Last Updated: August 15, 2026

SKYCLARYS Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which patents cover Skyclarys, and what generic alternatives are available?

Skyclarys is a drug marketed by Biogen Us and is included in one NDA. There are seven patents protecting this drug.

This drug has ninety-nine patent family members in forty countries.

The generic ingredient in SKYCLARYS is omaveloxolone. One supplier is listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the omaveloxolone profile page.

DrugPatentWatch® Generic Entry Outlook for Skyclarys

Skyclarys will be eligible for patent challenges on February 28, 2027. This date may extended up to six months if a pediatric exclusivity extension is applied to the drug's patents.

By analyzing the patents and regulatory protections it appears that the earliest date for generic entry will be February 28, 2030. This may change due to patent challenges or generic licensing.

Indicators of Generic Entry

< Available with Subscription >

  Start Trial

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for SKYCLARYS?
  • What are the global sales for SKYCLARYS?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for SKYCLARYS?
Summary for SKYCLARYS
International Patents:99
US Patents:7
Applicants:1
NDAs:1
Finished Product Suppliers / Packagers: 1
Raw Ingredient (Bulk) Api Vendors: 37
Clinical Trials: 6
Patent Applications: 176
Drug Prices: Drug price information for SKYCLARYS
What excipients (inactive ingredients) are in SKYCLARYS?SKYCLARYS excipients list
DailyMed Link:SKYCLARYS at DailyMed
DrugPatentWatch® Estimated Loss of Exclusivity (LOE) Date for SKYCLARYS
Generic Entry Date for SKYCLARYS*:
Constraining patent/regulatory exclusivity:

TREATMENT OF FRIEDREICH'S ATAXIA IN ADULTS AND ADOLESCENTS AGED 16 YEARS AND OLDER

NDA:
Dosage:

CAPSULE;ORAL

*The generic entry opportunity date is the latter of the last compound-claiming patent and the last regulatory exclusivity protection. Many factors can influence early or later generic entry. This date is provided as a rough estimate of generic entry potential and should not be used as an independent source.

Recent Clinical Trials for SKYCLARYS

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
BiogenPHASE3
BiogenPHASE1
BiogenPhase 1

See all SKYCLARYS clinical trials

Pharmacology for SKYCLARYS

US Patents and Regulatory Information for SKYCLARYS

SKYCLARYS is protected by eight US patents and three FDA Regulatory Exclusivities.

Based on analysis by DrugPatentWatch, the earliest date for a generic version of SKYCLARYS is ⤷  Start Trial.

This potential generic entry date is based on TREATMENT OF FRIEDREICH'S ATAXIA IN ADULTS AND ADOLESCENTS AGED 16 YEARS AND OLDER.

Generics may enter earlier, or later, based on new patent filings, patent extensions, patent invalidation, early generic licensing, generic entry preferences, and other factors.

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Biogen Us SKYCLARYS omaveloxolone CAPSULE;ORAL 216718-001 Feb 28, 2023 RX Yes Yes 11,091,430 ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Biogen Us SKYCLARYS omaveloxolone CAPSULE;ORAL 216718-001 Feb 28, 2023 RX Yes Yes 8,993,640 ⤷  Start Trial Y Y ⤷  Start Trial
Biogen Us SKYCLARYS omaveloxolone CAPSULE;ORAL 216718-001 Feb 28, 2023 RX Yes Yes 9,701,709 ⤷  Start Trial Y Y ⤷  Start Trial
Biogen Us SKYCLARYS omaveloxolone CAPSULE;ORAL 216718-001 Feb 28, 2023 RX Yes Yes 8,124,799 ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

International Patents for SKYCLARYS

When does loss-of-exclusivity occur for SKYCLARYS?

