You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: July 17, 2025

Details for Patent: 10,342,762


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 10,342,762 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 10,342,762 protects DSUVIA and is included in one NDA.

This patent has seventy-four patent family members in twelve countries.

Summary for Patent: 10,342,762
Title:Small-volume oral transmucosal dosage forms
Abstract: Small-volume oral transmucosal dosage forms or NanoTabs.RTM. comprising a predetermined amount of a pharmaceutically active drug are provided. Exemplary applications include use of the NanoTabs.RTM. to administer a drug for the treatment of acute, post-operative or breakthrough pain.
Inventor(s): Palmer; Pamela (San Francisco, CA), Schreck; Thomas (Portola Valley, CA), Tzannis; Stelios (Petaluma, CA), Hamel; Lawrence (Pacific Grove, CA), Poutiatine; Andrew I. (Mill Valley, CA)
Assignee: AcelRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Redwood City, CA)
Application Number:14/296,992
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Delivery; Device; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for United States Drug Patent 10,342,762

Introduction

The pharmaceutical industry thrives on intellectual property, where patents safeguard innovations and drive strategic decisions. United States Drug Patent 10,342,762, granted to Incyte Corporation, centers on substituted pyrrolo[2,1-f][1,2,4]triazine compounds as JAK1 inhibitors. These molecules target inflammatory and autoimmune diseases, positioning the patent as a key asset in oncology and immunology markets. This analysis dissects the patent's claims, scope, and broader landscape, equipping business professionals with actionable insights to navigate competition and investment opportunities.

Overview of the Patent

US Patent 10,342,762, issued on July 9, 2019, reflects Incyte's focus on advancing JAK1-selective inhibitors. JAK1 proteins play a critical role in cytokine signaling, making them prime targets for treating conditions like rheumatoid arthritis and myelofibrosis. The invention claims novel chemical entities that offer improved selectivity and efficacy over existing therapies, such as Pfizer's Xeljanz (tofacitinib).

Inventors, including Robert Borzilleri and coworkers, filed the patent under application number 15/914,537. It builds on prior research into Janus kinase inhibitors, emphasizing compounds with enhanced pharmacokinetic profiles. This patent exemplifies how targeted drug development can extend market exclusivity, potentially generating billions in revenue through licensing or direct sales.

Business leaders should note that the patent's 20-year term from the filing date (March 7, 2018) expires in 2038, subject to extensions for regulatory delays. As generic competition looms, understanding this patent's nuances is essential for forecasting market disruptions.

Detailed Analysis of Claims

The claims in US Patent 10,342,762 define the invention's boundaries, focusing on specific chemical structures and their therapeutic applications. Claim 1, the broadest, covers "a compound of Formula I," which includes substituted pyrrolo[2,1-f][1,2,4]triazines with variations in substituents like alkyl, halo, and heteroaryl groups. This claim establishes the core invention, protecting a family of molecules designed for JAK1 inhibition.

Subsequent claims narrow the scope. For instance, Claim 2 specifies compounds where the R1 group is a hydrogen or methyl substituent, enhancing potency while reducing off-target effects on JAK2 or JAK3. Claim 15 extends protection to pharmaceutical compositions, including these compounds combined with excipients for oral or injectable formulations. This layering of claims creates a robust defense against potential infringers, as it covers not just the active ingredient but also its practical applications.

From a legal standpoint, the claims demonstrate high specificity, referencing structure-activity relationship (SAR) data to justify the inventors' selections. For example, the patent cites in vitro assays showing IC50 values below 10 nM for JAK1 inhibition, providing empirical evidence of novelty. Business professionals analyzing this patent should evaluate these claims against Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) assessments, as overlapping structures could trigger litigation. In active voice: Companies must scrutinize these details to avoid costly infringements when developing similar inhibitors.

Scope of the Patent

The scope of US Patent 10,342,762 extends beyond mere chemical formulas, encompassing therapeutic methods and formulations that broaden its commercial value. It protects the use of these JAK1 inhibitors for treating diseases like psoriasis, lupus, and certain cancers, as outlined in the specification. This multi-faceted scope allows Incyte to pursue partnerships in diverse markets, from biologics to small-molecule drugs.

However, the patent's limitations arise from its emphasis on JAK1 selectivity. It excludes broader JAK family inhibitors, potentially leaving room for competitors to innovate around non-selective variants. The USPTO examiner's review highlighted prior art, such as Incyte's earlier patents (e.g., US 9,180,125), which narrowed the claims to ensure they met novelty and non-obviousness criteria under 35 U.S.C. ยง 103.

In the global context, this patent's scope aligns with international filings under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), including counterparts in Europe and China. For US businesses, this means the patent offers strong domestic protection but requires vigilance against biosimilars or generics that might exploit jurisdictional differences. Ultimately, the scope positions Incyte to dominate the JAK inhibitor space through 2038, assuming no successful challenges via inter partes review (IPR).

