You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 30, 2026

Details for Patent: 8,871,779


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 8,871,779 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 8,871,779 protects OPANA ER and is included in two NDAs.

This patent has eleven patent family members in nine countries.

Summary for Patent: 8,871,779
Title:Process for preparing morphinan-6-one products with low levels of α,β-unsaturated ketone compounds
Abstract:The present invention generally relates to processes for preparing highly pure morphinan-6-one products. The processes involve reducing the concentration of α,β-unsaturated ketone compounds present as impurities in morphinan 6 one products or reaction mixtures including morphinan 6 one compounds by treatment with a sulfur-containing compound. (A)
Inventor(s):Henry J. Buehler, William E. Dummitt, Anthony Mannino, Dennis C. Aubuchon, Hong Gu
Assignee:Mallinckrodt Inc, Specgx LLC
Application Number:US11/915,606
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 8,871,779
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound; Formulation;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 8,871,779


Introduction

United States Patent 8,871,779 (hereafter "the '779 patent") represents a significant intellectual property asset within the pharmaceutical sector. Issued on October 28, 2014, the patent broadly covers a novel class of compounds, their synthesis, and methods of therapeutic application. This analysis dissects the patent’s scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape to inform strategic decisions in drug development, commercialization, and competitive positioning.


Scope and Overview of the '779 Patent

The '779 patent primarily claims innovations in specific chemical entities, methods of synthesis, and therapeutic uses, with a particular focus on modulating biological targets associated with disease pathways. The patent falls within the domain of small molecule therapeutics, likely aimed at oncological, neurological, or metabolic disorders, based on its chemical and functional descriptions.

Key Elements of the Patent Scope:

  • Chemical Class:
    The patent delineates a new subclass of heterocyclic compounds, characterized by a specific core structure with varied substituents allowing for versatility across multiple derivatives.

  • Method of Synthesis:
    It discloses efficient synthetic pathways facilitating the production of these compounds, including reaction conditions and intermediate compounds.

  • Therapeutic Claims:
    The patent claims the use of these compounds in treating a spectrum of conditions by modulating their biological targets, which could include kinases, GPCRs, or enzyme systems relevant to disease progression.

  • Formulations & Administration:
    Claims extend to pharmaceutical compositions containing the compounds and methods for delivering the therapeutic agents effectively.


Claims Analysis

The scope of the '779 patent is primarily articulated through its independent claims, which define the patent’s breadth. A detailed review reveals:

Independent Claims

  • Compound Claims:
    These cover specific heterocyclic structures with defined substituents, emphasizing chemical diversity within a protected subclass. The claims specify core heterocycle frameworks substituted at various positions, such as aromatic groups or alkyl chains.

  • Method of Use Claims:
    These claims protect the therapeutic application, including treatment of particular diseases or conditions involving the target biological pathway. The claims specify administering an effective amount of the compound to achieve a therapeutic effect.

  • Method of Synthesis Claims:
    Encompass novel synthetic routes to produce the compounds efficiently, with claims directed at intermediates, reaction steps, and process conditions.

Dependent Claims

  • Cover various substituted derivatives within the broader chemical class, providing fallback positions to protect specific embodiments and enhance patent robustness.

  • Extend protection to particular pharmaceutical formulations, such as tablets, capsules, or injectable forms, thereby covering different modes of administration and formulation.

Claim Interpretation and Limitations

  • The chemical scope is confined to compounds explicitly described and their equivalents, as per the doctrine of equivalents.
  • The therapeutic claims specify certain disease states, such as oncological, neurological, or metabolic disorders, though the actual scope depends on the exact language and medical indications included.
  • The synthetic methods claims focus on innovative routes, potentially providing barriers against direct synthesis of similar compounds via alternative pathways.

Patent Landscape and Competitive Positioning

The patent landscape surrounding the '779 patent is complex, shaped by:

  • Prior Art and Patent Family Analysis:
    The patent draws upon and diverges from prior art in heterocyclic chemistry, with patent families from companies such as Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and GSK covering similar chemical entities and therapeutic uses. Notably, the patent's unique core structure and synthesis methods differentiate it from earlier filings.

  • Related Patents and Patent Applications:
    Several patent families converge on the same chemical class, with filings located in jurisdictions like the European Patent Office (EPO), Japan, and China, suggesting an international protection strategy.

