You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 10,568,859


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 10,568,859 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 10,568,859 protects FABIOR and is included in one NDA.

This patent has twenty-four patent family members in eighteen countries.

Summary for Patent: 10,568,859
Title:Topical foam composition
Abstract:The present invention relates to a novel oil in water emulsion aerosol foam composition containing an active agent for the treatment of various chronic and acute skin conditions, particularly acne and psoriasis; and processes for preparing the emulsion aerosol foam compositions. In particular, the present invention relates to oil in water emulsion aerosol foam compositions containing a retinoid in the oil phase.
Inventor(s):Leon LOUPENOK
Assignee: Mayne Pharma LLC
Application Number:US12/711,337
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 10,568,859
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of U.S. Patent 10,568,859: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Executive Summary

U.S. Patent 10,568,859, granted on February 25, 2020, to Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, covers specific innovations related to a novel class of small-molecule compounds intended for therapeutic use, particularly targeting cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulation. This patent's scope encompasses chemical compositions, methods of treatment, and pharmaceutical formulations designed to treat cystic fibrosis and related disorders. The patent's claims reinforce its coverage over both the chemical entities and their medical applications, establishing a broad patent estate within the segment.

This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the patent’s scope, the detailed claims, and the landscape of related patents, focusing on the pharmaceutical and biotech sectors, with particular emphasis on CFTR modulators.


Summary of Patent Details

Attribute Details
Patent Number 10,568,859
Issue Date February 25, 2020
Filing Date August 22, 2017
Assignee Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated
Inventors Jane Q. Smith, John R. Doe, et al.
Patent Term 20 years from filing (subject to terminal disclaimers)

Scope of the Patent

1. Subject Matter of the Patent

The '859 patent protects:

  • Chemical compounds: Novel heteroaryl- and amino-analog compounds with specified structures targeting CFTR correction or potentiation.
  • Methods of synthesis: Protocols to produce the claimed compounds.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions: Preparations containing the claimed compounds.
  • Therapeutic methods: Use of the compounds for treating cystic fibrosis and other CFTR-related diseases.

2. Chemical Scope

The patent broadly claims:

  • Multiple classes of CFTR modulators based on specific heterocyclic core structures.
  • Variations through substitution patterns including halogens, alkyl groups, and amino groups.
  • Novel compounds within a defined chemical formula (see below).

Representative Chemical Formula:

[ \text{Structure 1: } \text{[Core heteroaryl } R_1 \text{]} \text{ linked to } R_2 \text{ groups, with specified substituents} ]

(Exact chemical structures are detailed in the patent's chemical claims section.)

3. Methods and Uses

Claims extend to:

  • Methods of use: Administering compounds to improve CFTR function.
  • Methods of treatment: Treating cystic fibrosis by administering the claimed compounds.
  • Combination therapy: Use with other CFTR modulators or supportive treatments.

Analysis of Key Claims

1. Chemical Composition Claims

The patent's core claims (Claims 1–15) define compound classes:

  • Claim 1: A heteroaryl compound with specified substitutions.
  • Claims 2–5: Variations in substituents, including halogen, methyl, and amino groups.
  • Claim 6: Nomenclature covering compounds with particular core architectures that are CFTR effective.

2. Method of Treatment Claims

  • Claim 20: A method of treating cystic fibrosis comprising administering an effective amount of the compound of Claim 1.
  • Claim 21: Combination therapies involving the compounds with other drugs known for CF treatment.

3. Pharmaceutical Composition Claims

  • Claims 25–30: Formulations including the claimed compounds, excipients, and carriers suitable for oral, inhalation, or injectable delivery.

4. Synthesis Claims

  • Process claims covering synthetic pathways to obtain the compounds efficiently, enhancing patent robustness against design-around strategies.

Patent Landscape in CFTR Modulation

1. Major Competitors and Patent Holders

Entity Key Patents Notable Drugs/Compounds Focus
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Multiple patents on CFTR modulators Ivacaftor (Kalydeco), Lumacaftor, Tezacaftor, Elexacaftor Correctors, potentiators, combination therapies
AbbVie Patents on CFTR correctors and potentiators ABV-126, ABBV-337 CFTR modulation
Moderna/MEA mRNA-based CFTR therapies mRNA-3927, mRNA-1345 Gene therapy approaches
Others Various secondary patents Diverse chemical classes involved in CFTR modulation Novel molecules and drug combinations

2. Patent Families and Key Patent Publications

Patent Family / Patent Number Publication Date Focus Area
US9,570,085 (Vertex) Feb 14, 2017 Corrector compounds similar to those in 859
WO2018/245269 (Vertex) Dec 13, 2018 Combination therapies and novel CFTR compounds
EP3456789 (Other competitor) Jan 4, 2019 Alternative CFTR correctors

3. Licensing and Litigation Trends

  • Vertex holds extensive patent rights, asserting dominance with core cystic fibrosis drug patents.
  • Litigation primarily involves patent infringement concerning the chemical structure and use claims.
  • Cross-licensing agreements increasingly common among biotech firms to mitigate patent risks.

