Last Updated: August 3, 2026

POTASSIUM CHLORIDE 10MEQ Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which patents cover Potassium Chloride 10meq, and when can generic versions of Potassium Chloride 10meq launch?

Potassium Chloride 10meq is a drug marketed by Fresenius Kabi Usa, Nexus, Baxter Hlthcare, Otsuka Icu Medcl, and Icu Medical Inc. and is included in fourteen NDAs.

The generic ingredient in POTASSIUM CHLORIDE 10MEQ is dextrose; potassium chloride; sodium chloride. There are nine drug master file entries for this compound. Four suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the dextrose; potassium chloride; sodium chloride profile page.

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for POTASSIUM CHLORIDE 10MEQ?
  • What are the global sales for POTASSIUM CHLORIDE 10MEQ?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for POTASSIUM CHLORIDE 10MEQ?
Summary for POTASSIUM CHLORIDE 10MEQ
Pharmacology for POTASSIUM CHLORIDE 10MEQ

US Patents and Regulatory Information for POTASSIUM CHLORIDE 10MEQ

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Fresenius Kabi Usa POTASSIUM CHLORIDE 10MEQ potassium chloride INJECTABLE;INJECTION 211087-001 Sep 9, 2020 AP RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Otsuka Icu Medcl POTASSIUM CHLORIDE 10MEQ IN DEXTROSE 5% AND SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.45% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER dextrose; potassium chloride; sodium chloride INJECTABLE;INJECTION 018362-009 Jul 5, 1983 AP RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Baxter Hlthcare POTASSIUM CHLORIDE 10MEQ IN PLASTIC CONTAINER potassium chloride INJECTABLE;INJECTION 019904-001 Dec 26, 1989 AP RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Otsuka Icu Medcl POTASSIUM CHLORIDE 10MEQ IN DEXTROSE 5% AND LACTATED RINGER'S IN PLASTIC CONTAINER calcium chloride; dextrose; potassium chloride; sodium chloride; sodium lactate INJECTABLE;INJECTION 019685-005 Oct 17, 1988 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Nexus POTASSIUM CHLORIDE 10MEQ potassium chloride INJECTABLE;INJECTION 214727-002 Mar 18, 2021 AP RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Icu Medical Inc POTASSIUM CHLORIDE 10MEQ IN DEXTROSE 5% AND SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.3% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER dextrose; potassium chloride; sodium chloride INJECTABLE;INJECTION 018876-001 Jan 17, 1986 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration
Last updated: June 29, 2026

Potassium Chloride 10 mEq Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory: Pricing, Volume, Competition, and Exclusivity Outlook

Executive summary: Potassium chloride 10 mEq is a long-established, generic-dominated oral salt product with broad manufacturing capacity and low patent leverage. The financial trajectory is driven by (1) sustained demand from potassium repletion and chronic hypokalemia prevention, (2) pressure from multi-source pricing, (3) periodic supply and quality-control disruptions that can temporarily lift price, and (4) working-capital and logistics economics typical for small, high-volume oral generics. Near-term market outcomes are most sensitive to FDA regulatory status (ANDAs and supplement churn), GMP stability, and payer reimbursement benchmarks rather than to new innovation cycles.

Scope note (what this analysis covers): “Potassium chloride 10 mEq” in the US market typically refers to oral solid oral dosage presentations delivering 10 mEq of potassium per unit (commonly tablets or extended-release forms depending on the labeled strength). The market is largely interchangeable across generic manufacturers when the product is bioequivalent and meets label requirements for the intended release profile.


How big is the US market for Potassium Chloride 10 mEq and what drives demand?

Featured snippet answer: Demand for oral potassium chloride is stable and scales with chronic cardiovascular and metabolic co-morbidity prevalence, diuretic use, and inpatient formularies. The 10 mEq strength is a dosing convenience point within a broader potassium chloride category sold across multiple strengths and release profiles.

What patient and prescriber behaviors support recurring sales

Key demand vectors:

  • Chronic hypokalemia prevention in patients using loop or thiazide diuretics for heart failure, hypertension, or edema.
  • Medication-driven potassium loss from diuretic regimens in outpatient care and from intensive diuretic protocols in inpatient settings.
  • Potassium repletion during electrolyte management in emergency and hospital care, where standardized oral replacement tablets are used once patients can tolerate enteral therapy.
  • Formulary substitution: because the active ingredient is potassium chloride (a simple inorganic salt), payer and hospital pharmacy teams prioritize lowest net cost and reliable supply.

Why 10 mEq is a “stability” strength rather than an innovation strength

  • 10 mEq sits in the middle of commonly used dosing regimens, so it tends to be used as part of titration schedules rather than as a unique therapeutic niche.
  • Substitution across strengths is common; patients can be moved between 5 mEq, 10 mEq, and higher-dose presentations with minimal clinical friction if the release profile matches.

What market dynamics shape pricing for oral Potassium Chloride 10 mEq?

Featured snippet answer: Pricing is pressured by generic multi-source competition, with temporary upward moves during supply disruptions or manufacturing slowdowns, and sustained downward pressure during normal competitive conditions.

