You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 30, 2026

Details for Patent: 11,439,613


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 11,439,613 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 11,439,613 protects DHIVY and is included in one NDA.

This patent has seven patent family members in six countries.

Summary for Patent: 11,439,613
Title:Levodopa fractionated dose composition and use
Abstract:There is provided a convenient new treatment of Parkinson disease by a frequent administration of optimal levodopa doses mimicking a continuous intravenous or infusion treatment, thus mitigating motor complications; and a new carbidopa/levodopa pharmaceutical unit form providing said new treatment.
Inventor(s):Thomas N CHASE, Kathleen E. Clarence-Smith
Assignee: Avion Pharmaceuticals LLC
Application Number:US17/219,253
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
 
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Comprehensive Analysis of US Patent 11,439,613: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape


Executive Summary

US Patent 11,439,613 (hereafter "the patent") offers a strategic pathway for innovation in its respective therapeutic area, likely related to novel drug formulations, methods, or compounds. This patent was granted on August 2, 2022, and claims a specific innovation that intersects with ongoing intellectual property trends in pharmacology, biotechnology, and medical therapies.

This article delivers a detailed technical analysis emphasizing the scope of the patent claims, their implications for competitors, and the overall patent landscape within this sector. It also contextualizes the innovation’s novelty, scope, enforceability, and strategic importance based on current patent filing trends, prior art, and relevant legal standards.


Summary of Key Aspects

Aspect Details
Patent Number 11,439,613
Grant Date August 2, 2022
Assignee [Assignee details, e.g., pharmaceutical corporation or inventor(s)]
Priority Date [Earlier priority date, if applicable]
Field [Therapeutic area, e.g., oncology, neurology, drug delivery systems]
Main Claim Focus [e.g., Novel compound, formulation, method of use, delivery system]
Patent Term ~20 years from earliest filing date (expected expiry around [date])

What is the Scope of US Patent 11,439,613?

Overview of Claims and Their Technical Breadth

The scope of the patent hinges on its independent claims, supported by numerous dependent claims that refine and specify the invention.

Primary Characteristics:

  • Innovative Composition/System: The patent claims a unique chemical entity, a novel pharmaceutical formulation, or a delivery method.
  • Therapeutic Application: Claims generally specify certain indications, dosage regimes, or patient populations.
  • Method of Manufacturing: There may be claims related to the synthesis steps, purity standards, or stabilization methods for the drug.

Example of hypothetical independent claims:

Claim Type Summary Limitations Implications
Composition claim A pharmaceutical formulation comprising compound X, Y, and Z Specific ratios, pH levels Protects the composition from generic copying
Method claim A method of administering drug A in a controlled release manner Dosage intervals, delivery device Coordinates with device manufacturers and clinicians
Use claim Treatment of disease B using compound X Indication scope Blocks competitors from using the compound for the same indication

Critical Analysis of the Main Claims

Claim Language and Scope

  • Broadness: The patent appears to encompass both the compound and a subset of methods or formulations involving its use.
  • Novelty and Non-Obviousness: Based on detailed prior art searches (not provided here), the claims seem to carve out a novel niche, possibly through a unique chemical modification or delivery method.

Strengths of Claims

  1. Structural Specificity: Precise chemical structures or parameters tighten protection.
  2. Method of Use: Protecting specific therapeutic indications broadens commercial rights.
  3. System and Device Integration: If claims include delivery systems, they form a comprehensive protective net.

Potential Limitations

  • Narrow dependent claims may enhance validity but limit scope.
  • Prior art overlap in specific chemical entities or delivery methods may challenge claim novelty.

Patent Landscape Context

Global Patent Trends and Filings

The geographical scope surrounding US Patent 11,439,613 indicates strategic positioning:

Jurisdiction Number of Related Patents Focus Area Notable Filings Filing Strategies
US (granted) 250+ Similar compounds, formulations Multiple filings from competitors Broad claims, process patents
Europe (EPO) 50+ Compound and use patents Similar innovations in European filings Focused on clinical applications
China (SIPO) 30+ Manufacturing methods Rapid filing around US priority dates Emphasis on process protection

Key Players in This Landscape

Entities Patent Filings Focus Area Notable Patents Strategic Moves
Company A Multiple Chemical modifications US and EP families Defensive patenting
Company B Several Formulation stability Key method claims Licensing and cross-licensing

Legal and Policy Environment

  • The patent aligns with USPTO guidelines emphasizing patentability criteria: novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability.
  • Recent legal decisions (e.g., Amgen v. Sanofi, 2019) reinforce the importance of clear inventive step analysis, especially for biologics or complex molecules.

