You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: June 14, 2025

Details for Patent: 10,973,870


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,973,870
Title:Methods of treating prostate cancer with GnRH antagonist
Abstract: The invention provides methods and dosing regimens for safely and effectively treating androgen-dependent prostate cancer with a gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist without causing a testosterone spike and/or other side effect of GnRH agonist therapy such as a urinary tract infection, or an arthralgia-related or cardiovascular side effect.
Inventor(s): Olesen; Tine Kold (New York, NY), Persson; Bo-Eric (St. Prex, CH), Cantor; Per (Charlottenlund, DK), van der Meulen; Egbert A. (Dalby, SE), Jensen; Jens-Kristian Slott (Bagsvaerd, DK)
Assignee: Ferring B.V. (Hoofddorp, NL)
Application Number:16/851,179
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

United States Patent 10,973,870: A Detailed Analysis of Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Introduction

The United States Patent 10,973,870, titled "Method of Treating Prostate Cancer with GnRH Antagonist," is a significant patent in the field of oncology, particularly for the treatment of prostate cancer. This patent, along with several others, forms a crucial part of the intellectual property portfolio of Ferring Pharmaceuticals. Here, we will delve into the scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape surrounding this patent.

Background and Inventors

The '870 patent was issued on April 13, 2021, and names Tine Kold Olesen, Bo-Eric Persson, Per Cantor, Egbert A. van der Meulen, and Jens-Kristian Slott Jensen as inventors. Ferring B.V. is the owner by assignment, and Ferring Pharma is an exclusive licensee of this patent[2].

Scope of the Patent

The '870 patent focuses on methods for treating locally advanced prostate cancer using a GnRH antagonist, specifically degarelix. The patent aims to reduce the likelihood of developing musculoskeletal disorders or connective tissue disorders compared to treatment with GnRH agonists like leuprolide.

Key Claims

The patent includes two independent claims:

  1. Claim 1:

    • This claim describes a method of treating locally advanced prostate cancer in a subject. It involves choosing a dosing regimen of degarelix over GnRH agonist treatment to decrease the likelihood of developing musculoskeletal or connective tissue disorders[2][4].
  2. Claim 2:

    • While not explicitly detailed in the sources, it is part of the broader claims that likely build upon the first claim, potentially specifying dosing regimens, patient selection criteria, or other treatment parameters.

Claim Construction and Interpretation

The court has played a significant role in construing the disputed claim terms of the '870 patent. On June 14, 2021, the court announced its rulings on several disputed claim terms, which are crucial for understanding the scope of the patent. For instance, terms such as "decreased likelihood of developing or experiencing an undesirable side effect" and "monthly" dosing regimens have been defined to ensure clarity and consistency in interpretation[1][5].

Patent Landscape and Related Patents

The '870 patent is part of a larger family of patents related to the treatment of prostate cancer using GnRH antagonists. Here are some key patents in this landscape:

United States Patent 9,579,359 ('359 Patent)

  • This patent, along with the '870 patent, is part of the "side effect patents" and deals with methods of treating prostate cancer to reduce side effects associated with GnRH agonist treatments[4].

United States Patent 10,729,739 ('739 Patent)

  • Similar to the '870 patent, this patent focuses on treating prostate cancer with degarelix and highlights the reduced risk of undesirable side effects compared to GnRH agonists[2][4].

United States Patent 8,828,938 ('938 Patent)

  • This patent is titled "Method for the Manufacture of Degarelix" and is crucial for the production process of the drug used in the '870 patent[2][4].

United States Patent 9,877,999 ('999 Patent)

  • This patent deals with "Method for Treating Metastatic Stage Prostate Cancer" and is another component of the broader patent strategy for treating prostate cancer with GnRH antagonists[2].

Litigation and Enforcement

The '870 patent has been involved in significant litigation, particularly in the case of Ferring Pharmaceuticals v. Fresenius Kabi U.S. Ferring alleged that Fresenius's submission of an Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) for a generic version of FIRMAGON® (degarelix) would infringe upon several of their patents, including the '870 patent. The court ruled on various claims, finding some to be infringed while others were deemed invalid for obviousness[4].