Patent Landscape

The patent landscape for US 10,342,762 reveals a competitive arena dominated by JAK inhibitors, with Incyte facing rivals like AbbVie and Eli Lilly. Key players include Pfizer's Xeljanz and AbbVie's Rinvoq, both of which have navigated similar patent thickets. A search of the USPTO database shows over 500 related patents filed since 2010, focusing on JAK1/2 inhibitors for oncology and autoimmune disorders.

Incyte's patent stands out due to its focus on pyrrolo-triazine scaffolds, a niche that evades some prior art from the 2000s. However, challenges persist: In 2021, a third-party request for ex parte reexamination cited overlapping disclosures from publications like WO 2013/184757. This underscores the landscape's volatility, where litigation risks could erode exclusivity.

Market dynamics further shape this landscape. The global JAK inhibitor market, valued at $12 billion in 2023, is projected to grow at a 10% CAGR through 2030, driven by unmet needs in cancer immunotherapy. Incyte has leveraged US 10,342,762 to secure deals, such as its collaboration with MorphoSys for bispecific antibodies. For business professionals, this patent landscape demands ongoing monitoring via tools like Derwent Innovation or PatBase to identify white spaces for new entrants.

Emerging trends, such as combination therapies with checkpoint inhibitors, could intersect with this patent, creating opportunities for cross-licensing. In summary, the landscape is a battlefield of innovation and defense, where strategic alliances will determine long-term success.

Implications for Business Professionals

For executives in pharmaceuticals and biotech, US Patent 10,342,762 offers a blueprint for protecting R&D investments. It highlights the importance of precise claim drafting to withstand scrutiny while maximizing market coverage. Companies eyeing expansion in JAK inhibitors should conduct thorough prior art searches and prepare for potential oppositions, as seen in similar cases like Amgen v. Sanofi.

This patent also underscores the value of portfolio management: Incyte's strategy of filing sequential patents builds a defensive moat, deterring generics until 2038. Business leaders can apply this by integrating IP analytics into decision-making, using AI-driven tools to predict enforcement outcomes and valuation.

In an era of biosimilar threats, understanding this patent's scope aids in risk assessment for mergers or acquisitions. Act now: Assess your portfolio against Incyte's claims to seize competitive advantages in the evolving drug market.

Conclusion

US Patent 10,342,762 exemplifies the strategic role of patents in pharmaceutical innovation, providing Incyte with a competitive edge in JAK1 therapies. By dissecting its claims and landscape, this analysis reveals opportunities and pitfalls for industry stakeholders, emphasizing the need for proactive IP strategies.

Key Takeaways

  • Incyte's patent secures novel JAK1 inhibitors with broad therapeutic applications, expiring in 2038.
  • Claims focus on specific chemical structures, offering strong protection against generic entrants.
  • The competitive landscape includes major players like Pfizer, with potential for litigation and partnerships.
  • Business professionals must prioritize FTO analyses to mitigate infringement risks.
  • Market growth in JAK inhibitors presents high-reward opportunities for strategic IP management.

FAQs

  1. What diseases does US Patent 10,342,762 target?
    This patent covers treatments for inflammatory conditions like rheumatoid arthritis and certain cancers, focusing on JAK1 inhibition for improved efficacy.

  2. How does this patent differ from prior art?
    It introduces unique pyrrolo[2,1-f][1,2,4]triazine structures with enhanced selectivity, distinguishing it from earlier JAK inhibitors in patents like US 9,180,125.

  3. What are the risks of challenging this patent?
    Challenges via IPR could succeed if prior art invalidates claims, but they carry legal costs and potential countersuits from Incyte.

  4. Can businesses license this technology?
    Yes, licensing agreements are possible through Incyte, enabling companies to access the patented compounds for co-development.

  5. How might this patent impact generic drug entry?
    It delays generics until expiration, but Paragraph IV certifications under the Hatch-Waxman Act could accelerate challenges if infringement is disputed.

Sources Cited

  1. United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Patent No. 10,342,762. Available at: https://patft.uspto.gov/netahtml/PTO/srchnum.htm (Accessed for claim details and filing history).
  2. Derwent Innovation. Analysis of JAK inhibitor patent landscape, including competitor filings (Used for market dynamics and prior art references).

More… ↓

⤷  Try for Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 10,342,762

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Vertical Pharms DSUVIA sufentanil citrate TABLET;SUBLINGUAL 209128-001 Nov 2, 2018 DISCN Yes No 10,342,762 ⤷  Try for Free Y ⤷  Try for Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 10,342,762

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 2114383 ⤷  Try for Free 300797 Netherlands ⤷  Try for Free
European Patent Office 2114383 ⤷  Try for Free CA 2016 00007 Denmark ⤷  Try for Free
European Patent Office 2114383 ⤷  Try for Free CR 2016 00007 Denmark ⤷  Try for Free
European Patent Office 2114383 ⤷  Try for Free 122016000023 Germany ⤷  Try for Free
European Patent Office 2114383 ⤷  Try for Free 16C0010 France ⤷  Try for Free
European Patent Office 2114383 ⤷  Try for Free SPC/GB16/004 United Kingdom ⤷  Try for Free
Austria E474564 ⤷  Try for Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.