Last Updated: May 10, 2026

Profile for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2005002542


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2005002542

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,709,713 May 26, 2030 Baudax ANJESO meloxicam
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of WIPO Patent WO2005002542: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: July 28, 2025


Introduction

Patent WO2005002542, published by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), pertains to innovative pharmaceutical compositions or methods; however, its specific scope and claims reveal critical insights into its strategic positioning within the global drug patent landscape. This analysis dissects its claim structure, scope, coverage, and broader patent environment, providing a foundation for understanding its relevance to pharmaceutical innovation, patent robustness, and competitive strategy.


Patent Overview and Technical Field

WO2005002542 is classified within the International Patent Classification (IPC) codes relevant to pharmaceuticals and biotechnological inventions. Its primary focus appears to involve novel compounds, formulations, or therapeutic methods designed for specific indications. Although the precise chemical entities are not provided here, WIPO patents in this domain generally aim to extend patent protection to new chemical entities, derivatives, or novel delivery systems.

The publication date suggests a filing window aligned with early 2000s drug development trends, often characterized by incremental innovations following foundational pharmaceuticals.


Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Claim Structure and Breadth

The patent claims articulate the scope of protection, defining the inventive leap and boundaries of exclusivity:

  • Independent Claims: Typically, these outline core novel chemical entities or methods. For WO2005002542, they likely encompass specific chemical structures, their pharmaceutical compositions, or therapeutic uses. The language used in these claims likely emphasizes novelty through structural features, such as unique substitutions, stereochemistry, or combinations.

  • Dependent Claims: These provide added specificity—covering specific formulations, dosing regimens, or manufacturing processes—thus broadening or narrowing protection as needed.

2. Technical Scope

The patent’s claims potentially cover:

  • Chemical entities: Either novel compounds or derivatives with innovative pharmacological profiles.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions: Combinations with excipients or delivery agents facilitating targeted release, stability, or bioavailability.
  • Therapeutic methods: Specific medical indications or treatment protocols leveraging the compound or compositions.

The scope’s breadth hinges on how broadly the claims are articulated. Narrow claims focusing on particular compounds provide limited protection but are easier to defend. Broad claims encompassing classes of compounds or methods afford extensive coverage but face higher scrutiny for patentability.

3. Strategic Claim Drafting

In WIPO patents, claim drafting balances broad protection with clear inventive steps. Given the PubMed or pharmaceutical industry standards, WO2005002542 likely employs a combination of composition and use claims to maximize the patent’s enforceability across jurisdictions.


Patent Landscape and Landscape Considerations

1. Patent Family and Geographical Coverage

As a WIPO international application, WO2005002542 serves as an international phase application under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT). Post-publication, applicants often pursue national phase entries across major pharmaceutical markets such as the US, Europe, Japan, China, and emerging markets.

The patent landscape would include:

  • Prior Art Searches: Covering earlier patents or publications related to the chemical compounds or therapeutic methods claimed.
  • Related Patent Families: Potentially comprising earlier filings or subsequent modifications, forming a patent family with national patents.

2. Competitor Equity and Similar Patents

The scope of WO2005002542’s claims influences competitive positioning:

  • A narrow claim set may be vulnerable to around-around patents or close substitutes.
  • A broad claim set could edge competitors or lead to patent thickets, offering a robust IP barrier.

3. Patent Challenges and Risks

Patents filed in the early 2000s often face challenges on grounds such as obviousness, insufficient disclosure, or lack of inventive step, particularly if the claimed compounds are structurally similar to known active ingredients. Patent examiners across jurisdictions may scrutinize the novelty and inventive step rigorously.

4. Lifecycle and Patent Term Strategy

Considering the typical 20-year patent term, filers often seek to extend patent life through secondary filings, formulations, or method claims, especially if the original application’s scope narrows due to prior art or legal challenges.

5. Complementary IP Assets

In the pharmaceutical field, patent landscapes often include supplementary protective measures such as data exclusivity, method-of-use patents, or regulatory data protections, augmenting the core patent.


Implications for Patent Holders and Industry Stakeholders

  • For Innovators: The scope of WO2005002542 may serve as a foundation patent, enabling licensing or further innovation through secondary patents.
  • For Generic Manufacturers: The patent’s breadth determines the ease of designing around or challenging the patent in markets with high generic activity.
  • For Investors: Understanding the patent landscape informs valuation, licensing potential, and litigation risks.

Regulatory and Commercial Context

In pharmaceutical development, patent rights influence pricing, market exclusivity, and R&D investment. Patents like WO2005002542, if robust, can secure commercial advantage for the innovator by delaying generic entry.

Additionally, strategic patenting around such core patents—covering dosage forms, indications, or manufacturing processes—optimizes lifecycle management.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope and Claims: WO2005002542’s claim set determines its protective breadth, balancing broad chemical class protection against enforceability challenges.
  • Patent Landscape: The patent likely forms a critical node within a larger patent family, requiring detailed landscape analysis to assess freedom-to-operate and infringement risks.
  • Strategic Positioning: Its strength hinges on claim precision, prior art navigation, and subsequent patent filings for lifecycle extension.
  • Legal Challenges: Given pharmaceutical patenting nuances, expect potential disputes over inventive step, novelty, or obviousness.
  • Market Implications: Secure and well-structured, this patent could provide significant commercial leverage in targeted therapeutic areas.

Conclusion

WO2005002542 exemplifies a strategic patent investment in drug innovation, with its scope and claims crucial to establishing market differentiation and protecting R&D efforts. Its landscape reflects both opportunities for exclusivity and risks inherent in patent prosecution, enforcement, and lifecycle management within the highly competitive pharmaceutical industry.


FAQs

1. What are the typical elements included in WIPO pharmaceutical patents like WO2005002542?
They usually encompass claims directed to novel chemical compounds, pharmaceutical compositions, methods of manufacturing, and therapeutic uses. The claims are crafted to balance broad protection with legal robustness, often including both product and method claims.

2. How does WO2005002542 fit into the global patent landscape?
As a PCT application, it serves as a milestone for later national filings. Its relevance depends on the scope of claims, prior art, and subsequent filings in key markets, influencing licensing, competition, and patent litigation strategies.

3. Can the claims in WO2005002542 be challenged?
Yes, patents are regularly challenged via patent opposition, invalidity proceedings, or litigation, particularly if prior art or obviousness issues are found during examination or post-grant.

4. How do claim scope and patent breadth affect drug commercial strategy?
Broader claims can secure wider exclusivity but are harder to defend; narrower claims are easier to enforce but offer limited coverage. Strategic claim drafting is essential for maximizing market protection.

5. What secondary protections complement WO2005002542’s core patent?
Secondary protections include formulations, delivery systems, specific therapeutic methods, and data exclusivity, collectively extending market exclusivity and commercial advantage.


References

  1. WIPO Patent WO2005002542 - Official Publication.
  2. Patent Landscape Reports - WIPO, EPO, USPTO insights.
  3. Pharmaceutical patenting best practices - WIPO Guide.
  4. Industry analyses on drug patent strategies - Bloomberg Intelligence.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.