You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 10,864,219


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,864,219
Title:Compositions and methods for ophthalmic and/or other applications
Abstract:Particles, compositions, and methods that aid particle transport in mucus are provided. The particles, compositions, and methods may be used, in some instances, for ophthalmic and/or other applications. In some embodiments, the compositions and methods may involve modifying the surface coatings of particles, such as particles of pharmaceutical agents that have a low aqueous solubility. Such compositions and methods can be used to achieve efficient transport of particles of pharmaceutical agents though mucus barriers in the body for a wide spectrum of applications, including drug delivery, imaging, and diagnostic applications. In certain embodiments, a pharmaceutical composition including such particles is well-suited for ophthalmic applications, and may be used for delivering pharmaceutical agents to the front of the eye and/or the back of the eye.
Inventor(s):Alexey Popov, Elizabeth M. Enlow, Hongming Chen, James Bourassa
Assignee: Alcon Inc , Johns Hopkins University
Application Number:US16/221,253
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Process;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

United States Patent 10,864,219: Scope, Claims, and Landscape Analysis

United States Patent 10,864,219, titled "Methods of treating disease with a GLP-1 receptor agonist and a PDE4 inhibitor," issued on December 15, 2020, to Eli Lilly and Company. The patent claims methods of treating a disease, specifically type 2 diabetes, by co-administering a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist with a phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitor. The claimed therapeutic approach aims to leverage synergistic effects to improve glycemic control and potentially other metabolic parameters. The patent's scope is defined by its independent claims, which outline the specific compounds, dosages, and treatment regimens. The patent landscape surrounding this technology is characterized by active research and development in both GLP-1 receptor agonists and PDE4 inhibitors, with a notable focus on their combination therapies for metabolic and inflammatory conditions.

What Are the Core Claims of Patent 10,864,219?

The central claims of Patent 10,864,219 describe methods for treating a disease using a specific combination of pharmaceutical agents.

What is the Claimed Therapeutic Approach?

Claim 1, the primary independent claim, defines the method as comprising administering to a subject in need thereof a therapeutically effective amount of a GLP-1 receptor agonist and a therapeutically effective amount of a PDE4 inhibitor. The disease being treated is identified as a disease for which GLP-1 receptor agonism is indicated. This broadly encompasses metabolic disorders, primarily type 2 diabetes.

Which Compounds Are Covered by the Claims?

The patent does not narrowly define the specific GLP-1 receptor agonists or PDE4 inhibitors. Instead, it utilizes functional definitions.

  • GLP-1 Receptor Agonists: The patent refers to "a GLP-1 receptor agonist." This allows for coverage of any compound that activates the GLP-1 receptor. Examples of commercially available GLP-1 receptor agonists that would fall under this definition include exenatide, liraglutide, semaglutide, dulaglutide, and lixisenatide, as well as potential future agonists.
  • PDE4 Inhibitors: Similarly, the patent refers to "a PDE4 inhibitor." This broad definition covers any compound that inhibits the phosphodiesterase 4 enzyme. This includes established PDE4 inhibitors like roflumilast and apremilast, as well as novel compounds in development.

What Are the Key Dosing and Administration Parameters?

The claims emphasize the co-administration of the two classes of drugs.

  • Co-administration: The method specifies administering both agents. This can be simultaneous, sequential, or staggered. The patent does not mandate a specific formulation for co-administration, allowing for separate or combined delivery systems.
  • Therapeutic Effectiveness: The claims rely on "therapeutically effective amounts." This is a standard patent term referring to doses that achieve the desired therapeutic outcome without causing undue toxicity. The specific amounts are not quantified in the independent claims, which is a common strategy to broaden protection.

What Is the Scope of the Patent's Geographic Coverage and Term?

Patent 10,864,219 is a United States patent, granting protection within the U.S.

  • Jurisdiction: The patent is exclusively valid within the United States. Foreign patent protection would require separate filings in respective countries or regions.
  • Issue Date: December 15, 2020.
  • Expiration Date: Typically, U.S. utility patents have a term of 20 years from the filing date. Patent 10,864,219 was filed on January 12, 2018. Therefore, its term extends to January 12, 2038, barring any patent term extensions or adjustments.

How Does Patent 10,864,219 Interact with Existing Patents?

