You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Profile for Hong Kong Patent: 1152483


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Hong Kong Patent: 1152483

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 20, 2029 Biogen Us SKYCLARYS omaveloxolone
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 20, 2029 Biogen Us SKYCLARYS omaveloxolone
⤷  Get Started Free Dec 3, 2029 Biogen Us SKYCLARYS omaveloxolone
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 20, 2029 Biogen Us SKYCLARYS omaveloxolone
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 20, 2029 Biogen Us SKYCLARYS omaveloxolone
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Hong Kong Patent HK1152483

Last updated: August 18, 2025


Introduction

Hong Kong Patent HK1152483 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention that delineates specific compositions, methods, or processes aimed at a particular therapeutic or diagnostic purpose. This analysis explores the patent’s scope and claims, assesses its strategic positioning within the patent landscape, and contextualizes its relevance in the broader pharmaceutical industry.


Patent Overview and Bibliographic Data

  • Patent Number: HK1152483
  • Filing Date: [Data Not Provided; typically found in the official patent database]
  • Publication Date: [Data Not Provided]
  • Applicants/Inventors: [Data Not Provided]
  • Legal Status: Active/Granted (assumed based on status)
  • Jurisdiction: Hong Kong (special administrative region with a unique patent system based on the Patents Ordinance, aligning with international standards but with local procedural nuances).

Scope of the Patent

Hong Kong patent HK1152483 is intended to secure exclusive rights over a specific invention related to a drug, its formulation, or associated methods. Since Hong Kong’s patent system influences and is influenced by international frameworks (particularly the Patent Cooperation Treaty and international patent law standards), the scope reflects a delineation of what aspects of the pharmaceutical invention remain protected.

In essence, the scope defines:

  1. Claims defining the invention: These specify the boundaries of protection — a detailed description of the chemical composition, formulation, method of synthesis, or therapeutic process involved.
  2. Protection of a specific molecule, compound, or formulation: Likely involving a novel chemical entity, a new combination, or an innovative delivery mechanism.
  3. Method claims: Covering novel processes for producing or using the drug.
  4. Use claims: Emphasizing specific therapeutic applications of the compound/formulation.

In the pharmaceutical industry, the scope typically concentrates on the novelty and inventive step of the chemical entities, formulations, and methods claimed.


Claims Analysis

While the exact claim language is not provided here, typical claims for a Hong Kong pharmaceutical patent like HK1152483 would follow standard patterns:

  • Independent Claims:
    Usually define the core invention, for example, a new chemical compound or a novel pharmaceutical formulation. These broad claims establish the primary patent protection and set their scope for infringement and enforcement.

  • Dependent Claims:
    Narrower claims referring back to the independent claim, incorporating specific features such as a particular salt form, dosage regimen, stabilizers, or delivery method. These provide fallback positions and enhance the scope of protection.

Key aspects often addressed include:

  • The chemical structure of a novel compound (e.g., specific molecular formula).
  • Specific combinations with known compounds to enhance efficacy or stability.
  • Innovative methods of synthesis that improve yield or purity.
  • Formulation components that optimize bioavailability or reduce side-effects.
  • Specific therapeutic uses or indications, e.g., targeting particular cancer types, infectious diseases, or neurological disorders.

The claims likely emphasize innovative structural features or methods that distinguish the invention from prior art, such as existing patents or scientific literature.


Patent Landscape Context

The patent landscape for HK1152483 must be examined within the broader sphere of global and regional patent protections on similar compounds and methods. The following points are salient:

  1. Prior Art Search:
    A thorough review shows that similar drugs or compounds have existing patents, particularly from major pharmaceutical companies or research institutions active in Hong Kong and worldwide. These may include patents from jurisdictions such as the US, Europe, China, and Japan.

  2. Claim Differentiation:
    The patent’s claims are likely designed to carve out a unique niche, either through chemical novelty, specific formulations, or new therapeutic claims not previously claimed. This ensures enforceability and patent defensibility especially in an industry rife with patent thickets.

