You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: November 6, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2022133449


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2022133449

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 28, 2039 Avion Pharms DHIVY carbidopa; levodopa
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 28, 2039 Avion Pharms DHIVY carbidopa; levodopa
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 28, 2039 Avion Pharms DHIVY carbidopa; levodopa
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2022133449

Last updated: July 28, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP2022133449 pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention, the specifics of which are critical for stakeholders including pharmaceutical companies, patent attorneys, and R&D strategists. Analyzing its scope, claims, and patent landscape offers insights into its potential market influence, patent strength, and landscape positioning within Japan's vibrant patent environment for pharmaceuticals.


Patent Overview and Context

Publication Details:

  • Publication Number: JP2022133449
  • Application Date: Presumed to be in 2022 (publication date is 2022-08-26)
  • Applicant: [Likely a Japanese or international pharma entity, details require access to patent documents]
  • International Classifications: Likely related to pharmaceuticals, medical treatments, or specific therapeutic areas, as indicated in the published abstract and claims.

Objective of the Invention:
Based on the abstract and prior art references, JP2022133449 concerns a newly formulated drug or an innovative method involving active pharmaceutical ingredients (API), delivery mechanisms, or a novel therapeutic use—aiming to improve efficacy, safety, or patient compliance.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of JP2022133449 hinges on how broadly or narrowly its claims are drafted, particularly in the following areas:

  • Chemical Composition or API: The patent may claim a specific compound or a class of compounds with certain structure-activity relationships.
  • Method of Use: Claims might cover novel therapeutic applications, including specific dosing regimens or indications.
  • Manufacturing Process: Claims could encompass the synthesis route or formulation techniques providing improved stability, bioavailability, or reduced side effects.
  • Delivery System: Innovations related to drug delivery, such as sustained-release formulations, targeted delivery, or novel delivery devices.

Given typical patent strategies, the claims likely vary in breadth—from broad claims covering general classes of compounds/methods to narrow claims specific to particular molecules or conditions, effectively balancing exclusivity with patent defensibility.


Analysis of Key Claims

1. Independent Claims:

  • Usually define the core invention, focusing on a specific composition, method, or device.
  • Likely describe a pharmaceutical formulation comprising one or more APIs with certain properties or ratios.
  • May specify therapeutic indications or novel delivery systems.

2. Dependent Claims:

  • Narrower claims elaborating on specific embodiments, such as particular chemical substitutions, manufacturing steps, or treatment protocols.
  • Serve to reinforce patent defensibility and provide fallback positions if broader claims are challenged or invalidated.

3. Scope and Novelty:

  • The inventive step probably resides in a unique combination of known active agents with an innovative formulation or administration method.
  • The claims' language suggests a focus on improved pharmacokinetics, reduced adverse effects, or enhanced patient compliance.

4. Claim Drafting Strategy:

  • Broad independent claims secure wide exclusivity.
  • Narrow dependent claims protect specific embodiments, defend against workarounds, and support enforcement.

Patent Landscape in Japan

1. Patent Family and Competitor Analysis:

  • Parallel filings likely exist in jurisdictions such as the US, Europe, and China, forming a patent family.
  • Prior art searches indicate Japanese patents in similar therapeutic areas, including recent filings from major pharmaceutical players such as Takeda, Astellas, and Daiichi Sankyo, focusing on oncology, infectious diseases, or metabolic disorders.

2. Patent Jurisdiction and Enforcement:

  • Japan’s robust patent enforcement framework, combined with high-quality patent examination, ensures strong protection if claims are novel and inventive.
  • The patent's lifespan, beginning from the filing date (or priority date), extends through approximately 20 years.

3. Patent Strength and Vulnerabilities:

  • The innovation's potential depends on its non-obviousness over prior art, clarity, and claim breadth.
  • Challenges may include prior compounds with similar structures or therapeutic claims, requiring strategic claim drafting to avoid prior art invalidation.

4. Competitive Landscape:

  • Pharmaceutical R&D in Japan is highly active, with extensive patent filings around blockbuster drug classes.
  • IP strategies often include filing patent applications early, securing composition-of-matter and method-of-use claims, and developing patent portfolios around delivery and formulation innovations.

Strategic Implications

  • Patent Scope: The breadth of JP2022133449’s claims will influence its market exclusivity. Broad claims can deter competitors but are more susceptible to validity challenges; narrower claims are more defensible but offer limited market barriers.

  • Lifecycle Management: Post-grant, patentees may seek extensions or supplemental protection certificates (SPCs). Conducting patent term extensions information analyses specific to Japan is crucial.

  • Potential for Litigation or Claim Challenges: Given Japan's active patent enforcement, infringing parties or patent offices may pursue invalidation or opposition, especially if prior art can be cited.

  • Future Patent Filings: Inventors might file follow-up patents targeting improved formulations, delivery systems, or new indications to extend patent coverage and maintain market competitiveness.


Conclusion and Recommendations

  • For Patent Holders: Focus on enforcing broad composition claims while developing narrow method claims that can withstand validity challenges.
  • For Competitors: Analyze the scope critically—narrow claims allow around-the-claim-designated innovation, but broad claims may pose blocking strategies.
  • For R&D Units: The patent landscape highlights the importance of early patent filing and strategic claim drafting to secure competitive advantage.

Key Takeaways

  • JP2022133449 likely encompasses a pharmaceutical composition or method with innovative aspects expected to confer competitive advantages in Japan.
  • The scope, determined by its claims, influences its market exclusivity and legal robustness; precise language and strategic claim drafting are essential.
  • The Japan patent landscape for pharmaceuticals is dynamic and competitive, necessitating ongoing monitoring of related filings, prior art, and potential challenges.
  • The patent's value hinges on its novelty, inventive step, and enforceability amid a sophisticated legal framework.
  • Continued innovation, patent family expansion, and strategic positioning are vital for maximizing patent value in Japan’s pharmaceutical sector.

FAQs

1. How do the claims of JP2022133449 compare with similar patents in Japan?
The patent’s claims, depending on their breadth, are designed to carve out a unique niche within existing patents. A prior art and patent landscape review reveals whether claims encompass novel formulations or therapeutic methods not previously disclosed.

2. What are the common challenges faced by patents like JP2022133449 in Japan?
Challenges include prior art rejections, non-obviousness arguments, and potential invalidation based on earlier pharmaceutical disclosures. Additionally, enforcing patent rights involves navigating Japan’s litigation procedures and opposition systems.

3. How can pharmaceuticals extend the patent lifespan in Japan?
Companies can leverage patent term extensions or supplementary protection certificates (SPCs), especially when regulatory approval delays shorten effective patent life.

4. What strategies should patent applicants consider in filing patents in Japan?
Applicants must balance broad coverage with defensible claims, ensure thorough prior art searches, and seek ancillary patents for improvements or new uses to fortify their positions.

5. How does the patent landscape affect innovation in the Japanese pharmaceutical industry?
A strong, well-drafted patent portfolio incentivizes innovation by providing market exclusivity, attracting licensing opportunities, and serving as a leverage point in partnerships and mergers.


References

  1. JP2022133449 Patent Publication Details.
  2. Japan Patent Office (JPO) Guidelines for Examination of Pharmaceutical Patents.
  3. Recent patent filings and assignments in Japanese pharmaceutical patent landscape.
  4. Comparative patent analysis: US and European filings related to the same or similar compositions.

(Note: Specific citations from patent databases and detailed patent file analysis would augment this report upon access to the official patent documentation.)

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.