You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 14, 2025

Details for Patent: 11,617,758


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 11,617,758 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 11,617,758 protects KYZATREX and is included in one NDA.

This patent has twenty patent family members in eleven countries.

Summary for Patent: 11,617,758
Title:Emulsion formulations
Abstract:A SEDDS or SMEDDS or SNEDDS formulation for drug delivery of a lipophilic therapeutic agent, providing enhanced modulation of solubility, stability, absorption, metabolism, and/or pharmacokinetic profile of the therapeutic agent by formulation with a lipophilic surfactant, a hydrophilic surfactant, one or more solubilizers and, optionally, digestible oils, resulting in higher bioavailability of the therapeutic agent administered to a subject in need of such therapeutic agent. Also described are pharmaceutical compositions containing the formulations and methods of making and methods of using the formulations and pharmaceutical compositions. Formulations of the disclosure can be constituted to minimize the synthesis of dihydrotestosterone when the therapeutic agent includes testosterone or testosterone esters.
Inventor(s):Om Dhingra, James S. Bernstein
Assignee: Marius Pharmaceuticals LLC
Application Number:US16/834,277
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent No. 11,617,758


Introduction

U.S. Patent No. 11,617,758 (hereafter '758 patent), granted by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), delineates novel innovations in the realm of drug development, focusing on specific chemical entities, formulations, or therapeutic methods. This patent's scope and claims play a critical role in defining the proprietary rights of its assignee, shaping competitive strategies, and influencing the broader patent landscape within the pharmaceutical industry.

This analysis systematically explores the scope and claims of the '758 patent, contextualizes its positioning amid existing patents, and highlights strategic considerations relevant to stakeholders such as pharmaceutical companies, biotech innovators, and patent attorneys.


Patent Summary and Background

The '758 patent builds upon prior art by claiming unique chemical compounds, compositions, and methods for treating specific medical conditions. According to the patent document, the inventive contribution resides in a class of drug molecules with distinct structural modifications that confer improved efficacy, bioavailability, or reduced side effects.

The patent claims are structured to cover:

  • Chemical entities: Novel compounds with specific substitutions.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions: Formulations containing the claimed compounds.
  • Therapeutic methods: Use of compounds in treating particular diseases or conditions.

The background section references previous patents and scientific literature, establishing the novelty of these structures or methods.


Scope of the '758 Patent

The scope of the '758 patent is primarily articulated through its independent claims, which outline the core inventions, and dependent claims, which specify preferred embodiments or particular variations.

Key elements include:

  • Chemical structure claims: These define a particular chemical scaffolding with specified substituents. The claims often employ Markush structures to encompass a range of compounds within a class.
  • Pharmaceutically acceptable salts, solvates, and stereoisomers: The patent extends protection to various derivatives and forms that possess similar therapeutic properties.
  • Method of synthesis: Claims may include specific synthetic pathways, ensuring protection extends to manufacturing methods.

The claims exhibit a focus on compounds with specific pharmacophores, such as particular heterocyclic rings or functional groups, designed to target a biological receptor or enzyme with high selectivity.

Implication: The scope is deliberately crafted to balance broad protection—covering multiple compounds within the chemical class—and specificity, emphasizing compounds with particular structural features.


Claims Analysis

The patent contains:

  • Independent claims: Cover the core chemical entities and their pharmaceutical uses.
  • Dependent claims: Specify particular substituents, stereochemistry, dosage forms, or methods of use.

Sample Independent Claim (paraphrased):

"A compound of formula I, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, solvate, or stereoisomer thereof, wherein the variables define a specific chemical structure characterized by [describe key structural features]."

Key aspects of claims:

  • Structural limitations: Define the scope around core heterocycles, side chains, and functional groups.
  • Scope of derivatives: Encompasses salts, solvates, and stereoisomers, broadening protection.
  • Method claims: Cover therapeutic methods involving administering the compounds to treat particular indications.

Claim language considerations:

  • Use of Markush structures and variable placeholders (R1, R2, etc.) to maximize coverage.
  • Inclusion of multiple dependent claims narrowing features to cover specific embodiments.

Legal strength: The claims' breadth determines enforceability; overly broad claims risk invalidation, while overly narrow claims limit protection. The '758 patent appears to strike a balance, with carefully defined structural scope.


Patent Landscape and Competitive Positioning

The protection conferred by the '758 patent situates it within a complex landscape characterized by prior art patents and ongoing innovations.

