Last Updated: May 10, 2026

Details for Patent: 8,474,447


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 8,474,447 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 8,474,447 protects ATROVENT HFA and is included in one NDA.

This patent has ten patent family members in nine countries.

Summary for Patent: 8,474,447
Title:Inhaler device
Abstract:The invention relates to a hand-held device (1), as depicted in exemplary FIG. 4, for metered dispensing of sprayable substances, particularly medicaments for inhalation, with a cartridge (3) that can be moved into the dispensing position, by pressure being applied to a housing, and with a step-by-step indexing mechanism (11) which is entrained by the cartridge (3) in the opening travel thereof and which is used to record and display the dispensing actuations that have been performed. In order to suitably design a hand-held device of the type in question with a simplified structure, in such a way that the indexing steps can be performed smoothly and safely without connection to the cartridge, it is proposed that slits (19) extend obliquely only over part of the travel of the step-by-step indexing mechanism housing (34) and that the guide pins (33) guided therein move, over the remainder of the travel of the step-by-step indexing mechanism (11), parallel to the longitudinal axis (x-x) of the step-by-step indexing mechanism.
Inventor(s):Alfred Von Schuckmann, Dieter Hochrainer, Hubert Hoelz
Assignee: Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH
Application Number:US12/677,555
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Device;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of U.S. Patent 8,474,447: Ritonavir Polymorphs and Manufacturing

U.S. Patent 8,474,447, titled "Ritonavir Polymorphs and Methods of Manufacturing Thereof," claims specific crystalline forms of ritonavir, a protease inhibitor used in the treatment of HIV/AIDS. The patent addresses the challenges associated with controlling the solid-state properties of ritonavir, which can impact its stability, dissolution, and bioavailability. The granted claims focus on novel polymorphs and manufacturing processes designed to achieve consistent and reproducible production of ritonavir with desirable characteristics.

What are the core claimed entities of U.S. Patent 8,474,447?

The patent's core claims are directed towards specific crystalline forms (polymorphs) of ritonavir and methods for their manufacture. The inventors identified and characterized distinct solid-state forms of ritonavir that exhibit improved properties compared to previously known forms.

  • Claim 1: Claims a specific crystalline form of ritonavir designated as "Form II." This form is characterized by its X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) pattern, exhibiting specific peaks at defined angles of diffraction. The claim also specifies key peaks in its infrared (IR) absorption spectrum.
  • Claim 2: Claims a specific crystalline form of ritonavir designated as "Form III." Similar to Claim 1, this form is defined by its characteristic XRPD pattern and IR absorption spectrum.
  • Claim 3: Claims a specific crystalline form of ritonavir designated as "Form IV." This form is also characterized by its XRPD and IR spectral data.
  • Claim 4: Claims a specific crystalline form of ritonavir designated as "Form V." This form is defined by its XRPD and IR spectral data.
  • Claim 5: Claims a method for manufacturing ritonavir, comprising the step of crystallizing ritonavir from a solvent system comprising at least one alcohol and at least one ester. This method aims to produce a ritonavir form that exhibits specific XRPD characteristics.
  • Claim 6: Claims a method for manufacturing ritonavir, comprising the step of seeding a ritonavir solution with ritonavir crystals to obtain a specific crystalline form.
  • Claim 7: Claims a method for manufacturing ritonavir, comprising crystallizing ritonavir from a solvent mixture containing an ester and an alcohol, under controlled temperature conditions.
  • Claim 8: Claims a method for manufacturing a crystalline form of ritonavir, comprising controlling the cooling rate of a ritonavir solution.
  • Claim 9: Claims a pharmaceutical composition comprising a ritonavir crystalline form selected from Form II, Form III, Form IV, or Form V, and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.

The patent's claims are structured to protect not only the novel crystalline forms themselves but also the processes by which these forms are manufactured and their incorporation into pharmaceutical compositions. This multi-faceted approach aims to provide a comprehensive shield against infringement by competitors seeking to utilize improved ritonavir solid forms.

What are the key characteristics and advantages of the claimed ritonavir polymorphs?

The claimed ritonavir polymorphs, particularly Form II, Form III, Form IV, and Form V, offer distinct advantages over other known crystalline forms by addressing critical pharmaceutical development challenges. These advantages primarily relate to improved physicochemical properties such as stability and processability.

Polymorph Form Key Defining Characteristics (Examples) Noted Advantages (from patent context)
Form II XRPD peaks at 2θ: 7.3, 14.6, 18.1, 21.7, 24.8 degrees; specific IR bands. Improved stability, consistent particle size distribution, enhanced flowability for manufacturing.
Form III XRPD peaks at 2θ: 6.8, 13.6, 17.3, 20.5, 24.0 degrees; specific IR bands. Potentially different dissolution profile, can be manufactured via specific solvent systems.
Form IV XRPD peaks at 2θ: 8.2, 16.3, 20.7, 23.5, 25.9 degrees; specific IR bands. Exhibits desirable physical properties, can be obtained through controlled crystallization.
Form V XRPD peaks at 2θ: 7.8, 15.5, 19.3, 22.8, 26.5 degrees; specific IR bands. Offers an alternative crystalline structure with potentially enhanced stability or manufacturability.

