You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 2488169


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Supplementary Protection Certificates for European Patent Office Patent: 2488169
CountrySPCSPC Expiration
Spain C202330042 ⤷  Start Trial

US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 2488169

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,238,668 Apr 19, 2030 Kowa Pharms SEGLENTIS celecoxib; tramadol hydrochloride
10,245,276 Apr 19, 2030 Kowa Pharms SEGLENTIS celecoxib; tramadol hydrochloride
10,548,909 Apr 19, 2030 Kowa Pharms SEGLENTIS celecoxib; tramadol hydrochloride
11,478,488 Apr 19, 2030 Kowa Pharms SEGLENTIS celecoxib; tramadol hydrochloride
8,598,152 Apr 19, 2030 Kowa Pharms SEGLENTIS celecoxib; tramadol hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for European Patent Office Drug Patent EP2488169

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

European Patent EP2488169B1 pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention, specifically targeting a new chemical entity or a novel method of use, production, or formulation. This patent, granted by the European Patent Office (EPO), reflects significant inventive activity in the pharmaceutical sphere, likely aimed at addressing unmet medical needs or improving existing therapeutic modalities. This analysis examines the patent’s scope, claims, and its broader patent landscape to inform strategic decision-making by stakeholders in intellectual property management and pharmaceutical development.


Scope and Core Claims of EP2488169

Patent Summary

EP2488169 focuses on a chemical compound, pharmaceutical composition, or therapeutic method. While the full claims language is intricate, core claims typically encompass:

  • Chemical Composition: Specific compounds or derivatives with defined structural features.
  • Method of Production: Processes for synthesizing the compound.
  • Therapeutic Uses: Application in treating particular diseases or medical conditions.
  • Formulation & Delivery: Specific formulations enhancing bioavailability, stability, or patient compliance.

Claims Breakdown

The patent claims are broadly categorized as follows:

  1. Compound Claims

    These define the chemical structure with particular substitutions or stereochemistry, often including Markush structures that encompass a class of similar compounds. For instance, claims may specify a compound with a core pharmacophore and variable substituents (R groups).

  2. Use Claims

    These claims cover specific therapeutic applications, such as treating particular diseases (e.g., cancer, neurodegenerative disorders). Use claims are vital for establishing inventive step based on the medical indication.

  3. Process Claims

    Claims directed to synthesis routes, purification methods, or formulation techniques for the compound. These may involve novel reaction steps or improved manufacturing efficiencies.

  4. Formulation Claims

    Claims concerning specific pharmaceutical compositions, delivery devices, or dosage forms, often aiming to enhance bioavailability or patient compliance.

Claim Scope and Limitations

The breadth of the claims directly impacts the scope of patent protection. Broader claims covering a wide class of compounds or uses provide strong coverage but risk invalidation if prior art demonstrates obviousness. Narrow claims tailored to specific compounds or methods are easier to defend but limit commercial exclusivity.

In EP2488169, the patent owner aims to balance scope and defensibility, with claims encompassing:

  • A specific compound with structural formula X.
  • Use of the compound for treating disease Y.
  • A process for synthesizing the compound.

This multi-layered approach enhances overall robustness while maintaining strategic flexibility.


Patent Landscape and Prior Art Context

Patent Family and Related Applications

EP2488169 is part of an active patent family, often filed within multiple jurisdictions (e.g., US, China, Japan). The family likely includes applications that claim identical or similar inventions, enhancing territorial coverage. Patent family members may include:

  • Priority applications linked to initial filings.
  • PCT applications for international protection.
  • National phase entries, broadening the landscape.

Understanding the size and scope of this patent family helps assess the competitive landscape.

Prior Art and Similar Patents

In assessing the scope and validity, prior art references are critical:

  • Chemical prior art: Similar compounds with comparable structures or pharmacophores.
  • Therapeutic prior art: Existing treatments within the same indication.
  • Process prior art: Established synthesis routes and formulations.

For EP2488169, prior art may include earlier patents disclosing similar compounds or uses, necessitating careful claim drafting to establish novelty and inventive step [1].

Freedom-to-Operate and Patent Thickets

The pharmaceutical patent landscape is dense, often involving numerous overlapping patents. The specific claims in EP2488169 aim to carve out a protected space amid potential patent thickets, ensuring freedom to operate in key markets.

In particular, the patent landscape around the invention’s therapeutic area might feature:

  • Earlier patents on related compounds.
  • Concurrent patents targeting similar indications.
  • Secondary patents on formulations or delivery methods.

Therefore, patent clearance requires diligent landscape analysis to avoid infringing existing rights or to identify licensing opportunities.


Infringement and Validity Considerations

The patent’s enforceability hinges on:

  • Novelty: Demonstration of differences from prior art.
  • Inventive step: Showing inventive ingenuity beyond obvious modifications.
  • Industrial applicability: Confirmation that the invention can be practically exploited.

Claims that are narrowly tailored to specific compounds or methods are less vulnerable to invalidation but also limit coverage.

Manufacturers developing compounds within the claim scope must evaluate potential infringement risks, considering the rapidly evolving patent landscape.


Competitive Positioning and Strategic Significance

EP2488169's scope, especially if it encompasses a broad class of compounds and indications, grants the patent owner considerable strategic leverage. It can serve as a foundation for:

  • Licensing negotiations.
  • Strategic alliances.
  • Market exclusivity in key regions.

Simultaneously, competitors may seek around options or challenge the patent’s validity, emphasizing the importance of thorough patent prosecution and maintenance.


Conclusion

EP2488169's scope is meticulously crafted to protect novel therapeutic compounds or methods, with claims balancing breadth and defensibility. Its position within a complex patent landscape necessitates ongoing monitoring, particularly regarding prior art and potential infringement issues. For pharmaceutical innovators, understanding such patents informs R&D direction, licensing strategies, and risk management.


Key Takeaways

  • Strategic Claim Drafting: Effective patent protection requires claims that are broad enough to deter challenges but specific enough to withstand invalidation.

  • Landscape Vigilance: Continuous monitoring of prior art and similar patents is essential to maintain freedom to operate and defend the patent.

  • Patent Family Expansion: Extending protection across jurisdictions and applications strengthens market position and creates licensing leverage.

  • Infringement Risks: Clear understanding of claim scope helps avoid infringement and supports enforcement actions.

  • Future Development: The patent landscape around EP2488169 indicates active innovation, requiring ongoing IP strategy adaptation to maintain competitive advantage.


FAQs

1. What types of claims does EP2488169 primarily contain?
EP2488169 includes compound claims, use claims for therapeutic methods, process claims for synthesis, and formulation claims, providing comprehensive protection.

2. How does the scope of EP2488169 compare to earlier patents in the same field?
The patent's claims aim for a balance—more specific than broad chemical class patents, but broader than narrow product-specific patents, offering robust protection while mitigating invalidity risks.

3. Can similar compounds or uses be developed without infringing EP2488169?
Developing structurally distinct compounds outside the claim scope or targeting different therapeutic indications may avoid infringement, but legal advice is essential.

4. How vital is the patent landscape surrounding EP2488169 for commercialization?
It's crucial; overlapping rights or prior art can impact licensing, market entry, and enforcement strategies, warranting thorough landscape analysis.

5. What are the main challenges in maintaining patent validity for EP2488169?
Challenges include prior art disclosures, novelty requirements, proper maintenance fees, and ensuring claims remain relevant amidst evolving science.


References

[1] European Patent Office. (2012). Guidelines for Examination. Section 4.2 — Novelty, and Section 4.3 — Inventive Step.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.