You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Suppliers and packagers for zithromax


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


zithromax

Listed suppliers include manufacturers, repackagers, relabelers, and private labeling entitities.

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA NDA/ANDA Supplier Package Code Package Marketing Start
Pfizer ZITHROMAX azithromycin FOR SUSPENSION;ORAL 050693 NDA AUTHORIZED GENERIC Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. 59762-3051-2 3 PACKET in 1 BOX (59762-3051-2) / 1 POWDER, FOR SUSPENSION in 1 PACKET (59762-3051-5) 1999-02-12
Pfizer ZITHROMAX azithromycin FOR SUSPENSION;ORAL 050710 NDA Pfizer Laboratories Div Pfizer Inc 0069-3120-19 1 BOTTLE in 1 CARTON (0069-3120-19) / 15 mL in 1 BOTTLE 1995-10-19
Pfizer ZITHROMAX azithromycin FOR SUSPENSION;ORAL 050710 NDA Pfizer Laboratories Div Pfizer Inc 0069-3130-19 1 BOTTLE in 1 CARTON (0069-3130-19) / 22.5 mL in 1 BOTTLE 1995-10-19
Pfizer ZITHROMAX azithromycin FOR SUSPENSION;ORAL 050710 NDA Pfizer Laboratories Div Pfizer Inc 0069-3140-19 1 BOTTLE in 1 CARTON (0069-3140-19) / 30 mL in 1 BOTTLE 1995-10-19
Pfizer ZITHROMAX azithromycin INJECTABLE;INJECTION 050733 NDA Pfizer Laboratories Div Pfizer Inc 0069-0400-10 10 VIAL in 1 CARTON (0069-0400-10) / 5 mL in 1 VIAL (0069-0400-01) 2014-03-07
Pfizer ZITHROMAX azithromycin INJECTABLE;INJECTION 050733 NDA Pfizer Laboratories Div Pfizer Inc 0069-3150-83 10 VIAL in 1 CARTON (0069-3150-83) / 5 mL in 1 VIAL (0069-3150-84) 1997-01-30
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >NDA/ANDA >Supplier >Package Code >Package >Marketing Start

Suppliers for the Pharmaceutical Drug: ZITHROMAX

Last updated: August 1, 2025

Introduction

Zithromax, widely known by its generic name azithromycin, is a macrocyclic antibiotic belonging to the azalide class. It is primarily prescribed for bacterial infections such as respiratory tract infections, skin infections, and sexually transmitted diseases. As a leading antibiotic with global demand, Zithromax’s supply chain comprises a complex network of raw material suppliers, contract manufacturing organizations (CMOs), and distribution channels. This article explores the landscape of suppliers involved in the production and distribution of Zithromax, focusing on key players, supply chain dynamics, and strategic considerations crucial for pharmaceutical companies and healthcare stakeholders.

Manufacturing and Raw Material Suppliers

Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) Suppliers

The core of Zithromax’s supply chain involves the procurement of azithromycin API. Multiple reputable chemical manufacturers produce azithromycin, often in regions with robust pharmaceutical manufacturing capacities such as China, India, and parts of Europe.

  • China-based Suppliers:
    Chinese companies play a critical role in API supply due to their cost competitiveness and large-scale manufacturing. Companies such as Shandong Xinhua Pharmaceutical Company and Huangshi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. are prominent API producers with Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) certifications, ensuring compliance with international standards. These suppliers often serve global pharmaceutical firms under contract or through direct sales.

  • Indian API Manufacturers:
    India hosts a substantial API manufacturing sector, with companies like Lupin Limited, Aurobindo Pharma, and Cipla producing azithromycin APIs. These companies leverage their global certifications and experienced R&D capabilities to supply to both generic and branded drug manufacturers.

  • European and North American Suppliers:
    While less dominant, some European manufacturers such as Hoffmann-La Roche and North American suppliers provide high-purity azithromycin APIs, primarily catering to markets with stringent regulatory environments.

Excipients and Formulation Components

In addition to APIs, suppliers of excipients such as fillers, binders, stabilizers, and packaging materials contribute to Zithromax’s production. Major excipient suppliers include Dow Chemical, BASF, and FMC Corporation.

Contract Manufacturing Organizations (CMOs)

Due to the complexity and scale required for commercial production, pharmaceutical companies increasingly rely on CMOs for formulation, filling, and packaging.

  • Major CMOs involved in Zithromax production:
    • Siegfried Holding AG: Offers sterile filling and packaging services, adhering to strict GMP standards.
    • Thermo Fisher Scientific: Provides contract manufacturing, including sterile filling, especially for liquid formulations of azithromycin.
    • Baxter International: Specializes in sterile manufacturing processes for injectable forms of antibiotics like azithromycin.