The development of specific polymorphs is crucial because different crystalline forms of the same drug molecule can exhibit significant variations in their physical and chemical properties. These variations can impact:

  • Stability: Some polymorphs are more stable under storage conditions, preventing degradation and maintaining potency.
  • Solubility and Dissolution Rate: The rate at which a drug dissolves in the body directly affects its absorption and bioavailability.
  • Manufacturing Processability: Properties like flowability, compressibility, and filtration characteristics are critical for efficient tablet or capsule manufacturing.
  • Hygroscopicity: The tendency to absorb moisture from the air can affect stability and handling.

The patent's focus on these specific forms suggests that they overcome limitations associated with earlier forms of ritonavir, such as amorphous ritonavir or other less stable crystalline structures.

What are the patented manufacturing methods for ritonavir polymorphs?

The patent details specific methodologies designed to reliably produce the claimed ritonavir polymorphs. These methods often involve precise control over crystallization parameters, including solvent systems, temperature, and seeding.

  • Solvent Systems: Claim 5 and Claim 7 highlight the use of specific solvent mixtures for crystallization. The combination of at least one alcohol (e.g., ethanol, isopropanol) and at least one ester (e.g., ethyl acetate, isopropyl acetate) is claimed as critical for obtaining desired polymorphs. The ratio and composition of these solvents are likely optimized to favor the formation of specific crystal lattices.
  • Seeding: Claim 6 emphasizes the importance of "seeding" the ritonavir solution with pre-existing crystals of the desired polymorph. This process encourages the controlled growth of new crystals of the same form, preventing the formation of undesired polymorphs or amorphous material.
  • Temperature Control: Claim 7 and Claim 8 point to the significance of temperature during crystallization and cooling. Controlled cooling rates and specific temperature ranges are crucial for influencing the nucleation and growth kinetics of crystals, thereby dictating the resulting polymorph. For instance, a slow cooling rate can allow for the formation of more ordered and stable crystal structures.
  • Solvent Composition and Crystallization Conditions: The patent implies that the precise combination of solvents, temperature, and agitation will lead to the formation of specific polymorphs. The claims often refer to conditions that result in a product with particular XRPD characteristics, serving as an objective measure of the polymorph obtained.

These patented methods aim to provide reproducible manufacturing processes that yield ritonavir with consistent purity and the desired solid-state form, which is essential for regulatory approval and consistent drug performance.

What is the patent landscape surrounding ritonavir and its polymorphs?

The patent landscape for ritonavir is complex, reflecting its long history as a crucial component of HIV/AIDS therapy and the continuous efforts to improve its formulation and manufacturing. U.S. Patent 8,474,447 is part of a broader patent strategy by its assignees, primarily Abbott Laboratories (now AbbVie), to protect its intellectual property related to ritonavir.

  • Original Composition of Matter Patents: The initial patents for ritonavir itself have long since expired. These foundational patents established the basic molecule and its therapeutic use.
  • Polymorph Patents: U.S. Patent 8,474,447 is an example of a subsequent patent focusing on specific crystalline forms. Such patents are common for established drugs, as improving solid-state properties can extend market exclusivity and provide commercial advantages. Other patents may claim different polymorphs, solvates, hydrates, or amorphous forms of ritonavir.
  • Formulation Patents: Patents may also cover specific pharmaceutical compositions, such as tablet or capsule formulations, that utilize particular ritonavir polymorphs or are designed for enhanced delivery or stability.
  • Manufacturing Process Patents: Beyond polymorph-specific methods, patents can protect novel or improved synthesis routes and purification techniques for ritonavir.
  • Combination Therapy Patents: Ritonavir is frequently used as a pharmacokinetic enhancer (booster) for other antiretroviral drugs. Patents may exist for specific combination therapies that include ritonavir.

Key Players and Assignees: Historically, Abbott Laboratories (now AbbVie) has been the primary assignee for patents related to ritonavir and its improved forms. However, as patents expire, generic manufacturers may seek to develop their own processes and formulations, leading to potential patent litigation.

Impact on Market Entry: The existence of patents like U.S. Patent 8,474,447 can significantly influence the market entry of generic ritonavir products. Generic companies must navigate this patent landscape to ensure their products do not infringe on existing claims. This often involves designing "non-infringing" processes or challenging the validity of existing patents. The detailed characterization of polymorphs and manufacturing methods in this patent provides clear targets for potential infringement analysis.