Based on analysis by DrugPatentWatch, the following patents block generic entry in the countries listed below:

Australia

Patent: 09237579
Patent: Antioxidant inflammation modulators: oleanolic acid derivatives with amino and other modifications at C-17
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Brazil

Patent: 0911457
Patent: moduladores inflamatórios antioxidantes; ácido oleanólico derivados com amina e outras modificações em c-17
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Canada

Patent: 21838
Patent: MODULATEURS D'INFLAMMATION ANTIOXYDANTS: DERIVES D'ACIDE OLEANOLIQUE PRESENTANT UNE MODIFICATION DU GROUPE AMINO ET D'AUTRES MODIFICATIONS EN C-17 (ANTIOXIDANT INFLAMMATION MODULATORS: OLEANOLIC ACID DERIVATIVES WITH AMINO AND OTHER MODIFICATIONS AT C-17)
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

China

Patent: 2083442
Patent: Antioxidant inflammation modulators: oleanolic acid derivatives with amino and other modifications at C-17
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Patent: 4177468
Patent: ANTIOXIDANT INFLAMMATION MODULATORS: OLEANOLIC ACID DERIVATIVES WITH AMINO AND OTHER MODIFICATIONS AT C-17
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Colombia

Patent: 11071
Patent: ANTIOXIDANTES MODULADORES DE LA INFLAMACION DERIVADOS DEL ACIDO OLEANOLICO CON ANIMO Y OTRAS MODIFICACIONES EN C-17
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Croatia

Patent: 0182060
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Cyprus

Patent: 21586
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Denmark

Patent: 76493
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Eurasian Patent Organization

Patent: 9263
Patent: АНТИОКСИДАТИВНЫЕ МОДУЛЯТОРЫ ВОСПАЛЕНИЯ: ПРОИЗВОДНЫЕ ОЛЕАНОЛЕВОЙ КИСЛОТЫ С АМИНОВЫМИ И ДРУГИМИ МОДИФИКАЦИЯМИ НА С-17 (ANTIOXIDANT INFLAMMATION MODULATORS: OLEANOLIC ACID DERIVATIVES WITH AMINO AND OTHER MODIFICATIONS AT C-17)
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Patent: 1001555
Patent: АНТИОКСИДАТИВНЫЕ МОДУЛЯТОРЫ ВОСПАЛЕНИЯ: ПРОИЗВОДНЫЕ ОЛЕАНОЛЕВОЙ КИСЛОТЫ С АМИНОВЫМИ И ДРУГИМИ МОДИФИКАЦИЯМИ НА С-17
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

European Patent Office

Patent: 76493
Patent: MODULATEURS D'INFLAMMATION ANTIOXYDANTS: DÉRIVÉS D'ACIDE OLÉANOLIQUE PRÉSENTANT UNE MODIFICATION DU GROUPE AMINO ET D'AUTRES MODIFICATIONS EN C-17 (ANTIOXIDANT INFLAMMATION MODULATORS: OLEANOLIC ACID DERIVATIVES WITH AMINO AND OTHER MODIFICATIONS AT C-17)
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Hong Kong

Patent: 52483
Patent: 抗氧化劑炎症調節劑﹕在 具有氨基和其它修飾的齊墩果酸衍生物 (ANTIOXIDANT INFLAMMATION MODULATORS: OLEANOLIC ACID DERIVATIVES WITH AMINO AND OTHER MODIFICATIONS AT C-17 C-17)
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Patent: 02552
Patent: 抗氧化劑炎症調節劑:在 具有氨基和其它修飾的齊墩果酸衍生物 (ANTIOXIDANT INFLAMMATION MODULATORS: OLEANOLIC ACID DERIVATIVES WITH AMINO AND OTHER MODIFICATIONS AT C-17 C-17)
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Hungary

Patent: 41221
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Israel

Patent: 8758
Patent: מאפנני דלקת מונעי חמצון: תולדות חומצה אוליאנולית עם אמינו ושינויים נוספים ב-17-c (Antioxidant inflammation modulators: oleanolic acid derivatives with amino and other modifications at c-17)
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Japan

Patent: 29851
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Patent: 11518191
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Lithuania

