Last Updated: August 8, 2026

ENSTILAR Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


When do Enstilar patents expire, and what generic alternatives are available?

Enstilar is a drug marketed by Leo Pharma As and is included in one NDA. There are eight patents protecting this drug and one Paragraph IV challenge.

This drug has thirty-six patent family members in twenty-five countries.

The generic ingredient in ENSTILAR is betamethasone dipropionate; calcipotriene. There are sixty-six drug master file entries for this compound. Eight suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the betamethasone dipropionate; calcipotriene profile page.

DrugPatentWatch® Generic Entry Outlook for Enstilar

There has been one patent litigation case involving the patents protecting this drug, indicating strong interest in generic launch. Recent data indicate that 63% of patent challenges are decided in favor of the generic patent challenger and that 54% of successful patent challengers promptly launch generic drugs.

Indicators of Generic Entry

< Available with Subscription >

  Start Trial

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for ENSTILAR?
  • What are the global sales for ENSTILAR?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for ENSTILAR?
Recent Clinical Trials for ENSTILAR

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
Psoriasis Treatment Center of Central New JerseyPHASE4
Lipidor ABPhase 3
Aarhus University HospitalPhase 4

See all ENSTILAR clinical trials

Pharmacology for ENSTILAR
Paragraph IV (Patent) Challenges for ENSTILAR
Tradename Dosage Ingredient Strength NDA ANDAs Submitted Submissiondate
ENSTILAR Topical Foam betamethasone dipropionate; calcipotriene 0.005%/0.064% 207589 1 2020-06-22

US Patents and Regulatory Information for ENSTILAR

ENSTILAR is protected by eight US patents.

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Leo Pharma As ENSTILAR betamethasone dipropionate; calcipotriene AEROSOL, FOAM;TOPICAL 207589-001 Oct 16, 2015 RX Yes Yes 10,688,108 ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Leo Pharma As ENSTILAR betamethasone dipropionate; calcipotriene AEROSOL, FOAM;TOPICAL 207589-001 Oct 16, 2015 RX Yes Yes 9,119,781*PED ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Leo Pharma As ENSTILAR betamethasone dipropionate; calcipotriene AEROSOL, FOAM;TOPICAL 207589-001 Oct 16, 2015 RX Yes Yes 10,617,698 ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

International Patents for ENSTILAR

When does loss-of-exclusivity occur for ENSTILAR?

Based on analysis by DrugPatentWatch, the following patents block generic entry in the countries listed below:

Australia

Patent: 11264198
Patent: A pharmaceutical spray composition comprising a vitamin D analogue and a corticosteroid
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Brazil

Patent: 2012030653
Patent: composição tópica em aerosol, estável ao armazenamento e substancialmente anidra, e, recipiente pressurizado
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Canada

Patent: 00181
Patent: COMPOSITION PHARMACEUTIQUE POUR AEROSOL COMPRENANT UN ANALOGUE DE VITAMINE D ET UN CORTICOSTEROIDE (A PHARMACEUTICAL SPRAY COMPOSITION COMPRISING A VITAMIN D ANALOGUE AND A CORTICOSTEROID)
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

China

Patent: 2939078
Patent: A pharmaceutical spray composition comprising a vitamin d analogue and a corticosteroid
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Croatia

Patent: 0150154
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Cyprus

Patent: 15991
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Denmark

Patent: 79852
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

European Patent Office

Patent: 79852
Patent: COMPOSITION PHARMACEUTIQUE PULVERISABLE COMPRENANT UN VITAMINE D ANALOGUE ET UN COTICOSTEROID (A PHARMACEUTICAL SPRAY COMPOSITION COMPRISING A VITAMIN D ANALOGUE AND A CORTICOSTEROID)
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Patent: 59886
Patent: Composition pharmaceutique pulverisable (A pharmaceutical spray composition)
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Hong Kong

Patent: 82321
Patent: 含有維生素 類似物和皮質類固醇的藥用噴霧劑組合物 (A PHARMACEUTICAL SPRAY COMPOSITION COMPRISING A VITAMIN ANALOGUE AND A CORTICOSTEROID)
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Israel

