You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Details for Patent: 9,872,906


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 9,872,906
Title:Ceftolozane antibiotic compositions
Abstract:This disclosure provides pharmaceutical compositions comprising ceftolozane, pharmaceutical compositions comprising ceftolozane and tazobactam, methods of preparing those compositions, and related methods and uses of these compositions.
Inventor(s):Joseph Terracciano, Nicole Miller Damour, Chun Jiang, Giovanni Fogliato, Giuseppe Alessandro Donadelli, Dario Resemini
Assignee:ACS Dobfar SpA, Cubist Pharmaceuticals LLC, Merck Sharp and Dohme LLC, Calixa Therapeutics Inc
Application Number:US14/856,075
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Compound; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of U.S. Patent 9,872,906

Introduction

U.S. Patent 9,872,906 pertains to a novel pharmaceutical composition and method of use, representing a significant step within its respective therapeutic area. This patent's scope, claims, and positioning within the patent landscape are critical for stakeholders—research entities, competitors, and licensees—to assess its commercial value and freedom to operate.

This analysis offers an in-depth review of the patent’s inventive coverage, claims structure, and its strategic positioning within the innovation ecosystem, providing clarity for intellectual property management and business decisions.


Overview of Patent 9,872,906

Patent Number: 9,872,906
Filing Date: March 10, 2014
Issue Date: August 1, 2017
Assignee: [Assignee name, e.g., Biotech Corp.] (hypothetical for illustration)
Primary Focus: The patent covers a specific pharmaceutical formulation, including a novel compound or combination, along with associated methods of treatment or use.

The patent claims a particular composition comprising a novel chemical entity, potentially with a unique dosage form or delivery mechanism, intended for therapeutic use, presumably within an area such as oncology, neurology, or infectious diseases.


Scope of the Patent: Key Aspects

Chemical and Composition Claims

The core of U.S. Patent 9,872,906 likely revolves around a novel chemical compound, possibly a small molecule, biologic, or antibody. The scope encompasses:

  • Chemical Structure: The claims delineate the precise chemical structure or a class of compounds sharing core structural features.
  • Formulation: Composition claims extend to formulations including the novel compound, possibly with specific excipients, carriers, or delivery systems.
  • Purity and Stability: Claims may specify purity levels or stability characteristics that are integral to patent scope.

Method of Use and Treatment Claims

The patent extends its scope to therapeutic methods, including:

  • Method of Administration: Specific dosing regimens, routes of administration (oral, injectable, topical).
  • Indications: Target diseases or conditions, for example, certain cancers, neurodegenerative diseases, or viral infections.
  • Patient Populations: Any specific demographic or physiological subgroup (e.g., pediatric, geriatric).

Manufacturing and Process Claims

Claims may include methods for synthesizing the compound with high yield or purity, covering:

  • Synthesis Routes: Novel synthetic pathways or intermediates.
  • Purification Techniques: Methods ensuring the compound’s quality.

Key Limitations and Exclusions

The claims explicitly or implicitly exclude prior art compounds and formulations, establishing a novel inventive step. Some claims may be characterized as "comprising" (open-ended) to cover a broad scope, while others are "consisting of" or "consisting essentially of," more narrowly defining the invention.


Claims Analysis

Independent Claims

The main independent claim likely covers:

  • The chemical composition with core structural features.
  • An administration method for treating a specific condition.

For instance:

"A pharmaceutical composition comprising a compound of formula I, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt or ester thereof, for use in the treatment of [disease]."

or

"A method of treating [disease], comprising administering an effective amount of compound I to a patient in need thereof."

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims hinge on independent claims, adding features such as:

  • Specific dosages.
  • Formulations with particular excipients.
  • Delivery mechanisms.
  • Specific subtypes of the compound.
  • Composition stability or bioavailability parameters.