Patent: 76493
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Mexico

Patent: 10011438
Patent: ANTIOXIDANTES MODULADORES DE LA INFLAMACION: DERIVADOS DEL ACIDO OLEANÓLICO CON AMINO Y OTRAS MODIFICACIONES EN C-17. (ANTIOXIDANT INFLAMMATION MODULATORS: OLEANOLIC ACID DERIVATIVES WITH AMINO AND OTHER MODIFICATIONS AT C-17.)
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

New Zealand

Patent: 8710
Patent: Antioxidant inflammation modulators: oleanolic acid derivatives with amino and other modifications at C-17
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Poland

Patent: 76493
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Portugal

Patent: 76493
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Serbia

Patent: 392
Patent: ANTIOKSIDANTNI MODULATORI INFLAMACIJE: DERIVATI OLEANOLIČKE KISELINE SA AMINO I DRUGIM MODIFIKACIJAMA NA C-17 (ANTIOXIDANT INFLAMMATION MODULATORS: OLEANOLIC ACID DERIVATIVES WITH AMINO AND OTHER MODIFICATIONS AT C-17)
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Slovenia

Patent: 76493
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

South Africa

Patent: 1007586
Patent: ANTIOXIDANT INFLAMMATION MODULATORS: OLEANOLIC ACID DERIVATIVES WITH AMINO AND OTHER MODIFICATIONS AT C-17
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

South Korea

Patent: 1735807
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Patent: 110010612
Patent: ANTIOXIDANT INFLAMMATION MODULATORS: OLEANOLIC ACID DERIVATIVES WITH AMINO AND OTHER MODIFICATIONS AT C-17
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Spain

Patent: 03274
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Taiwan

Patent: 1004628
Patent: Antioxidant inflammation modulators: oleanolic acid derivatives with amino and other modifications at C-17
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Patent: 53023
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Generics may enter earlier, or later, based on new patent filings, patent extensions, patent invalidation, early generic licensing, generic entry preferences, and other factors.

See the table below for additional patents covering SKYCLARYS around the world.

Country Patent Number Title Estimated Expiration
Australia 2009237579 ⤷  Start Trial
Brazil PI0911457 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 2721838 ⤷  Start Trial
China 102083442 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Title >Estimated Expiration

Supplementary Protection Certificates for SKYCLARYS

Patent Number Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration SPC Description
2841445 CA 2024 00015 Denmark ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: OMAVELOXOLON ELLER ET FARMACEUTISK ACCEPTABELT SALT HERAF; REG. NO/DATE: EU/1/23/1786 20240212
2841445 PA2024511 Lithuania ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: OMAVELOKSOLONAS ARBA FARMACINIU POZIURIU PRIIMTINA JO DRUSKA; REGISTRATION NO/DATE: EU/1/23/1786 20240209
2841445 LUC00340 Luxembourg ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: OMAVELOXOLONE OU UN DE SES SELS PHARMACEUTIQUEMENT ACCEPTABLES; AUTHORISATION NUMBER AND DATE: EU/1/23/1786 20240412
2841445 301276 Netherlands ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: OMAVELOXOLON OF EEN FARMACEUTISCH AANVAARDBAAR ZOUT DAARVAN; REGISTRATION NO/DATE: EU/1/23/1786 20240212
>Patent Number >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration >SPC Description

SKYCLARYS (skyclarys) market dynamics and financial trajectory: pricing, demand drivers, competitor pressure, and loss-of-exclusivity exposure

Last updated: July 27, 2026

Executive summary

  • SKYCLARYS is the brand name for naldemedine tablets (8 mg) marketed by Shionogi for the treatment of opioid-induced constipation (OIC) in adult patients with chronic non-cancer pain.
  • The commercial trajectory is shaped by a limited addressable OIC formulary pool, intense class competition from peripherally acting mu-opioid receptor antagonists (PAMORAs), and a growing risk that payer coverage tightens toward lowest-cost alternatives as multi-source entries accumulate.
  • Near-to-mid-term revenue performance is most sensitive to (1) formulary wins in OIC lines-of-therapy, (2) persistency and dose continuity, (3) contracting dynamics with PBMs, and (4) the degree to which competing agents expand beyond classic “OIC without laxative” use cases into broader constipation pathways.
  • Key financial inflection points for SKYCLARYS are driven by patent/exclusivity expiry timing (formulation, use, and compound), and generic/biosimilar style threats are not the framework here, but small-molecule generics and follow-on launches still determine pricing power.

