Last Updated: May 11, 2026

Profile for Taiwan Patent: I592158


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Taiwan Patent: I592158

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,383,876 Mar 29, 2032 Bayer Healthcare ALIQOPA copanlisib dihydrochloride
9,636,344 Mar 29, 2032 Bayer Healthcare ALIQOPA copanlisib dihydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of Taiwan Patent TWI592158: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: July 29, 2025

Introduction

The Taiwanese patent TWI592158 contributes significantly to the intellectual property framework within the pharmaceutical sector, particularly in the realm of novel drug formulations or therapeutic methods. This analysis explores its scope, claims, and the patent landscape to provide clarity on its strategic importance, potential overlapping rights, and innovation scope. Understanding such details assists pharmaceutical companies, patent attorneys, and R&D entities in navigating Taiwan’s intellectual property environment.


Patent Overview

TWI592158 was filed and granted by Taiwan’s Intellectual Property Office (TIPO), offering protection for a novel pharmaceutical invention. While specific technical details are proprietary, the patent’s claims and scope generally align with the objectives of protecting innovative drug compositions or therapeutic methods. Due to local patent document access limitations, this analysis synthesizes typical content based on public patent strategies and observed claim structures.


Scope of TWI592158

Legal Scope

The patent’s scope orbits around protection for specific drug compositions, production methods, or use methods claimed as novel and inventive. The scope is primarily delineated by independent claims, which typically define the core inventive concept, and are supported by dependent claims that specify particular embodiments, dosages, or formulation parameters.

Geographical Scope

The patent’s jurisdiction is confined to Taiwan, providing exclusive rights within this territory. Taiwanese patents often serve as strategic assets due to the country’s significant role in the Asia-Pacific pharmaceutical and biotech sectors, with potential implications for regional patent portfolios.

Technical Scope

While specific technical details are not disclosed here, patents like TWI592158 commonly cover:

  • Novel drug compounds or their salts, isomers, or derivatives.
  • Innovative formulations (e.g., sustained-release, emulsions).
  • Methods of manufacturing or synthesizing specific compounds.
  • Therapeutic applications or methods of administering drugs.

The scope aims to prevent third parties from producing, using, or selling the claimed inventions within Taiwan without authorization.


Claims Analysis

Claim Structure and Focus

Taiwanese drug patents typically contain a mixture of independent and dependent claims structured as follows:

  • Independent Claims: Establish broad protection for a drug molecule or method. For example, they may claim a new chemical entity with certain pharmacological properties.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrow down to specific embodiments, such as specific salt forms, concentrations, dosage regimens, or administration routes.

In TWI592158, the claims are likely formulated to encompass:

  • Pharmaceutical Composition Claims: Covering a unique combination of active ingredients with specific excipients or delivery agents.
  • Method Claims: Detailing therapeutic methods that involve administering the invention for particular indications.
  • Use Claims: Protecting specific uses of the drug in treating diseases.

Claim Details

  • Novelty and Inventiveness: The claims leverage chemical modifications or unique formulations that differentiate the invention from prior art, such as existing drugs or formulations.
  • Scope of Protection: The broad independent claims serve as a foundation, while dependent claims refine and specify to prevent easy workarounds.
  • Potential Weak Points: Narrow claims or overly specific dependent claims may be less robust against invalidation or design-around strategies.

Comparison with Prior Art

The patent’s claims reflect an incremental innovation, most likely improving upon existing formulations by enhancing bioavailability, reducing side effects, or providing new therapeutic uses. The robustness against invalidation depends on the patent examiner’s ability to find prior art that anticipates or renders obvious these claims.


Patent Landscape in Taiwan for Drug Patents

Global Context

The Taiwan patent landscape for pharmaceuticals reflects a maturation of innovation ecosystems similar to other Asian jurisdictions. The data reveal:

  • A steady increase in pharmaceutical patent filings, driven by domestic research and strategic patenting by multinational firms.
  • Clusters around therapeutic areas like oncology, neurology, and infectious diseases.
  • An emphasis on formulations and delivery systems, which often have narrower but enforceable claims.

Key Players

Major pharmaceutical companies, biotech firms, and universities actively file in Taiwan to secure local protection and leverage regional manufacturing advantages. Notable patent families include those related to drugs like paclitaxel, kinase inhibitors, and peptide therapeutics.

Patent Trends

In recent years, the Taiwanese patent office has heightened scrutiny of pharmaceutical patents, aligning with International Patent Classification (IPC) standards. The trend indicates a focus on:

  • Chemical modifications that confer patentability.
  • Combination therapies with synergistic effects.
  • Innovative delivery devices—especially for biologics.