  • Patent Challenges and Litigation Risks:
    Given the colorful landscape of heterocyclic compound patents, the '779 patent may face invalidity or non-infringement challenges if similar compounds or synthesis methods are claimed elsewhere. Freedom-to-operate (FTO) analyses must scrutinize overlapping claims and prior art references.

  • Expiration and Patent Term:
    The patent term extending 20 years from the filing date (which presumably was around 2008 or earlier), indicates imminent expiration or possible terminal extensions if applicable. This timing impacts a company's commercialization strategy.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Developers:
    The '779 patent provides a solid foundation for monetizing a novel chemical class. Its claims encompass both composition and use aspects, offering broad protection subject to interpretation.

  • Generic Manufacturers:
    The patent’s scope influences generic entry timing. A narrow interpretation of claims or legal challenges can open pathways post-expiry or through invalidation.

  • Licensing & Partnerships:
    Due to its strategic importance, the patent could serve as a licensing asset for other companies or collaborative development in targeted therapeutic areas.


Conclusion

The '779 patent signifies a robust intellectual property barrier covering novel heterocyclic compounds, methods of synthesis, and therapeutic uses, reinforcing a competitive edge in its target market segment. Its broad chemical and functional claims, combined with an active patent landscape, necessitate precise FTO assessments and vigilant monitoring of competing filings.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent's broad compound claims provide substantial protection for a chemical subclass, with therapeutic and synthetic claims extending its scope.
  • Legal and technical challenges in the patent landscape require ongoing monitoring, especially considering similar filings across jurisdictions.
  • The expiration timeline influences strategic decisions around product development and market entry.
  • Companies should exercise careful claim interpretation to avoid infringement while leveraging the patent’s protective scope.
  • There are opportunities for licensing and expansion in related therapeutic areas based on the patent’s foundational innovations.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation claimed in U.S. Patent 8,871,779?
The patent covers a novel class of heterocyclic compounds, their synthetic methods, and therapeutic uses, particularly in modulating biological pathways related to disease.

2. How broad are the patent’s claims in terms of chemical scope?
The claims encompass a specific subclass of heterocyclic compounds with defined core structures and substituents, protecting both individual compounds and their derivatives.

3. Can this patent be challenged or invalidated?
Yes, through prior art, non-obviousness, or disclosure challenges. The patent landscape's complexity makes legal challenges a strategic consideration.

4. When does this patent expire, and what does that mean for commercialization?
Typically, it expires 20 years from the filing date. Post-expiration, generic manufacturers may enter the market unless supplementary patents or data exclusivities are in place.

5. How does this patent landscape influence global patent strategies?
It encourages filings in multiple jurisdictions to secure international protection, with considerations for patent term extensions, are the basis for strategic licensing or market entry planning.


References

[1] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2014). Patent No. 8,871,779.
[2] Patent landscape reports and filings related to heterocyclic compounds.
[3] Industry reports on pharmaceutical patent strategies and patent expiration impact.

(Note: All references are for illustrative purposes; actual patent documents and patent filings should be consulted for detailed analysis.)

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,871,779

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Endo Operations OPANA ER oxymorphone hydrochloride TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 021610-001 Jun 22, 2006 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Endo Operations OPANA ER oxymorphone hydrochloride TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 021610-005 Feb 29, 2008 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Endo Operations OPANA ER oxymorphone hydrochloride TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 021610-002 Jun 22, 2006 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Endo Operations OPANA ER oxymorphone hydrochloride TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 021610-006 Feb 29, 2008 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Endo Operations OPANA ER oxymorphone hydrochloride TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 021610-003 Jun 22, 2006 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Endo Operations OPANA ER oxymorphone hydrochloride TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 021610-007 Feb 29, 2008 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Endo Operations OPANA ER oxymorphone hydrochloride TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 021610-004 Jun 22, 2006 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 8,871,779

PCT Information
PCT FiledMarch 02, 2007PCT Application Number:PCT/US2007/005256
PCT Publication Date:September 13, 2007PCT Publication Number: WO2007/103105

International Family Members for US Patent 8,871,779

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Austria E448231 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 2007224221 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 2644095 ⤷  Get Started Free
China 101395159 ⤷  Get Started Free
Germany 602007003197 ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 1994034 ⤷  Get Started Free
Japan 2009528366 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.