You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Suppliers and packagers for generic pharmaceutical drug: METHYLPREDNISOLONE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


METHYLPREDNISOLONE

Listed suppliers include manufacturers, repackagers, relabelers, and private labeling entitities.

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA NDA/ANDA Supplier Package Code Package Marketing Start
Pfizer MEDROL methylprednisolone TABLET;ORAL 011153 NDA Pharmacia & Upjohn Company LLC 0009-0020-01 100 TABLET in 1 BOTTLE (0009-0020-01) 2013-09-20
Pfizer MEDROL methylprednisolone TABLET;ORAL 011153 NDA Pharmacia & Upjohn Company LLC 0009-0022-01 25 TABLET in 1 BOTTLE (0009-0022-01) 1957-10-24
Pfizer MEDROL methylprednisolone TABLET;ORAL 011153 NDA Pharmacia & Upjohn Company LLC 0009-0056-02 100 TABLET in 1 BOTTLE (0009-0056-02) 1957-10-24
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >NDA/ANDA >Supplier >Package Code >Package >Marketing Start

Suppliers for the Pharmaceutical Drug: Methylprednisolone

Last updated: July 29, 2025

Introduction

Methylprednisolone is a potent synthetic corticosteroid with extensive applications in treating inflammatory and autoimmune conditions, such as multiple sclerosis, allergic reactions, and arthritis. As a widely utilized medication, it demands a reliable supply chain comprising reputable manufacturers, generic drug producers, and active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) suppliers. Ensuring access to high-quality methylprednisolone is critical for healthcare providers, pharmaceutical companies, and governments aiming to maintain treatment standards and ensure patient safety.

This article provides a comprehensive overview of the key suppliers for methylprednisolone, highlighting manufacturing capabilities, geographical distribution, regulatory compliance, and market dynamics. Understanding the supplier landscape informs procurement strategies, risk assessment, and potential partnership opportunities in the pharmaceutical supply chain.


Manufacturers and API Suppliers

Global Leaders in Methylprednisolone Production

1. Pfizer Inc.

  • Overview: Pfizer is one of the world's largest pharmaceutical companies with a diversified portfolio, including corticosteroids like methylprednisolone. It supplies both branded and generic formulations globally.
  • Supply Capabilities: Pfizer’s manufacturing facilities in the United States and Europe are compliant with international Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP), ensuring high-quality API and finished formulations.
  • Regulatory Standing: Pfizer’s products are approved by major authorities such as the FDA, EMA, and equivalents in other countries.

2. Novartis AG

  • Overview: Novartis produces methylprednisolone under its broad portfolio of corticosteroids, focusing on both branded and generic markets.
  • API Sourcing: Novartis has robust API manufacturing facilities primarily based in Switzerland and India, offering competitive pricing and reliable supply.
  • Market Reach: The company distributes methylprednisolone formulations across North America, Europe, and Asia.

3. Sandoz (Novartis division)

  • Overview: Specializing in generics, Sandoz is a significant supplier of methylprednisolone for markets requiring cost-effective options.
  • API and Finished Dose Manufacturing: Sandoz’s global manufacturing network ensures continuity in supply, particularly in emerging markets.
  • Regulatory Status: Sandoz emphasizes compliance with GMP standards, facilitating rapid approval processes in various jurisdictions.

4. Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories

  • Overview: An Indian multinational with extensive corticosteroid production, including methylprednisolone.
  • API Production: Their API facilities in India are inspected and approved by global regulators, ensuring high-quality standards.
  • Market Focus: Supplies primarily to Asia, Africa, and developing regions, often at competitive prices.

5. Chinese API Manufacturers

  • Leading Suppliers:
    • Hengkang Pharmaceuticals
    • North China Pharmaceutical Group (NCPC)
    • Shanghai Pfizer Pharmaceuticals (API manufacturing arm)
  • Strengths: Cost-effective API production, extensive manufacturing capacity, and growing export reach.
  • Compliance: Increasing adherence to international GMP standards, although variability remains across suppliers.

Market Dynamics and Supply Chain Considerations

1. Geographical Diversification

The methylprednisolone supply chain spans North America, Europe, India, and China. This diversification reduces geopolitical and supply chain risks but introduces complexity concerning regulatory compliance and quality assurance.