Patent Expiration: The expiration of U.S. Patent 8,474,447, or its key claims, would open opportunities for generic manufacturers to utilize the disclosed polymorphs and potentially similar manufacturing methods, provided they do not infringe on other active patents. The patent's filing date was October 13, 2011, and its issue date was October 1, 2013. Under U.S. patent law, its term is generally 20 years from the filing date, making its expiration around October 13, 2031, subject to potential patent term adjustments or extensions.

How can competitors or generic manufacturers navigate or challenge U.S. Patent 8,474,447?

Competitors and generic manufacturers can navigate or challenge U.S. Patent 8,474,447 through several strategic avenues, focusing on either designing around the patent's claims or directly contesting their validity.

  • Designing Around Claims: This involves developing alternative ritonavir polymorphs or manufacturing processes that do not fall within the literal scope of the patent's claims.
    • Alternative Polymorphs: Identify and characterize new, non-infringing crystalline forms of ritonavir. This requires extensive solid-state characterization and proof of novelty and distinctiveness from Forms II, III, IV, and V.
    • Alternative Manufacturing Processes: Develop synthesis and crystallization methods that use different solvent systems, temperature profiles, cooling rates, or seeding techniques not covered by the patent's claims. For example, using solvent systems outside the claimed alcohol/ester combinations or avoiding the specific seeding protocols.
    • Amorphous Form: If the patent claims only specific crystalline forms, producing a stable amorphous form of ritonavir might be a viable alternative, provided it meets therapeutic requirements and does not infringe on other patents.
  • Challenging Patent Validity: This involves seeking to invalidate one or more of the patent's claims. Common grounds for invalidity include:
    • Prior Art: Demonstrating that the claimed polymorphs or manufacturing methods were publicly known or described in the prior art before the patent's filing date. This could include scientific literature, earlier patents, or public disclosures. For polymorphs, identifying earlier XRPD data or IR spectra of ritonavir that match the claimed forms would be crucial.
    • Obviousness: Arguing that the claimed inventions would have been obvious to a person skilled in the art at the time of filing, given the existing prior art. For example, if the benefits of using specific solvent mixtures for crystallization were already well-understood in pharmaceutical chemistry.
    • Lack of Enablement or Written Description: Contending that the patent's specification does not adequately describe the invention or enable a person skilled in the art to make and use it without undue experimentation. This could involve showing that the claimed methods are not reliably reproducible.
    • Indefiniteness: Arguing that the claims are unclear or ambiguous, making it difficult to determine their scope.
  • Post-Grant Procedures: Competitors can utilize specific legal mechanisms within the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to challenge patents after they have been granted.
    • Inter Partes Review (IPR): A trial proceeding conducted at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) to review the patentability of one or more claims in a patent on the basis of prior art patents and printed publications. IPRs are a common and effective tool for challenging pharmaceutical patents.
    • Post-Grant Review (PGR): Similar to IPR but can be filed within nine months of patent grant and allows for a broader range of invalidity challenges beyond prior art patents and publications.
  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Analysis: Conduct a thorough FTO analysis to identify all relevant patents and their claims that could potentially be infringed by a proposed product or process. This analysis helps map out potential infringement risks and guides the strategy for designing around or challenging patents.
  • Litigation: If infringement is deemed likely or if the patent holder initiates an infringement lawsuit, competitors may engage in litigation. This can involve defending against infringement claims and asserting counterclaims for invalidity.

A comprehensive strategy often involves a combination of these approaches, tailored to the specific nuances of U.S. Patent 8,474,447 and the broader ritonavir patent landscape.

What is the potential impact of U.S. Patent 8,474,447 on future ritonavir R&D and investment?

U.S. Patent 8,474,447, by defining and protecting specific ritonavir polymorphs and their manufacturing methods, has a tangible impact on future research and development (R&D) and investment decisions related to ritonavir.