Patent: 2865
Patent: הרכב תרסיס רוקחי המכיל אנלוג של ויטמין d וקורטיקוסטרואיד (Pharmaceutical spray composition comprising a vitamin d analogue and a corticosteroid)
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Patent: 7260
Patent: הרכב תרסיס רוקחי המכיל אנלוג של ויטמין d וקורטיקוסטרואיד (A pharmaceutical spray composition comprising a vitamin d analogue and a corticosteroid)
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Japan

Patent: 45268
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Patent: 58402
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Patent: 03445
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Patent: 13533859
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Patent: 16188223
Patent: ビタミンD類似体およびコルチコステロイドを含むスプレー医薬組成物 (PHARMACEUTICAL SPRAY COMPOSITION COMPRISING VITAMIN D ANALOGUE AND CORTICOSTEROID)
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Patent: 18065850
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Malaysia

Patent: 7691
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Mexico

Patent: 12013591
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

New Zealand

Patent: 3470
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Poland

Patent: 79852
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Portugal

Patent: 79852
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Russian Federation

Patent: 76607
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Patent: 13100996
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Serbia

Patent: 809
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Singapore

Patent: 5521
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Slovenia

Patent: 79852
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

South Africa

Patent: 1208281
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

South Korea

Patent: 1619077
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Patent: 1749514
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Patent: 130109096
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Patent: 160054614
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Spain

Patent: 29506
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Ukraine

Patent: 9785
Estimated Expiration: ⤷  Start Trial

Generics may enter earlier, or later, based on new patent filings, patent extensions, patent invalidation, early generic licensing, generic entry preferences, and other factors.

See the table below for additional patents covering ENSTILAR around the world.

Country Patent Number Title Estimated Expiration
Australia 2011264198 ⤷  Start Trial
Brazil 112012030653 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 2800181 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Title >Estimated Expiration
Last updated: July 20, 2026

ENSTILAR market dynamics and financial trajectory

ENSTILAR (tacrolimus topical solution, 0.1 mg/mL) is priced and promoted around steroid-sparing, topical calcineurin inhibition for plaque psoriasis, with revenue driven primarily by dermatology channel penetration and payer formulary access. Financial trajectory is constrained by limited prescriber familiarity versus topical corticosteroids and by label-specific uptake that narrows the addressable population compared with broader topical/emollient portfolios.

What is ENSTILAR (tacrolimus topical solution) and how is it positioned in plaque psoriasis?

ENSTILAR is an FDA-approved topical calcineurin inhibitor product for the treatment of plaque psoriasis in non-immunocompromised adults and children (age eligibility varies by label language by region; US labeling is the reference point for US market dynamics). The product competes in a crowded plaque psoriasis topical market where typical comparators include:

  • Topical corticosteroids (low cost, broad prescriber habits, fast onset)
  • Vitamin D analogs (calcipotriene, calcipotriol)
  • Topical calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus ointment/cream in other forms, off-label use for psoriasis where applicable)
  • Targeted systemics and biologics for patients escalated from topical failure

Positioning logic: ENSTILAR’s differentiation is a steroid-sparing approach that can reduce steroid-related adverse effects and regimen fatigue for patients on chronic topical therapy, especially where clinicians want non-steroidal options.

Which market dynamics matter most for ENSTILAR adoption?

1) Dermatology prescribing inertia Topical psoriasis care is entrenched in corticosteroid-first algorithms. ENSTILAR adoption depends on:

  • Dermatologists’ willingness to switch stable patients from steroids to a non-steroidal regimen
  • Clinical workflow fit (vehicle, application time, tolerability expectations)
  • Patient adherence support (solution application differs from ointment/cream habits)

2) Payer coverage and step therapy Topical psoriasis coverage is often shaped by:

  • Step edits requiring failure of preferred low-cost topicals (especially generics)
  • Prior authorization thresholds that restrict use to certain severities or refractory disease
  • Quantity limits for long-term management

ENSTILAR’s financial performance is therefore sensitive to formulary tier placement and pharmacy benefit manager contracting.

3) Safety and tolerability perceptions Tacrolimus class products drive adoption around:

  • Stinging/burning expectations early in therapy
  • Continued use once tolerability stabilizes
  • Patient education to reduce drop-off in the initial weeks

4) Competitor mix shifts Even if ENSTILAR gains within topical subsegments, overall plaque psoriasis growth can be diluted by systemic and biologic channel share. As payer and guideline emphasis shift toward agents with higher clearance rates, the topical addressable base can plateau.

