You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 11, 2025

SODIUM POLYSTYRENE SULFONATE Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


When do Sodium Polystyrene Sulfonate patents expire, and when can generic versions of Sodium Polystyrene Sulfonate launch?

Sodium Polystyrene Sulfonate is a drug marketed by Ajenat Pharms, Chartwell Rx, Citrusphrma, Cmp Pharma Inc, Epic Pharma Llc, Nuvo Pharms Inc, Pai Holdings Pharm, Upsher Smith Labs, Ani Pharms, Hikma, Lyne, Morton Grove, and Roxane. and is included in thirteen NDAs.

The generic ingredient in SODIUM POLYSTYRENE SULFONATE is sodium polystyrene sulfonate. There are one thousand four hundred and seventy-two drug master file entries for this compound. Eleven suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the sodium polystyrene sulfonate profile page.

DrugPatentWatch® Litigation and Generic Entry Outlook for Sodium Polystyrene Sulfonate

A generic version of SODIUM POLYSTYRENE SULFONATE was approved as sodium polystyrene sulfonate by CMP PHARMA INC on January 19th, 1989.

  Get Started Free

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for SODIUM POLYSTYRENE SULFONATE?
  • What are the global sales for SODIUM POLYSTYRENE SULFONATE?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for SODIUM POLYSTYRENE SULFONATE?
Drug patent expirations by year for SODIUM POLYSTYRENE SULFONATE
Drug Prices for SODIUM POLYSTYRENE SULFONATE

See drug prices for SODIUM POLYSTYRENE SULFONATE

Recent Clinical Trials for SODIUM POLYSTYRENE SULFONATE

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological ResearchPHASE3
Alexandria UniversityNA
University of California, IrvinePhase 4

See all SODIUM POLYSTYRENE SULFONATE clinical trials

US Patents and Regulatory Information for SODIUM POLYSTYRENE SULFONATE

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Ajenat Pharms SODIUM POLYSTYRENE SULFONATE sodium polystyrene sulfonate POWDER;ORAL, RECTAL 205727-001 Feb 23, 2016 AA RX No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Nuvo Pharms Inc SODIUM POLYSTYRENE SULFONATE sodium polystyrene sulfonate POWDER;ORAL, RECTAL 204071-001 Nov 28, 2014 AA RX No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Cmp Pharma Inc SODIUM POLYSTYRENE SULFONATE sodium polystyrene sulfonate POWDER;ORAL, RECTAL 089910-001 Jan 19, 1989 AA RX No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for Sodium Polystyrene Sulfonate

Last updated: July 27, 2025

Introduction

Sodium Polystyrene Sulfonate (SPS), marketed under brand names such as Kayexalate, is a cation-exchange resin primarily used to treat hyperkalemia—a condition characterized by elevated potassium levels in the blood. As an integral component in managing electrolyte imbalances, SPS occupies a crucial niche in hospital pharmacies and outpatient settings. The ongoing evolution of healthcare landscapes, driven by technological advances, regulatory shifts, and demographic trends, influences the market dynamics and financial outlook for this pharmaceutical agent. This report provides an exhaustive analysis, projecting the future trajectory for Sodium Polystyrene Sulfonate within the pharmaceutical industry.

Market Overview and Current Status

Therapeutic Role and Demand Drivers

SPS was first introduced in the 1950s and has been extensively used over the decades, particularly in acute care settings. Its primary function is to bind potassium in the gastrointestinal tract, facilitating its excretion and alleviating hyperkalemia-associated risks such as cardiac arrhythmias and neuromuscular disturbances. The demand for SPS correlates strongly with the prevalence of renal diseases, heart failure, and conditions predisposing to hyperkalemia.

Market Size and Revenue

According to recent market estimates, the global potassium-binding agents market, encompassing SPS and newer alternatives, was valued at approximately USD 500 million in 2022, with SPS accounting for a significant share due to its widespread use and existing manufacturing infrastructure. Forecasts project a compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) of around 3-4% over the next five years, driven by increased geriatric populations and higher incidence of chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Market Dynamics

Factors Favoring Growth

  1. Rising Incidence of Hyperkalemia: An aging population and increased prevalence of CKD, heart failure, and diabetes amplify hyperkalemia cases. The CDC reports CKD affects over 37 million Americans, with hyperkalemia being a common complication [1].

  2. Lifestyle and Comorbidities: The widespread adoption of medications like RAAS inhibitors, which elevate potassium levels, further sustains demand for SPS.

  3. Established Therapeutic Profile: SPS’s long-standing clinical use and familiarity among healthcare providers reinforce its persistent utilization, especially in resource-limited settings where newer agents may be less accessible.

Market Constraints and Challenges

  1. Availability of Alternatives: Recent approvals of novel potassium binders—patiromer (Veltassa) and sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (Lokelma)—offer safer and more tolerable options. These agents are touted for fewer gastrointestinal side effects and higher efficacy, threatening SPS’s market share [2].

  2. Regulatory and Safety Concerns: SPS has faced scrutiny over potential adverse events such as gastrointestinal ulceration and rare cases of colonic necrosis. The FDA issued safety warnings, prompting cautious prescribing practices that limit its use.

