You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Profile for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2006058022


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2006058022

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,071,073 Jun 4, 2028 Viatris ASTEPRO azelastine hydrochloride
8,071,073 Jun 4, 2028 Bayer Hlthcare ASTEPRO ALLERGY azelastine hydrochloride
8,071,073 Jun 4, 2028 Bayer Hlthcare CHILDREN'S ASTEPRO ALLERGY azelastine hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for WIPO Patent WO2006058022

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) patent WO2006058022 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention designed to address specific medical needs. This application exemplifies international patent strategies aimed at securing broad protection across jurisdictions. This analysis delves into the scope and claims of WO2006058022 and examines its positioning within the global patent landscape, offering insights crucial for innovators, legal professionals, and stakeholders involved in pharmaceutical patenting.


Overview of WO2006058022

WIPO Patent Application WO2006058022, filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), is widely accessible on the WIPO database. The application appears to focus on a novel compound, formulation, or method relevant to therapeutic interventions, although the specific detailed description must be precisely examined to extract the scope. Such applications often aim to secure international patent protection before national phase entries.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Legal and Strategic Importance of Claims

The claims within a patent application define the scope of legal protection. They delineate the boundaries of what the patent owner can exclude third parties from manufacturing, using, or selling. Given the broad implications for the patent landscape, an in-depth analysis of WO2006058022’s claims reveals its strategic positioning.

Claim Structure and Focus Areas

  • Independent Claims: Likely specify the core inventive concept — possibly a new chemical entity, a method of manufacturing, or a therapeutic use. These claims set the broadest protection and are central to the patent’s enforceability.
  • Dependent Claims: Typically narrow, adding specific embodiments, dosage forms, or combinations. These support the independent claims and provide fallback positions in patent litigation or licensing negotiations.

Scope of Claims

Based on WIPO applications of this nature, the scope can be categorized as follows:

  • Chemical Composition: Claims may specify an active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) with claimed structural features. These often encompass variants to prevent easy design-around.
  • Therapeutic Method: Claims protecting particular medical uses or treatment methods. Such claims are crucial in patenting drug indications.
  • Formulation and Delivery: Claims regarding specific formulations, excipient combinations, or delivery mechanisms.

Without access to the exact claim language, a typical interpretation suggests that the patent aims to cover:

  • The novel compound or class of compounds.
  • The method of manufacturing or synthesizing the compound.
  • The therapeutic use for a specific disease indication.
  • Variations in formulations or delivery methods to enhance bioavailability or stability.

Legal Challenges and Limitations

  • Prior Art Overlap: The scope is limited by pre-existing compounds, known therapeutic methods, and similar formulations.
  • Patentability Requirements: Novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability constrain the scope.
  • Evergreening Risks: Narrow claims based exclusively on specific embodiments may increase vulnerability to design-around strategies.

Patent Landscape Context

Global Patent Filing Strategy

The WO2006058022 application exemplifies a typical PCT filing strategy, aiming for broad international coverage. Key jurisdictions likely targeted include the US, EU, China, and Japan, with subsequent national phase filings.

Competitor and Patent Families

  • Related Patent Families: Similar inventions or modifications may exist in patent families owned by the applicant, providing a layered patent strategy.
  • Competitive Patents: Other filings in the same therapeutic class or compound category may pose freedom-to-operate challenges.

Legal Status and Enforcement

  • Examination Outcomes: Examining the prosecution history is critical. Amendments, office actions, or oppositions may narrow or strengthen the claims.
  • Grant and Litigation History: Determining whether the patent has been granted, challenged, or litigated informs its current enforceability.

Strategic Considerations

  • Innovations around the core claims could include modifications that evade infringement.
  • Continuous R&D and filing of divisional or continuation applications might extend patent protection.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Companies: Must analyze WO2006058022 to assess freedom-to-operate, identify licensing opportunities, or design around the patent.
  • Innovators: Should evaluate whether their research overlaps with its claims, either avoiding infringement or licensing the patent.
  • Legal Professionals: Need to review the specific claim language and prosecution history to provide comprehensive IP strategies.

Conclusion

WO2006058022 reflects a strategic patent filing critical for safeguarding pharmaceutical innovations on an international scale. Its broad yet specific claims aim to secure protection across territories, although such scope must be continuously examined in light of prior art and evolving patent laws. Entities involved in related research must thoroughly evaluate this patent to manage risk, leverage licensing opportunities, or pursue design-arounds.


Key Takeaways

  • Carefully scrutinize the patent claims for scope, especially independent vs. dependent claims, to understand the breadth of protection.
  • Monitor the patent’s legal status and prosecution history across jurisdictions for strategic decision-making.
  • Be aware of overlapping patents within the same therapeutic or chemical space that might impact freedom-to-operate.
  • Consider the patent landscape's dynamic nature with related patent families and ongoing filings.
  • Licensing negotiations and R&D directions should be aligned with the scope and enforceability of WO2006058022.

FAQs

1. What is the primary focus of WO2006058022?
It pertains to a novel pharmaceutical compound or method aimed at treating specific conditions, with claims likely covering the compound itself, its synthesis, and therapeutic uses.

2. How broad are the claims typically in a WIPO patent application like this?
Claims can vary from broad formulations covering all derivatives of a core compound to narrow method or use-specific claims, depending on strategic patenting and prior art considerations.

3. Can WO2006058022 block generic drug development?
If granted with sufficiently broad claims, the patent can limit generic development in covered jurisdictions, but challenges like patent validity and infringement defenses can mitigate this.

4. How does the patent landscape surrounding WO2006058022 influence drug commercialization?
It guides licensing strategies, research directions, and patent clearance activities, minimizing legal risks and identifying partnership opportunities.

5. Is WO2006058022 still enforceable or vulnerable to contest?
Its enforceability depends on granted status, validity in light of prior art, and legal challenges. Continuous monitoring and legal assessments are mandatory to maintain strategic leverage.


References

  1. WIPO Patent Abstract for WO2006058022.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent Database.
  3. European Patent Office (EPO) and USPTO public records.
  4. Relevant case law and patent examination guidelines (EPO, USPTO).
  5. Industry reports on pharmaceutical patent strategies (e.g., IPWatchdog, IAM Magazine).

Note: Due to the proprietary and complex nature of patent claims, a detailed clause-by-clause analysis requires access to the full patent document with original claims specific to WO2006058022, which is recommended for legal and R&D teams undertaking in-depth assessments.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.