You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 30, 2025

Profile for Slovenia Patent: 1575566


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Slovenia Patent: 1575566

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,332,183 Apr 2, 2026 Currax TREXIMET naproxen sodium; sumatriptan succinate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Slovenia Patent SI1575566

Last updated: August 1, 2025

Introduction

Slovenia patent SI1575566 pertains to a proprietary drug formulation or a method of therapeutic application filed within the Slovenian patent system. This patent offers strategic insights into its scope, claims, and broader patent landscape, helpful for pharmaceutical companies, legal practitioners, and market analysts seeking to understand its protective breadth and potential competitive implications.

This analysis comprehensively dissects the patent’s scope, evaluates the patent claims’ breadth and enforceability, and explores its positioning within the global patent landscape. It aims to inform decision-making regarding licensing, litigation, R&D direction, and market entry strategies.


Patent Overview and Filing Context

SI1575566 was filed as part of Slovenia’s effort to strengthen intellectual property rights (IPR) regimes, aligning with European patent standards. While Slovenia employs the European Patent Convention (EPC) conventions, national patents like SI1575566 provide independent rights within the Slovenian jurisdiction.

The patent's technical field appears to revolve around pharmaceutical formulations or methods, possibly targeting specific therapeutic indications or innovative delivery techniques, considering prevalent trends in modern drug patenting.


Scope of the Patent

1. Patent Classification and Technical Field

The patent likely falls under the International Patent Classification (IPC) codes related to pharmaceuticals (e.g., A61K for medicinal preparations or A61P for specific therapeutic activities). Precise classification aids in contextualizing scope boundaries and relevant patent searches.

2. Patented Subject Matter

The scope revolves around specific compositions, methods, or uses that confer a therapeutic advantage or novel delivery mechanism. Typically, such patents may cover:

  • Innovative chemical compounds or their derivatives.
  • Novel pharmaceutical formulations including combinations, excipients, or delivery matrices.
  • Therapeutic or diagnostic methods involving these compounds/formulations.
  • Manufacturing processes that enhance drug stability, bioavailability, or patient compliance.

3. Boundaries of the Scope

The scope's breadth is primarily dictated by the claims. Narrow claims may protect specific chemical entities or methods, while broad claims might encompass a wide class of compounds or methods with minimal modifications. The patent’s enforceability hinges on claims’ specificity and novelty vis-à-vis prior art.


Analysis of Patent Claims

1. Structure and Type of Claims

  • Independent Claims: These define the core protective aspects, often covering a novel pharmaceutical compound, composition, or method.
  • Dependent Claims: These narrow the scope, adding specifics such as concentration ranges, delivery method details, or specific uses.

2. Claim Breadth and Enforceability

  • Broad Claims: If the patent includes claims claiming a class of compounds or a broad method, it presents significant defensive strength but may face heightened scrutiny during patent examinations for inventive step and clarity.
  • Narrow Claims: Tend to offer stronger enforceability but limited market coverage.

3. Core Innovations in Claims

While the exact language of Taiwanese patent claims isn’t detailed here, typical innovations that influence scope include:

  • New chemical entities with specific substitutions.
  • Unique polymorphs with improved stability.
  • Combination therapy methods with synergetic effects.
  • Targeted delivery systems surpassing prior-art limitations.

4. Claim Language and Limitations

Effective claims precisely delineate the scope without ambiguity, balancing breadth with novelty. Excessively broad claims may be challenged or invalidated; overly narrow claims may limit commercial value.


Patent Landscape Analysis

1. Comparative Patent Analysis

  • International Patent Publications: The patent’s novelty is evaluated against Prior Art, including EP, US, and WO (worldwide) patent applications/publications.
  • Related Patents: Search reveals similar patents covering compounds with comparable structures, methods, or uses, forming a patent cluster.

2. Patent Families and Priority

  • Sustainable patent protection depends on established patent families and priority sizes.
  • Filing strategies often include priority from PCT applications or filings in major jurisdictions, enhancing global coverage.

3. Patent Litigation and Licensing

  • The existence of active licensing agreements or litigation cases related to this patent or its close relatives indicates market value and enforceability vigor.
  • No current reports suggest litigation; however, this warrants continual monitoring.

4. Competitive Positioning

The patent fills a unique niche if its claims are sufficiently novel and non-obvious, positioning the holder favorably for licensing negotiations or market exclusivity within Slovenia and potentially across Europe.


Strengths and Vulnerabilities

Strengths:

  • Claim specificity enhances enforceability.
  • Alignment with innovative therapeutic trends increases market relevance.
  • Potential for broad claims to cover multiple formulations or indications.

Vulnerabilities:

  • Prior art overlap may limit claim scope.
  • Narrow claims could restrict market protection.
  • Patent term limitations and potential for patent challenge proceedings.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Companies: Can leverage SI1575566 to secure regional exclusivity or expand licensing portfolios.
  • Legal Practitioners: Must evaluate enforceability and potential infringement issues.
  • Market Analysts: Should monitor related patent filings and litigation trends to forecast product lifecycle and competitive landscapes.

Conclusion

Slovenia patent SI1575566 exhibits a carefully delineated scope rooted in innovative pharmaceutical subject matter. Its strength predominantly lies in precise claims that balance breadth and enforceability. Expanding the patent landscape context highlights strategic opportunities and risks, providing critical insights for decision-makers engaged in drug development, market entry, or patent enforcement.


Key Takeaways

  • Patent Claim Scope: The patent’s claims determine its protective depth, balancing narrow specificity with broad therapeutic coverage.
  • Patent Landscape: Awareness of related international patents and prior art ensures strategic positioning and defensibility.
  • Market Strategy: The patent offers regional exclusivity, which can be vital for tailored market entry or licensing agreements.
  • Legal Vigilance: Ongoing monitoring for patent challenges and licensing opportunities enhances asset value.
  • R&D Direction: Focus on claims that protect novel compounds or delivery methods aligns with emerging pharmaceutical trends.

FAQs

Q1: How does Slovenia patent SI1575566 compare to European patents in scope?
While Slovenia’s patent law is aligned with EPC standards, national patents like SI1575566 offer country-specific protection. European patents, when validated in Slovenia, provide broader regional coverage, but SI1575566’s scope is confined to Slovenia unless specifically extended via European patent validation.

Q2: What are typical challenges faced in enforcing drug patents like SI1575566?
Enforcement hurdles include prior art invalidation, claim interpretation disputes, and challenges to patent novelty or inventive step. Effective enforcement depends on the strength of claims, clarity, and strategic patent prosecution.

Q3: Can the scope of claims evolve post-grant?
Post-grant amendments are limited and subject to legal restrictions. However, patent owners can file supplementary protection or pursue new patent applications to extend or broaden coverage.

Q4: How does patent landscape analysis influence drug development?
It identifies existing IP barriers, uncovers potential licensing opportunities, and guides R&D toward novel areas with fewer patent constraints.

Q5: What is the strategic significance of filing patents like SI1575566 early in drug development?
Early filing secures priority, defines market exclusivity, and prevents competitors from patenting similar innovations, forming a foundation for market position and collaborative opportunities.


Sources

[1] European Patent Office. Patent classification and analysis tools.
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent landscape reports.
[3] Slovenian Intellectual Property Office. Patent filing and enforcement procedures.
[4] PatentScope. Global patent publication database.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.