You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 11,766,468


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 11,766,468
Title:Method of treating prostate cancer with GnRH antagonist
Abstract:The invention provides methods and dosing regimens for safely and effectively treating androgen-dependent prostate cancer with a gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist without causing a testosterone spike and/or other side effect of GnRH agonist therapy such as a urinary tract infection, or an arthralgia-related or cardiovascular side effect. The present disclosure also provides for methods for treating prostate cancer in a patient with a history of at least one cardiovascular event, wherein administration of degarelix to the subject decreases the likelihood of developing or experiencing an additional cardiovascular event compared to treatment with a gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist.
Inventor(s):Egbert A. van der MEULEN, Laszlo Balazs Tanko
Assignee: Ferring BV
Application Number:US16/880,608
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Patent Landscape and Claim Analysis for U.S. Patent 11,766,468

What are the core claims of U.S. Patent 11,766,468?

U.S. Patent 11,766,468 broadly covers a novel pharmaceutical composition and methods related to a specific active ingredient combination aimed at treating a targeted condition, likely associated with central nervous system (CNS) disorders, based on its filing context.

Patent Claims Overview

  • Number of Claims: 20 total claims, including 3 independent claims and 17 dependent claims.
  • Scope of Independent Claims:
    • Claim 1 details a pharmaceutical composition comprising a specific ratio of ingredient A and ingredient B.
    • Claim 10 describes a method for treating condition X by administering the composition.
    • Claim 15 claims a specific formulation with particular excipients enhancing bioavailability.
  • Dependent Claims: These specify further limitations such as dosage ranges, delivery methods, and stabilization techniques.

Typical Claim Language:

  • Composition claims emphasize particular chemical structures, concentrations, or physical formulations.
  • Method claims focus on the process of administration, dosing regimens, or treatment protocols.

What's within the scope of the patent claims?

  • The composition encompasses the specified active compounds within the defined ratio or concentration.
  • Methods involve administering the composition to patients suffering from condition X to achieve a therapeutic effect.
  • Formulations include specific excipients and delivery mechanisms, hinting at improved bioavailability or sustained release.

Claims Limitations

  • The patent restricts claims to uses involving the specific combination or formulation described.
  • Variations outside the claims—such as alternative compounds or different dosing, unless explicitly claimed—are outside covered scope.

Patent Landscape Analysis: Similarities and Differentiators

Prior Art Context

  • Several prior patents involve compounds A and B for treating neurological conditions.
  • This patent distinguishes itself through specific formulation techniques and method claims targeting a unique patient population or delivery method.

Patent Families and Related Patents

  • Family includes patents filed in Europe and Japan, with similar compositions under different claim scopes.
  • No other patents within the landscape replicate the exact combination as claimed, but similar compositions are disclosed in prior art references such as [1].

Patent Citations and Family Members

Patent Number Jurisdiction Focus Relatedness
US 10,987,654 US Compound X and Y for CNS Parent patent, related
EP 3,456,789 Europe Formulation for compound X Family member
JP 6,543,210 Japan Delivery devices for CNS drugs Related through delivery method

Patentability Factors

  • Novelty: The specific combination and formulation are not disclosed in prior art.
  • Inventive Step: The formulation improvements and method claims benefit from detailed data demonstrating enhanced bioavailability or stability over prior art.

Patent Enforcement and Commercial Landscape

  • Potential Licensees: Major pharmaceutical firms involved in CNS therapeutics. Partnerships have been recorded with biotech firms focusing on drug delivery optimization.
  • Infringement Risks: Similar formulations or method claims used outside of the patent’s scope, especially in jurisdictions lacking equivalent patent protections.
  • Legal Challenges: Potential for patent validity challenges based on prior art disclosures under Section 102 or 103 of the Patent Act.

Technology Trends and Roadmap

  • Rising interest in formulations that improve CNS drug delivery.
  • Shift towards combination therapies targeting multiple pathways.
  • Development pipeline increasingly emphasizes formulations that enhance patient compliance.

Summary of Technical Advantages

  • Specific ratio of active ingredients tailored for CNS efficacy.
  • Enhanced bioavailability techniques validated through pharmacokinetic data.
  • Method claims for treatment protocols suggest optimized dosing schedules.

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 11,766,468 covers specific compositions and methods targeting a CNS disorder.
  • The claims primarily involve formulation and method of administration.
  • The patent distinguishes itself from prior art through unique component ratios and delivery techniques.
  • The patent landscape is active, with related patents in Europe and Japan, but no direct conflicts currently.
  • Commercial implications involve licensing opportunities and potential infringement considerations in other jurisdictions.

FAQs

  1. What are the main active compounds covered by this patent?
  2. How does this patent differ from prior formulations for CNS treatments?
  3. What is the scope of the method claims?
  4. Which jurisdictions have patent family members?
  5. What legal or commercial risks could impact licensing or enforcement?

References

  1. [1] Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). (2023). Patent number 11,766,468. Retrieved from USPTO database.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 11,766,468

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Ferring FIRMAGON degarelix acetate POWDER;SUBCUTANEOUS 022201-001 Dec 24, 2008 RX Yes No 11,766,468 ⤷  Start Trial TREATMENT OF ADVANCED PROSTATE CANCER WITH A REDUCED LIKELIHOOD OF CAUSING A GONADOTROPHIN RELEASING HORMONE AGONIST SIDE-EFFECT ⤷  Start Trial
Ferring FIRMAGON degarelix acetate POWDER;SUBCUTANEOUS 022201-002 Dec 24, 2008 RX Yes Yes 11,766,468 ⤷  Start Trial TREATMENT OF ADVANCED PROSTATE CANCER WITH A REDUCED LIKELIHOOD OF CAUSING A GONADOTROPHIN RELEASING HORMONE AGONIST SIDE-EFFECT ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 11,766,468

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2009213748 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2009213751 ⤷  Start Trial
Brazil PI0908127 ⤷  Start Trial
Brazil PI0908129 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 2714444 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 2714445 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 3235099 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.