Last Updated: August 9, 2026

INTELENCE Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which patents cover Intelence, and what generic alternatives are available?

Intelence is a drug marketed by Janssen R And D and is included in one NDA.

The generic ingredient in INTELENCE is etravirine. There are five drug master file entries for this compound. Seven suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the etravirine profile page.

DrugPatentWatch® Litigation and Generic Entry Outlook for Intelence

A generic version of INTELENCE was approved as etravirine by AMNEAL on June 14th, 2021.

  Start Trial

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for INTELENCE?
  • What are the global sales for INTELENCE?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for INTELENCE?
Summary for INTELENCE
Recent Clinical Trials for INTELENCE

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
IRCCS Eugenio MedeaPhase 2
University of Rome Tor VergataPhase 2
Fundacio Lluita Contra la SIDAPhase 1

See all INTELENCE clinical trials

US Patents and Regulatory Information for INTELENCE

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Janssen R And D INTELENCE etravirine TABLET;ORAL 022187-003 Mar 26, 2012 RX Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Janssen R And D INTELENCE etravirine TABLET;ORAL 022187-001 Jan 18, 2008 AB RX Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Janssen R And D INTELENCE etravirine TABLET;ORAL 022187-002 Dec 22, 2010 AB RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

EU/EMA Drug Approvals for INTELENCE

Company Drugname Inn Product Number / Indication Status Generic Biosimilar Orphan Marketing Authorisation Marketing Refusal
Janssen-Cilag International NV Intelence etravirine EMEA/H/C/000900Intelence, in combination with a boosted protease inhibitor and other antiretroviral medicinal products, is indicated for the treatment of human-immunodeficiency-virus-type-1 (HIV-1) infection in antiretroviral-treatment-experienced adult patients and in antiretroviral-treatment-experienced paediatric patients from six years of age.This indication is based on week-48 analyses from two phase-III trials in highly pretreated patients where Intelence was investigated in combination with an optimised background regimen (OBR) which included darunavir/ritonavir. The indication in paediatric patients is based on 48-week analyses of a single-arm, phase-II trial in antiretroviral-treatment-experienced paediatric patients. Authorised no no no 2008-08-28
>Company >Drugname >Inn >Product Number / Indication >Status >Generic >Biosimilar >Orphan >Marketing Authorisation >Marketing Refusal

International Patents for INTELENCE

See the table below for patents covering INTELENCE around the world.

Country Patent Number Title Estimated Expiration
African Regional IP Organization (ARIPO) 1683 HIV replication inhibiting pyrimidines. ⤷  Start Trial
Argentina 024227 PIRIMIDINAS INHIBIDORAS DE REPLICACION DE HIV, UN PROCESO PARA SU PREPARACION, EL USO DE LAS MISMAS PARA LA MANUFACTURA DE UN MEDICAMENTO, COMPOSICIONES FARMACEUTICAS, Y UN PROCESO PARA PREPARARLAS ⤷  Start Trial
Austria 233740 ⤷  Start Trial
Austria 455107 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2011200708 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 6200899 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Title >Estimated Expiration

Supplementary Protection Certificates for INTELENCE

Patent Number Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration SPC Description
1002795 PA2008016 Lithuania ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: ETRAVIRINUM; REG. NO/DATE: EU/1/08/468/001 20080828
1002795 CA 2009 00004 Denmark ⤷  Start Trial
1002795 300373 Netherlands ⤷  Start Trial 300373, 20191101, EXPIRES: 20230827
1002795 91528 Luxembourg ⤷  Start Trial 91528, EXPIRES: 20230828
1002795 PA2008016,C1002795 Lithuania ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: ETRAVIRINUM; REGISTRATION NO/DATE: EU/1/08/468/001 20080828
1002795 SPC033/2008 Ireland ⤷  Start Trial SPC033/2008: 20090914, EXPIRES: 20230827
>Patent Number >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration >SPC Description

INTELENCE (etravirine) market dynamics and financial trajectory: exclusivity, competitive pressure, pricing, and revenue outlook

Last updated: July 21, 2026

INTELENCE (etravirine), a Janssen antiretroviral for HIV-1, faces sustained competitive pressure from dolutegravir- and bictegravir-based regimens and broader first-line guideline preference. After patent and regulatory exclusivity overhangs, the product has shifted from growth to steady decline dynamics in most mature markets, with revenue durability driven by (1) continued use in treatment-experienced patients with resistance profiles and (2) persistent uptake in combination therapy where alternative options are constrained by resistance or tolerability.

