You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

CLEOCIN PHOSPHATE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which patents cover Cleocin Phosphate In Dextrose 5% In Plastic Container, and when can generic versions of Cleocin Phosphate In Dextrose 5% In Plastic Container launch?

Cleocin Phosphate In Dextrose 5% In Plastic Container is a drug marketed by Pfizer and is included in one NDA.

The generic ingredient in CLEOCIN PHOSPHATE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER is clindamycin phosphate. There are fifty-five drug master file entries for this compound. Thirty-six suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the clindamycin phosphate profile page.

DrugPatentWatch® Litigation and Generic Entry Outlook for Cleocin Phosphate In Dextrose 5% In Plastic Container

A generic version of CLEOCIN PHOSPHATE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER was approved as clindamycin phosphate by HIKMA on April 25th, 1988.

  Get Started Free

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for CLEOCIN PHOSPHATE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER?
  • What are the global sales for CLEOCIN PHOSPHATE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for CLEOCIN PHOSPHATE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER?
Summary for CLEOCIN PHOSPHATE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Drug patent expirations by year for CLEOCIN PHOSPHATE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Recent Clinical Trials for CLEOCIN PHOSPHATE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
Stiefel, a GSK CompanyPhase 1
GlaxoSmithKlinePhase 1

See all CLEOCIN PHOSPHATE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER clinical trials

US Patents and Regulatory Information for CLEOCIN PHOSPHATE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Pfizer CLEOCIN PHOSPHATE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER clindamycin phosphate INJECTABLE;INJECTION 050639-001 Aug 30, 1989 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Pfizer CLEOCIN PHOSPHATE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER clindamycin phosphate INJECTABLE;INJECTION 050639-002 Aug 30, 1989 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Pfizer CLEOCIN PHOSPHATE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER clindamycin phosphate INJECTABLE;INJECTION 050639-003 Apr 10, 1991 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for Cleocin Phosphate in Dextrose 5% in Plastic Container

Last updated: August 2, 2025


Introduction

Cleocin Phosphate in Dextrose 5% in Plastic Container, primarily comprising clindamycin phosphate, is a parenteral antibiotic indicated for severe bacterial infections. Its market trajectory, driven by evolving antimicrobial resistance, regulatory landscapes, manufacturing trends, and healthcare demands, influences the financial outlook of manufacturers and stakeholders. This report examines the core market dynamics and financial prospects surrounding this pharmaceutical formulation.


Market Landscape

Product Profile and Clinical Use

Cleocin Phosphate (clindamycin phosphate) in Dextrose 5% serves as an essential therapeutic agent targeting anaerobic bacteria and certain protozoal infections. Its formulation as a sterile, single-dose injectable in a plastic container aligns with hospital-based administration and emergency settings. The shift towards ready-to-use plastic containers enhances convenience, compliance, and infection control.

Market Size and Growth

The global demand for intravenous antibiotics, including cleocin phosphate, remains robust, fueled by increasing bacterial infections, especially in immunocompromised populations. According to [1], the global sterile injectable drugs market is projected to grow at a CAGR of approximately 6.5% through 2027, with antibacterial agents constituting a significant share. The Asia-Pacific region exhibits the fastest growth, attributed to expanding healthcare infrastructure and rising bacterial infection incidence.

Key Drivers

  • Rising Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR): Growing resistance to broad-spectrum antibiotics causes increased favorability for drugs like clindamycin, which target specific bacteria, preserving efficacy and reducing resistance proliferation [2].
  • Hospital and ICU Demand: The rise in hospital-acquired infections prompts increased utilization of hospital-grade antibiotics, including cleocin phosphate in plastic containers.
  • Product Advancements: Transition toward convenient, ready-to-use formulations in plastic containers aligns with hospital sterilization protocols and reduces preparation errors.
  • Regulatory Approvals and Patent Status: Off-patent status for clindamycin has led to competition among multiple generic producers, influencing pricing and market volume.

Market Challenges

  • Antibiotic Stewardship: Increasing regulatory emphasis on responsible antibiotic use restricts over-prescription, potentially limiting market growth.
  • Generic Competition: High entry barriers are absent due to patent expiry, resulting in price erosion and margin pressures.
  • Supply Chain Disruptions: Raw material shortages (e.g., API supply constraints) impact manufacturing output.

Market Segmentation

The market segmentation for cleocin phosphate in dextrose 5% in plastic containers is primarily by end-user application:

  • Hospitals: The dominant segment, driven by inpatient treatment protocols.
  • Clinics and Long-term Care Facilities: Smaller but growing due to outpatient therapy expansions.
  • Pharmacies: Limited use, primarily for dispensing compounded preparations.

