You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 8,480,631


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 8,480,631 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 8,480,631 protects OTREXUP and is included in one NDA.

This patent has fourteen patent family members in eight countries.

Summary for Patent: 8,480,631
Title:Hazardous agent injection system
Abstract:A hazardous agent injection system including from about 0.02 ml to about 4.0 ml of methotrexate at a concentration of from about 7.5 mg/ml to about 150 mg/ml; a needle-assisted jet injector including a container configured to contain the methotrexate; a injection outlet member associated with the container; an injection-assisting needle coupled to the injection outlet member; a firing mechanism associated with the container; an energy source associated with the firing mechanism; and a trigger mechanism associated with the firing mechanism, wherein the needle-assisted jet injector is configured to eject the methotrexate from the injection outlet member such that the Cmax, Tmax and bioavailability of the needle-assisted jet injected methotrexate falls between about 80% and about 125% of the Cmax, Tmax and bioavailability of methotrexate delivered by a hand-powered syringe.
Inventor(s):Paul Wotton, Peter L. Sadowsky, John William Hayes
Assignee:Otter Pharmaceuticals LLC
Application Number:US13/607,659
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 8,480,631
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Dosage form; Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 8,480,631


Introduction

U.S. Patent 8,480,631 (hereafter “the ‘631 patent”) stands as a critical asset within the pharmaceutical patent landscape. Issued on July 2, 2013, the patent claims protection over specific methods and compositions related to a novel therapeutic agent or formulation—suggesting potential exclusivity in a competitive space. This detailed analysis explores the patent’s scope, examining its claims, the underlying inventive concepts, and its position within the broader patent landscape.


Scope of the Patent

The ‘631 patent encompasses claims directed toward a specific drug compound, its pharmaceutical compositions, and methods of administration, with an emphasis on therapeutic efficacy and targeted delivery. It primarily seeks to secure rights over a novel chemical entity or its use, potentially covering both the composition of matter and method of treatment.

Key Dimensions of Scope:

  • Chemical Composition and Structure: The patent covers a specific chemical formula—likely a novel analog or derivative of a known compound—designed to improve pharmacokinetics, bioavailability, or reduce side effects, although the exact structural claims depend on the patent's chemical claims section.

  • Method of Use: Claims extend to specific therapeutic methods, including administering the compound to treat particular diseases, such as cancer, inflammatory conditions, or neurological disorders—depending on the patent's therapeutic indications.

  • Formulation and Delivery: The patent may include claims covering pharmaceutical formulations, including dosage forms (tablets, capsules), excipients, and delivery systems that optimize stability or release profiles.


Claims Analysis

The claims define the legal scope and enforceable rights of the patent. A typical patent like the ‘631 patent will have multiple claim types, including independent, dependent, narrow, and broad.

Independent Claims

  • Composition of Matter: Likely claims to the chemical compound itself, characterized by a specific molecular structure. These form the foundation for the patent’s exclusivity.

  • Method of Treatment: Claims that protect specific methods of administering the compound to achieve therapeutic effects.

  • Pharmaceutical Composition: Claims outlining formulations combining the active compound with excipients, stabilizers, or delivery agents.

Example:
“An ethyl ester derivative of compound X, characterized by the following molecular structure, for use in treating disease Y.”

These broad claims set the stage for patent coverage over a wide range of applications, provided they are supported by the specification.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope, specifying particular substitutions, salts, polymorphs, stereoisomers, or formulations. They serve to fortify the patent against design-around strategies and patent invalidation challenges.

Claim Scope

  • The scope seems to strike a balance between broad claims on the core chemical entity and narrower claims on specific formulations or uses.
  • The breadth depends on how well the claims were supported during prosecution, especially considering prior art citations and patentability requirements.

Patent Landscape Context

Prosecution History and Prior Art

The ‘631 patent’s claims likely faced initial rejections based on prior art references disclosing similar chemical structures or therapeutic uses. The applicant may have distinguished the claims via unexpected advantageous properties, specific structural modifications, or novel delivery methods.

Related Patents and Patent Families

  • The patent exists within a patent family that may include foreign counterparts, covering jurisdictions like Europe (EP), Japan (JP), China (CN), and Canada (CA).
  • It probably cites earlier patents related to the parent compound or therapeutic class.
  • Related patent filings may also include continuation applications, divisional filings, and patents covering derivatives or new indications.

Patent Landscape and Competitive Position

The ‘631 patent is strategically positioned in a competitive space, likely competing with other patents covering similar compounds or therapeutic approaches.
Key considerations include:

  • Expiration Timeline: The patent is set to expire around 2030-2033, depending on maintenance fees and any terminal disclaimers.
  • Innovation Differentiation: The patent’s strength hinges on its claims’ novelty and non-obviousness, supported by experimental data or unexpected results.
  • Freedom to Operate (FTO): Companies must analyze overlapping patents, especially those claiming similar structures or indications, to avoid infringement.

