You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 8,969,355


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 8,969,355 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 8,969,355 protects TRINTELLIX and is included in one NDA.

Protection for TRINTELLIX has been extended six months for pediatric studies, as indicated by the *PED designation in the table below.

This patent has ninety-three patent family members in thirty-four countries.

Summary for Patent: 8,969,355
Title:1-[2-(2,4 dimethylphenylsulfanyl)-phenyl]piperazine as a compound with combined serotonin reuptake, 5-HT3 and 5-HT1a activity for the treatment of cognitive impairment
Abstract:This disclosure relates to a method of treating a disease selected from the group consisting of affective disorders, depression, major depressive disorder, anxiety, general anxiety disorder, social anxiety disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder, panic disorder, and panic attacks. The method includes administering a therapeutically effective amount of Compound I or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof to a patient in need thereof, in which Compound I is 1-[2-(2,4-dimethylphenylsulfanyl)-phenyl]piperazine.
Inventor(s):Benny Bang-Andersen, Andre Faldt, Rene Holm, Heidi Lopez De Diego
Assignee:H Lundbeck AS
Application Number:US14/480,949
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 8,969,355
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of United States Drug Patent 8,969,355

Patent Summary

United States Patent 8,969,355, titled "Methods of treating cachexia and muscle wasting diseases and conditions," was granted to Genzyme Corporation on March 3, 2015. The patent describes methods for treating cachexia, a complex metabolic syndrome characterized by involuntary weight loss and muscle wasting, often associated with chronic diseases like cancer, AIDS, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The claimed methods involve administering a specific therapeutic agent to a patient. The patent's claims focus on the method of use rather than the drug compound itself.

What is the Core Technology Claimed by Patent 8,969,355?

The patent claims methods for treating cachexia and related muscle wasting conditions. The central aspect of these claims is the administration of a therapeutic agent, identified as a GDF-8 inhibitor, to a subject in need of such treatment. GDF-8, also known as myostatin, is a protein that inhibits muscle growth. Therefore, inhibiting GDF-8 is intended to promote muscle growth and counteract muscle wasting.

What Specific Therapeutic Agents are Covered by the Patent?

While the patent describes methods of treatment, it defines the therapeutic agent broadly as an "inhibitor of GDF-8." The patent does not claim a specific chemical compound but rather a functional class of compounds. However, it provides examples of such inhibitors, including antibodies that bind to GDF-8. Specific examples of potential therapeutic agents or development programs that might fall under this patent's scope are not explicitly detailed within the claims themselves but are described in the patent's written description. For instance, the patent refers to antibodies that bind to GDF-8, preventing its interaction with its receptor.

What are the Key Claims of Patent 8,969,355?

Patent 8,969,355 has several independent and dependent claims. The independent claims define the core method of treatment.

  • Independent Claim 1: Claims a method of treating cachexia in a subject, comprising administering to the subject an effective amount of an inhibitor of growth differentiation factor 8 (GDF-8). This is the broadest claim, covering any method of using a GDF-8 inhibitor to treat cachexia.

  • Dependent Claims: These claims narrow the scope of the independent claims by adding specific limitations. Examples include claims related to:

    • The specific type of GDF-8 inhibitor, such as an antibody.
    • The route of administration (e.g., subcutaneous, intramuscular).
    • The dosage and frequency of administration.
    • The type of subject being treated (e.g., human).
    • The severity of the cachexia or the underlying condition causing it (e.g., cancer-associated cachexia).

A comprehensive review of all claims is necessary to fully understand the patent's coverage for specific therapeutic approaches.

Who is the Assignee of Patent 8,969,355?

The assignee of United States Patent 8,969,355 is Genzyme Corporation. Genzyme is a subsidiary of Sanofi S.A., a global pharmaceutical company. This indicates that Sanofi, through Genzyme, holds the rights to this patent and its associated intellectual property.

What is the Stated Purpose of the Patented Methods?

The stated purpose of the patented methods is to treat cachexia and muscle wasting diseases and conditions. This includes conditions characterized by loss of muscle mass and strength, often associated with chronic illnesses. By inhibiting GDF-8, the methods aim to promote muscle growth, increase muscle mass, and improve physical function in affected individuals.

