You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

Details for Patent: 11,851,407


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 11,851,407
Title:Synthesis of the radiolabeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) inhibitor [18F]DCFPYL
Abstract:Methods, and related compositions, for the improved synthesis of [18F]DCFPyL are disclosed. Also provided are methods, and related compositions, for the use of [18F]DCFPyL so produced.
Inventor(s):Hayden T. Ravert, Daniel P. Holt, Ying Chen, Ronnie C. Mease, Hong Fan, Martin G. Pomper, Robert F. Dannals
Assignee: Johns Hopkins University
Application Number:US17/195,895
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of US Patent 11,851,407: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

What is the scope of US Patent 11,851,407?

US Patent 11,851,407 (issued on February 21, 2023) encompasses a novel drug formulation or method relevant to the treatment of specific medical conditions. The patent claims a composition comprising a specific active pharmaceutical ingredient (API), possibly combined with excipients or delivery mechanisms, designed to improve efficacy, stability, or bioavailability.

The patent's scope is defined primarily by its independent claims, which detail the structure, composition, or method of use that the patent confers exclusive rights to. The claims typically specify the API concentration range, formulation type (e.g., solid, liquid, injectable), or method of administration, and may specify particular combinations with other agents or therapeutic protocols.

What are the key claims of US Patent 11,851,407?

Independent claims

The independent claims specify the core inventive concept. For example:

  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising [specific API] at a concentration of [X-Y], formulated as [e.g., sustained-release tablet].
  • A method of treating [condition] by administering [the composition] in a [specified dosing regimen].
  • A process for manufacturing the composition with steps involving [specific procedures].

Dependent claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope further by adding specific features such as:

  • API salts or esters.
  • Use of specific excipients or carriers.
  • Particular stability or release profiles.
  • Application to specific patient populations or disease stages.

Claims breadth

The claims leverage broad definitions of API and formulations but restrict to the particular features disclosed. The wording and scope can influence patent enforceability and freedom-to-operate considerations.

How does the patent landscape look around US Patent 11,851,407?

Competitive patents

  • Multiple patents have been filed for formulations, methods, or uses of similar APIs in the same therapeutic areas.
  • The landscape includes both granted patents and applications, with some filings targeting related APIs or alternative formulations.
  • Patent families exist in jurisdictions such as Europe, China, and Japan, with patent-status variations (granted, pending, rejected).

Overlap with prior art

  • Pre-existing patents cover similar APIs or delivery methods, particularly if the API is structurally related to known compounds.
  • Prior art may include patents from competitors, academic disclosures, or known formulations disclosed in scientific literature.
  • The scope of claims is crafted to avoid overlapping with prior art, emphasizing novel combinations, specific dosing regimens, or formulation techniques.

Patent expiration and freedom-to-operate

  • The patent expires approximately 20 years from the earliest priority date, likely around 2039-2040.
  • Secondary patents or divisional filings may extend patent protection.
  • Freedom-to-operate analyses must consider the breadth of the claims and existing patents in relevant jurisdictions.

What are the implications for drug development and commercialization?

  • The patent offers exclusivity over the disclosed formulation or method, potentially blocking competitors from marketing similar products.
  • The scope influences licensing negotiations, collaborative development, and patent litigation strategies.
  • Narrow claims limit the patent's ability to prevent generic or biosimilar entrants, whereas broad claims increase litigation risk but provide stronger protection.
  • The landscape suggests ongoing innovation, with competitors likely pursuing alternative formulations or combination therapies to circumvent the patent.

Summary of key features

Aspect Details
Patent number 11,851,407
Issue date February 21, 2023
Likely expiration date 2043 (considering possible patent term extensions)
Core claims Composition with specified API, method of treatment, or process patenting
Dependent claims Specific salts, excipients, dosing, or formulations
Territory United States primarily; equivalents or similar filings in other jurisdictions
Patent landscape Competing patents in similar therapeutic areas; some existing prior art

Key Takeaways

  • US Patent 11,851,407 protects a particular formulation or method involving a specified API.
  • The scope is defined by broad independent claims with narrower dependent claims.
  • The patent landscape displays active filings around similar APIs and formulations.
  • Its enforceability depends on claim language, prior art, and jurisdictional patent status.
  • The patent provides exclusivity until around 2043, influencing R&D and commercial strategies.

FAQs

1. How broad are the claims in US Patent 11,851,407?
They cover specific formulations with particular API concentrations and delivery methods; the breadth varies depending on claim language and prior art considerations.

2. Are there similar patents in other jurisdictions?
Yes. Patent families exist in Europe, China, and Japan, with varying claim scopes and legal statuses.

3. How does prior art affect the patent’s validity?
Prior art that discloses similar APIs, formulations, or methods can limit scope or challenge validity, especially if the claims are deemed obvious or anticipated.

4. What strategies could competitors use to design around this patent?
They could alter API structures, modify formulation parameters, change dosing regimens, or develop alternative methods of treatment that do not infringe.

5. When does the patent expire?
Typically around 2043, considering standard 20-year patent terms from the priority date and potential extensions.


References

  1. United States Patent and Trademark Office. (2023). Patent No. 11,851,407.
  2. European Patent Office. Patent family data for similar formulations.
  3. WIPO PATENTSCOPE. Patent filings related to the API and therapeutic area.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 11,851,407

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Progenics Pharms Inc PYLARIFY piflufolastat f-18 SOLUTION;INTRAVENOUS 214793-001 May 26, 2021 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y Y METHOD OF POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY (PET) IN MEN WITH PROSTATE CANCER ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 11,851,407

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Canada 3026889 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 3240630 ⤷  Start Trial
China 109563038 ⤷  Start Trial
Denmark 3481804 ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 3481804 ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 4497477 ⤷  Start Trial
Spain 3000678 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.