Last Updated: June 24, 2026

Suppliers and packagers for xeljanz


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


xeljanz

Listed suppliers include manufacturers, repackagers, relabelers, and private labeling entitities.

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA NDA/ANDA Supplier Package Code Package Marketing Start
Pfizer XELJANZ tofacitinib citrate SOLUTION;ORAL 213082 NDA Pfizer Laboratories Div Pfizer Inc 0069-1029-02 1 BOTTLE in 1 CARTON (0069-1029-02) / 240 mL in 1 BOTTLE (0069-1029-01) 2021-02-08
Pfizer XELJANZ tofacitinib citrate SOLUTION;ORAL 213082 NDA U.S. Pharmaceuticals 63539-029-02 1 BOTTLE in 1 CARTON (63539-029-02) / 240 mL in 1 BOTTLE (63539-029-01) 2021-02-08
Pf Prism Cv XELJANZ tofacitinib citrate TABLET;ORAL 203214 NDA Pfizer Laboratories Div Pfizer Inc 0069-1001-01 60 TABLET, FILM COATED in 1 BOTTLE (0069-1001-01) 2012-11-09
Pf Prism Cv XELJANZ tofacitinib citrate TABLET;ORAL 203214 NDA Pfizer Laboratories Div Pfizer Inc 0069-1002-01 60 TABLET, FILM COATED in 1 BOTTLE (0069-1002-01) 2018-07-02
Pf Prism Cv XELJANZ tofacitinib citrate TABLET;ORAL 203214 NDA U.S. Pharmaceuticals 63539-012-02 60 TABLET, FILM COATED in 1 BOTTLE (63539-012-02) 2012-11-08
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >NDA/ANDA >Supplier >Package Code >Package >Marketing Start

XELJANZ (tofacitinib): Who Supplies What Across the Value Chain

Last updated: April 26, 2026

What companies supply XELJANZ manufacturing inputs and finished product?

XELJANZ is marketed by Pfizer (brand owner). The supply chain depends on whether the item is active ingredient (API), finished drug product, or packaging/logistics. Public sources do not consistently name every supplier across all geographies, but they do identify contract manufacturing and local packaging channels through regulatory filings and label/market authorizations.

Finished product and in-market supply

Role Supplier / company Evidence
Brand owner / marketing authorization holder (key territories) Pfizer Product labeling and authorization records for XELJANZ (tofacitinib)
Local supply/packaging (varies by country) National Pfizer affiliates and local distributors Country labels list local distributors/packagers (varies by EU member state and market)

Result: At minimum, Pfizer is the constant supplier at the finished-product and brand level; downstream packaging and distribution suppliers vary by jurisdiction.


Who supplies the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) for tofacitinib?

For tofacitinib (the XELJANZ API), API sourcing is typically handled via qualified API manufacturers named in regulatory submissions (for example, in Drug Master Files or equivalent dossiers). Public-facing sources often omit the full supplier list, or list only those relevant to a specific territory.

Result: Publicly accessible sources do not provide a complete, global API supplier roster for tofacitinib in a single dataset. The supplier set is territory- and filing-dependent, and contract API manufacturing is commonly disclosed in country-specific regulatory documentation rather than in the brand label.


What contract manufacturers are involved in XELJANZ production?

Finished-dose manufacturing for branded oral solid products commonly uses contract manufacturing organizations (CMOs) or Pfizer-owned plants depending on the market and strength. Public label information typically does not name the CMO plant.

Result: Without relying on jurisdiction-specific regulatory access, a complete and accurate contract-manufacturer supplier list cannot be produced from public label data alone.


Where do you see supplier names confirmed in regulated sources?

When supplier names are visible, they usually appear in one of these places:

  • Country product leaflets / labels (manufacturer of record, local distributor)
  • EMA national or EPAR-linked documents (when available for the specific product presentation)
  • USFDA Orange Book listing context for the drug substance and products (where manufacturers of listed products appear)

Result: Labeling and authorization documents confirm who is responsible for placing the product on the market in each territory, while API and CMO plant-level suppliers require regulatory dossier-level disclosure.


What is the actionable supplier map for an investment or R&D sourcing decision?

1) Supplier tiers you can reliably confirm from public materials

Tier Confirmable supplier class What you can verify quickly
Brand and market authorization Pfizer (and authorized local entities) Marketing authorization holder and local distributor names on labeling
Finished product manufacturer of record Market-specific “manufacturer” on pack Country leaflets and carton text
Packaging Local packager/distributor “Distributed by” / “Manufactured for” lines on country labels
API and internal processing Not fully recoverable from labels alone Requires dossier/regulatory access for each territory

2) What to treat as variable vs stable

Item Stable across markets? Typical variability driver
Marketing and brand responsibility Yes: Pfizer Distribution agreements
Local distributor/packager No Import rules and tendering
API supplier No Contracting, cost, risk, qualification status
CMO plant for final dose No Capacity allocation by strength/presentation

Why supplier discovery is hard for XELJANZ specifically (and how to structure diligence anyway)?

XELJANZ is an oral small-molecule (tofacitinib) and is sold as multiple strengths and presentations (subject to the country and time window). Supplier identity changes over time due to:

  • site lifecycle changes (commercial launches, line changes)
  • multi-supplier qualification for continuity of supply
  • territory-specific packaging/distribution

Best-practice diligence approach (structure):

  • Build a country-by-country supplier list from labeling (manufacturer of record and local distributor).
  • Cross-check each country presentation against regulatory listing documents (for manufacturer-of-record consistency).
  • For API sourcing and CMO plant identification, use dossier-level sources tied to the specific presentation strength and approval revision.

Key Takeaways

  • Pfizer is the stable supplier at the brand/authorization and finished product responsibility level for XELJANZ (tofacitinib).
  • Local distributors and packagers vary by territory and are usually the most visibly named suppliers on product labels.
  • A complete global API supplier and CMO plant list is not recoverable from public label text alone; it requires territory-specific regulatory dossier disclosure.

FAQs

1) Who supplies XELJANZ worldwide?

Pfizer supplies XELJANZ at the brand and authorization level, but local distributors and manufacturers of record vary by country.

2) Are API suppliers shown on the XELJANZ label?

Usually not. XELJANZ labeling commonly names the market authorization holder and manufacturer/distributor for the finished product, not the API plant.

3) Do suppliers change across strengths (e.g., different tofacitinib doses)?

Yes. Supplier responsibility can differ by strength and presentation due to manufacturing line and packaging assignments.

4) Where can supplier names be confirmed reliably?

Country labeling and regulatory authorization documents that name the manufacturer of record and local distributor/packager are the most reliable public sources.

5) How do you identify API manufacturers for tofacitinib?

Typically through dossier-level regulatory records or equivalents that list the drug substance manufacturers, which are not consistently exposed in consumer-facing labeling.


References

[1] Pfizer. XELJANZ (tofacitinib) product labeling and prescribing information (country-specific versions).
[2] European Medicines Agency (EMA). Public assessment and product documentation for XELJANZ/tofacitinib (where available by presentation).
[3] US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Orange Book listings context for tofacitinib-containing products and related manufacturer entries.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.