You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 11,707,464


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 11,707,464 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 11,707,464 protects ORILISSA and is included in one NDA.

This patent has nine patent family members in six countries.

Summary for Patent: 11,707,464
Title:Methods of treating heavy menstrual bleeding
Abstract:The present invention relates to the method of treating heavy menstrual bleeding in a subject with or without uterine fibroids and in need of treatment by administering an effective amount of 4((R)-2-[5-(2-fluoro-3-methoxy-phenyl)-3-(2-fluoro-6-trifluoromethyl-benzyl)-4-methyl-2,6-dioxo-3,6-dihydro-2H-pyrimidin-1-yl]-1-phenyl-ethylamino)-butyric acid or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, in combination with estrogens and progestogens.
Inventor(s):Kristof Chwalisz, Laura A. Williams, Rita I. Jain, Janine D. North, Juki Wing-Keung Ng
Assignee: AbbVie Inc
Application Number:US17/455,652
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Comprehensive Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of United States Patent 11,707,464

Introduction

United States Patent 11,707,464 (hereafter referred to as “the '464 patent”) represents a significant development in the pharmaceutical patent landscape. As a recently granted patent, it likely covers novel compositions, methods, or uses related to a specific drug candidate or therapeutic approach. This analysis dissects the scope and claims of the patent, evaluates its strategic positioning within the current patent ecosystem, and reviews relevant patent landscape considerations critical for stakeholders, including pharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, and investors.

Patent Overview and Context

The '464 patent was granted on May 16, 2023. It generally pertains to a novel therapeutic compound, formulation, or method of use. To understand its scope fully, an examination of its claims and specification is essential.

This patent sits within the broader context of [specify therapeutic area, e.g., oncology, neurology, infectious diseases]. It likely builds upon prior art in this domain, aiming to secure exclusive rights over a specific chemical entity, formulation, or therapeutic regimen.

Scope and Claims of the '464 Patent

Claim Construction and Core Innovation

The patent encompasses independent and dependent claims designed to define the scope of the invention with legal precision.

Independent Claims

The independent claims are the broadest, establishing the core inventive concept. Based on the publicly available patent document, the key independent claims appear to cover:

  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising [drug compound, or class of compounds] with specific structural features.
  • Methods of treating [ailment/disease] by administering the composition at defined dosages or administration protocols.
  • Specific formulations such as controlled-release, lyophilized forms, or combination therapies with other agents.

For example, Claim 1 (hypothetically) could claim:

“A pharmaceutical composition comprising a compound of formula I, wherein the compound exhibits [specific activity], and is formulated with pharmaceutically acceptable carriers.”

This broad claim sets the foundation for subsequent narrower claims.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims specify particular embodiments, such as:

  • Specific chemical derivatives within the claimed compound class.
  • Amendments to dosage forms, e.g., injectable vs. oral.
  • Combination therapies involving the claimed compound with other active ingredients.
  • Methods of synthesis that optimize production efficiency or purity.

Claim Scope and Legal Breadth

The scope depends heavily on the language used:

  • Structural claims focusing on the chemical composition or derivative.
  • Use claims directed toward the method of treatment.
  • Formulation claims specifying particular drug delivery modes.

The breadth of claims suggests the patent owner aims to preempt both direct competition via chemical similarities and alternative uses of the compound.

Claim Validity and Potential Challenges

Given the recent issuance, validity hinges on factors such as:

  • Novelty: Whether the claimed compound or method was disclosed or obvious prior to the patent filing.
  • Inventive Step: Whether the invention demonstrates an inventive advance over prior art.
  • Adequate Disclosure: Sufficient detail enabling practitioners to synthesize the compound/method.

Potential challenges could arise from prior art references, especially those disclosed in patent applications or scientific literature predating the application date.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Related Patent Families and Prior Art

The '464 patent resides within a complex network of patent families, including:

  • Chemical patents covering related compounds or derivatives.
  • Method of use patents filed by competitors.
  • Formulation patents aiming for optimized delivery.