Multi-source competition mechanics

  • Potassium chloride oral products are typically sold by multiple generic manufacturers at different time points following ANDA approvals and line expansions.
  • Gross-to-net pricing is the key battleground: rebates, chargebacks, and contracting tend to compress realized prices quickly after competitor entries.
  • The category behaves like a commodity oral electrolyte: small product-level pricing changes can be large in revenue terms because volumes are high and recurring.

Supply chain and GMP sensitivity

Even in low-innovation categories, price can swing when:

  • manufacturing lines pause for sterility, contamination controls, or particulate control (less common for dry tablets but still relevant for solid oral plants),
  • distribution is constrained by product holds or packaging shortages,
  • raw material logistics for inorganic salts are disrupted.

When supply is tight, wholesalers and PBMs can temporarily raise contracted rates until inventories normalize.


What is the patent and exclusivity landscape for Potassium Chloride 10 mEq, and how does it affect financial trajectory?

Featured snippet answer: Potassium chloride is a generic active ingredient with limited ability to sustain exclusivity at the drug-product level. Financial trajectory is therefore dominated by generic competitive dynamics rather than by brand-like patent cliffs.

How “exclusivity” typically manifests in this category

Inorganic salt products usually lack meaningful active-ingredient patent coverage. Where exclusivity exists, it typically comes from:

  • formulation-level patents on specific release profiles or excipient systems,
  • method-of-use claims (less common for potassium chloride due to established clinical use),
  • manufacturing process claims (often hard to enforce against bioequivalent equivalents in practice).

Net effect on finance: even where patents exist, the market tends to enter generic parity quickly for the same labeled strength and release profile, leading to stable-but-low margin conditions.


How many ANDAs compete for Potassium Chloride 10 mEq, and what does that mean for market share?

Featured snippet answer: The number of competitors is high relative to value because the active ingredient is mature and the product is typically not protected by strong exclusivity. Market share typically follows contracted formulary status and supply reliability.

Competitive entry patterns

  • New entrants often compete on the same labeled strength and route (oral).
  • Lines expanding to additional package sizes or release profiles can capture share from under-supplied SKUs.
  • Switching costs are low for payers and pharmacies if the product is therapeutically equivalent and meets the same release specification.

What wins contracts

  • Net price and rebate structure.
  • Continuity of supply and low backorder rates.
  • Packaging attributes that match institutional dispensing and inventory workflows.
  • Stability of quality metrics, especially during site changes and line upgrades.

What is the Orange Book status of potassium chloride 10 mEq, and what does it imply for generic entry risk?

Featured snippet answer: Orange Book listings typically show multiple ANDA products with limited remaining new-drug exclusivity. Generic entry risk is low because the category is already generic, so the issue is supply and contract placement rather than patent-driven delay.

How to interpret Orange Book listings for this category

  • Priority is whether any specific listed patents remain in-force against a given product and strength with the same release profile.
  • In practice, the category’s value chain is less sensitive to patent term and more sensitive to whether product lines continue to run and whether FDA actions restrict supply.

Implication for business planning: revenue forecasting should weight regulatory and manufacturing continuity over “patent watch” scenarios.


What Paragraph IV litigation would apply to Potassium Chloride 10 mEq?

Featured snippet answer: Paragraph IV litigation is unlikely to be a meaningful near-term driver because the category is mature and multiple generic versions already exist. Litigation impact, when it occurs, is usually episodic and localized to specific product presentations.

What usually causes legal events in mature generics

  • site-specific FDA actions (not patent-centric),
  • patent disputes tied to niche formulation or release claims,
  • labeling disputes rather than core composition disputes.

Implication for financial trajectory: expect less “headline-driven” swings; treat legal events as rare but operationally material when they block supply.


What formulation and release-profile patents could matter for 10 mEq tablets versus extended-release?

Featured snippet answer: If the market includes both immediate-release and extended-release or sustained-action formulations, patent coverage may differ by release profile. Release profile alignment is the main practical differentiator.

Common product differentiation axes

  • immediate-release tablets vs extended-release tablets/granules
  • excipient systems affecting dissolution rate
  • tablet hardness and manufacturing consistency
  • packaging and dosing unit design (less patent-sensitive, more supply-chain sensitive)

Business implication: competitive pressure is strongest when multiple competitors meet the same release profile requirement with bioequivalent data.


How does Potassium Chloride 10 mEq compare with other potassium supplementation options?

Featured snippet answer: Potassium chloride oral tablets compete with other potassium delivery forms primarily on cost, formulary position, and tolerance.

Key substitution classes

  • other oral potassium chloride strengths and release profiles (primary substitute)
  • dietary potassium strategies (weaker substitute in treatment of clinically significant hypokalemia)
  • other potassium salts (less common for routine use; substitution depends on label and clinical practice)
  • IV potassium chloride in hospital settings (not a like-for-like substitute for oral 10 mEq)

Implication for revenue: substitution risk is highest within the same oral potassium chloride family, where multi-source products undercut each other.


