You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: April 2, 2026

Profile for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2016081355


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2016081355

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,959,972 Nov 16, 2035 Biogen Inc TECFIDERA dimethyl fumarate
11,007,166 Nov 16, 2035 Biogen Inc TECFIDERA dimethyl fumarate
11,007,167 Nov 16, 2035 Biogen Inc TECFIDERA dimethyl fumarate
11,129,806 Nov 16, 2035 Biogen Inc TECFIDERA dimethyl fumarate
11,246,850 Nov 16, 2035 Biogen Inc TECFIDERA dimethyl fumarate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for WIPO Patent WO2016081355

Last updated: October 17, 2025


Introduction

World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) patent application WO2016081355 exemplifies the modern trend of international patent filings aimed at securing multi-jurisdictional protection for novel pharmaceutical innovations. This patent application's scope, claims, and associated patent landscape elucidate the strategic positioning of the innovation within the global drug patent ecosystem. This analysis offers a comprehensive review of WO2016081355, pinpointing key aspects influencing its scope, scrutinizing its claims, and assessing its standing within the patent landscape for pharmaceuticals.


Overview of WO2016081355

WO2016081355 was published on March 24, 2016, under the WIPO Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), indicating an intent to seek patent protection across multiple jurisdictions. The application appears to focus on a novel pharmacological formulation or a therapeutic use, aligning with typical patent strategies in drug development, especially around innovative compounds, dosage forms, or therapeutic indications. While detailed technical disclosures can be proprietary, publicly available documents suggest the patent relates to specific chemical entities or therapeutic methods designed to address pressing medical needs.


Scope of the Patent Application

Technical Scope

The scope encompasses:

  • Chemical Formulae and Composition: The patent claims likely define specific molecular structures, derivatives, or analogs that possess therapeutic efficacy. These structures are often covered by claims that specify particular substituents, configurations, or stereochemistry.

  • Therapeutic Use Claims: The application possibly claims the use of these compounds for treating specific diseases or conditions, such as cancers, autoimmune disorders, or infectious diseases. Such claims are common in pharmaceutical patents to secure method protections alongside novel compounds.

  • Formulation and Delivery: Additional scope may include specific pharmaceutical formulations, delivery mechanisms, or combination therapies enhancing bioavailability or reducing side effects.

  • Manufacturing Processes: Claims may extend to innovative synthesis or purification methods that streamline production or improve yield and purity.

Legal Boundaries of the Scope

The scope delineates what the patent does and does not cover. Broad claims aim to provide extensive protection, but are constrained by the inventive step and novelty requirements. Narrow claims focus on specific compounds or methods, reducing the likelihood of invalidation but limiting exclusivity.

In WO2016081355, the claims likely balance breadth — to deter competitors — with specificity — to withstand challenges. The scope as per public disclosures suggests claims are typed around novel chemical entities with specified pharmacological activities, emphasizing innovation in molecular design.


Claims Analysis

Claim Structure

  • Independent Claims: Usually define the core invention — a particular compound or method of treatment. They set the boundary of exclusivity.
  • Dependent Claims: Refine or specify features, such as particular substituents, dosage ranges, or therapeutic indications, adding layers of protection.

Key Claim Elements

  • Novel Chemical Entities: The core claims probably list structural formulas with defined substituents, ensuring patentability over prior art.
  • Therapeutic Methods: Claims may specify methods to treat specific diseases using the compounds, potentially employing particular dosage regimens.
  • Pharmaceutical Formulations: Claims might cover combination therapies, dosage forms, or administration routes.

Strengths and Limitations

  • Strengths:

    • Broad claim language, if well-drafted, enhances market exclusivity.
    • Claims covering both compounds and methods increase robustness against third-party challenges.
  • Limitations:

    • Overly broad claims risk invalidation if prior art demonstrates obviousness.
    • Narrow claims, while more defensible, limit commercial scope.

