Last Updated: August 8, 2026

IMVEXXY Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which patents cover Imvexxy, and what generic alternatives are available?

Imvexxy is a drug marketed by Mayne Pharma and is included in one NDA. There are twenty patents protecting this drug and one Paragraph IV challenge.

This drug has one hundred and sixty-five patent family members in twenty-one countries.

The generic ingredient in IMVEXXY is estradiol. There are seventy-five drug master file entries for this compound. Forty-seven suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the estradiol profile page.

DrugPatentWatch® Litigation and Generic Entry Outlook for Imvexxy

A generic version of IMVEXXY was approved as estradiol by BARR LABS INC on October 22nd, 1997.

  Start Trial

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for IMVEXXY?
  • What are the global sales for IMVEXXY?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for IMVEXXY?
Summary for IMVEXXY
Recent Clinical Trials for IMVEXXY

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
Teva Pharmaceuticals USAPhase 3
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical CenterPhase 4

See all IMVEXXY clinical trials

Paragraph IV (Patent) Challenges for IMVEXXY
Tradename Dosage Ingredient Strength NDA ANDAs Submitted Submissiondate
IMVEXXY Vaginal Inserts estradiol 4 mcg and 10 mcg 208564 1 2019-12-30

US Patents and Regulatory Information for IMVEXXY

IMVEXXY is protected by thirty-four US patents.

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Mayne Pharma IMVEXXY estradiol INSERT;VAGINAL 208564-001 May 29, 2018 AB RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Mayne Pharma IMVEXXY estradiol INSERT;VAGINAL 208564-002 May 29, 2018 AB RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Mayne Pharma IMVEXXY estradiol INSERT;VAGINAL 208564-002 May 29, 2018 AB RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Mayne Pharma IMVEXXY estradiol INSERT;VAGINAL 208564-001 May 29, 2018 AB RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Mayne Pharma IMVEXXY estradiol INSERT;VAGINAL 208564-002 May 29, 2018 AB RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

International Patents for IMVEXXY

See the table below for patents covering IMVEXXY around the world.

Country Patent Number Title Estimated Expiration
Argentina 095619 FORMULACIÓN Y TERAPIAS PARA SUSTITUCIÓN HORMONAL DE COMBINACIÓN NATURAL ⤷  Start Trial
Argentina 098160 COMPOSICIONES FARMACÉUTICAS DE ESTRADIOL INSERTADAS EN LA VAGINA Y PROCEDIMIENTOS ⤷  Start Trial
Argentina 099872 FORMULACIONES DE PROGESTERONA ⤷  Start Trial
Argentina 107022 COMPOSICIONES FARMACÉUTICAS DE ESTRADIOL INSERTADAS POR VÍA VAGINAL Y MÉTODOS ⤷  Start Trial
Argentina 127914 COMPOSICIONES FARMACÉUTICAS DE ESTRADIOL INSERTADAS EN LA VAGINA Y PROCEDIMIENTOS ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Title >Estimated Expiration

Supplementary Protection Certificates for IMVEXXY

Patent Number Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration SPC Description
0136011 C00136011/03 Switzerland ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NMAE: ESTRADIOL UND MEDROXYPROGESTERONACETAT; REGISTRATION NO/DATE: IKS 55288 20000417
0136011 2000C/027 Belgium ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: ETHINYLESTRADIOLUM / NORETHISTERONI ACETAS; NAT. REGISTRATION NO/DATE: 19 IS 106 F3 20000911; FIRST REGISTRATION: NL RVG 23909 19991124
0136011 99C0003 Belgium ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: ESTRADIOL AND NORETHISTERONE; FIRST REGISTRATION NO/DATE: 403 IS 106 F3 19980928; FIRST REGISTRATION: SE 14007 19980306
0584952 99C0004 Belgium ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: ESTRADIOL, HEMIHYDRATE, NORETHISTERONE, ACETATE; NAT. REGISTRATION NO/DATE: NL 23753 19981210; FIRST REGISTRATION: SE - 14 007 19980306
0398460 SPC/GB04/032 United Kingdom ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: ESTRADIOL, OPTIONALLY IN THE FORM OF A HYDRATE, TOGETHER WITH DROSPIRENONE; REGISTERED: NL RVG 27505 20021211; UK PL 00053/0341 20040310
>Patent Number >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration >SPC Description

IMVEXXY (estradiol vaginal inserts) market dynamics and financial trajectory: pricing, uptake, payer coverage, and exclusivity-driven competitive risk

Last updated: July 21, 2026

IMVEXXY (estradiol vaginal insert, 4 mcg and 10 mcg) is a niche, brand-priced women’s health product. Its near-term financial trajectory is determined by (1) the size and growth of the genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) treated population, (2) formulary access by major pharmacy benefit managers for low-dose local estrogen, and (3) competitive pressure from generic estradiol vaginal tablets/inserts and alternative branded local estrogen products. Patent and exclusivity timing drive the inflection points for generic and “authorized pathway” competitive entries.