What are the commercial outcomes: revenue, margin, and working-capital profile for the category?

Featured snippet answer: Revenue is volume-led with low margin, and working capital is tightly linked to inventory turns. Financial trajectory is often stable but can show sharp volatility from supply disruptions and contract renegotiations.

Revenue drivers

  • number of institutional formularies carrying the SKU
  • PBM contracting and rebate structures
  • inpatient usage protocol adoption
  • pharmacy distribution channels: retail, mail order, and hospital systems

Cost and margin structure

Typical drivers:

  • commodity raw materials and packaging costs
  • manufacturing utilization and scale economics
  • QA costs and regulatory compliance burden
  • logistics costs and penalties for shortages/backorders

Expectation: gross margins compress quickly after entry; EBITDA depends on throughput and cost control more than on price.


What supply disruptions or quality actions can change financial trajectory for this product?

Featured snippet answer: Product holds, recalls, and manufacturing stoppages can temporarily lift net pricing but often lead to churn in contracts and lost volume once supply normalizes.

Where shocks originate

  • batch failures or stability failures
  • sterility is generally less critical for dry solids than for injectables, but particulate and microbiological controls still matter
  • container-closure system or packaging defects
  • distribution channel constraints during peak demand

Business impact pattern:

  • short-term price relief if competitors are out
  • medium-term volume loss if the manufacturer is perceived as unreliable
  • potential long-term contract renegotiation following repeated issues

How does FDA regulatory status influence availability and financial performance for Potassium Chloride 10 mEq?

Featured snippet answer: For this mature oral generic category, FDA status affects the market mainly through supply availability, manufacturing approvals, and any restrictions or labeling actions rather than through exclusivity.

Operational FDA levers

  • ANDA approvals and manufacturing site qualifications
  • supplement approvals for process changes
  • enforcement actions that restrict distribution
  • REMS is not typical for potassium chloride; risk management is usually label and GMP-based

Which manufacturers are likely to dominate Potassium Chloride 10 mEq distribution and why?

Featured snippet answer: Dominant players tend to be high-utilization generic manufacturers with multiple authorized sites, robust distribution footprints, and strong contract management with wholesalers and PBMs.

What differentiates winners

  • supply continuity during line maintenance cycles
  • fast turnaround on supplement approvals for manufacturing changes
  • scale to maintain low unit costs
  • packaging variants that match institutional purchasing formats

What generic entry scenarios exist for Potassium Chloride 10 mEq and how should financial models be built?

Featured snippet answer: Entry scenarios are already “open” because generics dominate. The realistic scenarios are not about exclusivity-driven delay, but about manufacturing ramp timing, contract wins, and supply disruptions.

Scenario framework for forecasting

  1. Competitive normalization: price declines modestly or holds; volume shifts toward contracted SKUs.
  2. Supply tightening: short-term price and margin expansion; delayed demand recovery afterward.
  3. Quality event: temporary loss of volume and potential contract discontinuation.
  4. Site transfer/ramp: revenue volatility based on time to achieve stable batch acceptance and distribution cadence.

Key Takeaways

  • Potassium chloride 10 mEq is a mature oral generic category where demand is stable and competition is multi-source.
  • Financial trajectory is driven primarily by contract economics, rebate/gross-to-net dynamics, and supply continuity rather than by patent exclusivity.
  • Patent and Orange Book dynamics are unlikely to be decisive in near-term revenue outcomes; operational GMP and FDA status are the main regulatory sensitivities.
  • Modeling should prioritize scenario-based forecasting around manufacturing ramp and supply disruptions, not around a patent cliff.
  • Competitive advantage comes from supply reliability, scale cost position, and institutional/payer contracting strength.

FAQs

1. Does Potassium Chloride 10 mEq have meaningful patent protection in the US?

For this mature salt-based oral product, meaningful long-term exclusivity at the product level is typically limited; financial outcomes are usually determined by generic competition and supply continuity.

2. Are extended-release potassium chloride 10 mEq products more defensible than immediate-release?

Release-profile differences can affect differentiation and potential formulation patent coverage, but practical market competitiveness remains high where bioequivalent equivalents are available.

3. What happens to price when multiple manufacturers face supply shortages?

When supply tightens across the category, wholesalers and payers can temporarily accept higher net pricing, but volumes may remain constrained until production normalizes.

4. How do hospital formularies influence potassium chloride tablet revenue?

Hospital uptake depends on cost, inventory stability, and substitution policies. Contracting and supply reliability typically drive SKU selection faster than clinical nuances for this active ingredient.

5. What regulatory events most affect supply for oral potassium chloride products?

GMP quality failures, manufacturing holds, packaging defects, and FDA actions restricting distribution can immediately affect availability and shift purchasing to other SKUs.


References (APA)

  1. FDA. (n.d.). Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/index.cfm
  2. FDA. (n.d.). ANDA Drug Approvals and Related Documents. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/abbreviated-new-drug-application-anda
  3. FDA. (n.d.). Drug Shortages. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/drugshortages/

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.