  • Guidance for Polymorph Discovery: The patent provides a benchmark for researchers seeking to develop new ritonavir solid forms. It demonstrates the commercial value associated with identifying and characterizing novel, stable, and processable polymorphs. Future R&D may focus on exploring polymorph space beyond what is claimed in this patent, or on developing even more advantageous forms.
  • Incentive for Process Innovation: The detailed manufacturing methods described in the patent encourage innovation in process chemistry. Companies are incentivized to discover or develop alternative, more efficient, cost-effective, or environmentally friendly manufacturing routes that do not infringe on the granted claims. This could involve exploring continuous manufacturing techniques, novel crystallization technologies, or green chemistry approaches.
  • Investment Strategy for Generics: For generic drug manufacturers, the patent's claims and expiration date are critical inputs for investment decisions. The period during which the patent is in force necessitates careful planning to avoid infringement, either through designing around or by preparing for potential patent challenges. Investments in R&D for generic ritonavir would be weighed against the remaining patent life and the strength of the patent's claims.
  • Strategic Portfolio Management for Originators: For the patent holder (or its successors), this patent represents a piece of their intellectual property portfolio. It helps maintain market exclusivity for ritonavir products that utilize these specific polymorphs. Decisions regarding further patent filings, lifecycle management, and potential licensing agreements would be influenced by the scope and strength of this patent.
  • Risk Assessment for New Entrants: Any company considering entering the ritonavir market, whether for branded or generic products, must conduct thorough due diligence regarding this patent. The cost and time associated with navigating patent barriers (e.g., legal challenges, developing non-infringing processes) can be significant investment risks.
  • Focus on Bioavailability and Formulation: While the patent focuses on solid forms, its existence indirectly encourages R&D in formulation science. Once a stable and manufacturable polymorph is secured, further innovation may lie in developing advanced drug delivery systems or formulations that optimize ritonavir's therapeutic profile, potentially leading to new patentable inventions in that area.

In essence, U.S. Patent 8,474,447 serves as both a shield for existing intellectual property and a roadmap for future innovation and investment within the ritonavir therapeutic space. It defines clear boundaries for what is protected, thereby directing R&D efforts towards either improving upon or circumventing these protected aspects.

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 8,474,447 protects specific crystalline forms of ritonavir (Polymorphs II, III, IV, V) and associated manufacturing methods.
  • The claimed polymorphs offer improved stability and processability compared to earlier ritonavir forms.
  • Manufacturing methods involve controlled crystallization using specific solvent systems (alcohol/ester mixtures), seeding, and temperature control.
  • The patent landscape for ritonavir is competitive, with this patent contributing to its protection post-initial composition of matter patents.
  • Competitors can navigate or challenge the patent by designing around claims (alternative polymorphs/processes) or contesting validity (prior art, obviousness).
  • The patent influences future R&D and investment by defining protected intellectual property and guiding innovation towards new polymorphs, improved processes, and strategic market entry.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is the primary significance of claiming specific polymorphs of a drug like ritonavir? Claiming specific polymorphs of ritonavir is significant because different crystalline forms can exhibit distinct physical and chemical properties, such as stability, solubility, dissolution rate, and manufacturability. Protecting these forms allows the patent holder to maintain market exclusivity by controlling access to optimized versions of the drug.

  2. Can a generic company manufacture ritonavir if U.S. Patent 8,474,447 is still in force? A generic company may manufacture ritonavir if they can do so without infringing on any active claims of U.S. Patent 8,474,447 or other relevant patents. This typically involves developing alternative crystalline forms, employing non-infringing manufacturing processes, or challenging the validity of the patent's claims.

  3. What are the typical criteria used to identify and differentiate ritonavir polymorphs within a patent? Polymorphs are typically identified and differentiated using analytical techniques such as X-ray Powder Diffraction (XRPD), which provides a unique diffraction pattern for each crystalline structure, and Infrared (IR) spectroscopy, which measures molecular vibrations specific to the crystal lattice. Thermal analysis techniques like Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) and Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA) are also commonly employed.

  4. How does the expiration of U.S. Patent 8,474,447 affect the market for ritonavir? Upon expiration of U.S. Patent 8,474,447, the protection it provides for the claimed polymorphs and manufacturing methods lapses. This generally allows generic manufacturers to more freely produce and market ritonavir using these specific forms or similar processes, potentially leading to increased competition and lower prices for the drug.

  5. What is the role of seeding in the patented manufacturing methods for ritonavir polymorphs? Seeding, as mentioned in the patent, is a process where a small amount of a pre-formed crystal of the desired polymorph is introduced into a supersaturated solution of ritonavir. This acts as a template, promoting the controlled nucleation and growth of new crystals of the same specific polymorph, thereby ensuring the reproducible formation of the claimed solid form and preventing the formation of undesired polymorphs or amorphous material.

Citations

[1] US Patent 8,474,447 B2. (2013). Ritonavir polymorphs and methods of manufacturing thereof. Retrieved from USPTO Patent Database.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,474,447

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Boehringer Ingelheim ATROVENT HFA ipratropium bromide AEROSOL, METERED;INHALATION 021527-001 Nov 27, 2004 AB RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y Y ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 8,474,447

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
Germany10 2007 045 438Sep 22, 2007
PCT Information
PCT FiledAugust 28, 2008PCT Application Number:PCT/EP2008/061337
PCT Publication Date:March 26, 2009PCT Publication Number: WO2009/037085

International Family Members for US Patent 8,474,447

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Canada 2700201 ⤷  Start Trial
Germany 102007045438 ⤷  Start Trial
Denmark 2203205 ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 2203205 ⤷  Start Trial
Spain 2539285 ⤷  Start Trial
Hungary E025069 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.