What is INTELENCE (etravirine) and how is it used in HIV treatment?

INTELENCE is an HIV-1 non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) used in combination antiretroviral therapy for adults with HIV-1 infection with evidence of NNRTI resistance.

Regimen role

  • Typical clinical positioning: treatment-experienced patients with resistance to NNRTIs, where etravirine retains activity against many resistant variants relative to earlier NNRTIs.
  • Product behavior: tends to track the resistant-HIV segment, which is smaller than first-line naïve cohorts.

Core commercial driver

  • Persistence in salvage/resistance-driven prescribing rather than first-line conversion. That mix shift is the central determinant of revenue trajectory post-major policy shifts toward integrase inhibitor (INSTI)-dominant regimens.

How has the HIV standard of care changed and what does it do to INTELENCE demand?

Guideline evolution is the primary macro demand headwind.

Demand shift mechanics

  • Earlier NNRTI-centered regimens lost share as INSTIs became preferred first-line.
  • In many formularies, INSTI-based fixed-dose combinations displaced NNRTI regimens where they offered similar efficacy with improved tolerability and resistance characteristics.

Downstream market effect

  • Smaller addressable market for new starts.
  • Greater reliance on ongoing prescriptions for patients already stabilized on NNRTI-containing regimens and those where etravirine is clinically favored due to resistance pattern.

What patents protect INTELENCE and how do patent cliffs affect revenue?

A patent estate shapes the speed of generic erosion, segment retention, and originator leverage in licensing.

Patent estate impact framework

  • If meaningful formulation or method-of-use protections remain, generics typically launch later or with narrower label scope.
  • If composition-of-matter protections expire, generic entry can still be slowed by bioequivalence tooling, manufacturing process know-how, and any remaining secondary IP barriers.

Commercial consequence

  • Originator revenue tends to show accelerated decline around credible generic entry windows and around any settlement that brings forward or delays launch.

When does INTELENCE lose exclusivity and when do generics become a real threat?

Exclusivity loss timing determines entry probability and speed.

Featured-snippet answer

  • The practical threat window for revenue is the combination of (1) Orange Book final relevant expiration for listed patents and (2) the entry date of the first approved generic(s) in key markets, plus any settlement-driven timing.

Market reality for INTELENCE

  • Even without a single “cliff,” INTELENCE has faced a multi-year exclusivity and competitive transition typical of mature HIV ARVs, where competitive substitution happens before formal patent expiry because prescribers move to newer regimens.

What is the Orange Book status of INTELENCE and how many ANDAs threaten the market?

Orange Book status is the regulatory scoreboard for small-molecule generic competition.

What to expect in the dataset (business interpretation)

  • Each listed patent maps to a generic approval/Paragraph IV strategy.
  • The number of ANDAs and their litigation posture influence the degree of price compression and payer switching.

Commercial impact

  • In mature ARVs, even limited generic presence can compress net pricing rapidly through tendering and formulary substitution. Originators then defend via contracting, rebates, and patient-assistance channels.

What generic entry risks exist for INTELENCE and how fast does price erosion happen?

Generic erosion pattern in mature HIV

  • Price declines often accelerate after first generics establish supply, followed by incremental pressure from additional entrants.
  • Rebate intensity increases as payers lock in lower net prices.

Segment-specific resilience

  • Salvage/resistance populations can slow switching versus naïve patient pools because prescribers may avoid changing a suppressive regimen without a clear clinical reason.
  • However, as therapy ages and lines-of-therapy shift, the originator’s remaining base shrinks.

Which companies compete with INTELENCE and what is their substitution advantage?

Competitive set includes:

  • INSTI-based regimens as therapeutic alternatives.
  • NNRTIs that compete in overlapping resistance contexts (class competition).
  • Generic etravirine if/when launched, competing primarily on price and access.

Substitution advantages

  • INSTIs: better guideline position, fixed-dose combination convenience, and broad efficacy across resistance patterns.
  • Generics: net-price compression through rebate negotiations and payer channel control.

How does INTELENCE compare with dolutegravir- and bictegravir-based regimens commercially?

Commercial comparison

  • First-line displacement: INSTI regimens capture new starts, reducing “top-of-funnel” demand for INTELENCE.
  • Formulary breadth: INSTI combinations often win preferential tiers due to fewer monitoring and simplified switching.

Residual value of INTELENCE

  • Resistance-dependent use cases can keep etravirine relevant after INSTI dominance.
  • That residual pool tends to be smaller and more expensive to defend commercially due to payer pressure for the cheapest clinically adequate option.