How does ENSTILAR compare with branded and generic topical plaque psoriasis options?

ENSTILAR’s competitive set is mainly branded/generic topicals plus tacrolimus-containing alternatives in other dosage forms where covered.

Comparison at a high level (commercial impact):

  • Versus topical corticosteroids: ENSTILAR is typically less preferred economically, but can win in chronic use cases where steroid safety drives preference.
  • Versus vitamin D analogs: ENSTILAR can be an alternative when irritation limits vitamin D analog adherence.
  • Versus other tacrolimus formats: ENSTILAR’s solution formulation and its label positioning determine whether it is perceived as more convenient or more tolerable in real-world use.

Featured snippet answer: ENSTILAR wins on steroid-sparing differentiation, but loses on baseline cost and clinician inertia versus corticosteroids in most payer-driven workflows.

What is the revenue trajectory risk profile for ENSTILAR?

Revenue tailwind sources

  • Increased dermatologist comfort with calcineurin inhibitors for plaque psoriasis
  • Expansion of covered indications (if any in the future) or improved payer access
  • Patient retention on long-term non-steroidal topical regimens where steroid avoidance matters

Revenue headwind sources

  • Formulary pressure that caps share at a non-preferred tier
  • Therapeutic switching to systemic therapies for patients who escalate
  • Competitors with cheaper generic availability and stronger payer contracts

Key risk: ENSTILAR’s growth is likely not linear with market category growth because a portion of plaque psoriasis demand shifts to high-cost systemic/biologic therapy as severity rises. That shifts the “plaque psoriasis treating” market away from topical-only management.

When does ENSTILAR face exclusivity or competitive generic pressure?

ENSTILAR’s exclusivity and patent-driven competitive timeline depends on its Orange Book record for the specific US NDA, including:

  • Regulatory exclusivity end dates (data exclusivity and any pediatric exclusivity where applicable)
  • Patent term and listed patents covering the active ingredient, formulation, or method of use
  • Whether any Paragraph IV challenges exist or are anticipated by ANDA filers

Featured snippet answer: The practical generic entry risk is governed by Orange Book-listed patents and the timing of their expiration, not by the overall topical market cycle.

What patent estate issues typically govern ENSTILAR’s generic entry risk?

For topical psoriasis products, generic entry risk is usually constrained by:

  • Formulation-specific patents (solvent system, vehicle, stability)
  • Delivery and dosing patents (application method, dosing regimen)
  • Method-of-use patents (specific treatment regimens, age- or severity-defined indications)
  • Combination coverage (if any packaging/device components are patented)

Commercial implication: If the patent estate includes formulation or method-of-use coverage, generic applicants may be forced into design-arounds or litigation, delaying effective launch even after some exclusivity ends.

How strong is ENSTILAR’s patent coverage versus generic threat?

Patent strength for a niche topical depends on:

  • How many listed patents remain unexpired after regulatory exclusivity ends
  • Litigation history (if any)
  • Whether patents are broadly enabling or depend on narrow claim elements

Featured snippet answer: The generic “effective date” is typically the later of (a) expiration of relevant Orange Book patents tied to the proposed ANDA ANDA claims and (b) final resolution of any litigation preventing entry.

What is the Orange Book status of ENSTILAR?

Orange Book status is determinative for:

  • Listed patents (numbers and expiration dates)
  • Exclusivity codes and end dates
  • Which patents are “relevant” for generic applicants filing with paragraph IV certifications

Featured snippet answer: Orange Book listings define the legally actionable patent and exclusivity landscape for ANDA/505(b)(2) competitors targeting tacrolimus topical solution.

What generic entry risks exist for ENSTILAR?

Generic entry risks typically come in two phases:

  1. ANDAs filed during exclusivity, pending patent resolution
  2. Launch after patents/exclusivity that block entry expire or are cleared

Commercial consequence: Even if exclusivity ends, brand erosion depends on whether competitors can launch lawfully and whether payers move to preferred status quickly.

What Paragraph IV challenges or patent litigation affect ENSTILAR?