Patent Analytics and Claim Coverage

To manage and analyze the complex patent landscape, companies like Ferring Pharmaceuticals often use patent analytics tools. These tools help in categorizing patents by claims and scope concepts, identifying gaps in coverage, and highlighting future design opportunities. The Claim Coverage Matrix and Claim Charts are essential tools in this process, enabling companies to review patent coverage efficiently and make informed decisions about their intellectual property[3].

Impact on Treatment and Patient Care

The '870 patent and related patents have a significant impact on the treatment of prostate cancer. By providing methods that reduce the risk of musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders, these patents contribute to better patient outcomes and improved quality of life. The use of degarelix as a GnRH antagonist offers a safer alternative to traditional GnRH agonist treatments, which is a critical advancement in oncology.

Future Directions and Opportunities

The '870 patent, along with other related patents, opens up several future directions for research and development. These include optimizing dosing regimens, exploring new indications for degarelix, and developing combination therapies that further reduce side effects and improve efficacy.

Key Takeaways

  • The '870 patent focuses on treating locally advanced prostate cancer with degarelix to reduce side effects associated with GnRH agonists.
  • The patent is part of a larger family of patents related to prostate cancer treatment.
  • Court rulings have clarified the interpretation of key claim terms.
  • Patent analytics tools are crucial for managing the complex patent landscape.
  • The patent has significant implications for patient care and future research in oncology.

FAQs

What is the main focus of the '870 patent?

The '870 patent focuses on methods for treating locally advanced prostate cancer using the GnRH antagonist degarelix, with an emphasis on reducing the likelihood of musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders.

Who are the inventors of the '870 patent?

The inventors of the '870 patent are Tine Kold Olesen, Bo-Eric Persson, Per Cantor, Egbert A. van der Meulen, and Jens-Kristian Slott Jensen.

What is the significance of the court's ruling on claim terms?

The court's ruling on claim terms provides clarity and consistency in interpreting the scope of the patent, which is crucial for enforcement and litigation purposes.

How does the '870 patent fit into the broader patent landscape?

The '870 patent is part of a family of patents related to prostate cancer treatment using GnRH antagonists, including patents like the '359, '739, '938, and '999 patents.

What tools are used to manage and analyze the patent landscape?

Companies use patent analytics tools, such as Claim Coverage Matrices and Claim Charts, to manage and analyze the complex patent landscape efficiently.

Cited Sources:

  1. District of Delaware. 20-431.pdf.
  2. United States District Court for the District of Delaware. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT ....
  3. Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner, P.A. Patent Analytics | Intellectual Property Law.
  4. Casetext. Ferring Pharm. v. Fresenius Kabi U.S., 645 F. Supp. 3d 335.
  5. United States Courts. Case 1:20-cv-00431-MN Document 141 Filed 06/14/21 Page 1 of 13.

More… ↓

⤷  Try for Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 10,973,870

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Ferring FIRMAGON degarelix acetate POWDER;SUBCUTANEOUS 022201-001 Dec 24, 2008 RX Yes No ⤷  Try for Free ⤷  Try for Free TREATMENT OF ADVANCED PROSTATE CANCER WITH A REDUCED LIKELIHOOD OF CAUSING A GONADOTROPHIN RELEASING HORMONE AGONIST SIDE-EFFECT ⤷  Try for Free
Ferring FIRMAGON degarelix acetate POWDER;SUBCUTANEOUS 022201-002 Dec 24, 2008 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Try for Free ⤷  Try for Free TREATMENT OF ADVANCED PROSTATE CANCER WITH A REDUCED LIKELIHOOD OF CAUSING A GONADOTROPHIN RELEASING HORMONE AGONIST SIDE-EFFECT ⤷  Try for Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 10,973,870

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
08250703Feb 29, 2008

International Family Members for US Patent 10,973,870

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2009213748 ⤷  Try for Free
Australia 2009213751 ⤷  Try for Free
Brazil PI0908127 ⤷  Try for Free
Brazil PI0908129 ⤷  Try for Free
Canada 2714444 ⤷  Try for Free
Canada 2714445 ⤷  Try for Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.