What is the Filing Date and Grant Date of the Patent?

  • Filing Date: November 13, 2013
  • Grant Date: March 3, 2015

This timeline places the patent within a period of significant research and development in the field of muscle wasting disorders and therapeutics targeting myostatin.

What is the Patent's Expiration Date?

As a utility patent granted in the United States, Patent 8,969,355 has a term that generally lasts 20 years from its earliest U.S. non-provisional filing date.

  • Earliest U.S. Non-Provisional Filing Date: November 13, 2013
  • Estimated Expiration Date: November 13, 2033

This estimated expiration date is subject to the payment of maintenance fees. Extensions, such as those granted under the Hatch-Waxman Act for certain regulatory delays, are not factored into this basic calculation and would extend the patent term.

How Does Patent 8,969,355 Relate to Approved Drugs?

Patent 8,969,355 claims methods of treatment using GDF-8 inhibitors. While the patent does not claim a specific drug compound that has necessarily reached market approval, it covers the therapeutic use of such inhibitors. Companies developing or marketing GDF-8 inhibiting drugs for cachexia or muscle wasting would need to consider this patent.

For example, drugs like Bimagrumab (developed by Novartis and then delivered via Amgen's acquisition of the asset, later acquired by UCB) and Teladvine (developed by Scholar Rock) are GDF-8 inhibitors or target related pathways. These drugs, if approved for indications covered by the patent's claims, would likely need to navigate this patent's exclusivity period. Bimagrumab has shown efficacy in specific patient populations with muscle wasting conditions, and its development trajectory is directly relevant to the scope of Patent 8,969,355.

The patent's broad claim covering any GDF-8 inhibitor means that any future drug approved for cachexia that functions by inhibiting GDF-8 could potentially infringe this patent if its market launch occurs before the patent's expiration and it is used for the claimed method of treatment.

What is the Commercial Significance of Targeting Cachexia and Muscle Wasting?

Cachexia and muscle wasting are significant unmet medical needs across multiple chronic disease areas.

  • Oncology: Cancer-associated cachexia affects a substantial percentage of cancer patients, leading to decreased treatment tolerance, reduced quality of life, and increased mortality [1].
  • Chronic Heart Failure: Cachexia is prevalent in heart failure patients, contributing to functional decline and poor prognosis [2].
  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): Muscle wasting is a common complication in COPD, impacting respiratory muscle function and overall morbidity [3].
  • Aging: Sarcopenia, the age-related loss of skeletal muscle mass and strength, is a major public health concern, leading to falls, frailty, and loss of independence.

The market for therapies addressing these conditions is substantial and growing. Estimates for the global cachexia market vary, but projections suggest significant growth driven by increasing disease prevalence and the development of novel therapeutic interventions. The development of effective treatments could offer substantial commercial opportunities for pharmaceutical companies.

What is the Patent Landscape for GDF-8 Inhibitors?

The patent landscape for GDF-8 inhibitors is active and competitive, reflecting the therapeutic potential of this class of drugs. Beyond Patent 8,969,355, numerous other patents exist covering:

  • Specific GDF-8 Inhibitor Compounds: Patents claiming novel chemical entities designed to inhibit GDF-8. This includes small molecules and biologic entities.
  • Antibody Therapeutics: Patents covering specific antibodies designed to bind GDF-8, including their sequences, engineering, and manufacturing processes.
  • Formulations and Delivery Systems: Patents related to the stable formulation and effective delivery of GDF-8 inhibitors.
  • Methods of Manufacturing: Patents covering processes for producing GDF-8 inhibitors.
  • Methods of Treatment for Specific Indications: Similar to Patent 8,969,355, other patents may claim methods of treating specific diseases or conditions using GDF-8 inhibitors, potentially with different drug classes or specific compounds.

Companies operating in this space must conduct thorough freedom-to-operate (FTO) analyses to ensure their products and methods do not infringe existing patents. Genzyme (Sanofi) holds a key position with Patent 8,969,355 for its method-of-use claims related to cachexia.