Geographical Segments

  • North America: Largest market owing to high healthcare expenditure, robust AMR concerns, and regulatory frameworks supporting injectable antibiotics.
  • Europe: Similar trends as North America, with stringent antimicrobial stewardship impacting growth.
  • Asia-Pacific: Rapid growth driven by expanding healthcare facilities, increasing infection rates, and cost-effective manufacturing.

Financial Trajectory and Revenue Projections

Historical Financial Performance

Historically, the market for injectable clindamycin formulations has been characterized by stable demand in developed markets, albeit with downward pressure on prices due to generic competition. Major pharmaceutical companies have experienced a plateau in revenue growth, with some manufacturers experiencing margin erosion due to commoditization.

Forecasting Future Revenues

Projections suggest moderate growth driven by:

  • Emerging Markets Expansion: Increased adoption in Asia, Latin America, and Africa.
  • New Indications: Exploration of off-label uses, although regulatory limitations exist.
  • Product Innovation: Development of combination therapies and improved formulations that extend product lifecycle.

An optimistic scenario anticipates a CAGR of approximately 3-4% over the next five years, contingent on regulatory approvals, infection rates, and healthcare infrastructure developments.

Pricing and Market Share Dynamics

Pricing is influenced heavily by generic competition, with some regions witnessing significant discounts to maintain market share. Manufacturers adopting biosimilar strategies and investing in manufacturing efficiencies can sustain margins despite price pressures.


Regulatory and Competitive Considerations

  • Patent Landscape: Cleocin’s patent expiration has led to widespread generic availability, fostering price competition.
  • Regulatory Approvals: Continuous approval requirements for manufacturing standards (GMP compliance), especially in emerging markets, influence costs and market entry timing.
  • Competitor Landscape: Dominance by several generic manufacturers in mature markets sustains price competition but also fragment the market, impacting revenue stability.

Supply Chain and Manufacturing Trends

Manufacturers are increasingly investing in robust sourcing of raw materials, ensuring compliance with evolving regulatory standards, and expanding manufacturing capacities. Transitioning to plastic containers has improved scalability, storage, and transportation, directly impacting production costs and delivery reliability.


Strategic Outlook and Investment Insights

  • Growth Opportunities: Emerging markets, especially in Asia-Pacific, present significant revenue expansion opportunities, provided regulatory and supply chain hurdles are managed.
  • Market Entry: Companies with efficient manufacturing, robust supply chains, and competitive pricing are positioned to capture market share.
  • Innovation Focus: Development of combination formulations or extended stability formulations can prolong product relevance in a competitive landscape.

Key Challenges and Risks

  • Regulatory stringency and antimicrobial stewardship restrict indiscriminate use.
  • Price erosion from generics remains a persistent challenge.
  • Supply chain disturbances, especially in APIs.
  • Evolving infection control protocols impact hospital procurement volumes.

Conclusion

The financial trajectory of Cleocin Phosphate in Dextrose 5% in Plastic Container reflects a mature yet resilient market, shaped by competitive pressures, regulatory environments, and healthcare trends. While moderate growth is projected, success hinges on strategic positioning in key geographies, efficient manufacturing, and adaptation to stewardship policies. Companies that innovate and optimize cost structures are poised to navigate the competitive landscape effectively.


Key Takeaways

  • The global injectable antibiotics market is growing steadily, with cleocin phosphate maintaining a critical role amid rising AMR concerns.
  • Patent expiry and generic competition pressurize pricing but open avenues in emerging markets.
  • The shift toward plastic container formulations enhances logistical and operational efficiency, supporting market expansion.
  • Strategic focus on supply chain resilience and innovation can mitigate risks associated with raw material shortages and regulatory shifts.
  • Companies should leverage emerging markets' growth prospects while maintaining stringent compliance standards.

FAQs

1. How does antimicrobial resistance influence the market for cleocin phosphate?
AMR drives increased demand for targeted antibiotics like clindamycin, expanding the market by reducing reliance on broad-spectrum agents and encouraging stewardship-based prescribing.

2. What are the key factors affecting the pricing of cleocin phosphate in plastic containers?
Pricing is primarily affected by generic competition, manufacturing costs, regulatory compliance, and regional healthcare policies promoting cost-effective treatments.

3. What opportunities exist for new entrants in this market?
Emerging markets with expanding healthcare infrastructure provide opportunities for cost-efficient manufacturing and distribution; innovation in formulations can also create competitive advantages.

4. How do regulatory standards impact the manufacturing of cleocin phosphate?
Strict GMP and quality standards increase manufacturing costs but enhance market credibility. Regulatory delays can inhibit timely product launches and growth.

5. What strategies can maximize revenue for manufacturers operating in this space?
Focusing on cost-efficient production, expanding into high-growth regions, investing in product innovation, and establishing robust supply chains are key strategies.


References

  1. [Market Research Future, “Sterile Injectable Drugs Market Analysis,” 2022]
  2. [World Health Organization, “Antimicrobial Resistance Global Report,” 2021]

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.