The claims of Patent 10,864,219 are directed to a method of treatment. This type of patent can interact with patents covering the individual active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) or specific formulations.

Relationship to API Patents

  • GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Patents: Numerous patents cover the composition of matter for individual GLP-1 receptor agonists. For example, patents for liraglutide and semaglutide are held by Novo Nordisk, while Eli Lilly holds patents for tirzepatide (which is a dual GLP-1/GIP agonist, but its GLP-1 activity is relevant). Patent 10,864,219 does not claim the APIs themselves but the method of using them in combination.
  • PDE4 Inhibitor Patents: Similarly, specific PDE4 inhibitors are covered by their own composition of matter patents. For instance, roflumilast is covered by patents originally held by Byk Gulden (now part of Aptalis Pharma/Takeda).

Interaction with Formulation and Combination Product Patents

Patent 10,864,219 claims a method of treatment, not a specific drug product. However, companies developing combination therapies often file patents for specific formulations that combine a GLP-1 receptor agonist and a PDE4 inhibitor into a single dosage form. Such formulation patents would be distinct from and potentially complementary to method-of-treatment patents like 10,864,219.

For example, a patent claiming a fixed-dose combination tablet containing liraglutide and roflumilast would be a different patent than 10,864,219, which claims the act of administering these two types of compounds.

What Is the Current Patent Landscape for GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and PDE4 Inhibitors?

The patent landscape for both GLP-1 receptor agonists and PDE4 inhibitors is extensive and highly competitive, reflecting their therapeutic importance.

GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Patent Activity

The GLP-1 receptor agonist market is dominated by several key players, with significant patent activity surrounding novel agonists, improved delivery methods, and new indications.

  • Key Players: Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, Takeda, and Pfizer are major patent holders and developers in this space.
  • Focus Areas: Patent filings include new chemical entities (NCEs) with enhanced efficacy, longer half-lives, reduced side effects, and oral formulations. Patents also cover methods of treating obesity, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), and cardiovascular disease in addition to type 2 diabetes.
  • Recent Trends: There is a significant trend towards developing dual or triple agonists (e.g., GLP-1/GIP, GLP-1/GIP/Glucagon) to achieve greater metabolic benefits. These advanced agonists will also be subject to their own patent protection.

PDE4 Inhibitor Patent Activity

PDE4 inhibitors, while initially developed for inflammatory conditions like COPD and psoriasis, are increasingly being explored for metabolic diseases, including diabetes and obesity, due to their effects on inflammation and insulin sensitivity.

  • Key Players: Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda, and Astellas are prominent in PDE4 inhibitor research and patenting.
  • Focus Areas: Patents focus on developing selective PDE4 inhibitors with improved tolerability profiles, particularly reducing gastrointestinal side effects like nausea and diarrhea, which have historically limited their use. Research is also ongoing for topical formulations and for treating other inflammatory or autoimmune diseases.
  • Combination Therapy Exploration: A significant portion of recent patent filings for PDE4 inhibitors involves their use in combination therapies, including combinations with GLP-1 receptor agonists for metabolic indications.

Overlap and Synergistic Patenting

Patent 10,864,219 highlights the strategic patenting of combination therapies. Companies are not only patenting novel single agents but also specific therapeutic methods and compositions that leverage the synergistic effects of existing or novel drug classes.

  • Method of Treatment vs. Composition of Matter: The strength of Patent 10,864,219 lies in its broad claim to a method, which can potentially block competitors from using any GLP-1 receptor agonist with any PDE4 inhibitor for the claimed diseases, irrespective of their specific patents on individual compounds. However, the practical enforcement of such method patents can be complex, particularly against defendants who do not directly infringe on the composition of matter patents of the individual components.
  • Defensive Patenting: This patent can also be seen as a defensive move by Eli Lilly to secure a position in the growing field of combination therapies for diabetes, even if they do not currently have a specific marketed product that embodies this exact combination.

What Are the Potential Market and R&D Implications?

The existence and scope of Patent 10,864,219 have several implications for market players and research and development strategies.