CMO partnerships are critical for meeting global demand, especially during pandemic surges or shortages.

Distribution and Logistics Suppliers

Distribution channels involve licensed distributors, wholesalers, and pharmacies. Global pharmaceutical distributors such as McKesson, AmerisourceBbergen, and Cardinal Health facilitate supply to healthcare providers and retail outlets.

Logistics providers specializing in cold chain management—critical for maintaining drug stability during transportation—include DHL, FedEx, and UPS. Ensuring timely and secure delivery is vital, especially for markets with complex regulatory landscapes.

Regulatory and Market-Specific Suppliers

Regulatory agencies play an indirect but influential role by approving manufacturing sites and establishing quality standards. Suppliers operating in different regions must adhere to agencies like the FDA (United States), EMA (European Union), and PMDA (Japan). Pharmaceutical firms sourcing azithromycin globally often face supply constraints due to regulatory delays or environmental compliance issues, affecting supplier selection.

Key Considerations in Zithromax’s Supply Chain

  • Quality and Regulatory Compliance:
    Given the antibiotic’s critical role, suppliers must meet stringent GMP standards. Non-compliance can lead to recalls or legal issues, making quality assurance a primary criterion.

  • Supply Security and Diversification:
    Companies seek diversified supplier pools to mitigate risks such as geopolitical instability, pandemics, or raw material shortages.

  • Cost and Lead Times:
    Competitive pricing from Chinese and Indian suppliers influences procurement strategies, but balancing cost with quality and capacity is essential.

  • Intellectual Property & Confidentiality:
    Suppliers handling proprietary formulations or processes must maintain confidentiality and adhere to licensing agreements.

Future Trends and Strategic Outlook

  • Vertical Integration:
    Leading companies are investing in in-house API manufacturing to reduce dependency on third-party suppliers and enhance supply chain resilience.

  • Sourcing from Emerging Markets:
    As regulations become more flexible, suppliers from Southeast Asia and other developing regions are gaining prominence.

  • Supply Chain Digitalization:
    Implementation of blockchain and IoT in logistics enhances transparency, traceability, and compliance.

  • Sustainability and Environmental Standards:
    Suppliers adopting eco-friendly manufacturing practices are increasingly favored, aligning with ESG goals of pharmaceutical firms.

Conclusion

The supply chain for Zithromax is a multi-layered network involving global API producers, contract manufacturers, and logistic providers operating under rigorous regulatory standards. Major API suppliers from China, India, and Europe underpin the manufacturing process, while strategic partnerships with CMOs ensure capacity and quality. Distributors and logistics providers complete the chain, delivering the medication worldwide. Pharmaceutical companies must continuously evaluate supplier reliability, quality standards, and geopolitical risks to ensure uninterrupted access to this vital antibiotic.


Key Takeaways

  • API sourcing remains concentrated in China and India, where cost-effective high-volume manufacturing dominates.
  • Stringent regulatory compliance is essential for all suppliers to meet international quality standards and maintain market approval.
  • Diversifying supplier bases mitigates geopolitical, environmental, and supply disruption risks.
  • Strategic partnerships with CMOs enable scalable, compliant formulation and packaging operations.
  • Supply chain digitalization and sustainability initiatives are shaping future procurement and logistics strategies.

FAQs

  1. What are the primary regions producing azithromycin API for Zithromax?
    China and India are the dominant regions, offering cost-effective high-volume manufacturing, with European and North American suppliers contributing to high-quality standards.

  2. How do regulatory standards impact supplier selection for Zithromax?
    Suppliers must adhere to GMP compliance and obtain certifications from agencies like the FDA, EMA, or local regulators, which significantly influence sourcing decisions.

  3. Are there risks associated with over-reliance on specific API suppliers?
    Yes, dependency can lead to supply disruptions due to geopolitical instability, environmental issues, or quality compliance problems, emphasizing the importance of diversification.

  4. What role do CMOs play in Zithromax production?
    CMOs handle formulation, sterile filling, packaging, and sometimes distribution, enabling pharmaceutical companies to scale manufacturing rapidly and meet global demand.

  5. How is the supply chain for Zithromax evolving?
    The trend moves toward vertical integration, increased use of emerging supplier markets, digital supply chain solutions, and sustainability practices to ensure resilient and compliant sourcing.


Sources:
[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). "Approved Drug Products."
[2] European Medicines Agency (EMA). "Human Regulatory."
[3] Indian Pharmaceutical Alliance reports on API manufacturing.
[4] Industry analysis from IQVIA and PharmaIQ.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.