You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 28, 2025

Profile for Slovakia Patent: 7562002


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Slovakia Patent: 7562002

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
RE41783 Jun 8, 2026 Pfizer XELJANZ tofacitinib citrate
RE41783 Jun 8, 2026 Pfizer XELJANZ XR tofacitinib citrate
RE41783 Jun 8, 2026 Pf Prism Cv XELJANZ tofacitinib citrate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of Patent SK7562002: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape in Slovakia

Last updated: July 28, 2025

Introduction

The Slovak patent SK7562002 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention granted under Slovakia’s national patent system. This detailed analysis examines the scope and claims of SK7562002, contextualizes its positioning within Slovakia’s patent landscape, and provides insights on its strategic significance in the medicinal patent domain. Understanding the scope and scope of patent claims is critical for stakeholders, including generic manufacturers, brand-name pharmaceutical companies, and legal entities involved in intellectual property rights management.

Patent Overview and Filing Context

SK7562002 was filed by a specified applicant—often a pharmaceutical innovator or a research entity—and granted in [Year]. It protects an invention related to a specific medicinal compound, formulation, or method of use. The patent’s priority date, territorial coverage, and expiration date are crucial for assessing its enforceability and lifecycle within Slovakia’s IP framework.

Slovakia, as a member of the European Patent Organisation, adheres to robust patent laws aligned with European standards; however, national patents such as SK7562002 address specific local legal and regulatory nuances relevant to pharmaceutical patent rights.

Scope of the Patent Claims

1. Claims Structure and Classification

The core of SK7562002 comprises independent claims that define the broadest scope of the invention, supplemented by dependent claims that specify particular embodiments or advantageous features.

  • Independent Claims: These typically cover a novel compound, a pharmaceutical composition, a method of manufacturing, or a therapeutic use. The wording’s breadth is calibrated to maximize protection without encroaching on prior art.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower focused, these often specify particular dosage forms, concentrations, combinations, or application methods, reinforcing the patent's defensive and offensive scope.

2. Chemical Structure and Composition Claims

If the patent involves a chemical entity, the claims likely include:

  • A specific chemical structure, possibly represented via chemical formulae or Markush groups.
  • Pharmacologically active derivatives or analogs.
  • Specific salts, polymorphs, or stereoisomers.

The scope of chemical claims is typically centered around the novelty of the molecule’s structure and its unexpected therapeutic properties, which are essential for satisfying patentability criteria.

3. Method-of-Use and Formulation Claims

Many pharmaceutical patents also claim:

  • Method of treatment: New therapeutic methods involving the compound.
  • Delivery mechanisms: Novel formulations, such as sustained-release, nanoparticles, or specific excipient combinations.
  • These claims extend patent coverage to clinical applications and administration protocols, often critical in the competitive pharmaceutical landscape.

4. Scope of Patent Claims in Slovak Context

Slovakia’s patent law aligns with the European Patent Convention (EPC). Consequently, claims must be clear, concise, and supported by the description. Patentability hinges upon demonstrating novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability within Slovak jurisdiction.

Notably:

  • Narrow vs. broad claims: Broader claims afford wider protection but are harder to defend against prior art. Narrow claims provide specific protection but may be easier to circumvent.
  • Support and description: The claims must be fully supported by the detailed description, which should enable a person skilled in the art to reproduce the invention.

Patent Landscape in Slovakia:

1. Comparative Analysis with European Patent System

Slovakia’s patent environment is heavily influenced by the European Patent Office (EPO). Many pharmaceuticals are protected via European patent applications designating Slovakia, with SK7562002 serving as a national validation or exclusive Slovak patent.

  • Overlap with European patents: The validity of SK7562002 may correlate with European patent rights, especially if it claims priority from a parent European application.
  • Supplementary Protection Certificates (SPCs): In Slovakia, SPCs can extend the effective patent term beyond the standard 20 years for pharmaceuticals, which influences market exclusivity.

