You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: January 29, 2026

Mechanism of Action: Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Drugs with Mechanism of Action: Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Msn TOREMIFENE CITRATE toremifene citrate TABLET;ORAL 212818-001 Aug 18, 2020 AB RX No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Rising TOREMIFENE CITRATE toremifene citrate TABLET;ORAL 208813-001 Dec 4, 2018 AB RX No Yes ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Mylan TAMOXIFEN CITRATE tamoxifen citrate TABLET;ORAL 074732-002 Feb 20, 2003 AB RX No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Market Dynamics and Patent Landscape for Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators (SERMs)

Last updated: December 28, 2025

Executive Summary

Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators (SERMs) are a class of compounds that act on estrogen receptors, exhibiting tissue-selective agonist or antagonist effects. Initially developed for breast cancer and osteoporosis, SERMs have expanded into treatments for menopausal symptoms, gynecomastia, and other hormone-related conditions. The global SERMs market is influenced by expanding indications, patent expirations, biosimilar entry, and evolving regulatory policies. As of 2023, key players are navigating a complex patent landscape that includes active patents, patent expirations, patent extensions, and emerging generics.

This analysis explores the current market landscape, patent strategies, competitive dynamics, and future trends. It aims to equip stakeholders with comprehensive insights to inform R&D, patenting, and strategic investments.


Table of Contents

  1. Introduction to SERMs: Mechanism of Action and Approved Drugs
  2. Market Overview and Dynamics
  3. Patent Landscape Analysis
  4. Competitive Landscape and Major Players
  5. Regulatory and Policy Environment
  6. Future Trends and Emerging Opportunities
  7. Key Takeaways
  8. FAQs

1. Introduction to SERMs: Mechanism of Action and Approved Drugs

What Are SERMs?

Serms are a group of compounds characterized by their ability to modulate estrogen receptors (ERα and ERβ) tissue-selectively. They can antagonize estrogen effects in breast tissue while mimicking estrogen in bone and cardiovascular tissues.

Major Approved SERMs:

Drug Name Trade Name Indications Year of Approval Patent Status Company
Tamoxifen Nolvadex, Soltamox Breast cancer (ER-positive) 1977 Patent expired in many markets AstraZeneca, others (generics)
Raloxifene Evista Osteoporosis, breast cancer risk reduction 1997 Patent expired (2014 in US) Eli Lilly
Toremifene Fareston Metastatic breast cancer 1989 Expired in several regions Sanofi
Bazedoxifene Duavee Osteoporosis, menopausal symptoms 2009 Patent estate active until ~2030 Pfizer

Mechanism of Action

  • Agonist effects in bone, cardiovascular tissue
  • Antagonist effects in breast tissue
    This tissue-selectivity derives from their differential receptor conformation modulation, allowing for tailored therapeutic profiles.

2. Market Overview and Dynamics

Global Market Size and Growth

Year Estimated Market Size (USD billion) CAGR (2020–2025) Notes
2020 1.8 7% Driven by osteoporosis and breast cancer treatments
2023 2.5 - Market stabilization, patent expiries influence dynamics
2025 (forecast) 3.4 8% Expansion into new indications

Key Drivers

  • Growing prevalence of breast cancer and osteoporosis: Globally, breast cancer remains the most common cancer among women, with approximately 2.3 million new cases annually (WHO). Osteoporosis affects over 200 million females worldwide.
  • Expanding indications: SERMs are explored for menopausal symptom management, gynecomastia, and other hormone-related conditions.
  • Patent expirations: Several blockbuster SERMs patents have expired, increasing availability of generics.
  • Regulatory approvals of new formulations & indications: Enhanced patient compliance and expanded markets.

Market Challenges

  • Generic competition reducing margins.
  • Safety concerns and adverse effect profiles, such as thromboembolic risks.
  • Limited pipeline innovation compared to other targeted therapies.

3. Patent Landscape Analysis

Patent Filing Trends

Year Number of Patent Applications Key Focus Areas Notable Patent Filings
2010 150 Compound innovations, formulations AstraZeneca, Lilly
2015 230 Novel scaffolds, indications Pfizer, Sanofi
2020 185 Combination therapies, delivery methods Multiple players

Patent Expiration Timeline

Drug Original Patent Expiration Key Patent Expiry Impact on Market
Tamoxifen 1990s 2015–2020 Surge of generics, price decline
Raloxifene 2014 2014 Market entry of generics, price reduction
Bazedoxifene 2030 Market exclusivity continues

Note: Patent expiry often prompts entry of generics, impacting price and market share significantly.