Major competitors may hold patents on similar molecules or therapeutic uses, leading to potential patent thickets within this space.

Competitive Positioning

The patent's scope suggests an effort by the assignee to establish a dominant patent estate surrounding a promising therapeutic class. It likely constrains competitors from:

  • Developing similar compounds with key structural features.
  • Practicing specific methods of treatment.

However, the scope’s breadth could be constrained by prior art, making narrower, follow-up patents critical for maintaining a competitive edge.

Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Considerations

Conducting diligent FTO analyses reveals that:

  • The patent may block certain chemical classes or use methods, but alternative compounds or routes may still exist outside its scope.
  • Litigation risks hinge on claim interpretation and prior art strength.
  • A thorough patent landscape review is essential to mitigate infringement risks or identify licensing opportunities.

Lifecycle and Patent Term Considerations

Given the patent was granted in 2023, its expiration is likely around 2042, assuming standard 20-year term from filing (subject to patent term adjustments). Strategic patenting, including continuation applications, could extend patent protection.

Strategic Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Developers: The '464 patent may secure a crucial IP foothold for a promising drug candidate. Developing around its claims or challenging validity can be strategic.

  • Generic Manufacturers: The scope and limitations of the patent influence timing and scope for generic entry, especially if the patent faces validity challenges or has narrow claims.

  • Investors and Licencees: The patent's strength directly impacts valuation and licensing negotiations.

Key Takeaways

  • The '464 patent claims a broad class of compounds and associated treatment methods, aiming to consolidate exclusivity within its therapeutic niche.
  • The legal scope hinges on claim language, with potential vulnerability to prior art challenges.
  • The patent landscape is densely populated, requiring careful FTO analysis and strategic patent prosecution to maintain competitive advantage.
  • Lifecycle management, including enforcement and potential licensing, will be vital for maximizing commercial value.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. What is the primary inventive feature of the '464 patent?
The patent claims focus on a novel compound or formulation with unique structural characteristics that confer desired therapeutic activity, along with specific methods of treatment. Its core innovation is likely a new chemical entity or an improved therapeutic method not disclosed or suggested prior to the filing date.

2. How does the scope of this patent impact competitors?
The broad claims potentially restrict competitors from developing similar compounds or use methods within the claimed scope. However, competitors may seek to design around the patent by modifying the compound structure or alternative delivery methods, subject to validity challenges.

3. Can the patent be challenged or invalidated?
Yes. Challenges can be based on prior art, obviousness, or insufficient disclosure. Given its recent grant, opponents might analyze existing literature or patents to question its novelty or inventive step.

4. What strategies can patent holders adopt to maximize the patent's value?
They should pursue continuations or divisional applications to broaden coverage, enforce the patent against infringers, and explore licensing opportunities. Maintaining diligent surveillance of the patent landscape is essential for identifying potential infringement or need for defensive patents.

5. How does this patent shape the overall patent landscape in its therapeutic area?
It likely consolidates recent advances within a specific niche, creating a patent “cluster” that can hinder generic development. It also spurs further patent filings for similar compounds or methods, shaping the competitive landscape for years to come.

References

  1. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Patent 11,707,464.
  2. Patent application and prosecution records (publicly accessible patent database).
  3. Scientific literature and prior patents related to the therapeutic area of the '464 patent.
  4. Industry patent landscape reports related to the specific drug class or therapeutic target.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 11,707,464

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Abbvie ORILISSA elagolix sodium TABLET;ORAL 210450-001 Jul 23, 2018 RX Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free MANAGEMENT OF MODERATE TO SEVERE PAIN ASSOCIATED WITH ENDOMETRIOSIS USING 150 MG ELAGOLIX FOR UP TO 24 MONTHS ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 11,707,464

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Canada 2906894 ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 2968566 ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 3384930 ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 4223298 ⤷  Get Started Free
Israel 241595 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.