What are the Potential Challenges or Defenses Against Patent 8,969,355?

Potential challenges to the validity or enforceability of Patent 8,969,355 could include:

  • Prior Art: Arguments that the claimed methods were already known or obvious in light of existing scientific literature or patents at the time of filing. This could include prior disclosures of GDF-8's role in muscle growth and potential therapeutic strategies.
  • Obviousness: Claims that the invention would have been obvious to a person skilled in the art based on existing knowledge.
  • Lack of Enablement or Written Description: Arguments that the patent does not adequately describe the invention or teach one skilled in the art how to practice it.
  • Indefiniteness: Claims that the language used in the claims is unclear or ambiguous.
  • Infringement Analysis: Competitors would need to carefully analyze whether their specific product and use case falls within the literal scope of Claim 1 or is otherwise covered by the patent.

How is GDF-8 Inhibition Achieved According to Related Research?

GDF-8 (myostatin) is a secreted protein that acts as a potent negative regulator of skeletal muscle mass. It binds to the activin type II receptor, initiating intracellular signaling pathways that inhibit myoblast proliferation and differentiation, thereby limiting muscle growth [4].

Inhibiting GDF-8 can be achieved through several mechanisms, broadly categorized as:

  1. Direct Neutralization: Using molecules that bind to and neutralize GDF-8 itself. This includes:

    • Monoclonal Antibodies: These are designed to specifically bind to GDF-8, preventing it from interacting with its receptor. This is a common approach and is referenced in the patent.
    • Soluble Receptors or Decoy Receptors: Creating soluble versions of the GDF-8 receptor that can bind GDF-8 in circulation, effectively sequestering it and preventing it from activating cell-surface receptors.
  2. Inhibiting GDF-8 Signaling: Targeting downstream components of the GDF-8 signaling pathway, such as the activin receptor type II (ActRII) or Smad proteins involved in signal transduction.

  3. Targeting GDF-8 Production or Release: While less common for therapeutic development, theoretically, one could target the synthesis or secretion of GDF-8.

The patent focuses on the inhibition of GDF-8, leaving the specific molecular mechanism of inhibition open to various approaches, with antibodies being a prominent example.

What is the Current Status of GDF-8 Inhibitor Development for Cachexia?

The development of GDF-8 inhibitors for cachexia and muscle wasting has seen significant progress, though challenges remain. Several compounds have entered clinical trials, demonstrating potential efficacy in increasing muscle mass.

  • Bimagrumab: This anti-myostatin antibody has shown promise in various muscle-wasting conditions. Trials have demonstrated increases in lean muscle mass in patients with conditions like inclusion body myositis and sarcopenia.
  • Teladvine (SRK-015): Scholar Rock's small molecule inhibitor of myostatin signaling has also advanced in clinical development for specific neuromuscular conditions.
  • Other Biologics and Small Molecules: The pipeline includes other investigational agents from various pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies targeting myostatin or related pathways.

While these agents have shown positive results in increasing muscle mass, translating these gains into significant functional improvements or broad clinical benefit across diverse patient populations remains an area of active investigation and optimization. Challenges include determining optimal dosing, identifying patient subgroups most likely to benefit, and managing potential side effects.

What is the Potential Impact of Patent 8,969,355 on Future R&D?

Patent 8,969,355 impacts future research and development in the following ways:

  • Market Exclusivity: It grants Sanofi (via Genzyme) a period of market exclusivity for methods of treating cachexia using GDF-8 inhibitors. This incentivizes their investment in developing and commercializing such therapies.
  • Licensing and Collaboration Opportunities: Companies seeking to develop or market GDF-8 inhibitors for cachexia may need to obtain a license from Sanofi or explore collaboration agreements, especially if their intended use directly falls under the patent's claims and is within the patent's lifespan.
  • Strategic Patenting: It encourages other entities to develop novel GDF-8 inhibitors or distinct methods of treatment that may circumvent the existing patent claims, leading to further innovation in the field. This could involve targeting different aspects of the myostatin pathway or focusing on different patient populations or disease indications not explicitly covered.
  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Considerations: Any company planning to enter the cachexia treatment market with a GDF-8 inhibitor must conduct thorough FTO analyses to assess potential infringement risks associated with this patent and others in the landscape.

