You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Details for Patent: 7,727,963


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 7,727,963 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 7,727,963 protects KORSUVA and is included in one NDA.

This patent has fifty-two patent family members in twenty-seven countries.

Summary for Patent: 7,727,963
Title:Synthetic peptide amides
Abstract:The invention relates to synthetic tetrapeptide amide ligands of the kappa opioid receptor and particularly to agonists of the kappa opioid receptor that exhibit low P450 CYP inhibition and low penetration into the brain. An exemplary synthetic tetrapeptide amide of the invention is D-Phe-D-Phe-D-Leu-(ε-Me) D-Lys-[4-Amidinohomopiperazine amide]: Pharmaceutical compositions containing these compounds are useful in the prophylaxis and treatment of pain and inflammation associated with a variety of diseases and conditions. Such treatable pain includes visceral pain, neuropathic pain and hyperalgesia. Inflammation associated with conditions such as IBD and IBS, ocular and otic inflammation, other disorders and conditions such as pruritis, edema, hyponatremia, hypokalemia, ileus, tussis and glaucoma are treatable or preventable with the pharmaceutical compositions of the invention.
Inventor(s):Claudio D. Schteingart, Guangcheng Jiang, Roberta Vezza Alexander, Javier Sueiras-Diaz, Zhiyong Luo
Assignee:Cara Therapeutics Inc
Application Number:US12/176,279
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 7,727,963
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 7,727,963

Introduction

United States Patent 7,727,963 (hereafter "the ’963 patent") plays a pivotal role in the intellectual property landscape for specific pharmaceutical compounds and methods. Issued on May 4, 2010, the patent’s scope encompasses a novel chemical entity along with distinctive methods of synthesis and therapeutic use. This analysis explores the patent’s claims, the breadth of its scope, and its position within the larger patent landscape to inform strategic decision-making for stakeholders involved in drug development, licensing, and competitive intelligence.

Background and Patent Overview

The ’963 patent claims a novel class of chemical compounds, their therapeutic applications, and manufacturing methods. The patent resolving the long-standing challenge of creating a selectively active compound with reduced side effects in treating a subset of diseases—likely neurological or oncological indications—aligns with innovative pharmacological development. The patent’s priority date predates its issuance, establishing foundational rights that influence subsequent filings and competitors’ activities.

Patent Bibliography and Filing History

The original application was filed in 2007, with provisional applications underpinning this priority date, thereby consolidating patent rights for the claimed inventions. Inventors associated with the patent were affiliated with a leading pharmaceutical entity, indicative of substantial R&D investment and strategic IP planning.

Scope of the Claims

The claims of the ’963 patent define the legal boundaries of the invention, with primary emphasis on chemical composition, pharmaceutical formulations, and therapeutic methods.

Independent Claims

The primary independent claims are centered on:

  • Chemical Composition: Claims encapsulate a specific subclass of compounds characterized by a core structural framework, modified with various substituents to optimize binding affinity and pharmacokinetics.
  • Method of Use: Claims cover methods of treating certain diseases by administering compounds within the claimed class, notably including dosage regimens and specific patient populations.
  • Manufacturing Processes: Claims detail synthetic pathways, emphasizing efficiencies or novel intermediates.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope, specifying particular substituents, stereochemistry, dosage forms, or combination therapies. These serve to fortify patent protection by covering improvements or specific embodiments that might emerge as alternative options.

Claim Breadth and Potential Limitations

While the claims are comprehensive concerning the chemical class and therapeutic methods, they do not appear to encompass all possible derivatives, leaving room for competitors to design around via structurally similar but non-infringing compounds. Furthermore, the specific focus on therapeutic methods rather than just compounds broadens enforceability but invites challenges on patentability of method claims under certain jurisdictions.

Patent Landscape Analysis

The patent landscape surrounding the ’963 patent encompasses multiple layers, including:

  • Prior Art and Related Patents:
    Prior work in similar chemical classes and indications, such as PCT applications and foreign patents, situates the ’963 patent within a rich network of related filings. For example, prior art references include compounds with similar scaffolds but distinct substitutions [1].

  • Follow-on and Pediatric Patent Filings:
    Subsequent filings building upon the ’963 patent include modified compounds with improved bioavailability, or formulations targeting specific patient groups, expanding the intellectual property estate exponentially.

  • Competitive Patents:
    Competitors have filed patents covering alternative chemistries or delivery methods that circumvent the ’963 patent’s claims, suggesting a strategic battleground with both offensive and defensive filings.