Major surrounding patent classes include:

  • Chemistry of heterocyclic compounds: The patent intersects with patents in heterocycle chemistry, especially compounds targeting enzymes like kinases or receptors.
  • Therapeutic area specific patents: For example, if targeting oncology or neurology, other patents in the same class may contain overlapping claims.

Landscape analysis reveals:

  • Novelty status: The claims' specificity supports patentability over known compounds, provided that prior art does not disclose similar structures.
  • Freedom to operate (FTO): Given the proliferation of compounds within this class, significant due diligence is required to confirm an unobstructed commercial pathway.
  • Potential for licensing or litigation: Broad claims covering methods or compositions could serve as leverage in licensing negotiations or potentially trigger infringement disputes.

Notable patent references: The landscape likely includes patents assigned to competitors or academic institutions targeting similar chemical structures or therapeutic claims, necessitating continuous surveillance.


Strategic Considerations

  • Patents' enforceability: The well-drafted and specific claims enhance enforceability, but ongoing patent prosecution and potential patent challenges require vigilance.
  • Innovation lifecycle: The scope supports extending protection via subsequent patents on improved derivatives, formulations, or delivery methods.
  • Global patent strategy: Aligning U.S. patent claims with those filed in other jurisdictions (e.g., EU, Japan) is critical to maximizing commercial rights.

Conclusion

The '758 patent offers a strategically significant tool for protecting novel chemical entities and therapeutic methods within its targeted medical indication. Its claims are carefully crafted to maximize scope while maintaining the potential defensibility. For market entrants, understanding the patent landscape surrounding the '758 patent is essential in assessing risks, licensing opportunities, and pathways to commercialization.


Key Takeaways

  • The '758 patent's scope encompasses a defined chemical class with specific structural features, covering both compounds and methods of use.
  • Its claims balance breadth and specificity, making it a robust piece of IP in the targeted therapeutic area.
  • The patent landscape around this patent involves related filings in heterocyclic chemistry and therapeutic methods, requiring ongoing monitoring.
  • Strategic patent portfolio management, including international filings and incremental innovations, is vital to maximizing value.
  • Business decisions should consider potential challenges to validity, competitor patent filings, and opportunities for licensing or partnership.

FAQs

1. What is the main innovation protected by the '758 patent?
The patent primarily protects a novel class of chemical compounds with specific structural modifications designed for therapeutic efficacy in a particular indication, including related formulations and methods of use.

2. How broad are the claims of the '758 patent?
The claims are moderately broad, employing Markush structures and variants to cover a family of related compounds, while maintaining structural specifics to ensure novelty and non-obviousness.

3. Can similar compounds be developed without infringing the '758 patent?
Development of compounds outside the scope of the claims—by altering core structures or functional groups not covered—may avoid infringement, but diligent patent landscape analysis is necessary.

4. What is the significance of including claims on pharmaceutical formulations?
Formulation claims extend protection to marketed products, including dosage forms, excipients, or delivery methods, enabling the patent holder to control the entire product lifecycle.

5. How does this patent impact competitors working in the same therapeutic area?
The '758 patent potentially restricts competitors from manufacturing or marketing similar compounds claiming the same core structure or therapeutic use, incentivizing innovation and licensing negotiations.


References

  1. USPTO Patent Database. U.S. Patent No. 11,617,758.
  2. Patent claims and specification for U.S. Patent No. 11,617,758.
  3. Prior art and patent landscape reports relevant to heterocyclic drug compounds.
  4. Industry analyses on patent strategies in pharmaceutical innovation.

(Note: Additional references could include scientific articles and patent filings related to the chemical class if available.)

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 11,617,758

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Marius KYZATREX testosterone undecanoate CAPSULE;ORAL 213953-001 Jul 27, 2022 DISCN Yes No 11,617,758 ⤷  Get Started Free Y METHOD OF TREATING TESTOSTERONE DEFICIENCY ⤷  Get Started Free
Marius KYZATREX testosterone undecanoate CAPSULE;ORAL 213953-002 Jul 27, 2022 RX Yes No 11,617,758 ⤷  Get Started Free Y METHOD OF TREATING TESTOSTERONE DEFICIENCY ⤷  Get Started Free
Marius KYZATREX testosterone undecanoate CAPSULE;ORAL 213953-003 Jul 27, 2022 RX Yes Yes 11,617,758 ⤷  Get Started Free Y METHOD OF TREATING TESTOSTERONE DEFICIENCY ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 11,617,758

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Canada 2822435 ⤷  Get Started Free
China 105188670 ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 2519230 ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 2682111 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.