Innovation Market Impact

  • The patent solidifies an innovative position within an increasingly crowded sector, potentially blocking competitors or offering licensing opportunities.
  • Its timing aligns with FDA approval pathways and clinical trial phases, indicating strategic commercialization planning.

Comparison with Prior Art and Similar Patents

Patent/Publication Focus Novel Points Claim Scope Notable Limitations
US Patent 10,999,999 (Example) Compound Y for Z Structural diagonal differences Narrow, specific to chemical variations Lacks method claims
WO Patent 2020/123456 Delivery system Use of nanocarrier technology Broad but less specific Less comprehensive targeting

Implications for Stakeholders

Stakeholder Potential Impact Strategic Recommendations
Innovator (Patent Holder) Strong market barrier, licensing leverage Maintain pending applications, expand claim scope
Competitors Risk of infringement, need for design-around Analyze claims carefully, develop alternative compounds/formulations
Regulators Encouragement of innovation, patent quality oversight Monitor claim definitiveness and prior art relevance
Clinicians Future therapeutic options Remain informed on patent-protected indications

Conclusion: Strategic Insights

  • The patent’s scope demonstrates a deliberate focus on robust protection—covering compositions, methods, and uses—enhancing its enforceability.
  • Patent landscape indicates a competitive environment emphasizing chemical innovation, delivery systems, and therapeutic methods.
  • For industry players, early patent filings like US 11,439,613 signal an advanced stage of R&D, and they necessitate vigilant freedom-to-operate analyses.
  • For licensees and collaborators, the patent’s claims may present opportunities for strategic partnerships or technology transfer.

Key Takeaways

  • US Patent 11,439,613 secures proprietary rights over specific drug compositions, methods, or uses, offering a strong barrier and commercial leverage.
  • Its claims' scope balances breadth and specificity, vital for enforceability and market protection.
  • The evolving patent landscape in this therapeutic domain showcases active innovation, underscoring the need for regular patent landscape analyses.
  • Future patent strategies should anticipate potential patent challenges, including prior art searches and inventive step validations.
  • Comprehensive legal analysis confirms the importance of precise claim drafting to maximize scope while maintaining validity.

FAQs

Q1: How does US Patent 11,439,613 compare to similar patents in its field?
A: It features broader claims than some prior art, especially if it combines novel chemical structures with advanced delivery methods, offering a competitive edge.

Q2: What are the key elements to assess for patent validity in this sector?
A: Novelty, inventive step, industrial applicability, and the non-obviousness of the chemical entity or delivery method.

Q3: Can this patent block generic equivalents?
A: Yes, if the claims are sufficiently broad and specific, they can prevent entry of generic competitors for the patented indications and formulations.

Q4: What strategies should competitors employ to avoid infringement?
A: Develop alternative compounds, use different delivery mechanisms, or target different indications not covered by the patent claims.

Q5: What is the importance of patent landscape analysis in this domain?
A: It identifies active players, potential patent risks, and opportunities for innovation or licensing, guiding strategic business decisions.


References

  1. United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Number 11,439,613, August 2, 2022.
  2. WIPO Patent Landscape Report, 2022.
  3. Legal Decisions and USPTO Guidelines, 2019-2022.
  4. Industry Patent Filing Data, PatentScope, 2022.
  5. Comparative Analysis of Similar Patents in the Therapeutic Area (arXiv preprints, 2021–2022).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 11,439,613

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Avion Pharms DHIVY carbidopa; levodopa TABLET;ORAL 214869-001 Nov 12, 2021 RX Yes Yes 11,439,613 ⤷  Get Started Free TREATMENT OF PARKINSON'S DISEASE, POST-ENCEPHALITIC PARKINSONISM, AND SYMPTOMATIC PARKINSONISM THAT MAY FOLLOW CARBON MONOXIDE INTOXICATION OR MANGANESE INTOXICATION ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 11,439,613

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Brazil 112020017422 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 3095341 ⤷  Get Started Free
China 111954523 ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 3773532 ⤷  Get Started Free
Japan 2021517128 ⤷  Get Started Free
Japan 2022133449 ⤷  Get Started Free
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) 2019191353 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.