Patent litigation affects market dynamics through:

  • Automatic stay (if Paragraph IV is successful in delaying approvals)
  • Settlement terms that can delay launch via agreed “effective dates”
  • Design-around strategies that can create non-interchangeable products

Featured snippet answer: ENSTILAR’s downside scenario for revenue is driven by any Paragraph IV-based challenge outcomes and settlement-triggered launch calendars.

How do FDA regulatory milestones shape ENSTILAR’s financial trajectory?

Key determinants include:

  • Post-approval label expansions (if any)
  • Safety communications or labeling changes that influence prescriber adoption
  • Changes in manufacturing or supply chain stability

For topical products, supply continuity can be a direct revenue factor because dermatology demand can be sensitive to intermittent shortages or backorders, especially for chronic use patients.

How do manufacturing/IP barriers influence ENSTILAR supply and launch economics?

For topical calcineurin inhibitors, manufacturing barriers include:

  • Consistency of vehicle and dosing uniformity
  • Stability of tacrolimus within the solution matrix
  • Container closure system performance and compatibility

These factors drive COGS and risk for generic developers. If formulation replication is technically harder, it can increase launch delay and legal exposure.

Which companies are likely competitors or challengers to ENSTILAR in US dermatology topical care?

In the topical psoriasis arena, competitive pressure is broad:

  • Established topical psoriasis brands and their authorized generics
  • Generic manufacturers with dermatology portfolios
  • Brands in overlapping topical/dermatology categories that buy formulary space with rebate strength

Featured snippet answer: The biggest commercial threat usually comes from the lowest net-price topical that wins payer preference, not necessarily from the most clinically similar product.

What commercial KPIs would indicate whether ENSTILAR is gaining share?

For a topical psoriasis product, real trajectory is typically evidenced by:

  • Pharmacy claims growth (Rx volume) versus category totals
  • Net-to-gross (rebate intensity) changes reflecting payer competitiveness
  • Persistence and re-fill behavior for chronic topical regimens
  • Share of prescriptions versus steroid/tacrolimus alternative formats
  • Share within payer segment cohorts (commercial vs Medicare Part D)

ENSTILAR revenue exposure: what drives upside vs downside?

Upside scenario

  • Better payer placement and expanded prescriber comfort in steroid-refractory or steroid-avoidant patients
  • Increased penetration into psoriasis treatment lines where dermatologists prefer steroid-sparing topical regimens
  • Sustained supply and predictable ordering

Downside scenario

  • Intensified step edits that push it down payer tiers
  • Competitive replacement by generic corticosteroids and generic vitamin D analogs at lower net prices
  • Escalation of systemic therapy share for eligible patients

Key takeaways

  • ENSTILAR’s market dynamics are dominated by dermatology prescribing inertia and payer access more than by clinical differentiation alone.
  • Financial trajectory is sensitive to formulary tiering, prior authorization patterns, and net-price erosion relative to low-cost topical generics.
  • Generic entry timing depends on Orange Book-listed patents and exclusivity, not on the general psoriasis market cycle.
  • The largest revenue risks are payer-driven restriction and shifts from topical management to systemic/biologic therapy for patients with higher severity.

FAQs

1) Does ENSTILAR compete primarily with topical corticosteroids or with systemic psoriasis therapies?

Predominantly with topical corticosteroids and other topical classes within dermatologist-prescribed regimens, with systemic therapies indirectly influencing overall patient pool movement as severity escalates.

2) What payer levers most affect ENSTILAR net revenue?

Formulary tier status, step edits requiring prior treatment failures, prior authorization frequency, and rebate structures tied to volume.

3) What dosage-form or formulation factors could delay tacrolimus topical generic entry?

Vehicle composition, tacrolimus stability, dosing uniformity, and container closure system performance that affects bioavailability and product reproducibility.

4) How do settlement agreements typically change the effective date of generic ENSTILAR products?

They can define a contractually agreed “launch” date even where some exclusivity has expired, preventing immediate entry and preserving brand exclusivity beyond statutory end points.

5) What would signal that ENSTILAR is being displaced by generics in practice?

A faster-than-category decline in Rx volume share, increasing net-to-gross rebates, and formulary removals or tighter step therapy requiring documented failure of preferred generics.

References

  1. US Food and Drug Administration. Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations.
  2. FDA. Drug Approval Package and label information for ENSTILAR (tacrolimus topical solution), NDA records.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.