What is IMVEXXY and how is it positioned commercially in GSM?

IMVEXXY is marketed for treatment of moderate to severe dyspareunia due to menopause. The product is a local estrogen therapy delivered via vaginal inserts with low systemic exposure versus older oral or transdermal alternatives, which supports payer acceptance when aligned to formulary criteria for GSM.

Key commercial positioning levers

  • Disease focus: GSM/dyspareunia indications, typically managed with step therapy across nonhormonal, then local estrogen.
  • Delivery: low-dose vaginal inserts in two strengths (commonly referenced as 4 mcg and 10 mcg) for titration-style coverage and prescribing convenience.
  • Competitive set: local vaginal estrogen products including estradiol tablets (generic and branded), estradiol vaginal rings, conjugated estrogen vaginal creams, and other branded insert/tablet formats.

How do pricing and reimbursement dynamics affect IMVEXXY net sales?

IMVEXXY’s financial trajectory is driven by the gap between list price and net price after rebates, wholesaler terms, and payer discounts. Local estrogen products are frequently competed on net price because payers can steer to lower-cost estradiol generics or therapeutically equivalent local alternatives.

Payer and PBM dynamics that typically move net price

  • Preferred status in women’s health formularies
  • Coverage criteria tied to “GSM/dyspareunia” and menopausal status
  • Step edits that route prescribers to lower-cost estradiol vaginal generics first
  • Contracting outcomes with large PBMs (rebate leverage vs preferred alternatives)

What to watch in financial reporting

  • Gross to net compression versus local estrogen peers
  • Mix shift between 4 mcg and 10 mcg if reimbursement favors one strength
  • Channel inventory: normalized wholesaler demand versus pull-through at retail

What is the competitive landscape for IMVEXXY, and where does it lose or win?

IMVEXXY’s competitive pressure is concentrated in local estradiol products because payers treat them as close therapeutic substitutes for GSM dyspareunia.

Competitive substitutes (segment-level)

  • Estradiol vaginal tablets (including generic entries)
  • Estradiol vaginal rings (lower frequency dosing can change patient preference)
  • Vaginal estrogen creams (often discounted via generic availability)
  • Other marketed local estrogen inserts or branded products, depending on regional availability

Advantage pathways for IMVEXXY

  • If formulary teams recognize the insert’s adherence profile or perceived tolerability
  • If prescribers treat IMVEXXY as a “patient preference” product after failure or intolerance to creams/tablets
  • If pharmacy benefit coverage avoids mandatory switching

Where IMVEXXY is exposed

  • Broad formulary access for generics that can undercut net price
  • Any movement from preferred to non-preferred tier placement
  • Substitution at pharmacy for therapeutically equivalent estradiol formulations

When does IMVEXXY lose exclusivity, and what are the key patent and regulatory drivers?

IMVEXXY’s generics risk hinges on FDA regulatory milestones and the exclusivity/patent regime tied to its approved NDA/BLA (IMVEXXY is an NDA). Exclusivity typically includes:

  • Market exclusivity (for new chemical entity or new formulation)
  • Patent-protected exclusivity and listed Orange Book patents
  • Potential for ANDA 3-paragraph/paragraph IV filings to launch after patent expiry or court outcomes

Patent estate mechanics that control generic entry

Generic entry risk is a function of:

  • Orange Book listed composition, formulation, and method-of-use patents
  • Remaining patent life (expiry/expiration dates)
  • Likelihood of successful Paragraph IV challenges and settlement-driven “carve-out” launch dates
  • Exclusivity stacking (if any) that extends nonmarketing periods beyond patent expiry

Practical generic entry scenarios that shape revenue

  • At-expiry launches: generic entry on the first date after the last blocking patent expires
  • “First-to-file” precedents: earlier ANDA filing can capture shared exclusivity if statutory conditions are met
  • Settlement terms: branded company may pay to delay launch or agree to design-around labeling restrictions

What is the Orange Book status of IMVEXXY and what patents are listed?

The Orange Book listing set determines which patents block generic approval and controls Paragraph IV opportunities. IMVEXXY’s financial trajectory is directly tied to whether the listed patents are:

  • Strong and widely asserted (composition/formulation and method-of-use)
  • Narrow (easy to design around)
  • Near expiration (creating a predictable launch window for ANDA challengers)

What drives “Orange Book” impact on revenue

  • Number of listed patents in each expiry “cluster”
  • Whether claims cover critical product characteristics (insert composition, release profile, or manufacturing)
  • Whether method-of-use patents tie exclusivity to a specific dosing/indication or administration method

How many patents cover IMVEXXY formulations and administration, and how strong is the patent estate?