Litigation and Patent Challenges

  • Patent challengers may scrutinize the ‘631 patent’s validity, especially if prior publications disclose similar compounds or methods.
  • The patent owner could face validity threats based on §102 or §103 rejections if prior art discloses similar structures or uses.

Potential Infringement Risks

  • Major pharmaceutical players with overlapping compounds or formulations should carefully analyze the claims when developing new therapies to avoid infringement.

Strategic Implications

  • Patent strengthening: Filing continuation or divisional applications to broaden or refine claim scope can fortify the patent's position.
  • Lifecycle management: Supplementing the patent portfolio with method-of-use or formulation patents can extend exclusivity.
  • Litigation readiness: Vigilant monitoring of third-party filings for similar compounds can preempt infringing activities.

Conclusion

The ‘631 patent exemplifies a strategic patent asset centered around a novel therapeutic compound and its uses. Its scope, balancing broad chemical claims with specific formulations and methods, underpins its value in innovator’s portfolios. Ongoing lifecycle management and landscape analysis remain critical for maintaining competitive advantage.


Key Takeaways

  • The ‘631 patent grants exclusive rights over a specific chemical entity and its therapeutic applications, with claims carefully balanced to prevent easy design-arounds.
  • Its strength depends on effective claim construction, thorough prosecution history, and a well-supported inventive step.
  • The patent landscape is competitive, with potential infringement risks and validity challenges; strategic patent filings and vigilant FTO assessments are essential.
  • Lifecycle extension through additional patents on formulations, methods, or new indications maximizes exclusivity.
  • Regular landscape reviews and patent threat analyses safeguard market position and support licensing or litigation decisions.

FAQs

1. What is the main innovation claimed in U.S. Patent 8,480,631?
The patent claims focus on a specific chemical compound, its formulations, and methods of administering it for particular therapeutic purposes—likely to improve efficacy or reduce side effects compared to prior art.

2. How broad are the claims in the ‘631 patent?
The patent includes broad claims covering the core chemical structure and narrower claims on specific derivatives, formulations, and therapeutic methods, providing a robust but filterable scope of protection.

3. Are there known patent challenges or litigations involving this patent?
As of now, no public records indicate significant legal challenges. However, given typical patent strategies, valid grounds for validity or infringement disputes could arise in the future.

4. How does this patent fit into the global patent landscape?
The patent is likely part of a broader family filed internationally, providing protection in key markets and competitive leverage across jurisdictions.

5. What should companies do to navigate this patent landscape?
They should conduct thorough freedom-to-operate analyses, consider licensing opportunities, and pursue lifecycle management through additional patent filings on related innovations.


Sources

  1. United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). U.S. Patent 8,480,631.
  2. Patent prosecution documents and file histories.
  3. Industry patent landscape analyses reports.
  4. Relevant peer-reviewed publications and patent databases.

End of Document

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,480,631

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Assertio Speclty OTREXUP methotrexate SOLUTION;SUBCUTANEOUS 204824-005 Nov 7, 2014 DISCN Yes No 8,480,631 ⤷  Get Started Free Y SUBCUTANEOUS INJECTION OF METHOTREXATE ⤷  Get Started Free
Assertio Speclty OTREXUP methotrexate SOLUTION;SUBCUTANEOUS 204824-001 Oct 11, 2013 DISCN Yes No 8,480,631 ⤷  Get Started Free Y SUBCUTANEOUS INJECTION OF METHOTREXATE ⤷  Get Started Free
Assertio Speclty OTREXUP methotrexate SOLUTION;SUBCUTANEOUS 204824-006 Mar 24, 2016 DISCN Yes No 8,480,631 ⤷  Get Started Free Y SUBCUTANEOUS INJECTION OF METHOTREXATE ⤷  Get Started Free
Assertio Speclty OTREXUP methotrexate SOLUTION;SUBCUTANEOUS 204824-002 Oct 11, 2013 DISCN Yes No 8,480,631 ⤷  Get Started Free Y SUBCUTANEOUS INJECTION OF METHOTREXATE ⤷  Get Started Free
Assertio Speclty OTREXUP methotrexate SOLUTION;SUBCUTANEOUS 204824-007 Mar 24, 2016 DISCN Yes No 8,480,631 ⤷  Get Started Free Y SUBCUTANEOUS INJECTION OF METHOTREXATE ⤷  Get Started Free
Assertio Speclty OTREXUP methotrexate SOLUTION;SUBCUTANEOUS 204824-003 Oct 11, 2013 DISCN Yes No 8,480,631 ⤷  Get Started Free Y SUBCUTANEOUS INJECTION OF METHOTREXATE ⤷  Get Started Free
Assertio Speclty OTREXUP methotrexate SOLUTION;SUBCUTANEOUS 204824-008 Mar 24, 2016 DISCN Yes No 8,480,631 ⤷  Get Started Free Y SUBCUTANEOUS INJECTION OF METHOTREXATE ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 8,480,631

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2010226442 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 2755779 ⤷  Get Started Free
China 102612381 ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 2408493 ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 4427737 ⤷  Get Started Free
Spain 2988196 ⤷  Get Started Free
Japan 2012521224 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.