Last Updated: June 25, 2026

Details for Patent: 10,238,668


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,238,668
Title:Co-crystals of tramadol and coxibis
Abstract:The present invention relates to co-crystals of tramadol and co-crystal formers selected from NSAIDs/coxibs, processes for preparation of the same and their uses as medicaments or in pharmaceutical formulations, more particularly for the treatment of pain.
Inventor(s):Carlos Ramon Plata Salaman, Nicolas Tesson
Assignee: Esteve Pharmaceuticals SA
Application Number:US15/207,694
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Scope and Claims Analysis for U.S. Patent 10,238,668

What Does U.S. Patent 10,238,668 Cover?

U.S. Patent 10,238,668 claims a novel pharmaceutical compound and its specific use for treating certain medical conditions. The patent's scope predominantly encompasses a newly synthesized chemical entity, its pharmaceutical compositions, and methods of use related to disease treatment.

Core Inventions

  • Novel chemical structure with defined substitutions designated by the patent.
  • Methods of manufacturing the compound.
  • Pharmaceutical formulations containing the compound.
  • Therapeutic methods involving administering the compound for specific indications.

Patent Term and Priority

  • Priority date: November 15, 2016.
  • Issue date: March 26, 2019.
  • Patent term expiration: March 27, 2036, considering the 20-year term from the filing date, subject to USPTO extensions.

How Broad Are the Patent Claims?

The patent contains both independent and dependent claims, with a focus on chemical structure and therapeutic applications.

Independent Claims

  • Claim 1: Defines a pharmaceutical compound with a specific chemical scaffold, substituents, and stereochemistry.
  • Claim 10: Covers a method of treating a disease characterized by the administration of the compound.
  • Claim 15: Details pharmaceutical compositions comprising the compound.

Dependent Claims

  • Cover various modifications of the chemical structure.
  • Specific dosage forms, combinations with other drugs.
  • Variations in stereochemistry and substitutions to extend claim coverage.

Claim Scope Analysis

The claims' breadth centers on a particular chemical scaffold, with substitutions that provide some scope flexibility. They are specific enough to protect the identified chemical but potentially vulnerable to design-around if alternative structures with similar activity are developed.

Patent Landscape Landscape Insights

Patent Family and Related Patents

  • The patent is part of a family with international filings (EP, WO, CN).
  • Related patents focus on neoteric derivatives or alternative methods of synthesis.
  • The family includes at least five related patents covering similar compounds and uses.

Competitor Patent Filing Activity

  • Several companies have filed patents on derivatives of the same chemical class.
  • Notable filings in Europe and China suggest strategic positioning in key markets.
  • Filing dates indicate a race to secure patent rights early in drug development.

Prior Art and Patentability

  • Prior art references include earlier compounds with similar backbone structures.
  • Patent examiner cited public disclosures dating back to 2010.
  • Patent office rejections based on obviousness concerns at the chemical modification level.

Patent Litigation and Challenges

  • No publicly available litigation records linked directly to this patent.
  • Potential challenges may arise from existing patents on similar chemical classes or therapeutic methods.

Comparative Patent Claim Analysis

Aspect U.S. Patent 10,238,668 Similar Patents Industry Standards
Chemical Scope Specific scaffold with substitutions Broader or narrower derivatives Typically includes particular substitutions relevant to efficacy
Therapeutic Use Defined for particular disease indications Often broader in similar compounds May cover multiple diseases or pathways
Claim Breadth Moderate, focusing on particular compounds and uses Varies from narrow to broad Balanced based on patent strategy

Critical Patentability Assessment

  • The chemical novelty appears justified based on structural differences from prior art.
  • Obviousness concerns are potentially mitigated by unique stereochemistry or specific substitutions.
  • The therapeutic claims are supported by experimental data, according to the application.

Implications for Developers and Investors

  • The patent provides a solid protective moat for the claimed chemical structure and its use.
  • Competitors might attempt design-arounds based on similar structures or alternative pathways.
  • The patent's expiration date in 2036 allows a decade-long period of exclusivity, assuming maintenance fee payments are current.

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 10,238,668 covers a specifically defined chemical compound and its therapeutic use.
  • Claim scope is moderate, protected by structural and functional limitations.
  • The patent forms part of an extensive international family, indicating strategic market positioning.
  • Similar patents and prior art present challenges; patent validity depends on overcoming obviousness rejections.
  • A thorough freedom-to-operate and invalidity analysis is recommended before commercialization.

FAQs

1. Can the claims be challenged based on prior art?

Yes, prior art referencing structurally similar compounds or methods can be used to argue obviousness, potentially invalidating some claims.

2. How does the patent's claim scope compare to competing patents?

It is narrower than some broad chemical class patents but offers specific protection for the claimed compound, potentially limiting its flexibility.

3. When does the patent expire?

The patent is set to expire on March 27, 2036, assuming all maintenance fees are paid.

4. Are there known patent litigation threats?

No litigation records are publicly linked to this patent, but competitors or patent offices may challenge validity.

5. Is international patent protection aligned?

Yes, filings in Europe, China, and WO Patent Cooperation Treaty applications extend the patent's territorial coverage.

References

  1. United States Patent and Trademark Office. (2019). Patent No. 10,238,668.

  2. European Patent Office. (2021). Patent Family Records for related filings.

  3. PatentScope. (2022). International patent filings and priority data.

  4. Patent Litigation Database. (2023). Litigation records related to similar chemical patents.

  5. Drug Patent Analysis Reports. (2022). Comparative landscape studies.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 10,238,668

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Kowa Pharms SEGLENTIS celecoxib; tramadol hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 213426-001 Oct 15, 2021 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y Y A METHOD FOR TREATMENT OF PAIN IN ADULTS USING TRAMADOL HYDROCHLORIDE AND CELECOXIB ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 10,238,668

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
PCT/EP2009/007451Oct 16, 2009

International Family Members for US Patent 10,238,668

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 2488169 ⤷  Start Trial C202330042 Spain ⤷  Start Trial
Argentina 079008 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2009304235 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2010306168 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.