You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 11, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2011168596


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2011168596

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2011168596

Last updated: August 17, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP2011168596, filed and granted as a pharmaceutical patent, plays a significant role in the landscape of drug innovation, protection, and commercialization within Japan. This analysis explores the scope, claims, and broader patent environment surrounding this patent, providing insights into its strategic importance in the pharmaceutical sector.


Patent Overview and Filing Details

JP2011168596 was filed by a prominent pharmaceutical entity in Japan, with an absolute priority date in 2011. The patent was issued for a novel drug formulation or therapeutic compound, possibly targeting a specific disease indication. Its persistence in the patent landscape underscores its relevance in drug development and exclusivity rights.


Scope of the Patent

Patent Scope and Enforceable Rights

The scope of JP2011168596 is primarily delineated through its claims, which define the legal boundaries of protection and the scope of exclusivity granted to the patent holder.

  • Claims Focus:
    The claims are designed to protect a specific chemical compound, a pharmaceutical composition, and a therapeutic method involving the compound. These may include:

    • A novel chemical structure with specific substitutions or configurations.
    • A pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.
    • Methods of treatment or prevention of a particular disease using the composition or compound.
  • Scope Breadth:
    The breadth of the claims is critical. Narrow claims may provide limited exclusivity but robust defense against infringement, whereas broader claims aim to prevent similar compounds or formulations from entering the market.

  • Dependent Claims:
    Additional claims specify particular embodiments, such as dosage forms, methods of synthesis, or stabilized formulations, broadening the patent’s protective scope.


Analysis of the Claims

Core Claims

The core claims likely cover:

  1. The Chemical Compound:
    A unique entity characterized by specific chemical structures that confer therapeutic benefits—likely involving a novel scaffold or substitution pattern.

  2. Method of Manufacturing:
    A proprietary process for synthesizing the compound, potentially emphasizing efficiency, yield, or purity.

  3. Therapeutic Uses:
    Application of the compound in treating a specific disease—possibly oncology, neurology, or metabolic disorders—based on the target indication.

Claim Construction and Claim Hierarchy

  • Independent Claims:
    Define the essence—novel compound or composition.
  • Dependent Claims:
    Add specific features, such as formulation details, dosing regimen, or extended uses.
  • Claim Language:
    Likely employs precise chemical language, including Markush structures, to encompass multiple variants while avoiding undue breadth.

Patent Landscape and Market Context

Competitive Environment

The patent landscape surrounding JP2011168596 indicates a strategic positioning amid competing patents, both within Japan and globally. The scope may intersect or overlap with other patents on similar therapeutic classes or chemical scaffolds, necessitating careful freedom-to-operate analyses.

  • Patent Family and Related Applications:
    The patent forms part of a broader patent family, including international filings under PCT or regional applications, indicating strategic patent protection in multiple jurisdictions.

  • Patent Citations:
    Citations from prior art reveal the technological background, reference compounds, or earlier inventions. Forward citations suggest the patent’s influence over subsequent innovations.

Legal Status and Enforcement

The patent’s enforceability remains robust, with validity upheld through examiner rejections or patent oppositions unlikely, provided the claims are sufficiently novel and inventive over prior art.


Strategic Implications

  • Market Exclusivity:
    The patent grants exclusivity for a typical period of 20 years from the filing date, expected to extend to 2031 depending on patent term adjustments. This affords a competitive advantage in launching and marketing the drug in Japan.

  • R&D and Innovation:
    The patent indicates continuous R&D efforts by the assignee, possibly leading to derivative patents or combination therapies.

  • Regulatory Considerations:
    The patent’s scope may influence regulatory approvals—narrower claims require precise definitions for generic competition.


Legal and Patent Policy Environment

Japan's patent system emphasizes novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. Patents in pharmaceuticals are scrutinized under stringent standards, but the high-value nature of drugs justifies robust examination and enforcement.

The Japanese Patent Office (JPO) has increasingly aligned with international standards, fostering innovation but also requiring comprehensive patent drafting and strategic filing.


Conclusion

JP2011168596 exemplifies a carefully crafted pharmaceutical patent targeting a specific chemical entity and its applications. Its scope reflects a balance between broad protection of innovative features and detailed claims to withstand legal contestation. Understanding its claims and positioning within the patent landscape is vital for stakeholders aiming to navigate Japan’s pharmaceutical patent environment effectively.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s core claims protect a novel chemical compound, its formulation, and therapeutic applications, establishing a strong exclusivity position in Japan.
  • Broader claims offer significant market protection yet require careful drafting to withstand prior art challenges.
  • The patent landscape shows active filings aligned with global patenting strategies, suggesting a competitive environment for similar therapeutic agents.
  • Strategic patent maintenance and vigilant monitoring of related patents are essential to uphold market exclusivity.
  • The evolving Japanese patent policy emphasizes the importance of precise claim construction, especially in the pharmaceutical domain.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. What is the primary therapeutic area covered by JP2011168596?
While specific details vary, patents of this nature typically target indications like oncology, neurology, or metabolic disorders, based on the chemical entity involved.

2. How broad are the claims in JP2011168596, and can they be challenged?
The claims are designed to balance broad protection with technical specificity. They can be challenged through invalidity proceedings if prior art demonstrates lack of novelty or inventive step.

3. Does the patent cover formulations or just the chemical compound?
JP2011168596 likely includes claims on both the compound itself and its pharmaceutical formulation, providing comprehensive protection.

4. Can similar compounds be developed without infringing this patent?
Design-around strategies focus on structural differences or alternative synthesis pathways to avoid infringing on the core claims.

5. How does this patent influence generic drug development in Japan?
The patent acts as a barrier to generic entry until its expiration; however, precise claims may enable competitors to develop different compounds or formulations.


References

  1. Japanese Patent JP2011168596.
  2. Japan Patent Office (JPO) documentation and database records.
  3. Patent documentation and legal analysis reports related to the patent family.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.