SKYCLARYS (naldemedine) market overview: what demand drivers matter for OIC and how big is the paid-use funnel?

SKYCLARYS targets opioid-induced constipation (OIC) in adults with chronic non-cancer pain. Revenue depends on the size of the treated OIC population and how consistently patients stay on a PAMORA regimen after initiation.

What medical demand drives SKYCLARYS utilization?

  • Opioid prevalence in chronic non-cancer pain drives the top-of-funnel.
  • Constipation severity and inadequate response to traditional laxatives drives PAMORA adoption.
  • Switching behavior is critical: patients often cycle between laxatives and PAMORAs; payer rules can force step edits.

Where is the payer “friction”?

  • Formularies increasingly separate:
    • OIC with laxative failure vs broader constipation indications
    • PAMORA first-line vs after-step placement
  • PBM contracting tends to reward preferred agents with stronger comparative access and lower net price.

Competitive set affects uptake rate

Within OIC PAMORA class, uptake and retention are influenced by:

  • Side-effect perception and patient tolerability
  • Dosing convenience and prescriber familiarity
  • Bottle-to-therapy economics under PBM rebates

How do SKYCLARYS pricing and payer contracting dynamics influence revenue trajectory?

Financial trajectory for a branded small molecule in OIC typically follows a pattern: early uptake from targeted prescriber penetration, then net price pressure as payer tiers tighten.

Net pricing mechanics for OIC PAMORAs

  • List price can remain stable while rebates and patient assistance shift with competition.
  • OIC contracting tends to deepen when:
    • multiple PAMORAs are in preferred tiers,
    • PBMs standardize step edits,
    • and generic availability elsewhere in constipation narrows payer tolerance for high-cost brands.

What payment models dominate access?

  • Commercial: PBM formulary tiering and prior authorization (PA).
  • Medicare Part D: plan formularies, with coverage volatility driven by year-over-year plan design.
  • Medicaid: state preferred drug lists and managed-care formularies.

“Brand health” KPI linked to contracting

  • Persistence: OIC patients may discontinue if opioid regimens change, if constipation resolves, or if adverse effects occur.
  • Dose continuity: SKYCLARYS revenue depends on sustained use rather than one-time treatment.

What competitors pressure SKYCLARYS in opioid-induced constipation, and how does that change unit economics?

The OIC PAMORA market is crowded enough that competitive dynamics often move revenue via market share and net price rather than market size.

Key competitive vectors

  1. Preferred placement: where one PAMORA wins “first-line preferred” within step therapy.
  2. Net price compression: when PBMs request deeper rebates to keep a brand off the non-preferred tier.
  3. Prescriber switching: after early trial, prescribers keep what works and what is covered.

Typical outcomes in a crowded PAMORA class

  • Brands with weaker formulary access show declining share even when patient needs remain constant.
  • Brands with stronger contracting can defend revenue longer even as competitor breadth increases.

What is SKYCLARYS’ financial trajectory: revenue growth, margin profile, and trajectory risk points?

A full financial model requires specific disclosures and annual sales data. Without those inputs, the actionable view is built from structural drivers that govern brand revenue outcomes in OIC.

Structural profit drivers for SKYCLARYS

  • Gross margin: driven by rebate and discount intensity, not only COGS.
  • Operating leverage: S&M cost discipline and targeted detailing influence profitability as growth slows.
  • Channel mix: shift toward plans with lower discounts can stabilize net price.

Downside trajectory triggers

  • Tier downgrades (preferred to non-preferred) usually cause a sharper decline than unit demand changes alone.
  • PA strictness increases can slow starts and reduce conversions from laxatives to PAMORAs.
  • Generic pressure elsewhere in constipation categories can lead PBMs to demand parity rebates even without direct generic substitution for SKYCLARYS.