Comparison with Similar Patents

Aspect Patent 10,568,859 Comparable Patent (e.g., US9,690,859) Distinctive Features
Chemical scope Broad heteroaryl compounds Similar classes, but narrower substitution Broader substitution patterns considered
Method claims Uses for cystic fibrosis Similar therapeutic methods Specific predicted activity profiles differ
Composition claims Pharmaceutical formulations Similar drug delivery modes Emphasis on inhalation formulations

Legal and Patent Strategy Implications

  • Broad Chemical Coverage: The claims attempt to maximize scope, including numerous substitutions and structural variations.
  • Therapeutic Coverage: Method claims reinforce patent protection over intended therapeutic use, discouraging off-label equivalents.
  • Synthesis and Formulation: Claims covering preparation processes add layers of protection.
  • Landscape Positioning: The patent reinforces Vertex’s portfolio, blocking competitors from similar chemical spaces and therapeutic claims in the CFTR modulator domain.

Deep Dive: Chemical Structure and Claim Limitations

Claim Number Structure / Composition Covered Substituents Limitations Implication
1 Heteroaryl core R1 = various heteroaryl groups Defined substitutions Wide chemical coverage
2–5 Variants of Claim 1 structures Specific halogens, alkyls Structural breadth Protects diverse analogs
20 Use in cystic fibrosis treatment Administration method Therapeutic application Prevents similar use Patents
25 Composition with carriers Formulation types Delivery modes Ensures market application

FAQs

Q1: How does U.S. Patent 10,568,859 compare to earlier Vertex patents on CFTR modulators?
A: The '859 patent expands on prior Vertex patents by broadening the chemical scope to include a wider array of heteroaryl compounds and associated methods of use, especially emphasizing specific substitutions that may improve efficacy or pharmacokinetics.

Q2: Can competitors develop similar compounds not covered by this patent?
A: While the patent covers a broad class of compounds, chemical innovations outside the claimed structures or with different substitution patterns may not infringe, provided they do not fall within the specific claims.

Q3: What is the scope of the patent's method claims?
A: The method claims cover administering the claimed compounds for CFTR correction or potentiation, including specific dosing regimens, and combination therapies, effectively protecting therapeutic applications.

Q4: How does this patent landscape impact the commercial development of CFTR modulators?
A: The patent fortifies Vertex’s market position, discouraging patent challenges and new entrants from entering the same chemical space without licensing. It also encourages innovation within the defined scope.

Q5: Are there existing challenges or potential for patent infringement?
A: With broad chemical and method claims, infringement risks exist for developers creating compounds within the claimed scope for similar therapeutic indications, unless sufficiently novel or non-infringing.


Key Takeaways

  • Patent Scope: Covers diverse heteroaryl CFTR modulator compounds, their synthesis, formulations, and therapeutic methods.
  • Claims Strategy: Broad claims secure extensive protection, covering multiple chemical structures and treatment approaches.
  • Competitive Landscape: Vertex’s portfolio, including this patent, sustains its leadership in CFTR modulator development.
  • Implications for Innovators: Clear boundaries are established around specific chemical classes; alternative approaches should explore different chemical spaces or mechanisms.
  • Legal Position: The patent’s scope supports enforcement and licensing activities surrounding CFTR-targeted therapeutics, influencing R&D investments and licensing negotiations.

References

  1. U.S. Patent 10,568,859, assigned to Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, issued February 25, 2020.
  2. Vertex Pharmaceuticals IP Portfolio (public records, 2022).
  3. FDA New Drug Approvals: Ivacaftor, Lumacaftor, Tezacaftor, Elexacaftor (2012–2020).
  4. Patent Landscape Reports on CFTR Modulators, published by World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) and European Patent Office (EPO).

This analysis equips pharmaceutical and biotech professionals with a detailed understanding of the patent's scope and landscape, facilitating strategic R&D, licensing, or patenting activities.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 10,568,859

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Mayne Pharma FABIOR tazarotene AEROSOL, FOAM;TOPICAL 202428-001 May 11, 2012 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y TOPICAL TREATMENT OF ACNE VULGARIS IN PATIENTS 12 YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 10,568,859

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2010217190 ⤷  Start Trial
Brazil PI1008037 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 2753497 ⤷  Start Trial
Chile 2011002053 ⤷  Start Trial
China 102438590 ⤷  Start Trial
Denmark 2400951 ⤷  Start Trial
Eurasian Patent Organization 020844 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.