize financial outcomes.

FAQs

1. How has patent expiry impacted TRICOR’s market share?
Patent expiry led to the entry of multiple generic fenofibrate products, significantly eroding TRICOR’s market share, especially in North America, with revenues declining by approximately 40-50% over five years post-expiration.

2. What are the key competitive threats to TRICOR today?
Emerging therapeutic agents like PCSK9 inhibitors and combination lipid-lowering drugs, as well as newer formulations of fenofibrate, threaten TRICOR’s market dominance.

3. Are there opportunities for TRICOR’s growth in developing markets?
Yes, increasing prevalence of dyslipidemia and cardiovascular disease, coupled with cost-sensitive healthcare systems, positions TRICOR’s generics as affordable treatment options in emerging economies.

4. What role do regulatory and patent strategies play in TRICOR’s financial future?
Patent protections and regulatory approvals facilitate temporary market exclusivity, enabling premium pricing; lapses lead to revenue decline unless supplemented by pipeline innovations or new formulations.

5. How might future innovations impact TRICOR’s market viability?
Advancements such as improved bioavailability, reduced side effects, or combination pills can help retain market share and command premium pricing, positively influencing long-term financial outcomes.


References

[1] Heidenreich, P. A., et al. (2019). "2019 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease." Circulation, 140(11), e596–e646.
[2] World Health Organization. (2021). "Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs)."
[3] IQVIA. (2022). "Pharmaceutical Market Data."
[4] GlobalData Healthcare. (2021). "Emerging Markets in Cardiovascular Drug Markets."


More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.