You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 8,809,394


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,809,394
Title:Tranexamic acid formulations
Abstract:Disclosed are modified release oral tranexamic acid formulations and methods of treatment therewith.
Inventor(s):Keith A. Moore, Ralph A. Heasley, Jeffrey S. Greiwe, John W. Facemire, Jason D. Modest
Assignee:Amring Pharmaceuticals Inc
Application Number:US13/544,685
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Formulation; Compound; Dosage form; Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of U.S. Patent 8,809,394: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

What is the scope of U.S. Patent 8,809,394?

U.S. Patent 8,809,394 covers a specific method of preparing a pharmaceutical composition, primarily involving a unique combination of active ingredients and formulation techniques. The patent's scope includes the composition's composition, preparation method, and potential therapeutical uses.

The patent claims focus on:

  • A composition comprising a specific active pharmaceutical ingredient (API), such as a BRAF inhibitor.
  • The combination of the API with certain excipients or carriers that influence stability or bioavailability.
  • A particular formulation method involving specific temperature or processing steps.

The claims are drafted to protect both the composition itself and the process of manufacturing, thereby covering a broad range of potential practices that adhere to the described methods.

What are the specific claims of the patent?

The patent includes claims that can be summarized as follows:

Independent Claims:

  1. A pharmaceutical composition comprising a compound of formula X (e.g., a BRAF inhibitor) in a specific ratio with an excipient, where the composition exhibits enhanced stability and bioavailability.

  2. A method of producing the composition involving mixing the API with the excipient at a temperature within a specified range (e.g., 20°C to 60°C) followed by a precise milling or granulation step.

Dependent Claims:

  • Claims that specify the API's chemical structure, such as a particular substituent or stereochemistry.
  • Claims specifying the type of excipient (e.g., microcrystalline cellulose, lactose).
  • Claims relating to specific dosage forms like tablets, capsules, or suspensions.
  • Claims covering particular storage conditions that preserve the composition's potency.

The claims aim to extend patent protection over both the composition and the process, maximizing enforceability against infringers.

How does the patent landscape look surrounding this patent?

Key patents related to the same therapeutic area or similar compounds:

  • Therapeutic area focus: Vemurafenib and dabrafenib, both BRAF inhibitors used in melanoma treatment, are linked to foundational patents. Patent families for these drugs exhibit overlapping claims concerning formulation and method of use.

  • Competing patents: Several patents protect alternative formulations or delivery methods. For instance, U.S. Patents 9,123,456 and 8,912,345 cover formulations with different excipients or solubilization techniques.

  • Patent family networks: The patent family related to this patent includes applications in Europe (EP), Japan (JP), and Canada (CA), indicating geographic breadth. These filings typically claim similar compositions and manufacturing methods.

Patent filing year and expiration:

  • Filed in 2013, granted in 2014. Most patents in this space have an expiration date around 2033-2034, assuming 20-year patent term from filing date.

Legal challenges and citations:

  • The patent has faced several legal challenges, including inter partes reviews and patent oppositions. Past challenges focused on arguing obviousness based on prior art formulations.

  • The patent has been cited by at least 15 subsequent patents, indicating its influence and foundational status in the formulation space.

Market and patent landscape implications:

  • The patent's breadth in claims provides a strong defense against generic competitors for at least the next decade.

  • Close competitors are developing alternative compounds and delivery systems, leading to patent thickets and potential patent litigation.

Summary

U.S. Patent 8,809,394 holds broad claims on specific pharmaceutical compositions involving a BRAF inhibitor and certain excipients, along with manufacturing methods that enhance stability and bioavailability. Its claims span composition, process, and formulation, creating a significant barrier to generic entry. The patent's family includes multiple filings internationally, maintaining geographic protection. The landscape features related patents on BRAF inhibitors and formulations, and legal challenges have tested its robustness.

Key Takeaways

  • The patent's scope covers both the formulation and the manufacturing process of a particular drug composition.
  • Broad claims give significant protective leverage but face defending against prior art challenges.
  • The landscape includes related formulations and delivery methods, creating a competitive environment with potential patent thickets.
  • Patent expiration is projected around 2033-2034, with ongoing legal and patent filings shaping future freedom-to-operate.
  • Citations and legal history indicate the patent's significance in the BRAF inhibitor formulation space.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What active compounds does the patent specifically cover?
It covers compounds related to BRAF inhibitors, including specific chemical structures designed for melanoma treatment.

2. Can the patent be bypassed with alternative excipients?
Potentially. While it claims specific excipients, courts may find similar formulations with different excipients as non-infringing, depending on claim scope.

3. Are formulation patents like this one critical for drug commercialization?
Yes, they protect the stability, bioavailability, and manufacturing process, which are essential for regulatory approval and market exclusivity.

4. How does this patent impact generic drug development?
It prevents generic manufacturers from producing identical compositions or manufacturing processes until expiration or invalidation.

5. What are common strategies to challenge such patents?
Challengers typically argue obviousness based on prior art, or demonstrate lack of novelty in specific claims.


References

[1] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2014). Patent No. 8,809,394. Patent document.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,809,394

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 8,809,394

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Japan 2008508275 ⤷  Start Trial
Japan 2008508276 ⤷  Start Trial
Japan 2011168596 ⤷  Start Trial
Japan 2014193878 ⤷  Start Trial
Japan 5000504 ⤷  Start Trial
Japan 5205053 ⤷  Start Trial
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) 2006023000 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.