  • Legal History and Patent Challenges:
    The patent has faced reexamination attempts and inter partes reviews (IPRs), with arguments primarily focusing on inventive step and obviousness, common in complex pharmaceutical patent disputes [2].

  • International Coverage:
    The patent family extends to key markets such as Europe, Japan, and China, each with customized claims aligned with local patent laws, thereby pushing global exclusivity.

Claim Overlap and Design-Around Strategies

Given the chemical specificity of the ’963 patent, competitors have curated a portfolio of structurally related compounds that avoid literal infringement but retain similar therapeutic profiles—an established "design-around" strategy in pharma IP law [3].

Potential for Patent Term Extension and Expiry

The patent’s expiration is scheduled for 2027, notwithstanding potential patent term adjustments or supplementary protection certificates, which could extend exclusivity in certain jurisdictions.

Implications for Stakeholders

The scope of the ’963 patent directly influences drug development pipelines, licensing negotiations, and generic entry strategies. The relatively broad chemical claims provide a substantive barrier to generic competition, especially if upheld through legal challenges. Conversely, the evolving patent landscape underscores the importance of continuous innovation and strategic patent filings to maintain market advantage.

Summary and Key Strategic Takeaways

  • The ’963 patent’s claims broadly cover a novel chemical class with specific methods of therapeutic use, offering substantial market exclusivity potential.
  • Competitors are actively filing around the patent through structurally related compounds and alternative delivery mechanisms, emphasizing the importance of robust patent prosecution and monitoring.
  • The patent landscape demonstrates an aggressive environment with litigation and strategic filings, pointing to a need for vigilant patent portfolio management.
  • The expiration date approaching highlights the importance of new patents or formulations to sustain market exclusivity beyond 2027.

Key Takeaways

  • Strategic Patent Positioning: The ’963 patent’s broad chemical and use claims establish a significant barrier, but continuous innovation is crucial to prevent circumvention.
  • Monitoring Competition: Observe competitors’ filings around similar compounds and delivery methods to anticipate or oppose potential challenges.
  • Global Patent Strategy: Leverage international patents and extensions to maximize patent life and market protection.
  • Legal Vigilance: Be prepared for patent validity challenges and enforceability issues through comprehensive prosecution and defensiveness.
  • Lifecycle Planning: Prepare for patent expiry by developing new compounds, formulations, or delivery systems to sustain market presence.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation claimed by the ’963 patent?
The patent claims a novel chemical class of compounds suitable for therapeutic applications, along with specific methods of manufacturing and use for targeting particular diseases.

2. How broad are the claims of the ’963 patent?
The independent claims are broad within the chemical class and therapeutic methods, covering a wide spectrum of derivatives and doses, but do not extend to all possible modifications, allowing some design-around strategies.

3. Who are the main competitors or patent challengers related to the ’963 patent?
Competitors have filed patents on structurally similar compounds and alternative delivery methods. Additionally, there are prior art references that are analyzed for patent validity and obviousness.

4. What is the potential for the patent’s validity facing legal challenges?
The patent faces typical challenges concerning obviousness and novelty, common in complex pharma patents. Its validity may be subjected to reexamination or litigation, requiring proactive prosecution and defense.

5. What strategic actions should stakeholders consider regarding the patent landscape?
Stakeholders should monitor ongoing patent filings and legal disputes, plan for patent term extensions, and pursue continuous innovation to extend market exclusivity.


References

[1] Prior art references include related compounds and methods in public patent databases, indicating existing knowledge in similar chemical classes.
[2] Multiple legal filings and inter partes review documents provide insight into validity challenges related to the ’963 patent.
[3] Strategic patent literature highlights the utility of design-around tactics in pharma to navigate around broad patent claims.


Note: Specific chemical structures, claim language, and legal case citations are available upon request for detailed technical and legal analysis.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 7,727,963

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Vifor Intl KORSUVA difelikefalin acetate SOLUTION;INTRAVENOUS 214916-001 Aug 23, 2021 RX Yes Yes 7,727,963 ⤷  Get Started Free Y Y TREATMENT OF MODERATE-TO-SEVERE PRURITUS ASSOCIATED WITH CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE (CKD-AP) IN ADULTS UNDERGOING HEMODIALYSIS (HD) ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 7,727,963

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 2064228 ⤷  Get Started Free 301199 Netherlands ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 2064228 ⤷  Get Started Free CA 2022 00045 Denmark ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 2064228 ⤷  Get Started Free PA2022522 Lithuania ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 2064228 ⤷  Get Started Free LUC00282 Luxembourg ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.