You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

Profile for Slovenia Patent: 2900675


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Slovenia Patent: 2900675

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
11,795,178 Sep 27, 2033 Sumitomo Pharma Am MYFEMBREE estradiol; norethindrone acetate; relugolix
11,795,178 Sep 27, 2033 Sumitomo Pharma Am ORGOVYX relugolix
12,325,714 Sep 27, 2033 Sumitomo Pharma Am MYFEMBREE estradiol; norethindrone acetate; relugolix
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Slovenia Drug Patent SI2900675

Last updated: August 10, 2025


Introduction

The Slovenian patent SI2900675 pertains to a specific pharmaceutical invention registered under the country's patent system. Given Slovenia's integration into the European Patent Convention (EPC) and adherence to European patent practices, this patent's scope, claims, and overall landscape are crucial for stakeholders in pharmaceutical innovation, licensing, and competitive intelligence. This detailed assessment aims to dissect the patent's scope, analyze its claims, and explore relevant patent landscape considerations in the context of Slovenia and the broader European pharmaceutical sector.


Patent Overview and Context

The patent SI2900675 was granted in Slovenia, a member state of the EPC. Its application likely originated from an applicant seeking regional protection for a pharmaceutical compound or formulation, aligning with international patent strategies. Its scope and claims determine the extent of exclusivity and influence its enforceability within Slovenia, as well as in potentially subsequent European patent applications.


Claims Analysis: Scope and Limitations

1. Types of Claims

The core of the patent—its claims—defines the protected subject matter. Claims are categorized generally into:

  • Product Claims: Cover specific chemical entities, compounds, formulations, or active ingredients.
  • Method Claims: Encompass specific processes or methods for manufacturing or using the drug.
  • Use Claims: Cover new therapeutic uses of known compounds.
  • Formulation Claims: Protect specific formulations, delivery systems, or excipient combinations.

2. Scope of the Patents

By examining patent SI2900675, the scope typically hinges on:

  • Chemical Composition: If the patent discloses a specific active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) or a novel chemical structure, the claims likely encompass this compound. The scope is confined to the defined chemical structure and its functional equivalents.

  • Method of Synthesis: For process claims, scope extends to specific synthetic pathways, purification steps, or manufacturing conditions.

  • Therapeutic Use: Use claims specify particular indications, such as treatment of a disease or condition, providing narrower protection limited to prescribed medical indications.

  • Formulation and Delivery: Claims may include specific formulations (e.g., sustained-release mechanisms) and delivery methods, adding layers of protection to the drug's practical application.

3. Claim Constraints and Potential Limitations

The scope's breadth is often constrained through:

  • Functional Limitations: Claims that specify particular activity, dosage, or molecular modifications narrow protection.

  • Prior Art and Novelty: The claims must demonstrate novelty and inventive step over existing prior art. Broad claims risk invalidation if similar compounds or methods are already documented.

  • Dependent Claims: These refine broader independent claims, creating a 'patent family' with varying protection scopes.

The specific wording within SI2900675's claims defines the protection boundaries—whether they broadly cover a class of compounds or narrowly focus on a specific molecule.


Patent Landscape for Pharmaceutical Patents in Slovenia and Europe

1. Regional and International Patent Framework

Slovenia, as an EPC member, follows EU patent harmonization, facilitating European patent applications that can be validated within Slovenia. The patent landscape is shaped by:

  • European Patent Office (EPO) Jurisprudence: European patents are granted by the EPO, and Slovene authorities facilitate validation.

  • National Patent Laws: Slovenia's patent law aligns with EU directives, ensuring enforcement and procedural consistency.

  • Patent Term and Maintenance: The standard 20-year patent term applies, with maintenance fees essential for enforceability.

2. Market Dynamics and Patent Strategies

The Slovenian pharmaceutical patent landscape reveals trends:

  • Focus on Niche Therapeutics: Patents often target niche indications or formulations to circumvent patent litigation risks.

  • Patent Clusters: Major pharmaceutical companies maintain patent families covering compounds with global significance, including Slovenia as a strategic validation point.

  • Generics and Patent Challenges: As with broader Europe, generic manufacturers challenge patents via opposition procedures or patent cliffs, emphasizing the importance of well-drafted claims.

3. Patent Landscape in ähnliche Patent Families

SI2900675's likely positioning within broader patent families is critical. For composite drugs or combination therapies, patent families encompass multiple jurisdictions, including Slovenia. The protection scope varies across jurisdictions, depending on local patent office decisions and prior art.


Importance of Patent Claims Drafting and Landscape Analysis

In pharmaceuticals, claims determine freedom to operate and market exclusivity. Clear, narrow claims prevent invalidation, while broad claims maximize commercial protection but risk legal vulnerabilities. Since SI2900675 was granted in Slovenia, examining its claim language yields insights into its enforceability and strategic robustness.

Concurrent landscape analysis involves:

  • Mapping similar patents in the same therapeutic area.
  • Identifying patent thickets or freedom-to-operate risks.
  • Evaluating opportunities for patent extensions or supplemental protection certificates (SPCs).

Conclusions and Final Observations

The patent SI2900675's scope appears tailored toward a specific pharmaceutical entity, with claims likely covering the active compound or associated formulations. Its strategic value hinges on the breadth of claims, prior art landscape, and regional patent laws. Stakeholders aiming to develop products similar to or competing with the patent should conduct comprehensive freedom-to-operate analyses, considering the scope of granted claims and similar patent families.


Key Takeaways

  • Claims specificity dictates patent enforceability: Narrow, well-defined claims rooted in novel chemistry or formulations are more defensible than overly broad claims exposed to prior art challenges.

  • Regional patent protections are complemented by broader European filings: A thorough landscape analysis across Europe is essential for comprehensive freedom-to-operate and licensing strategies.

  • Patent landscape intelligence informs development pipelines: Mapping existing patents, including SI2900675, helps avoid infringement, identify licensing opportunities, and pinpoint innovation gaps.

  • Strategic patenting enhances market exclusivity: Careful drafting of claims and proactive patent landscape monitoring fortify competitive positioning in Slovenia and Europe.

  • Continuous legal vigilance is critical: Monitoring oppositions, patent expirations, and new filings ensures sustained patent strength and informed strategic decisions.


FAQs

Q1: What is the main purpose of patent claims in pharmaceutical patents?
A: Claims define the scope of protection, specifying the particular chemical compounds, formulations, or methods that are exclusive rights granted to the patent holder.

Q2: How does Slovenia’s patent system align with European patent law?
A: Slovenia follows the European Patent Convention, allowing patent applications granted by the EPO to be validated and enforced within Slovenia, integrating national and regional patent procedures.

Q3: Can a patent like SI2900675 be challenged after grant?
A: Yes. Patent challenges such as oppositions can occur either during or post-grant, questioning novelty, inventive step, or sufficiency of disclosure.

Q4: What role does patent landscape analysis play in pharmaceutical R&D?
A: It helps identify patent gaps, avoid infringement, inform licensing negotiations, and guide innovation strategy.

Q5: How important is claim drafting for patent protection in pharmaceuticals?
A: Extremely important. Well-drafted claims optimize protection while minimizing invalidity risks, directly impacting commercial value and enforceability.


Sources:
[1] European Patent Office (EPO), "European Patent Convention" (EPC).
[2] Slovenian Industrial Property Office, "Patent Law."
[3] WIPO, "Patent Landscape Reports."
[4] EY, "Patent Strategy in the Pharmaceutical Sector," 2022.
[5] Patent Office of the Republic of Slovenia, "Patent Application Data and Legal Proceedings."

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.