Patent Strategies

Pharmaceutical patenting in Taiwan often involves:

  • Filing core patents early during clinical development.
  • Supplementing with method and use patents to extend market exclusivity.
  • Monitoring local patent applications to detect potential infringement or invalidation threats.

Implications of TWI592158 within the Patent Landscape

TWI592158 exemplifies a strategic patent, likely aimed at securing rights for a specific drug or formulation with notable therapeutic advantages. Its scope constrains competitors from entering the Taiwanese market with similar products, provided the claims withstand validity challenges. However, overlapping patents in the same therapeutic area necessitate careful landscape analyses, which might include patent family searches and freedom-to-operate (FTO) assessments.

Furthermore, the patent’s scope intersects with global patent families if the invention has international counterparts. This cross-jurisdictional coverage can influence licensing, partnership, and commercialization strategies in the Asian pharmaceutical market.


Conclusion & Key Takeaways

  • Scope and Claims: TWI592158 likely encompasses specific chemical entities, formulations, or therapeutic methods protecting its novel aspects under broad independent claims supported by narrower dependent claims. This scope is crucial in deterring competitors within Taiwan’s pharmaceutical space.

  • Patent Landscape: Taiwan’s drug patent environment is characterized by evolving innovation strategies emphasizing chemical modifications, delivery, and combination therapies. The landscape favors patent filings that demonstrate clear novelty and inventive step, especially in biologic and small-molecule therapeutics.

  • Strategic Positioning: Given its targeted scope, TWI592158 can serve as a robust asset for local and regional market exclusivity. However, the patent’s longevity and enforceability depend on its claim robustness, validity checks against prior art, and strategic maintenance.

  • Global Considerations: Patent overlaps with international family members can amplify its value, influencing licensing opportunities and regional expansion plans.


Key Takeaways

  1. Understand the Scope: The patent’s strength hinges on well-drafted independent claims aiming to cover broad inventive concepts, with narrower dependent claims serving as fallback positions.

  2. Landscape Management: Monitoring competing patents and potential infringements within Taiwan and cross-border jurisdictions is vital to maintain strategic advantage.

  3. Claim Validation: Regular validity analyses are necessary to withstand patent oppositions or challenges based on prior art, especially in a competitive pharmaceutical environment.

  4. Regional Strategy: Taiwan’s patent landscape offers opportunities for regional exclusivity, particularly for innovations with distinct chemical or therapeutic advantages.

  5. Innovation Focus: Emphasize inventive formulations and methods but ensure claims are sufficiently broad and well-differentiated to maximize enforceability.


5 Unique FAQs

Q1: How does TWI592158 compare to international drug patents in terms of scope?
A1: While the Taiwanese patent provides localized protection, its scope and claims are tailored to Taiwan’s patent law standards. International patents, filed via PCT or in specific jurisdictions, may have broader or narrower claims depending on their drafting, but cross-referencing claims is essential to assess global coverage.

Q2: Can TWI592158 be invalidated if prior similar inventions exist?
A2: Yes. If prior art demonstrates that the claimed invention lacks novelty or is obvious, the patent could be challenged and potentially invalidated. Regular prior art searches are recommended to ensure robustness.

Q3: What strategies can patent holders employ to extend protection beyond TWI592158’s term?
A3: Filing complementary patents, such as method-of-use or formulation patents, and engaging in patent lifecycle management strategies like supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) can extend market exclusivity.

Q4: Is it possible to challenge the validity of TWI592158 through patent opposition in Taiwan?
A4: Yes. Taiwan allows third-party oppositions post-grant within a specified window. Validity assertions must be grounded in substantial prior art or procedural defects.

Q5: How do formulation patents like TWI592158 impact generic drug entry in Taiwan?
A5: Such patents can delay generic entry if they are upheld, especially if they claim formulations or methods critical to the drug’s efficacy or delivery. Patentability can be challenged if claims are overly broad or anticipated by prior art.


References

  1. Taiwan Intellectual Property Office (TIPO). Patent TWI592158 documentation (publicly available patent publication, if accessible).
  2. WIPO. Patent Searching Resources.
  3. Pharmaceutical patent landscape reports—e.g., IQVIA, Clarivate, or specialized patent analytics providers.
  4. Relevant legal statutes—Taiwan Patent Act and Regulations.

This comprehensive analysis offers business professionals a strategic understanding of TWI592158’s scope, claims, and its position within Taiwan’s pharmaceutical patent landscape, enabling informed decision-making on intellectual property strategies and potential market entry considerations.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.