You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

Profile for Taiwan Patent: 200427453


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Taiwan Patent: 200427453

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jun 8, 2026 Pfizer XELJANZ tofacitinib citrate
⤷  Get Started Free Jun 8, 2026 Pfizer XELJANZ XR tofacitinib citrate
⤷  Get Started Free Jun 8, 2026 Pf Prism Cv XELJANZ tofacitinib citrate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of Taiwan Patent TW200427453: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 3, 2025

Introduction

Patent TW200427453 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention filed within Taiwan’s intellectual property framework, likely targeting a novel medicinal compound or formulation. As Taiwan’s patent system offers a robust environment for drug innovation, understanding the scope, claims, and overall patent landscape of TW200427453 is essential for stakeholders involved in drug development, licensing, or competitive strategy.

This analysis explores the legal scope of the patent, examines the claims to determine the protective boundaries, and contextualizes its position within Taiwan’s pharmaceutical patent landscape, considering relevant prior art, filing trends, and other patents.


Patent Scope and Granting Background

Taiwanese patents are granted based on patentability criteria including novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. TW200427453 was filed with the Taiwan Intellectual Property Office (TIPO), which adheres closely to international standards such as the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT).

The scope of a patent hinges on its claims—the defining legal boundaries of protected invention. A clear, well-drafted set of claims delineates the invention’s exclusivity, influencing freedom-to-operate and licensing strategies.

As of the patent’s issuance, TW200427453’s scope likely encompasses a specific drug compound, a new formulation, or a method of synthesis for a known medicinal agent, tailored for improved efficacy, stability, bioavailability, or safety.


Analysis of Claims

Claims Overview

Although the detailed claim language is not provided here, typical drug patents in Taiwan center around:

  1. Compound Claims – Covering the chemical structure of a new drug entity.
  2. Formulation Claims – Covering drug combinations, delivery systems, or dosage forms.
  3. Method Claims – Covering synthesis, purification, or therapeutic application methods.

Based on the patent number, TW200427453 likely claims a novel chemical entity or a pharmaceutical composition. The scope extends to:

  • Independent claims: Broad protection over the key invention—e.g., a chemical compound with specific structural features.
  • Dependent claims: Narrower limitations incorporating specific variants, formulations, or synthesis pathways.

Claim Language Analysis

Assuming the core claim involves a compound comprising specific substituents, the scope would be broad if the structural formula is comprehensively described, yet limited by functional groups or substitutions.

Key evaluation points include:

  • Novelty and Inventive Step: The claims must distinguish over prior art—existing patents, scientific publications, or known formulations.
  • Scope Breadth: Broader claims offer stronger protection but invite higher patentability scrutiny. Narrow claims limit exclusivity but improve defensibility.
  • Claim dependencies: Multiple dependent claims can fortify the patent by covering various embodiments.

Potential Claim Limitations

If claims are overly broad, they risk invalidation due to prior art. Conversely, overly narrow claims may only protect a specific embodiment, reducing market exclusivity. The strategic balance influences the patent’s enforceability and licensing potential.


Patent Landscape and Competitive Context

Prior Art Search & Patent Family

In Taiwan, the patent landscape for pharmaceutical inventions is dynamic, with numerous filings focusing on:

  • Chemical class innovations: For example, kinase inhibitors, antivirals, or biologics.
  • Formulation innovations: Extended-release systems, lipid nanoparticles, or inhalable forms.
  • Methodology patents: Novel synthesis routes or therapeutic applications.

For TW200427453, the patent landscape includes:

  • Related patents from major pharmaceutical players or universities.
  • Prior art references disclosed in the patent’s examination dossier.
  • National and international patent publications (via PCT and CPT33) covering similar compounds or formulations.

Through patent family analysis, TW200427453 possibly links to broader patent families covering related compounds or therapeutic uses, broadening its strategic value.

Major Patent Holders & Filing Trends

  • Local and global competitors: Major players such as Taiwan Liposome Company, Inc., or subsidiaries of global pharma firms often file patents covering comparable drug classes in Taiwan.
  • Filing trends: Increasing filings in targeted therapeutic areas such as oncology, infectious disease, or chronic conditions suggest a competitive landscape where TW200427453 operates.

Legal and Market Implications

The strength and breadth of the claims influence licensing negotiations, patent infringement risks, and R&D investments. A well-drafted patent with broad, defensible claims can serve as a strong barrier to entry, enhancing market position.


Legal Status and Enforcement Potential

The patent’s enforceability hinges on patent prosecution history, prior art challenges, and potential infringement scenarios. Taiwan’s patent law permits enforcement actions for patent infringement within its jurisdiction, with patent term typically lasting 20 years from the priority date, contingent on timely maintenance fees.

Given the robust patent examination processes, TW200427453’s claims—assuming they are well-supported—are likely enforceable.


Conclusion

TW200427453 embodies a strategic patent focused on a pharmaceutical innovation, with its core scope determined by its claims’ structural and functional limitations. Its positioning within Taiwan’s competitive drug patent landscape depends on its novelty, claim breadth, and strategic linkage to related patents.

This patent could serve as a pivotal asset, fostering licensing, collaborations, or commercialization efforts, provided its claims hold robust against prior art and legal challenges.


Key Takeaways

  • Claim Clarity: Precise, well-supported claims maximize enforceability while balancing breadth.
  • Strategic Positioning: Linking TW200427453 to a portfolio of related patents enhances market robustness.
  • Prior Art Vigilance: Continuous monitoring of related patent filings and scientific disclosures strengthens patent defensibility.
  • Landscape Awareness: Competitor patent activities influence strategic R&D and patent filing decisions.
  • Legal Compliance: Regular maintenance and vigilant enforcement ensure the patent’s longevity and value.

FAQs

1. What is the typical scope of drug patents like TW200427453 in Taiwan?

Drug patents generally claim specific chemical compounds, formulations, or methods of synthesis. The scope depends on claim language—broad structural claims protect entire classes, while narrow claims focus on specific compounds or formulations.

2. How does Taiwan’s patent law influence the protection of pharmaceutical inventions?

Taiwan’s patent law grants 20-year exclusivity from the filing date, with a high standard for novelty and inventive step. The law supports comprehensive protection, but patents can be challenged via invalidation procedures if prior art disclosures are found.

3. How can companies evaluate the strength of claims in TW200427453?

Companies should analyze claim language for breadth and specificity, compare against prior art references, and assess whether claims cover commercially relevant embodiments. Expert patent prosecution and landscape searches provide insights into enforceability.

4. What is the significance of patent families linked to TW200427453?

Patent families expand protection across jurisdictions and related inventions. They enable strategic licensing, deter infringement, and provide broader market exclusivity.

5. How does Taiwan’s patent landscape compare to other jurisdictions for pharmaceutical patents?

Taiwan maintains rigorous standards aligned with international norms, fostering a competitive environment. Its shorter examination timelines and unique patent challenges necessitate tailored strategies compared with jurisdictions like the US or Europe.


Sources:
[1] Taiwan Intellectual Property Office (TIPO). Patent Examination Guidelines.
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Landscape Reports.
[3] PatentScope Database. International Patent Literature.
[4] Taiwan Patent Patent Search System.
[5] Major pharmaceutical patent portfolio analyses.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.