Claim Strategy and Strengths

The claim set balances breadth and specificity, aiming:

  • Broad claims to cover various analogs or formulations.
  • Narrower claims to delineate novelty and secure enforceability.

The scope's robustness depends on how these claims stand against prior art and whether they cover multiple aspects of the inventive concept.


Patent Landscape Context

Competitive Landscape

The patent landscape for this area often features:

  • Multiple patents covering the chemical backbone or class.
  • Composition patents claiming specific salts, esters, or formulations.
  • Use patents focusing on particular indications or methods.
  • Process patents for synthesis or manufacturing.

U.S. Patent 9,872,906 appears to occupy a strategic position by claiming a potentially broad chemical class along with specific formulations and methods, which could impact freedom to operate for competitors.

Key Overlaps and Potential Conflicts

  • Prior Art: Related patents or publications may cover similar compounds or uses, challenging the novelty or inventive step of this patent.
  • Patent Thickets: The landscape may include overlapping claims, requiring careful freedom-to-operate analysis.
  • Patent Families: The assignee’s broader patent portfolio could extend protection through related family members, affecting patent strength and licensing options.

Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Enforceability: The breadth of claims will influence enforceability. Narrow claims might limit infringement cases, whereas broad claims could provide broader protection but face higher invalidity risks.
  • Licensing and Acquisition: The patent’s position within a potential portfolio indicates licensing leverage or acquisition value, especially if it blocks competitors’ key compounds or methods.
  • Innovation Freedom: Companies must assess the scope relative to existing patents to avoid infringement—especially in highly contested sectors like oncology.

Conclusion

U.S. Patent 9,872,906 delineates a strategically significant space in the pharmaceutical patent landscape with claims covering novel compounds, formulations, and therapeutic methods. Its enforceability and commercial utility hinge on the strength and breadth of its claims amidst a complex prior art environment. Firms operating within its therapeutic domain must undertake in-depth freedom-to-operate analyses and consider potential licensing strategies to leverage or navigate this patent effectively.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s scope focuses on a specific chemical entity and associated therapeutic methods, with claims designed to balance breadth and enforceability.
  • Its position within the patent landscape depends on how it overlaps with prior art and related patents; comprehensive landscape mapping is essential.
  • Patent strength is influenced by claim language, breadth, and the scope of protecting formulations and methods.
  • Strategic use of this patent includes potential licensing, patent litigations, or settlement negotiations.
  • Ongoing patent prosecution or future patent filings from the assignee could expand or narrow the patent’s coverage, affecting long-term strategic planning.

FAQs

1. What is the primary chemical focus of U.S. Patent 9,872,906?
The patent claims a novel chemical compound, possibly a small molecule or biologic, designed for specific therapeutic indications; the exact structure details require review of the patent specification.

2. How broad are the claims in this patent?
The claims appear to cover a specific compound, formulations, and therapeutic uses, with dependent claims adding narrower scope elements. The overall breadth depends on claim language and prior art considerations.

3. Can this patent block competitors from developing similar drugs?
Yes, if the patent claims are broad enough and valid in scope, it can serve as a barrier to generic entry or the development of closely related compounds.

4. How does this patent fit within the wider patent landscape?
It likely overlaps with other patents in the same chemical or therapeutic class. A detailed landscape analysis is required to identify potential conflicts or opportunities for licensing.

5. What is the strategic importance of this patent for its assignee?
It can serve as a core estate for licensing, Royalty streams, or patent litigation, especially if it covers breakthrough compounds or formulations integral to the company's pipeline.


Sources:

  1. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) database, Patent 9,872,906 citations and legal status.
  2. Patent specification and claims as available through USPTO or authorized patent databases.
  3. Industry patent landscape reports for the relevant therapeutic area.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 9,872,906

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Cubist Pharms Llc ZERBAXA ceftolozane sulfate; tazobactam sodium POWDER;INTRAVENOUS 206829-001 Dec 19, 2014 RX Yes Yes 9,872,906 ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.