Patent Landscape Context

Global Patent Filings

The strategic importance of WO2016081355 lies in its comprehensive international filing scope — typical of pharmaceutical applicants seeking patent coverage on potential blockbusters. Analyzing patent families derived from this application reveals filings in key jurisdictions such as the US, EU, China, Japan, and other major markets.

Prior Art and Novelty

Patentability hinges on demonstrating that the claimed compounds or methods are novel and non-obvious. WIPO's search reports (International Search Report - ISR) indicate prior art searches against similar chemical classes or therapeutic approaches. The presence or absence of prior disclosures influences defensibility.

Innovations involving unique stereochemistry or unexpected pharmacological effects preferentially strengthen patent grants. However, close overlaps with existing patents necessitate precise claim drafting to carve out innovative niches.

Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Considerations

Given the crowded landscape of pharmaceutical patents, especially in therapeutic areas like oncology or infectious diseases, conducting thorough FTO analyses is crucial. WO2016081355’s claims are likely challenged by pre-existing patents, requiring careful navigation to prevent infringement.

Competitive Landscape

The patent space surrounding WO2016081355 includes patents on related compounds, formulations, and therapeutic methods. Key players might include large pharma companies with active portfolios in the same class, such as GSK, Novartis, or emerging biotech firms. Cross-licensing, patent thickets, and litigation might influence commercial deployment.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Innovators: Must monitor the scope and claims validity to guard against patent invalidation. Strategic claim drafting can enhance market exclusivity.
  • Patent Practitioners: Should analyze the scope relative to prior art, crafting claims to maximize coverage while minimizing invalidity risks.
  • Businesses: Need to evaluate patent landscapes to identify licensing opportunities or potential risk areas, especially in competitive markets.

Key Takeaways

  • Holistic Claim Drafting Is Crucial: Effective patent protection hinges on detailed, well-crafted claims that balance breadth and specificity.
  • Global Strategy Enhances Market Position: The international filing scope signifies an intent to secure broad protection, critical in high-value drug markets.
  • Patent Landscape Analysis Is Vital: Understanding related patents helps avoid infringement and identify gaps for innovation.
  • Continuous Monitoring: Patent landscapes evolve; periodic review ensures ongoing defensibility and fosters strategic planning.
  • Legal Robustness Matters: Precision in claim language and adherence to patentability criteria influence granting success and enforceability.

FAQs

1. What is the primary focus of WO2016081355?
It appears to focus on novel chemical compounds with therapeutic applications, possibly including formulations and methods of treatment, although detailed specifics require access to the full patent document.

2. How broad are the claims likely to be?
Claims can range from broad, encompassing entire classes of compounds or methods, to narrow, covering specific molecular structures or particular therapeutic indications. The actual breadth depends on strategic drafting and prior art considerations.

3. Which jurisdictions are most relevant for patent enforcement based on WO2016081355?
Major markets like the US, European Union, China, Japan, and South Korea are typically targeted for pharmaceutical patents, given their size and patent enforcement infrastructure.

4. How does patent landscape analysis influence drug development strategies?
It helps identify freedom to operate, potential licensing opportunities, patent infringement risks, and positioning for future innovation, thereby guiding R&D and commercialization efforts.

5. What are the common challenges in patenting pharmaceutical innovations like those in WO2016081355?
Challenges include demonstrating novelty and inventive step amidst dense prior art, drafting claims that are sufficiently broad to protect innovation yet defensible, and navigating complex regulatory and legal environments across jurisdictions.


References

[1] World Intellectual Property Organization. Patent WO2016081355.

[2] WIPO PatentScope database. Public file documents for WO2016081355.

[3] Patent landscape reports and analysis related to pharmaceutical compositions and methods.

[4] Prior art references cited in the international search report.

[5] Strategic guidelines for patent drafting and prosecution in pharmaceuticals.


This detailed appraisal emphasizes the strategic importance of WO2016081355 within the broader pharmaceutical patent landscape, providing stakeholders with a foundation for informed decision-making and competitive positioning.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.