What formulation patents or method-of-use protections can slow generic substitution for INTELENCE?

Where present, they can delay “at-launch” substitution even if composition-of-matter has expired.

Protection types that matter to market dynamics

  • Solid oral dosage formulation improvements (bioavailability and stability).
  • Manufacturing process claims (scale-up, polymorph control).
  • Method-of-use claims that lock coverage to specific resistance-defined populations.

Business effect

  • If any secondary IP remains enforceable, generics may face delayed launch or narrower labeling strategies, buying time for contract defense and patient retention.

What patent litigation affects INTELENCE and what settlements matter for market timing?

Litigation posture is a leading indicator of launch timing.

How to interpret litigation outcomes commercially

  • Sustained injunctions: delay generic entry and keep net pricing higher for longer.
  • Settlements: can create “pay-for-delay” type timing effects that may postpone generic competition.
  • Dismissals or adverse court decisions: accelerate generic entry windows.

What is the FDA regulatory status of INTELENCE and what lines of therapy does it cover?

INTELENCE is an FDA-approved HIV-1 therapy under a NNRTI class with use tied to treatment-experienced adults.

Regulatory status implications

  • Label-driven prescribing constraints keep use more concentrated than broad-spectrum first-line regimens.
  • That concentration increases sensitivity to guideline shifts and resistance testing practices.

How do distribution channels and payer contracting affect INTELENCE net price and revenue?

For mature ARVs, channel mechanics often determine the financial trajectory more than wholesale demand.

Key contracting dynamics

  • PBM and payer formulary placement: influences volume.
  • Rebate structures: determine net price.
  • Tender dynamics in some regions: force rapid downward pricing when generics enter.

Net revenue behavior

  • Gross-to-net compression can outpace volume decline if originators lose formulary position or if payer contracts reset to match lowest-available prices.

INTELENCE revenue trajectory: what typically happens to sales after HIV INSTI standardization?

INTELENCE’s financial path in most markets follows a common pattern for older HIV brands:

  1. Early post-peak: stabilization driven by the remaining resistant/salvage base.
  2. Medium-term: steady decline as INSTI-based regimens take share and patients cycle through lines of therapy.
  3. Later phase: accelerated decline around generic entry or major contracting reset events, if they occur.
  4. Residual durability: maintenance in subpopulations where resistance and history favor etravirine.

What KPIs should investors track for INTELENCE going forward?

Market and commercial KPIs

  • Share of prescriptions within NNRTI-containing combinations (not just total HIV).
  • Net price vs list price movement after rebate resets.
  • Volume trends in treatment-experienced segments and across major geographies.
  • Generic penetration: number of stocked SKUs and rebate differentials.
  • Channel data: payer coverage rate and prior authorization frequency.

Geographic differences: where does INTELENCE typically perform better and why?

More durable markets

  • Regions where second-line and salvage therapy management relies heavily on existing regimen libraries.
  • Markets with slower payer formulary turnover or where generic penetration is delayed.

Faster decline markets

  • Regions with rapid formulary reclassification toward INSTI fixed-dose combinations.
  • Countries where generic etravirine entry accelerates net pricing immediately.

Key Takeaways

  • INTELENCE faces structural demand headwinds from INSTI-led guideline shifts that reduce new-start share.
  • Commercial resilience depends on continued use in treatment-experienced and resistance-defined populations.
  • Revenue trajectory is likely to show steady long-run decline with periodic step-downs tied to generic entry and payer contracting resets.
  • Litigation and Orange Book-linked exclusivity timelines determine the speed and magnitude of generic price erosion.
  • Sustained financial impact is most sensitive to net-price dynamics (rebates and tendering) rather than only absolute patient counts.

FAQs

  1. How does etravirine dosing in treatment-experienced HIV affect market demand compared with first-line INSTI regimens?
  2. Do payer policies change faster for HIV NNRTIs than for INSTI-based fixed-dose combinations, and how does that impact net sales?
  3. What is the typical revenue profile of older NNRTI brands once integrase inhibitor dominance is established in formularies?
  4. How do settlement-driven generic launch dates influence originator net pricing for mature HIV small molecules?
  5. What manufacturing and supply-chain constraints most often determine how quickly generic etravirine prices compress in key countries?

References

  1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations.
  2. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. INTELENCE (etravirine) Prescribing Information.
  3. IAS-USA and DHHS/NIH HIV treatment guidelines (latest available versions).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.