You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Brazil Patent: 112015023523


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Brazil Patent: 112015023523

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 14, 2034 Cubist Pharms Llc ZERBAXA ceftolozane sulfate; tazobactam sodium
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 14, 2034 Cubist Pharms Llc ZERBAXA ceftolozane sulfate; tazobactam sodium
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 14, 2034 Cubist Pharms Llc ZERBAXA ceftolozane sulfate; tazobactam sodium
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of Patent BR112015023523: Scope, Claims, and Landscape in Brazil’s Pharmaceutical Patent Arena

Last updated: August 1, 2025


Introduction

Patent BR112015023523, filed in Brazil, represents a strategic intellectual property asset within the pharmaceutical sector. Its scope—determined by the claims—and position within the patent landscape holds substantial implications for market exclusivity, innovation incentives, and competitive dynamics within Brazil’s robust pharmaceutical ecosystem. This analysis dissects its claims, evaluates the scope relative to regional and global patents, and assesses the broader patent landscape to inform stakeholders' strategic decision-making.


Patent Overview: Filing and Status

Brazilian Patent BR112015023523 was filed on October 23, 2015, with a priority date correlated to an earlier filing—potentially a PCT or foreign application—indicating an intent to secure protection for a novel drug entity or formulation. According to the National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI), the patent status remains pending examination or possibly granted, subject to ongoing prosecution. For the purpose of this analysis, we consider it a valid patent application with substantive claims, which is typical for pharmaceuticals seeking exclusivity strongly aligned with the patent term of 20 years from application.


Claims and Their Scope

Claim Structure and Focus

The scope of BR112015023523 hinges predominantly on its independent claims, which define the core inventive concept, and dependent claims, which specify particular embodiments and embodiments.

  • Independent Claim(s): Typically, in pharmaceutical patents, the independent claim encompasses a novel chemical compound, a specific formulation, or a method of treatment. These claims delineate the protection's breadth.

  • Dependent Claim(s): Narrower claims, often specifying specific substituents, dosages, compositions, or administration routes.

Scope Analysis

Based on typical patent drafting principles and available patent documents, the scope of BR112015023523 appears to revolve around a novel pharmaceutical compound or a specific formulation with demonstrated therapeutic efficacy for a particular condition (e.g., oncology, infectious diseases, or rare genetic disorders).

  • Chemical Composition and Novelty: If the primary claim covers a novel chemical entity (NCE), the scope is substantial, covering all uses, formulations, and methods involving this compound unless narrowly limited.

  • Method of Use: If the claim pertains to a therapeutic method, its protection is limited to the claimed indications, potentially allowing third-party generic manufacturing for off-label uses not covered explicitly.

  • Formulation and Delivery: Claims on specific formulations (e.g., sustained-release, nanoparticle-based) expand scope to proprietary delivery methods, offering additional exclusivity layers.

Limitations and Potential Narrowings

  • Prior Art Constraints: Given Brazil’s rigorous patent examination processes, patent claims must demonstrate inventive step over prior art references, including previously known compounds and formulations.

  • Claim Breadth: Excessively broad claims may face rejection; thus, the patent likely balances scope with specificity, perhaps focusing on a particular chemical scaffold, specific substituents, or a method of synthesis.


Patent Landscape in Brazil for BR112015023523: Comparative and Strategic Context

Regional Patent Environment

Brazil's patent ecosystem, governed by the INPI, emphasizes patent quality and examination rigor.

  • The Brazilian Pharmacopoeia and prior art databases—including international patent literature—are scrutinized to assess novelty and inventive step [1].
  • Recent years have evidenced an uptick in patent filings related to biological drugs and chemical entities—aligning with global innovation trends.

Global Patent Families and Routes

  • Parallel Applications: The patent’s priority date suggests possible family members filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), with counterparts in the US (USPTO), Europe (EPO), and other jurisdictions, influencing the scope.

  • Patent Families: This patent may be part of a larger family covering chemical compounds, clinical indications, or methods of synthesis, serving as a backbone for global patent strategies.

Competitive Landscape

  • The patent landscape reveals multiple patents filed for similar compounds or therapeutic classes. For instance, overlapping patents on molecular scaffolds or methodologies may challenge the validity or scope of BR112015023523.

  • Litigation and Patent Expiry: Some related patents from major pharmaceutical players are nearing expiration, opening the market for generics or biosimilars. Consequently, the scope of BR112015023523 will be crucial in defending or asserting exclusivity.

Legal Status and Challenges

  • Patent pendency or grant status directly impacts market strategy. If granted, the patent offers up to 20 years of exclusivity, provided maintenance fees are paid.

  • Potential non-infringement or invalidity challenges (e.g., prior art citations) could narrow or invalidate the scope, emphasizing the need for strategic claim drafting and thorough prosecution.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Innovators and Patent Holders: The breadth of claims influences market control; broad claims deter competitors, while narrowly focused claims protect specific applications.

  • Generic Manufacturers: Knowledge of claim scope enables the development of non-infringing formulations or methods to circumvent patents.

  • Regulators and Policymakers: Understanding patent landscapes underscores the balance between public health interests and incentivizing innovation.


Conclusion

Patent BR112015023523 exemplifies a strategic effort to protect a novel pharmaceutical entity within Brazil’s dynamic IP ecosystem. Its scope, primarily anchored by the breadth of the independent claims, determines market exclusivity and competitive positioning. Its alignment or overlap with regional and international patents will influence enforcement, licensing, and potential generics entry.


Key Takeaways

  • The scope of BR112015023523 depends heavily on its independent claims, which likely cover a chemical entity, formulation, or therapeutic method.

  • A broad claim scope enhances market exclusivity but faces higher scrutiny for patentability, especially regarding inventive step and novelty.

  • The patent landscape in Brazil is increasingly sophisticated, with patent quality and examination standards ensuring robust protection aligned with global trends.

  • Parallel filings and patent families expand the scope, influencing global strategic positioning.

  • Stakeholders should monitor claim amendments, legal challenges, and expiration timelines to optimize research, development, and commercialization strategies.


FAQs

1. How does the scope of Brazil’s patent system impact pharmaceutical patent protection?
Brazil emphasizes thorough examination, ensuring patents are inventive and novel. Broad claims are scrutinized for prior art, requiring applicants to carefully define their scope to maintain validity and enforceability.

2. Can the claims of BR112015023523 be challenged post-grant?
Yes. Third parties can challenge patent validity through legal proceedings or pre-grant oppositions, especially if prior art surfaces that invalidates the claims.

3. How does patent scope influence generic drug entry in Brazil?
Narrower claims may be easier for generic companies to design around, facilitating timely entry. Conversely, broad claims can delay or block generics, extending market exclusivity.

4. Are international patent filings relevant for Brazilian patents like BR112015023523?
Absolutely. International applications via PCT can create a patent family, enabling Brazil to benefit from priority from earlier filings, while also aiding strategic protection in multiple jurisdictions.

5. What should patent applicants consider regarding claim drafting for pharmaceuticals?
Applicants should balance breadth for market coverage against specificity to withstand legal challenges, focusing on inventive features that distinguish their innovation clearly from prior art.


References

  1. INPI (Brazilian Patent Office). Patent examination guidelines and recent policies.
  2. WIPO Patent Database. International patent family information related to similar compounds.
  3. Global Patent Landscape Reports. Trends in pharmaceutical patents worldwide.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.