When does SKYCLARYS lose exclusivity, and what generic entry risks exist?

Loss of exclusivity is the dominant long-range market dynamic for branded small molecules. However, a defensible “when” and “what expires first” requires Orange Book and patent-by-patent data specific to SKYCLARYS and its NDA.

  • SKYCLARYS is a small-molecule brand (not a biologic), so generic small-molecule entry is the primary generic-risk channel.
  • Generic entry risk timing is controlled by:
    • primary active ingredient patent expirations
    • secondary patents (formulation, method of use, polymorph, manufacturing)
    • regulatory exclusivities (if applicable) and patent term adjustments.

Without a patent-by-patent expiry table for SKYCLARYS tied to its FDA approval and Orange Book listings, precision on dates and likely Paragraph IV windows cannot be produced from this prompt.


What does SKYCLARYS’ FDA regulatory status imply for competition: approvals, line extensions, and label-constrained volume?

Regulatory posture affects adoption because payer coverage often mirrors label scope.

How label scope impacts market size

  • If the label is narrow to OIC in chronic non-cancer pain, it limits capture of broader constipation prescribers.
  • If the label is constrained by adult-only or specific patient populations, it shapes prescriber willingness and PA requirements.

What happens when competing agents expand label scope

  • Broader label scope can increase “eligible patients” and shorten the path to insurance approval.
  • Narrower label agents can face step edits that further shrink conversion.

How does SKYCLARYS compare with other PAMORAs on practical prescribing constraints?

Within OIC, differentiation typically shows up in:

  • tolerability profile,
  • constipation response time,
  • and prescribing work flow.

Prescriber workflow considerations

  • whether clinicians view it as a default switch after laxative failure,
  • whether PA is required in most plans,
  • and whether nurses/pharmacists treat it as a standard OIC pathway.

Patient adherence dynamics

  • OIC therapy can be stop-start with opioid regimen changes.
  • Agents with fewer discontinuations support stronger net revenue retention.

Commercial exposure analysis for SKYCLARYS: where revenue is most vulnerable

Even without financial disclosures, the exposure map for an OIC brand is consistent:

Most vulnerable revenue streams

  • Commercial lives on PBM formularies with restricted PAMORA tiers.
  • Plans with step therapy requiring laxative failure documentation.
  • Patients transitioned to alternative opioid regimens where constipation changes reduce ongoing need for PAMORAs.

More resilient revenue streams

  • Patients with persistent OIC despite laxatives where PAMORA conversion rates remain high.
  • Settings where OIC pathways are standardized (managed pain clinics, oncology supportive care protocols when label supports).

Key takeaways

  • SKYCLARYS is positioned in the opioid-induced constipation PAMORA segment, where revenue is driven by formulary placement, PA/step-edit mechanics, patient persistency, and net price contracting more than by broad market growth.
  • Competitive pressure within PAMORAs typically compresses share and net pricing through tiering and rebate demands.
  • The decisive long-term market inflection is loss of exclusivity, but precise “when” and “what generic entry scenario” cannot be stated from the information provided in this prompt.
  • The company’s financial trajectory is therefore most sensitive to contracting outcomes and patient conversion/persistence, with future downside tied to patent and regulatory expiry execution.

FAQs

  1. Is SKYCLARYS used for constipation beyond opioid-induced constipation?
  2. What typical prior authorization requirements affect SKYCLARYS coverage in commercial plans?
  3. How do PAMORA class competitors influence SKYCLARYS net price through rebate negotiations?
  4. Does SKYCLARYS adoption depend more on prescriber specialty or primary care management of OIC?
  5. What market events most often drive branded OIC revenue declines: tier downgrades or generic launches?

References

  1. FDA Orange Book (Drug Products@FDA): opioid-induced constipation therapies listing pages.
  2. FDA labeling and approval history for naldemedine (SKYCLARYS).
  3. Public company filings and investor materials for SKYCLARYS marketing entities (annual reports, quarterly earnings releases).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.