  3. Regulatory and Patent Landscape: As a generic, SPS faces minimal patent protections, leading to price compression and stiff competition among manufacturers.

  4. Manufacturing and Supply Chain: Toxicity concerns and manufacturing complexities influence the availability and costs associated with SPS production.

Regulatory Environment and Impact

Regulatory bodies worldwide continue to monitor the safety profile of SPS, influencing prescribing guidelines and market viability. In 2020, the FDA issued a safety alert citing gastrointestinal adverse events, prompting clinicians to reevaluate risk-benefit assessments. While these warnings temper widespread use, they also open avenues for newer agents with improved safety profiles.

Emerging Trends and Innovations

The shift towards more targeted, patient-friendly therapies is evident. Pharmaceutic innovation is focused on developing potassium binders with minimal side effects and ease of use, such as orally disintegrating tablets and liquid formulations. Additionally, digital health tools aimed at monitoring serum potassium levels may reduce the reliance on pharmacologic interventions like SPS.

Financial Trajectory

Revenue Projections

Despite safety concerns, SPS remains a core therapeutic agent, especially in low-resource settings and hospitals with established formularies. The current global market size is projected to sustain a slow but steady CAGR of approximately 2-3% over the next five years, owing to demographic trends and persistent clinical necessity.

Pricing Trends

Pricing pressures are intense due to commoditization and generic competition. The average wholesale price (AWP) for SPS per unit has declined by approximately 10-15% annually in major markets over the past decade. Volume-driven revenue remains pivotal, but margins are under continuous erosion.

Competitive Landscape

Key manufacturers include Pfizer, Fresenius Kabi, and local generic producers. Innovation and market entry barriers are relatively low for generics, intensifying price competition. The introduction of new, safer potassium binders is expected to further compress SPS market shares.

Potential for Market Expansion

While developed markets may see limited growth due to safety concerns and substitution, emerging markets with expanding healthcare infrastructure and limited access to newer agents offer growth opportunities. The increasing burden of CKD and heart failure in Asia-Pacific and Africa could drive demand for SPS as a cost-effective treatment option.

Regulatory and Policy Impact on Financial Outlook

Healthcare policies promoting cost containment, such as formulary restrictions and prior authorization, could negatively impact SPS sales. Conversely, inclusion in essential medicines lists and governmental procurement programs could bolster demand in resource-constrained environments. Ongoing regulatory evaluations will continue to shape the financial prospects for SPS manufacturers.

Conclusion

Sodium Polystyrene Sulfonate’s market remains characterized by stability amid gradual decline, primarily due to safety concerns and the advent of newer potassium binders. Its enduring role in managing hyperkalemia in specific settings ensures a baseline demand, especially in developing regions. The financial outlook hinges on balancing legacy therapeutic utility with evolving safety standards, competitive pressures, and demographic shifts.

Key Takeaways

  • Steady but Declining Market: SPS continues to serve as a cost-effective hyperkalemia treatment, but its market share diminishes as safer alternatives emerge.
  • Growing Hyperkalemia Burden: Aging populations and chronic disease prevalence sustain baseline demand, especially in low-resource and hospital settings.
  • Competitive Pressures: The advent of novel potassium binders with better safety profiles poses a significant threat, compressing margins and market share.
  • Regulatory Influence: Safety warnings impact prescribing practices and sales, underscoring the importance of regulatory navigation.
  • Emerging Market Opportunities: Developing nations represent growth potential, driven by cost-sensitive healthcare systems and expanding chronic disease burdens.

FAQs

1. How does the safety profile of SPS compare to newer potassium binders?
SPS has been associated with gastrointestinal adverse events, including ulceration and colonic necrosis, leading regulators to issue cautions. Newer agents like patiromer and sodium zirconium cyclosilicate demonstrate improved safety profiles with fewer gastrointestinal side effects, making them preferable in many clinical scenarios.

2. Will SPS be phased out in favor of newer treatments?
While clinical adoption favors newer potassium binders, SPS’s low cost and established manufacturing mean it likely remains in use, especially in resource-limited settings. However, prescribers are increasingly cautious, and future phasing out depends on regulatory actions and evolving clinical guidelines.

3. What are the main drivers for SPS market longevity?
Cost-effectiveness, longstanding clinical familiarity, and availability in generic form sustain SPS usage. Additionally, in settings where newer agents are unavailable or unaffordable, SPS remains a vital treatment.

4. How do demographic trends impact the financial outlook for SPS?
An aging global population and increasing prevalence of CKD and cardiovascular diseases sustain demand. These trends suggest stable baseline usage, although growth may be limited due to alternative therapies.

5. Are there any ongoing innovations in SPS formulations?
Current innovations focus mainly on developing safer and more convenient formulations of newer potassium binders. SPS formulations remain largely unchanged, but manufacturing improvements may continue to reduce costs and enhance safety over time.


References

[1] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Chronic Kidney Disease Facts. CDC, 2022.
[2] Gupta, R., & Bhan, A. (2021). Novel Potassium Binders in Hyperkalemia Management. Journal of Clinical Therapeutics, 45(7), 1125-1132.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.