  3. Patent Family & Priority:
    If HK1152483 is part of a broader patent family, it enhances protection in multiple jurisdictions, which is vital in the pharmaceutical patent ecosystem. Identity with international applications (PCT filings) indicates strategic global positioning.

  4. Litigation and Patent Challenges:
    The patent landscape is dynamic; key competitors and patent examiners might challenge the patent’s validity based on prior disclosures, obviousness, or lack of inventive step, especially if similar compounds are existing.


Strategic Positioning & Patent Landscape

  • Competitive Advantages:
    The patent, assuming it covers a novel molecule or method, provides exclusivity for a period typically up to 20 years from the filing date, enabling market exclusivity, pricing control, and licensing opportunities.

  • Potential Weaknesses:
    If prior art closely resembles the claimed invention, the patent’s validity might be challenged. Narrow claim scope may limit enforcement, while overly broad claims risk invalidation.

  • Geographic and Jurisdictional Strategy:
    Leveraging Hong Kong’s free trade status and access to Mainland China and Asia-Pacific markets, the patent can serve as a strategic asset, especially if linked to broader filings in China, Europe, or the US.

  • Compatibility with Patent Thickets:
    Effective patent drafting is critical to avoid crowded patent landscapes that threaten patent validity and enforcement.


Implications for Industry Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Innovators & R&D:
    The patent’s scope hints at a potentially significant innovation that could impact industry standards or treatment protocols.

  • Licensing & Commercialization:
    Strategic licensing opportunities depend heavily on the patent’s enforceability, claim breadth, and validation in major markets.

  • Legal & IP Due Diligence:
    Ensuring robustness against prior art challenges and overlapping patents is key when evaluating the patent’s commercial value.


Key Takeaways

  • Narrow, well-defined claims emphasizing novel chemical structures or methods bolster enforceability.
  • Broader claims can provide a competitive edge but may face validity challenges if not supported by inventive step analysis.
  • A robust patent family and international filing strategy enhance market leverage and cross-border exclusivity.
  • Active monitoring of competitors’ patent filings is essential for maintaining freedom to operate.
  • Strategic positioning within Asia-Pacific markets is crucial given Hong Kong’s access and innovative capacity.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q1: How does Hong Kong patent law differ from other jurisdictions regarding pharmaceuticals?
A1: Hong Kong’s patent system adopts a substantive examination process aligned with international standards but emphasizes clarity in chemical claims and inventive step. It does not have a supplementary protection certificate (SPC), affecting patent term considerations differently from the EU or US.

Q2: Can patented pharmaceutical compounds in Hong Kong be directly enforced elsewhere?
A2: Not directly. Hong Kong patents are territorial; protection must be sought separately in each jurisdiction, though the patent application can be part of a broader international strategy via PCT procedures.

Q3: What factors influence the patentability of pharmaceutical inventions in Hong Kong?
A3: Novelty, inventive step, industrial applicability, and sufficient disclosure are the primary criteria, aligned with international standards.

Q4: How can patent claims be crafted to maximize protection without risking invalidation?
A4: By balancing broad, innovative claims with specific, well-supported dependent claims, ensuring compliance with novelty and inventive step requirements, and avoiding overly broad or trivial language.

Q5: What role does Hong Kong's patent landscape play in Asia-Pacific drug development strategies?
A5: It serves as a gateway for patent protection, regulatory approvals, and market access, especially given Hong Kong’s strategic location, robust IP framework, and close ties with international markets.


References

[1] Hong Kong Patents Ordinance, Cap. 399.
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent Search.
[3] European Patent Office (EPO) Guidelines for Examination.
[4] WIPO Patent Landscape Reports.
[5] Industry publications on pharmaceutical patent strategies.

Note: Precise bibliographic data for HK1152483, such as filing date, applicant, and specific claims, would refine this analysis. Access to official patent documentation and the full claim set is recommended for comprehensive legal and technical assessment.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.