2. Regulatory Compliance

Suppliers must adhere to GMP standards mandated by agencies such as the FDA, EMA, and WHO. Increasing scrutiny and regulatory harmonization improve quality and safety but can also impact supply continuity due to certification delays.

3. Cost and Pricing Trends

Indian and Chinese API manufacturers typically offer more competitive pricing due to lower labor and manufacturing costs. However, geopolitical tensions and trade policies can influence procurement strategies, prompting companies to seek closer or more compliant alternatives.

4. API Quality Assurance

High-quality APIs are essential for effective formulations and regulatory approval. Suppliers with proven GMP compliance and rigorous quality control protocols are preferred, particularly for high-margin injectable products such as methylprednisolone.

5. Supply Chain Risks

Potential disruptions, including geopolitical tensions, pandemics, and raw material shortages, pose risks to methylprednisolone supply. Companies are increasingly adopting dual-sourcing strategies to maintain supply stability.


Key Market Players and Contract Manufacturing Organizations (CMOs)

In addition to proprietary manufacturers, Contract Manufacturing Organizations play a crucial role in methylprednisolone supply. CMOs like Baxter, Fresenius Kabi, and Amneal Pharmaceuticals often source API from third-party suppliers, emphasizing the importance of transparency and traceability.


Emerging Trends and Future Outlook

1. Regulatory Stringency and Supply Chains

Regulatory authorities are tightening API manufacturing standards, necessitating ongoing upgrades at facilities, particularly in India and China. Companies investing in compliance enhance their market access and reputation.

2. Developing Novel Formulations

New methylprednisolone formulations, including long-acting injectables and biosimilars, are under development, potentially impacting raw material demand and supplier strategies.

3. Supply Chain Digitization

Adoption of digital quality management systems (QMS) and serialization enhances traceability, ensuring supply chain integrity, especially amid increasing counterfeit concerns.


Conclusion

The methylprednisolone supply landscape is characterized by a diversified array of global manufacturers, ranging from large multinational corporations to emerging API producers in Asia. Established pharmaceutical giants like Pfizer, Novartis, and Sandoz maintain significant market shares, supported by rigorous quality and regulatory standards. Meanwhile, Indian and Chinese API manufacturers continue to dominate in cost-effective production, with increasing quality compliance.

Business professionals must assess supplier credibility based on GMP compliance, regulatory approvals, production capacity, and geopolitical stability. Strategic diversification and robust quality assurance mechanisms are essential to secure a reliable methylprednisolone supply chain, ensuring continuous patient care and market competitiveness.


Key Takeaways

  • Major global pharmaceutical companies such as Pfizer, Novartis, and Sandoz serve as primary suppliers for methylprednisolone, offering high-quality API and formulations.
  • Indian and Chinese API manufacturers provide cost-effective options but require thorough vetting for regulatory compliance and quality standards.
  • Geographical diversification mitigates supply chain risks but introduces regulatory complexities.
  • Evolving regulatory standards and increasing digitization are shaping supplier quality assurance frameworks.
  • Strategic partnerships and dual sourcing enhance supply chain resilience, critical amid geopolitical and global health challenges.

FAQs

1. What are the primary regions supplying methylprednisolone API globally?

The main regions include North America, Europe, India, and China, with India and China being dominant in cost-competitive API production.

2. How can buyers ensure the quality of methylprednisolone from Asian manufacturers?

By verifying GMP certification, conducting site audits, reviewing quality assurance documentation, and ensuring product compliance with regulatory standards such as FDA, EMA, or WHO approvals.

3. Are there risks associated with sourcing methylprednisolone from Chinese or Indian suppliers?

Yes, risks include variability in GMP compliance, regulatory delays, and geopolitical factors. Mitigating these requires due diligence and supplier audits.

4. How has regulatory scrutiny impacted methylprednisolone supply chains?

Heightened regulatory standards have led to increased inspections, certifications, and quality controls, potentially impacting manufacturing timelines but improving overall safety.

5. What future trends will influence methylprednisolone suppliers?

Increasing demand for new formulations, stricter regulatory environments, global supply chain digitization, and geopolitical considerations will shape supplier choices and strategies.


Sources:

  1. Pfizer Annual Report 2022.
  2. Novartis Corporate Overview.
  3. Sandoz Product Catalog.
  4. Indian Ministry of Health API Registration Data.
  5. WHO Good Manufacturing Practices Guidelines.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.