Implications for Generic Manufacturers

Generic manufacturers seeking to market GLP-1 receptor agonists or PDE4 inhibitors for type 2 diabetes would need to carefully assess the claims of Patent 10,864,219. If they intend to market these drugs in combination for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, they may face infringement issues. However, the patent claims a method, and generic manufacturers typically seek to market the API or a formulation. Infringement would depend on how the generic product is marketed and the specific claims of any formulation patents.

Implications for Pharmaceutical Companies

  • R&D Strategy: Companies developing new GLP-1 receptor agonists or PDE4 inhibitors should consider the potential for synergistic effects and the patentability of combination therapies. This patent suggests a strategic avenue for innovation.
  • Licensing and Collaboration: Companies with strong pipelines in either drug class might seek to license or collaborate with others to develop and market combination products that fall under the scope of this patent.
  • Freedom to Operate (FTO) Analysis: Any company developing products or therapies related to GLP-1 receptor agonists or PDE4 inhibitors for metabolic diseases must conduct thorough FTO analyses to identify potential patent infringements.

Competitive Landscape

The patent creates a barrier to entry for competitors looking to exploit the combination of GLP-1 receptor agonists and PDE4 inhibitors for type 2 diabetes. Companies might need to:

  • Develop novel compounds that do not fall under the broad definitions within the patent.
  • Focus on different therapeutic indications where the combination is not covered.
  • Challenge the validity of the patent through legal means.
  • Wait for the patent to expire in 2038.

Key Takeaways

  • Patent 10,864,219 claims a method of treating type 2 diabetes by co-administering any GLP-1 receptor agonist with any PDE4 inhibitor.
  • The patent's broad definitions of the active agents allow for wide coverage, encompassing numerous existing and future compounds.
  • The patent is valid in the United States until January 12, 2038.
  • This method-of-treatment patent interacts with composition-of-matter patents for individual drugs and potentially with specific formulation patents.
  • The patent landscape for both GLP-1 receptor agonists and PDE4 inhibitors is dense and competitive, with a growing interest in combination therapies.
  • The patent has significant implications for generic manufacturers, R&D strategy, and competitive positioning in the metabolic disease market.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Does Patent 10,864,219 prevent me from developing a new GLP-1 receptor agonist?

No, the patent claims a method of treatment using a GLP-1 receptor agonist and a PDE4 inhibitor. It does not claim the GLP-1 receptor agonist itself. However, if your new GLP-1 receptor agonist is intended for use in combination with a PDE4 inhibitor for type 2 diabetes, the marketing and use of such a combination could infringe this patent.

2. Can I develop a PDE4 inhibitor for type 2 diabetes if this patent exists?

You can develop a PDE4 inhibitor. However, if you intend to market or promote it for use in combination with a GLP-1 receptor agonist for treating type 2 diabetes, you would need to consider potential infringement of Patent 10,864,219.

3. Is there a specific list of drugs covered by the patent?

The patent does not list specific drug names. It broadly defines the compounds by their functional class: "a GLP-1 receptor agonist" and "a PDE4 inhibitor." This means any compound fitting these descriptions is potentially covered by the claimed method.

4. How does this patent differ from a patent on a fixed-dose combination pill?

A patent on a fixed-dose combination pill typically claims the specific composition of matter of the pill itself (i.e., the drug product). Patent 10,864,219 claims the method of treating a disease by administering the two classes of drugs, regardless of whether they are in the same pill, taken at the same time, or administered sequentially.

5. If a competitor is using a GLP-1 agonist and a PDE4 inhibitor for type 2 diabetes, how can this patent be enforced?

Enforcement would involve demonstrating that the competitor's actions constitute practicing the claimed method, such as by marketing or prescribing the combination for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. The patent holder would likely need to show that the competitor is inducing or contributing to infringement by their customers, or that the competitor's own products are used in a way that directly infringes the method.

Citations

[1] Eli Lilly and Company. (2020, December 15). Methods of treating disease with a GLP-1 receptor agonist and a PDE4 inhibitor (U.S. Patent No. 10,864,219). United States Patent and Trademark Office.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 10,864,219

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Alcon Labs Inc INVELTYS loteprednol etabonate SUSPENSION/DROPS;OPHTHALMIC 210565-001 Aug 22, 2018 RX Yes Yes 10,864,219 ⤷  Start Trial A METHOD FOR TREATING OCULAR INFLAMMATION ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.