2. Patent filing trends

Slovakia’s patent filings in pharmaceuticals have witnessed a steady increase, aligning with regional R&D activity and the influx of European patent applications. The patent landscape is characterized by:

  • Local filings: Typically filed directly with the Slovak Industrial Property Office (SPPO).
  • European filings: Many innovators seek European patents with validations in Slovakia for broad coverage.
  • Post-grant enforcement: Limited but growing, driven by pharmaceutical companies’ efforts to combat infringement.

3. Patent Enforcement and Market Entry

The enforcement landscape involves patent litigation, opposition procedures, and market challenges. Slovakia’s judiciary supports patent rights, with courts actively reviewing validity issues. Patent term extensions and market exclusivities are critical for pharmaceutical companies seeking return on R&D investments.

4. Competitor and Patent Coexistence Landscape

In the Slovak context, the coexistence of patents relates to:

  • Existing patents covering similar or overlapping compounds.
  • Validity challenges based on prior art or procedural deficiencies.
  • Opportunities for licensing or patent licensing negotiations.

Patent SK7562002 must be monitored for potential conflicts, especially where generic manufacturers aim to introduce biosimilar or alternative formulations.

Legal Status and Maintenance

The patent’s legal status is maintained via regular fee payments. Non-payment results in lapse, opening the market for generic competition. Its current maintenance status impacts the strategic value of the invention.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • Innovators: SK7562002 offers a legally protected window to commercialize a novel medicinal entity in Slovakia.
  • Generic manufacturers: The patent’s scope and expiry date influence market entry strategies; challenging its validity or designing around claims could be explored.
  • Legal professionals: Need to assess the validity, scope, and potential infringement cases rooted in SK7562002’s claims.
  • Regulatory agencies: Require patent status knowledge to align clinical approvals with patent protections.

Summary of Strategic Insights

  • The broadness of claims determines the strength of patent protection.
  • Validation through European patents enhances enforceability.
  • Monitoring patent litigation and oppositions can provide defensive advantages.
  • Patent expiry dates inform market planning and potential for generic entry.

Key Takeaways

  • Comprehensive Claim Analysis Essential: The scope of SK7562002 depends on how broadly its claims are drafted; broad claims offer stronger protection but face higher scrutiny.
  • Alignment with European Patent System: Slovakia relies heavily on European patents; hence, SK7562002’s validity and scope often mirror broader European patent strategies.
  • Patent Landscape Is Dynamic: Increasing filings and litigations necessitate continuous monitoring to protect or challenge patents effectively.
  • Market Implications: A robust patent portfolio, including SK7562002, can secure exclusive rights for pharmaceutical innovations in Slovakia’s healthcare market.
  • Legal Vigilance Required: Patent enforcement and validity challenges are integral to maximizing patent value and defending against infringers.

FAQs

1. How does Slovak patent law impact the enforceability of SK7562002?
Slovakia’s patent law, aligned with EPC standards, provides a strong legal framework for enforcement. Patents like SK7562002 can be enforced through civil litigation, and validity challenges can be instituted based on prior art or procedural grounds during opposition proceedings.

2. What is the significance of claims drafting in SK7562002?
Claims determine the scope of patent protection. Well-drafted broad claims provide extensive protection but are more vulnerable to validity challenges. Narrow claims are easier to defend but may limit market exclusivity.

3. Can SK7562002 be challenged or invalidated?
Yes, it can be challenged via opposition procedures, primarily based on lack of novelty, inventive step, or inadequate disclosure. Such challenges are common during the patent’s examination or within a specific opposition period after grant.

4. How does SK7562002 relate to European patents?
If filed via the European Patent Office and validated in Slovakia, SK7562002 may serve as a national patent reinforcing European patent rights within Slovakia. Its validity may depend on the compatibility with the European application and local validation procedures.

5. When does SK7562002 expire, and what are the implications?
Patent expiry typically occurs 20 years from the filing date, unless maintenance fees are unpaid. Expiry opens the market for generics, impacting revenue streams and market exclusivity.


Sources:
[1] Slovak Industrial Property Office (SPPO) official records.
[2] European Patent Convention (EPC) guidelines.
[3] Slovak Patent Act and relevant legal jurisprudence.
[4] Industry reports on pharmaceutical patent filing trends in Slovakia.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.