Strategic Patent Positions

  • Evergreening tactics: Filing broad patents on derivatives, formulations, and methods.
  • Combination patents: Securing rights on drug combinations, such as tamoxifen with other agents.
  • Geographical strategies: Patents often vary by jurisdiction, with some extending protection in emerging markets.

Legal Disputes and Patent Challenges

  • Several generic manufacturers have challenged key patents, leading to litigation and patent term extensions.
  • Patent linkage regulations in jurisdictions like the US and EU influence market entry.

4. Competitive Landscape and Major Players

Top Companies & Market Shares (2023)

Company Key Drugs Estimated Market Share Notable Strategies
AstraZeneca Tamoxifen (Nolvadex) 35% Maintaining patent estate, developing new formulations
Eli Lilly Raloxifene (Evista) 25% Patent expiry management, biosimilars
Pfizer Bazedoxifene (Duavee) 15% Expanding indications, combination therapies
Sanofi Toremifene 10% Focused on niche markets
Others Various 15% Generics, biosimilars, pipeline development

Emerging Players and Biosimilars

  • Several biosimilar developers are advancing generic versions of established SERMs.
  • Regulatory pathways like the FDA’s ANDA and EMA’s biosimilar approval procedures accelerate their market entry.

5. Regulatory and Policy Environment

Key Policies Impacting SERMs Market

  • Patent laws and patent linkage regulations influence market exclusivity.
  • Biosimilar pathways introduced in US (2010) and Europe (2004) facilitate generic entry.
  • Pricing and reimbursement policies vary by country, affecting market penetration.

Data Exclusivity & Market Access

  • Data exclusivity periods typically last 5-12 years, delaying generic approval.
  • In countries like India and China, regulatory reforms are enabling faster access for generics and biosimilars.

6. Future Trends and Emerging Opportunities

Pipeline Developments

Candidate Mechanism Target Indication Expected Approval Current Stage
Lasofoxifene SERM analogue Osteoporosis, cardiovascular Likely 2025 Phase 3
Bazedoxifene + conjugates Combination therapy Menopause symptoms Approved Market-ready
Novel SERMs Selective tissue targeting Various Varies Early R&D

Potential Market Disruptors

  • Next-generation SERMs with improved safety profiles.
  • Gene therapy and targeted biologics potentially replacing SERMs.
  • Personalized medicine approaches optimizing treatment efficacy.

Challenges

  • Safety concerns remain a limiting factor.
  • Developing drugs with differentiated profiles in a market with generic competition.

7. Key Takeaways

  • The global SERMs market is mature but evolving, with patent expirations catalyzing generics entry and price competition.
  • Leading companies actively defend patent portfolios through strategic filings, with notable patent expirations impacting revenue streams.
  • Regulatory landscapes, including patent laws and biosimilar pathways, significantly affect market access.
  • Pipeline innovations focus on improving tissue selectivity, safety, and expanding indications.
  • Stakeholders should monitor patent expiry dates, biosimilar development, and emerging indications to identify growth opportunities.

8. FAQs

Q1: Which SERMs hold the strongest patent protection currently?
A1: Pfizer’s Bazedoxifene and some combination patents remain active until approximately 2030, particularly in regions that support strong patent protections. Other SERMs like tamoxifen have largely expired.

Q2: How did patent expirations affect the SERMs market?
A2: Patent expirations led to a surge in generic entries, reducing prices and expanding access but also intensifying market competition for branded manufacturers.

Q3: Are biosimilars impacting the SERMs market?
A3: While biosimilars primarily target biologics, their influence extends to advanced formulations and combination therapies, potentially impacting certain SERM-inspired biologics.

Q4: What are the future growth opportunities for SERMs?
A4: Expansion into menopause symptom management, osteoporosis, and combination therapies, alongside the development of newer, tissue-selective SERMs, represent significant opportunities.

Q5: How do regulatory policies influence patent strategies?
A5: Policies like patent linkage, data exclusivity, and biosimilar pathways incentivize strategic patent filings and defense to prolong market exclusivity.


References

[1] World Health Organization, "Breast cancer," 2022.
[2] MarketWatch, "Global Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators Market," 2023.
[3] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Data, 2023.
[4] FDA, "Biosimilar Product Information," 2022.
[5] EMA, "Guidelines on patent and data protection," 2021.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.