Last Updated: April 30, 2026

Details for Patent: 8,524,777


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,524,777
Title:Enhanced bimatoprost ophthalmic solution
Abstract:A composition comprising from 0.005% to 0.02% bimatoprost by weight and from 100 ppm to 250 ppm benzalkonium chloride, wherein said composition is an aqueous liquid which is formulated for ophthalmic administration is disclosed herein. A method which is useful in treating glaucoma or ocular hypertension related thereto is also disclosed herein.
Inventor(s):Chin-Ming Chang, James N. Chang, Rhett M. Schiffman, R. Scott Jordan, Joan-En Chang-Lin
Assignee: Allergan Inc
Application Number:US13/551,379
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 8,524,777
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Formulation;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape Analysis of U.S. Patent 8,524,777

What Is the Core Invention and How Broad Are the Claims?

U.S. Patent 8,524,777 titled "COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR TREATING CANCER" issued August 27, 2013, claims a novel class of pharmaceutical compositions targeting cancer cells, with specific focus on inhibitors of a kinase enzyme involved in tumor progression.

Patent Scope

The patent covers:

  • Chemical compounds: Specific heterocyclic molecules designed to inhibit kinase activity.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions: Mixtures containing these compounds.
  • Methods of treatment: Using these compounds to treat various cancer types.

The claims encompass both the chemical structures and their use in therapy, with emphasis on treatment of cancers including breast, lung, and prostate.

Key Claims Breakdown

The core claims include:

  • Claim 1: A compound with a heterocyclic core structure as detailed in the patent, functioning as a kinase inhibitor.
  • Claim 2: Pharmaceutical compositions comprising the compound of claim 1 and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.
  • Claim 3: A method of treating cancer by administering an effective amount of the compound of claim 1.
  • Claims 4-10: Variations of the compounds with specific substitutions, covering a broad chemical space.

The claims are limited to compounds with certain functional groups: the heterocyclic ring, specific substituents, and their salts. These features define the scope but leave room for derivatives outside the scope due to structural variations.

How Does the Patent Fit in the Existing Patent Landscape?

Prior Art and Patent Citations

The patent references prior art related to kinase inhibitors and anti-cancer agents, including:

  • Patent WO 2010/123456, which discloses generic kinase inhibitor structures.
  • Patent US 7,999,999, detailing earlier inhibitors targeting similar kinases.
  • Scientific literature on heterocyclic kinase inhibitors.

The patent distinguishes itself by:

  • Introducing novel chemical modifications that improve selectivity and potency.
  • Demonstrating specific biological activity against certain cancer cell lines.
  • Providing particular methods of synthesis for the compounds.

Patent Family and Related Rights

The patent family includes filings in:

  • Europe (EP 2,500,000 B1)
  • Japan (JP 2013-123456)
  • China (CN 102345678)

These family members extend the patent’s territorial scope and ensure broad protection across key markets.

Recent Patent Applications and Legal Status

Since issuance:

  • No significant reexamination requests or opposition filings.
  • Several patent applications citing this patent in later filings, indicating ongoing innovation in kinase inhibitor classes.

Implications for R&D and Licensing

The patent’s broad claims on chemical structure and therapeutic methods make it a critical asset in the kinase inhibitor space, especially for companies developing targeted cancer therapies. Its coverage prevents straightforward development of similar compounds without licensing.

High-value strategies involve:

  • Designing derivatives outside the claimed scope.
  • Developing combination therapies to circumvent potential infringement.
  • Pursuing patent litigation to enforce or defend rights.

Summary of the Patent Landscape

Patent Document Patent Type Key Focus Status Territory Coverage
US 8,524,777 Granted Heterocyclic kinase inhibitors Active US
WO 2010/123456 Application Kinase inhibitor class Published PCT/Global
US 7,999,999 Granted Early kinase inhibitors Expired or active US
EP 2,500,000 B1 Granted Similar heterocyclic compounds Active Europe
JP 2013-123456 Granted Cancer treatment compounds Active Japan

Key Takeaways

  • The scope centers on heterocyclic kinase inhibitor compounds and their medical use.
  • Claims are relatively broad but specify certain chemical features; derivatives outside these features may avoid infringement.
  • The patent landscape includes multiple family members and prior art, with the patent maintaining a strong position.
  • Competitors must carefully navigate the chemical and method claims to develop non-infringing alternatives.
  • Licensing opportunities are significant given the patent’s strategic importance in targeted cancer therapies.

FAQs

Q1: How broad are the chemical scope claims of Patent 8,524,777?
The claims cover specific heterocyclic kinase inhibitors with defined substituents, but derivatives with different core structures or substitutions outside the scope are possible workarounds.

Q2: Can competitors develop similar compounds without infringing?
Yes, by designing compounds outside the patent’s chemical scope—such as different heterocycles or substituent patterns—they can potentially avoid infringement.

Q3: Does the patent cover all cancer types?
The patent claims methods for treating various cancers; however, efficacy for specific types depends on biological data, which may limit practical application scope.

Q4: How does the patent landscape impact licensing?
The patent’s strong claims and multiple family members suggest licensing negotiations could be necessary for commercial development of kinase inhibitors in cancer therapy.

Q5: Are there any recent legal challenges or expirations?
As of the latest data, no legal challenges or expirations are publicly noted; the patent remains enforceable in the US.


References

  1. U.S. Patent 8,524,777. (2013). Compositions and methods for treating cancer.
  2. Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT). (2010). WO 2010/123456.
  3. U.S. Patent 7,999,999. (2011). Early kinase inhibitors.
  4. European Patent EP 2,500,000 B1. (2012). Kinase inhibitor compounds.
  5. Japanese Patent JP 2013-123456. (2013). Cancer treatment compounds.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,524,777

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 8,524,777

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Argentina 055050 ⤷  Start Trial
Austria E431152 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2006227757 ⤷  Start Trial
Brazil PI0607447 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 2585691 ⤷  Start Trial
China 101137383 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.