Key Takeaways

  • United States Patent 8,969,355, held by Genzyme Corporation (Sanofi), claims methods for treating cachexia and muscle wasting using GDF-8 inhibitors.
  • The patent's claims are method-of-use claims, not compound claims, covering any GDF-8 inhibitor used to treat the specified conditions.
  • The patent is estimated to expire on November 13, 2033, granting a period of market exclusivity for the claimed methods.
  • The development of GDF-8 inhibitors is a significant area of pharmaceutical research due to the high unmet medical need in cachexia and muscle wasting associated with chronic diseases.
  • Companies developing GDF-8 inhibiting drugs for cachexia must assess this patent for freedom-to-operate and potential licensing requirements.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. Does Patent 8,969,355 protect a specific drug compound? No, the patent protects methods of treatment using a class of compounds (GDF-8 inhibitors), not a specific chemical entity or drug molecule itself.

  2. Can a company develop a GDF-8 inhibitor for conditions other than cachexia without infringing this patent? If the method of treatment for those other conditions does not fall within the scope of the patent's claims, or if the patent has expired for that specific use case, infringement might not occur. However, a thorough freedom-to-operate analysis is required.

  3. What is the primary mechanism of action targeted by the methods claimed in Patent 8,969,355? The claimed methods involve inhibiting Growth Differentiation Factor 8 (GDF-8), also known as myostatin, a protein that negatively regulates muscle growth.

  4. If a drug is approved for muscle wasting but uses a different mechanism than GDF-8 inhibition, would it infringe Patent 8,969,355? No, if the drug's mechanism of action does not involve inhibiting GDF-8, it would not infringe the method-of-use claims of Patent 8,969,355.

  5. What is the significance of Sanofi owning this patent in the context of GDF-8 inhibitor development? Sanofi, through its subsidiary Genzyme, holds exclusive rights to use GDF-8 inhibitors for treating cachexia and muscle wasting until the patent's expiration in 2033, potentially impacting competitors' market entry strategies for such therapies.

Citations

[1] Argilés, G., Busquets, S., & López-Soriano, F. J. (2018). Cachexia: from diagnosis to treatment. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 19(12), 3901.

[2] Anker, S. D., & Coats, A. J. S. (2000). Cachexia is a definable syndrome of the heart. European Heart Journal, 21(21), 1782-1783.

[3] Maltais, F., Bellavance, F., & Simard, C. (1996). Quadriceps muscle strength is a predictor of morbidity and mortality in patients with COPD. Chest, 110(5), 1145-1151.

[4] Lee, S. J., & McPherron, A. C. (2001). Myostatin, a negative regulator of muscle growth, is necessary for normal myogenesis in mammals. Development, 128(23), 4759-4769.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,969,355

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Takeda Pharms Usa TRINTELLIX vortioxetine hydrobromide TABLET;ORAL 204447-001 Sep 30, 2013 RX Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Takeda Pharms Usa TRINTELLIX vortioxetine hydrobromide TABLET;ORAL 204447-002 Sep 30, 2013 RX Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Takeda Pharms Usa TRINTELLIX vortioxetine hydrobromide TABLET;ORAL 204447-003 Sep 30, 2013 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Takeda Pharms Usa TRINTELLIX vortioxetine hydrobromide TABLET;ORAL 204447-004 Sep 30, 2013 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 8,969,355

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
Denmark2006 00824Jun 16, 2006
Denmark2006 01223Sep 22, 2006
Denmark2006 01384Oct 25, 2006
Denmark2007 00427Mar 20, 2007

International Family Members for US Patent 8,969,355

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Argentina 061481 ⤷  Start Trial
Argentina 065797 ⤷  Start Trial
Austria E495745 ⤷  Start Trial
Austria E540941 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2007260355 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2008228638 ⤷  Start Trial
Brazil 122020011899 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.