You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Profile for South Africa Patent: 201706919


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for South Africa Patent: 201706919

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,912,751 Mar 14, 2036 Esperion Theraps Inc NEXLIZET bempedoic acid; ezetimibe
11,744,816 Mar 14, 2036 Esperion Theraps Inc NEXLETOL bempedoic acid
11,744,816 Mar 14, 2036 Esperion Theraps Inc NEXLIZET bempedoic acid; ezetimibe
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for South Africa Patent ZA201706919

Last updated: August 9, 2025


Introduction

Patent ZA201706919 pertains to a novel pharmaceutical innovation registered within South Africa’s intellectual property framework. This analysis dissects the patent's scope and claims, explores its positioning within the current patent landscape, and evaluates strategic considerations relevant to industry stakeholders. As South Africa’s patent system aligns with the Patent Act No. 57 of 1978, amended by recent developments to harmonize with international standards such as TRIPS, understanding the nuances of this patent provides valuable insights into regional pharmaceutical innovation and commercialization prospects.


Patent Overview and Bibliographic Data

Patent Title: [Assuming the invention relates to a specific drug or pharmaceutical composition based on the patent number nomenclature.]

Filing Date: [Exact date would typically be retrieved from official records.]

Publication Date: 2017, with grant likely in 2018 or later.

Applicant/Proprietor: [Typically a pharmaceutical company, research institution, or individual inventor.]

Jurisdiction: South Africa

Patent Number: ZA201706919


Scope of the Patent

Purpose and Technical Field

This patent covers a specific pharmaceutical composition or a method of treatment involving a novel compound, formulation, or delivery mechanism. It aims to address unmet medical needs, such as improved efficacy, safety, stability, or bioavailability of therapeutic agents.

Type of Patent

ZA201706919 appears to fall within the category of a product patent—protecting a drug substance or pharmaceutical composition—or a process patent, covering a manufacturing or formulation process.


Claims Analysis

Claims Structure:

The patent’s claims are the legal backbone, explicitly defining the scope of protection. Typically:

  1. Independent Claims: Cover the core invention, i.e., the specific drug compound or composition, or a novel process.
  2. Dependent Claims: Specify embodiments or particular variants, adding scope and robustness to the patent.

Key Elements in the Claims:

  • Compound Structure or Formula: If the patent protects a novel chemical entity, claims detail the molecular structure, possibly including stereochemistry or specific substitutions, aligned with IUPAC nomenclature.

  • Pharmaceutical Composition: Claims may encompass formulations containing the compound with specific excipients, stabilizers, carriers, or delivery systems.

  • Method of Use or Treatment: The patent might claim therapeutic methods, including administration schedules or targeted medical indications (e.g., specific diseases or conditions).

  • Manufacturing Process: If applicable, claims could cover unique synthesis routes or formulation steps.

Scope Evaluation:

  • Broad vs. Narrow Claims: The breadth depends on claim wording. Broad claims protect the core invention but are more vulnerable to validity challenges based on prior art, while narrow claims offer limited protection but are easier to defend.

  • Novelty and Inventiveness: Provided the claims are supported by credible novelty over prior art, especially existing patents in South Africa and internationally, their enforceability is strengthened.

  • Potential Overlaps: Similar patents in the global landscape could impact enforcement if overlapping claims exist, demanding continuous landscape monitoring.


Patent Landscape Analysis

Global and Regional Patent Environment

South Africa's pharmaceutical patent landscape is influenced by its adherence to international treaties like TRIPS and regional patent protocols. Key points include:

  • Patent Thickets: Historically, the landscape has seen overlaps, especially with patent families originating from multinationals and local innovators.

  • Major Patent Holders: Global pharmaceutical companies, such as GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, and local entities, build patent portfolios that could intersect with ZA201706919, particularly if similar compounds or formulations are involved.

  • Patent Compatibility: South African patents often align with international patent classifications, facilitating strategic filings in emerging markets.

Prior Art and Patentability Considerations

  • Pre-existing Art: The patent’s validity hinges on its novelty over prior art, including patents, scientific literature, and clinical data available before the filing date.

  • Patent Challenges and Litigation: South Africa's patent system allows for opposition proceedings, which can challenge the scope or validity of patents, especially for pharma compounds claiming broad protection.

Patents of Concern in the Landscape

  • Patent Citations: Prior art disclosures cited during prosecution provide insights into overlapping innovations.

  • Freedom-to-Operate: Stakeholders must evaluate whether this patent constrains generic development or if licensing opportunities exist, especially as South Africa is a significant market in Africa.


Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Market Exclusivity: The patent likely confers exclusive rights for 20 years from the filing, incentivizing R&D investment.

  • Generic Market Entry: Once the patent expires or if invalidated, generic manufacturers can exploit the patent landscape to launch equivalents.

  • Strategic Positioning: Patent holders should continuously monitor the landscape for potential infringement risks and opportunities for licensing.


Concluding Remarks

The scope and claims of ZA201706919 reflect targeted protection over a novel pharmaceutical entity or process, potentially offering a strong competitive advantage within South Africa. Its alignment with regional patent norms and the global landscape underscores the importance of robust claim drafting and vigilant landscape analysis. Regardless of the specific invention, its strategic value is intertwined with ongoing judicial and prosecution developments in the South African patent system.


Key Takeaways

  • Precise Claim Drafting is Critical: To maximize protection, claims should balance breadth with defensibility, especially in a complex patent landscape.

  • Continuous Landscape Monitoring is Essential: Monitoring existing patents and publications ensures the patent's strength and identifies infringement or licensing opportunities.

  • Local and International Patent Trends Influence Strategy: Considerations of regional patent laws and international treaties can impact patent validity, enforceability, and licensing.

  • Innovation in the Pharmaceutical Sector Faces Challenges: Strong patent positions can be challenged based on prior art, emphasizing the need for thorough novelty and inventive step evaluations.

  • Licensing and Market Entry Risks/Opportunities: Besides protecting R&D investments, patents open pathways for licensing, partnerships, or strategic exits in emerging markets like South Africa.


FAQs

1. What makes South Africa's patent system unique for pharmaceutical innovations?
South Africa's patent system aligns with international standards through TRIPS compliance, but it also permits certain limitations, such as compulsory licensing under public health considerations, influencing patent enforcement.

2. How can patent ZA201706919 be challenged or invalidated?
Invalidation can occur through opposition proceedings, citing prior art that prejudices novelty or inventive step, or administrative/legal challenges based on compliance with patentability criteria.

3. Does the patent protect both the drug compound and its manufacturing process?
This depends on the specific claims; typically, patents can cover either or both aspects if they meet patentability requirements.

4. How does patent landscape analysis impact drug commercialization in South Africa?
Understanding the patent landscape helps identify potential infringement risks, licensing opportunities, and pathways for market entry, thereby informing strategic decisions.

5. Can local pharmaceutical companies bypass such patents?
Only if they develop and patent alternative compounds or formulations that do not infringe existing patents, or if the patent is invalidated, expired, or licensed appropriately.


References

  1. South African Patent Office. Official patent documentation and status.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent landscape reports.
  3. South African Patent Act No. 57 of 1978. Legislative framework.
  4. International Patent Classification (IPC). Patent classification and comparison.
  5. Pharmaceutical patent landscape reports. Market analyses and legal assessments.

Note: Specific details regarding the exact invention, claims, and applicant information were inferred or assumed due to the absence of explicit content in this analysis. Access to the full patent documentation is recommended for precise legal and technical interpretation.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.