Financial impact correlates with patent breadth and enforceability. For local estrogen products delivered as inserts, the highest commercial sensitivity is in patents that cover:

  • Composition of estradiol insert formulations
  • Excipients and dose form characteristics
  • Manufacturing process conditions that are hard to replicate
  • Method-of-use claims that are tied to patient subgroups or dosing regimens

Patent strength indicators used in licensing and litigation decisions

  • Claim scope (product-by-process vs strict structural claims)
  • Prior art overlap (validity risk)
  • Obviousness and enablement exposure
  • Injunction likelihood and litigation duration (delays increase brand sales)

What patent litigation affects IMVEXXY, including Paragraph IV outcomes and settlements?

IMVEXXY’s revenue curve can show sharp inflections following:

  • Court decisions on ANDA/PIV claims
  • Settlement agreements setting delayed launch dates
  • Design-around approvals enabling a “non-blocked” generic product

What to map for financial trajectory

  • Filing dates of any ANDAs referencing IMVEXXY
  • Case numbers, status, and whether remedies included launch delays
  • Whether settlements include exclusivity transfers (rare) or timeline-specific restrictions

What FDA regulatory milestones shape IMVEXXY uptake and competitive entry?

IMVEXXY’s near-term sales trajectory depends on continued clinical confidence and reliable supply, but competitive entry is driven by:

  • ANDA approval timing
  • Labeling and formulation equivalence
  • REMS-like requirements (if any) and distribution controls
  • Pharmacovigilance outcomes influencing payer comfort

Uptake milestones

  • Initial adoption in women’s health practices
  • Specialty pharmacy vs retail distribution efficiency
  • Treatment persistence and switching patterns from creams/tablets

How does IMVEXXY financial performance compare with other local estrogen products?

Relative performance is driven by:

  • Net price positioning after discounts
  • Patient persistence (insert usability vs cream dosing)
  • Formulary tier placement and step edit patterns

Competitive comparison framework

  • Category-level growth: GSM awareness and prescribing
  • Share sensitivity: shift in prescription preference among local estrogen delivery systems
  • Brand survival: whether IMVEXXY sustains premium differentiation after generic penetration

What generic entry risks exist for IMVEXXY, and how would launch scenarios impact revenue?

Generic exposure risk is dominated by:

  • How quickly ANDA approvals can be converted into market reality
  • Pharmacy substitutability (including payer-directed substitution)
  • Whether the generic is priced aggressively enough to win switching

Launch scenario mechanics

  • “Slow adoption” scenario: generics receive coverage but patient persistence to IMVEXXY stays high
  • “Fast switch” scenario: IMVEXXY loses preferred tier and prescribers switch quickly after patient education and pharmacy formulary prompts
  • “Design-around” scenario: generic with label carve-outs or dosing differences limits direct interchange and delays share loss

Revenue impact levers for IMVEXXY

  • Net price erosion (rebate and contract renegotiations)
  • Prescription share loss
  • Margin pressure from maintaining commercial support despite declining volume

What commercialization and supply-chain risks could change IMVEXXY’s financial trajectory?

Local estrogen product performance can change quickly with:

  • Manufacturing interruptions or scale-up constraints affecting allocation
  • Quality system issues that force recalls or temporary distribution holds
  • Supply normalization that either unlocks or constrains prescribing

Key takeaways

  • IMVEXXY’s financial trajectory depends on formulary access and net pricing versus local estrogen substitutes, especially generics.
  • Exclusivity and Orange Book patent listings are the principal determinants of generic timing and revenue step-down risk.
  • Revenue inflections are most likely around Orange Book patent expiry windows, ANDA/PAR4 litigation outcomes, and settlement-driven launch delays.
  • Short-term sales durability requires sustained payer preference and high patient persistence relative to tablets/creams/rings.

FAQs

1) What is IMVEXXY’s typical payer coverage strategy in GSM dyspareunia?
Coverage typically follows women’s health formulary rules that favor lower-cost local estradiol options, with exceptions driven by patient preference or intolerance to alternatives.

2) How do PBM rebates influence IMVEXXY net sales versus list price?
Rebates and contract terms determine net price and can either cushion demand during competitive pressure or accelerate revenue decline if coverage is lost.

3) What are the highest-risk times for IMVEXXY generic entry?
Risk concentrates in periods after expiration of Orange Book listed patents that block ANDAs and any associated exclusivity windows.

4) Does IMVEXXY face biosimilar competition?
IMVEXXY is not a biologic product in the typical biosimilar sense; competition is expected from ANDA-style generics of the small-molecule/local estradiol formulation.

5) What portfolio actions would most affect IMVEXXY revenue resilience?
Formulary positioning, contract renegotiations tied to net price, and litigation strategy against ANDA/PAR4 challenges drive the most visible revenue outcomes.

References

  1. FDA. Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/
  2. FDA. Drug Trials Snapshots: IMVEXXY (estradiol vaginal insert). U.S. Food and Drug Administration. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-approvals-and-databases/drug-trials-snapshots

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.