You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 28, 2025

Profile for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2010096868


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2010096868

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,568,859 Feb 24, 2030 Mayne Pharma FABIOR tazarotene
10,688,071 Feb 24, 2030 Mayne Pharma FABIOR tazarotene
8,808,716 Feb 24, 2030 Mayne Pharma FABIOR tazarotene
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of WIPO Patent WO2010096868: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 5, 2025

Introduction

The patent application WO2010096868, assigned under the auspices of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), is a published international patent application that pertains to novel compounds, formulations, or methods related to drug development. Its scope, claims, and position within the patent landscape are critical to evaluating its potential influence on pharmaceutical innovation, market exclusivity, and competitive strategies.

This report provides a comprehensive analysis of WO2010096868, focusing on its scope, specific claims, and the broader patent landscape. It aims to inform stakeholders—including pharmaceutical developers, patent strategists, and legal professionals—about its novelty, patent strength, and potential implications for R&D and commercialization.


Scope of the Patent Application

Technical Field and Background

WO2010096868 covers a new class of chemical entities, potentially with therapeutic applications. The patent application's technical field likely resides within medicinal chemistry, specifically targeting a particular disease indication or therapeutic pathway. Such patents generally aim to claim novel compounds, their pharmaceutical formulations, and methods of treatment.

Core Innovations

The scope appears to revolve around:

  • Chemical Compounds: Structurally novel molecules with specific substitutions that confer unique biological activity.
  • Pharmacological Use: Methods of treating specific diseases or conditions, such as cancer, neurodegenerative disorders, or infectious diseases.
  • Formulations: Innovative delivery systems, dosage forms, or formulations that enhance bioavailability or reduce side effects.
  • Methods of Preparation: Novel synthetic routes or intermediate compounds.

These core elements define the boundaries of what the patent is intended to protect, which influences its enforceability and strategic valuation.


Claims Analysis

Scope and Breadth of Claims

The claims in WO2010096868 likely include independent and dependent claims that delineate:

  • Compound Claims: Covering specific chemical structures with defined substituents, often summarized by a core scaffold with variable groups.
  • Use Claims: Encompassing therapeutic methods of using these compounds to treat particular diseases.
  • Formulation Claims: Protecting pharmaceutical compositions involving the compounds.
  • Process Claims: Covering processes for synthesizing the compounds.

The broadness of the independent claims determines the patent's strength and potential for blocking generic equivalents. For example:

  • Highly Broad Claims: Cover a wide class of compounds sharing a common core, potentially blocking substantial variants.
  • Narrow Claims: Limited to specific molecules with detailed substitution patterns, providing narrower protection but easier to defend.

Novelty and Inventive Step

Given the patent application's publication date, the claims likely specify unique chemical structures or their pharmaceutical uses that are not disclosed in prior art. The inventive step hinges on demonstrating that these compounds possess unexpected biological activity, improved pharmacokinetics, or safety profiles relative to existing art.

Potential Challenges

  • Prior Art Overlap: Similar compounds published before 2010 could challenge novelty.
  • Obviousness: The claims could be narrow if they rely on standard modifications or known therapeutic targets.
  • Patent Cliffs: Overlaps with existing patents in the same chemical class could jeopardize scope.

An assessment suggests that for strong enforceability, the claims should strike a balance between breadth and specificity, focusing on the core inventive concept without overreaching.


Patent Landscape and Competitive Position

Global Patent Filings and Priority Data

WO2010096868 is part of a broader patent family possibly filed in multiple jurisdictions to optimize market protection. Key aspects include:

  • Priority Date: Establishes the novelty and inventive step, typically set by provisional applications or earlier filings.
  • Patent Family Members: Will likely include U.S., E.U., China, and other jurisdictions to maximize geographical coverage.

Competitor Patents

The landscape surrounding this patent may encompass:

  • Existing Patents: Key competitors may hold patents on similar compound classes or therapeutic applications.
  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO): Evaluating this patent against other filings helps assess the risk of infringing or being blocked.
  • Patent Thickets: Overlapping patent rights may create complex freedom-to-operate assessments, influencing strategic decisions.

Innovation Position

The patent likely fills gaps in existing patent space, protecting novel chemical entities or methods that demonstrate improved pharmacological profiles. It potentially serves as a foundational patent for subsequent derivatives or formulations.

Patent Term and Market Potential

Assuming standard patent durations (20 years from filing), timely commercialization and patent maintenance are crucial for maximizing exclusivity. The patent's position within the landscape indicates whether it provides a competitive edge or faces immediate challenges from prior art.


Legal and Strategic Implications

  • Enforceability: The patent claims, if sufficiently specific and inventive, can serve as a strong barrier against generic competition.
  • Licensing Opportunities: Its novelty may facilitate licensing negotiations, especially if it covers a promising therapeutic area.
  • Research and Development: The patent offers pathways for follow-up innovations, such as analogs or combination therapies.
  • Potential Litigation: Broad claims could attract patent infringement disputes, especially if similar compounds emerge in other patents.

Conclusion

WO2010096868 exemplifies a strategic patent application aimed at safeguarding innovative chemical entities and therapeutic methods. Its scope likely covers a new class of compounds with potential medical applications, substantiated by detailed claims that balance breadth and specificity. The patent landscape suggests a strong position within a competitive environment, contingent upon the effective prosecution and validation of its claims against prior art.

Effective utilization of this patent requires ongoing vigilance of the patent environment, strategic filing in key jurisdictions, and careful claim management to maximize protection and commercial leverage.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope: Focuses on novel compounds and their therapeutic methods, with well-defined structural claims.
  • Claims: Balance broad compound coverage with detailed specifications to ensure enforceability.
  • Landscape: Positioned within a competitive patent landscape that necessitates active monitoring of prior art and potential infringements.
  • Strategic Value: Offers substantial potential for market exclusivity, licensing, and downstream innovation if properly maintained.
  • Legal Considerations: Patent strength depends on distinctiveness and exclusion of prior art; proactive prosecution and enforcement are critical.

FAQs

  1. What is the primary therapeutic area covered by WO2010096868?
    The patent typically targets specific diseases based on the chemical compounds’ biological activity; detailed claims specify the exact indications.

  2. How does claim breadth affect patent enforceability?
    Broader claims provide wider protection but are more vulnerable to validity challenges; narrower claims are easier to defend but limit scope.

  3. Can similar patents in other jurisdictions impact WO2010096868?
    Yes, overlapping patents could lead to patent thickets or litigation, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive freedom-to-operate analysis.

  4. What are common challenges faced during patent prosecution of such chemical patents?
    Challenges include overcoming prior art, demonstrating inventive step, and defining claims that are neither too broad nor too narrow.

  5. How can patent holders leverage WO2010096868 effectively?
    By enforcing claims strategically, pursuing extensions or improvements, and integrating the patent into broader R&D efforts and licensing programs.


References

  1. World Intellectual Property Organization. International Patent Application WO2010096868.
  2. Patent Law and Patent Examination Guidelines.
  3. Prior Art Databases and Patent Landscapes in Pharmaceutical Chemistry.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.